Revision as of 14:28, 1 March 2015 edit2.96.240.144 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 19:54, 16 January 2025 edit undo50.146.71.10 (talk) →Personal life: Image date added in caption | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|American film critic and author (1942–2013)}} | |||
{{refimprove|date=July 2014}} | |||
{{For|the website named after Ebert|RogerEbert.com{{!}}''RogerEbert.com''}} | |||
{{Use mdy dates|date=April 2013}}<!--]--> | |||
{{Good article}} | |||
{{Use mdy dates|date=January 2024}} | |||
{{Infobox writer <!-- for more information see ] --> | |||
{{Infobox writer | |||
| name = Roger Ebert | | name = Roger Ebert | ||
| image = Roger Ebert cropped.jpg | | image = Roger Ebert cropped.jpg | ||
| caption = Ebert |
| caption = Ebert in 2006 | ||
| birth_name = Roger Joseph Ebert | | birth_name = Roger Joseph Ebert | ||
| birth_date = {{birth date|1942|6|18}} | | birth_date = {{birth date|1942|6|18|mf=y}} | ||
| birth_place = ], |
| birth_place = ], U.S. | ||
| death_date = {{death date and age|2013|4|4|1942|6|18}} | | death_date = {{death date and age|2013|4|4|1942|6|18|mf=y}} | ||
| death_place = |
| death_place = Chicago, Illinois, U.S. | ||
| occupation = {{hlist|Film critic|journalist|screenwriter|film historian|author}} | |||
| death_cause = ] | |||
| alma_mater = ] (]) | |||
| parents = {{Unbulleted list | |||
| years_active = 1967–2013 | |||
| Walter H. Ebert | |||
| Annabel Stumm | |||
}} | |||
| occupation = ], ], ], ], ] | |||
| nationality = American | |||
| education = ] | |||
| alma_mater = {{Unbulleted list | |||
| ] (B.A.) | |||
| ] (PhD, did not finish) | |||
}} | |||
| language = English | |||
| home_town = Chicago, Illinois, U.S. | |||
| party = ] | |||
| period = 1967–2013 | |||
| subject = Film | | subject = Film | ||
| notableworks = {{ |
| notableworks = {{flatlist| | ||
* '' |
* '']'' | ||
* '' |
* '']'' | ||
* '' |
* '']'' | ||
* '']'' | |||
* ''Life Itself: A Memoir'' | * ''Life Itself: A Memoir'' | ||
}} | }} | ||
| spouse = {{marriage|]|July 18, 1992}} | |||
| spouse = Chaz Hammelsmith Ebert<ref name=SunTimesObit>{{cite news|last=Steinberg|first=Neil|title=Roger Ebert dies at 70 after battle with cancer|url=http://www.suntimes.com/17320958-761/roger-ebert-dies-at-70-after-battle-with-cancer.html|newspaper=Chicago Sun-Times|date=April 4, 2013}}</ref><br />(1992–2013; his death) | |||
| awards = ] (1975) | |||
| influenced = {{Unbulleted list | |||
| ]<ref>]. '']'' April 13, 2008</ref> | |||
| ]<ref name="Corliss" /> | |||
| ]<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.reelviews.net/reelthoughts.php|title=Reelviews Movie Reviews |publisher=Reelviews.net|date=May 10, 2012 |accessdate=June 11, 2012}}</ref> | |||
| ]<ref>{{cite web|last=Yamato |first=Jen |url=http://www.rottentomatoes.com/news/1696574/meet_a_critic_michael_phillips |title=Meet a Critic: Michael Phillips |publisher=Rotten Tomatoes |date=December 11, 2007 |accessdate=April 11, 2013}}</ref> | |||
| ]<ref>{{cite web|last=Leitch|first=Will|url=http://deadspin.com/5482198/my-roger-ebert-story|title=My Roger Ebert Story|publisher=Deadspin.com|date=March 1, 2010|accessdate=July 18, 2012}}</ref> | |||
| ]<ref>]. ]; April 15, 2010</ref> | |||
| ]<ref>Ebert, Roger. ''Awake in the Dark: The Best of Roger Ebert'' (ISBN 0-226-18200-2). The University of Chicago Press, 2006. Foreword pp. xiii–xix</ref> | |||
| ]<ref>Walker, Doug (November 10, 2009). . That Guy with the Glasses.</ref> | |||
| ]<ref>Murphy, Jackson (April 4, 2013). </ref> | |||
| ]<ref>{{cite web|last=Ebert |first=Roger |url=http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2009/12/who_do_you_read.html |title=Who do you read? Good Roger, or Bad Roger? – Roger Ebert's Journal |publisher=Blogs.suntimes.com |date= |accessdate=April 5, 2013}}</ref> | |||
}} | |||
| awards = ] | |||
| signature = Roger Ebert signature.png | | signature = Roger Ebert signature.png | ||
| website = {{URL| |
| website = {{URL|https://rogerebert.com}} | ||
| portaldisp = | | portaldisp = | ||
}} | }} | ||
'''Roger Joseph Ebert''' ({{IPAc-en|ˈ|iː|b|ər|t}} {{respell|EE|bərt}}; June 18, 1942 – April 4, 2013) was an American ], film historian, journalist, essayist, screenwriter and author. He was the film critic for the '']'' from 1967 until his death in 2013. Ebert was known for his intimate, Midwestern ] and critical views informed by values of ] and ].<ref>{{cite news |last=Zak |first=Dan |date=April 5, 2013 |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/roger-ebert-lover-of-life-taught-me-to-write/2013/04/05/131daa82-9d76-11e2-a2db-efc5298a95e1_story.html |title=Roger Ebert, lover of life, taught me to write |newspaper=] |access-date=April 29, 2020 |archive-date=November 5, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201105235654/https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/roger-ebert-lover-of-life-taught-me-to-write/2013/04/05/131daa82-9d76-11e2-a2db-efc5298a95e1_story.html |url-status=live }}</ref> Writing in a prose style intended to be entertaining and direct, he made sophisticated cinematic and analytical ideas more accessible to non-specialist audiences.<ref>{{cite news |last=Zeitchik |first=Steven |date=April 5, 2013 |url=https://www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/la-xpm-2013-apr-05-la-et-mn-roger-ebert-reviews-film-newspapers-changed-20130405-story.html |title=Five unexpected ways Roger Ebert changed film journalism |newspaper=] |access-date=April 29, 2020 |archive-date=August 6, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200806203342/https://www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/la-xpm-2013-apr-05-la-et-mn-roger-ebert-reviews-film-newspapers-changed-20130405-story.html |url-status=live }}</ref> Ebert endorsed foreign and independent films he believed would be appreciated by mainstream viewers, championing filmmakers like ], ] and ], as well as ], whose first published review he wrote. In 1975, Ebert became the first film critic to win the ]. ] of the ''Chicago Sun-Times'' said Ebert "was without question the nation's most prominent and influential film critic,"<ref name=SunTimesObit>{{cite news |last=Steinberg |first=Neil |authorlink=Neil Steinberg|title=Roger Ebert dies at 70 after battle with cancer |url=http://www.suntimes.com/17320958-761/roger-ebert-dies-at-70-after-battle-with-cancer.html |newspaper=] |date=April 4, 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141216070113/http://www.suntimes.com/17320958-761/roger-ebert-dies-at-70-after-battle-with-cancer.html |archive-date=December 16, 2014}}</ref> and ] of the '']'' called him "the best-known film critic in America."<ref name="LA Times death Turan">{{cite news |last=Turan |first=Kenneth |authorlink=Kenneth Turan |title=Remembrance: Roger Ebert, film's hero to the end |url=http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/moviesnow/la-et-mn-roger-ebert-appreciation-20130405,0,669989.story |newspaper=] |date=April 4, 2013 |access-date=April 5, 2013 |archive-date=April 27, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130427071136/http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/moviesnow/la-et-mn-roger-ebert-appreciation-20130405,0,669989.story |url-status=live }}</ref> Per '']'', "The force and grace of his opinions propelled film criticism into the mainstream of American culture. Not only did he advise moviegoers about what to see, but also how to think about what they saw."<ref name=NYTObit>{{cite news| author=Douglas Martin| title=Roger Ebert Dies at 70; a Critic for the Common Man| date=April 4, 2013| work=]| url=https://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/05/movies/roger-ebert-film-critic-dies.html}}</ref> | |||
'''Roger Joseph Ebert''' ({{IPAc-en|ˈ|iː|b|ər|t}}; June 18, 1942 – April 4, 2013) was an American ], journalist, and screenwriter. He was a film critic for the '']'' from 1967 until his death in 2013.<ref name="site">{{cite web|url=http://www.rogerebert.com |title=RogerEbert.com |publisher=RogerEbert.com |date=October 13, 2004 |accessdate=July 24, 2011}}</ref> In 1975, Ebert was the first film critic to win the ].<ref name="Salt Lake Tribune death" /> As of 2010, his reviews were ] to more than 200 newspapers in the United States and abroad. Ebert also published more than 20 books and dozens of collections of reviews. | |||
Ebert and '']'' critic ] helped popularize nationally |
Early in his career, Ebert co-wrote the ] movie '']'' (1970). Starting in 1975 and continuing for decades, Ebert and '']'' critic ] helped popularize nationally televised film reviewing when they co-hosted the ] show '']'', followed by several variously named '']'' programs on commercial TV ]. The two verbally sparred and traded humorous barbs while discussing films. They created and trademarked the phrase "two thumbs up," used when both gave the same film a positive review. After Siskel died from a ] in 1999, Ebert continued hosting the show with various co-hosts and then, starting in 2000, with ]. In 1996, Ebert began publishing essays on great films of the past; the first hundred were published as ''The Great Movies''. He published two more volumes, and a fourth was published posthumously. In 1999, he founded the Overlooked Film Festival in his hometown of ]. | ||
In 2002, Ebert was diagnosed with cancer of the ] and ]. He required treatment that included removing a section of his lower jaw in 2006, leaving him severely disfigured and unable to speak or eat normally. However, his ability to write remained unimpaired and he continued to publish frequently online and in print until his death in 2013. His '']'' website, launched in 2002, remains online as an archive of his published writings. ] wrote, "Roger leaves a legacy of indefatigable connoisseurship in movies, literature, politics and, to quote the title of his 2011 autobiography, ''Life Itself''."<ref>{{Cite magazine |last=Corliss |first=Richard |date=April 4, 2013 |title=Roger Ebert: Farewell to a Film Legend and Friend |url=https://entertainment.time.com/2013/04/04/roger-ebert-farewell-to-a-film-legend-and-friend/ |magazine=] |access-date=February 12, 2023 |archive-date=February 12, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230212155437/https://entertainment.time.com/2013/04/04/roger-ebert-farewell-to-a-film-legend-and-friend/ |url-status=live }}</ref> In 2014, ''Life Itself'' was adapted as a ], released to positive reviews. | |||
In 2005, Ebert became the first film critic to receive a star on the ].<ref name="Salt Lake Tribune death">{{cite news|last=Rousseau|first=Caryn|title=Roger Ebert, first movie critic to win Pulitzer, dies at 70|url=http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/entertainment2/56107300-223/ebert-movie-siskel-chicago.html.csp|newspaper=The Salt Lake Tribune|date=April 4, 2013}}</ref> ] of the ''Chicago Sun-Times'' said Ebert "was without question the nation's most prominent and influential film critic",<ref name=SunTimesObit /> Tom Van Riper of '']'' described him as "the most powerful pundit in America",<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.forbes.com/2007/09/21/pundit-americas-top-oped-cx_tvr_0924pundits.html|title=The Top Pundits in America|publisher=]|accessdate=December 9, 2008|author=Riper, Tom Van|date=September 24, 2007|work=Forbes}}</ref> and ] of the '']'' called him "the best-known film critic in America".<ref name="LA Times death Turan">{{cite news|last=Turan|first=Kenneth|title=Remembrance: Roger Ebert, film's hero to the end|url=http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/moviesnow/la-et-mn-roger-ebert-appreciation-20130405,0,669989.story|newspaper=Los Angeles Times|date=April 4, 2013}}</ref> | |||
== Early life and education == | |||
Ebert lived with cancer of the ] and ] from 2002 that required treatments necessitating the removal of his lower jaw, which cost him the ability to speak or eat normally. Regardless, his ability to write was unimpaired and he continued to publish frequently both online and in print right up until his death on April 4, 2013.<ref name=SunTimesObit /> | |||
Roger Joseph Ebert<ref name=NYTObit/><ref name=YouTubeInterview>{{YouTube|kTYVnuKnJNo|"Roger Ebert – Archive Interview Part 1 of 3 "}}. May 20, 2008. Retrieved June 7, 2012.</ref> was born on June 18, 1942, in ], the only child of Annabel (née Stumm),<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G2-3069000035.html |title=Ebert, Roger (R. Hyde, Reinhold Timme) |website=encyclopedia.com |date=April 4, 2013 |access-date=August 31, 2012 |archive-date=December 15, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121215122957/http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G2-3069000035.html |url-status=live }}</ref> a bookkeeper,<ref name=SunTimesObit /><ref name=bookref1>{{cite book |title=Life Itself: A Memoir |url=https://archive.org/details/lifeitselfmemoir00eber |url-access=registration |last=Ebert |first=Roger |year=2011 |publisher=Grand Central Publishing |location=New York City |isbn=9780446584975}}</ref> and Walter Harry Ebert, an electrician.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/the-company-men-2011 |first=Roger |last=Ebert |title=What do you make at work, Daddy? |newspaper=] |via=] |date=January 19, 2011 |access-date=April 23, 2022 |archive-date=April 24, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220424123531/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/the-company-men-2011 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name=ChicagoMag /> He was raised ], attending St. Mary's elementary school and serving as an ] in Urbana.<ref name=ChicagoMag /> | |||
His paternal grandparents were German immigrants<ref>{{cite web |url=http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20020412/REVIEWS/204120305/1023 |title=Maryam Movie Review & Film Summary |date=April 12, 2002 |last=Ebert |first=Roger | website=] |access-date=January 2, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170316065612/http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/maryam-2002 |archive-date=March 16, 2017}}</ref> and his maternal ancestry was Irish and Dutch.<ref name=bookref1 /><ref>{{cite web|first=Roger|last=Ebert|url=http://www.rogerebert.com/rogers-journal/oh-say-can-you-wear|date=May 13, 2010|website=]|title=Oh, say, can you wear?|access-date=January 3, 2017|archive-date=January 3, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170103094319/http://www.rogerebert.com/rogers-journal/oh-say-can-you-wear|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2013/02/what_was_my_aunt_martha_trying.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130226041411/http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2013/02/what_was_my_aunt_martha_trying.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=February 26, 2013 |title=What was my Aunt Martha trying to ask me? |author=Ebert, Roger |date=February 22, 2013 |website=Roger Ebert's Journal }}</ref> His first movie memory was of his parents taking him to see the ] in ] (1937).<ref name=NPR>{{cite news| title=Roger Ebert: A 'Life' Still Being Lived, and Fully| author=Melissa Block | work=]| url=https://www.npr.org/2011/09/13/140437328/ebert-a-life-still-being-lived-and-fully}}</ref> He wrote that '']'' was "the first real book I ever read, and still the best."<ref>{{cite book| title=Life Itself: A Memoir| author=Roger Ebert| page=11}}</ref> He began his writing career with his own newspaper, ''The Washington Street News'', printed in his basement.<ref name=NYTObit/> He wrote letters of comment to the ]s of the era and founded his own, ''Stymie''.<ref name=NYTObit/> At age 15, he was a sportswriter for '']'' covering ] sports.<ref>{{cite book |title=Life Itself: A Memoir |last=Ebert |first=Roger |location=New York |publisher=Grand Central Publishing |page=30}}</ref> He attended Urbana High School, where in his senior year he was class president and co-editor of his ], ''The Echo''.<ref name=ChicagoMag /><ref name="Ebert My old man">{{cite web |last1=Ebert |first1=Roger |title=My old man |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/rogers-journal/my-old-man |access-date=July 11, 2019 |date=March 18, 2010 |quote=I always worked on newspapers. Harold Holmes, the father of my best friend Hal, was an editor at The News-Gazette, and took us down to the paper. A linotype operator set my byline in lead, and I used a stamp pad to imprint everything with "By Roger Ebert." I was electrified. I wrote for the St. Mary's grade school paper. Nancy Smith and I were co-editors of the Urbana High School Echo. At Illinois, I published "Spectator," a liberal weekly, my freshman year, and then sold it and went over to The Daily Illini. But that was after my father's death. |archive-date=July 11, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190711003048/https://www.rogerebert.com/rogers-journal/my-old-man |url-status=live }}</ref> In 1958, he won the ] state ] championship in "radio speaking," an event that simulates radio newscasts.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ihsa.org/SportsActivities/IndividualEvents/RecordsHistory.aspx?url=/data/ie/records/index.htm |title=Roger Ebert in the IHSA list of state speech champions, 1957–58 |publisher=Ihsa.org |access-date=April 5, 2013 |archive-date=February 16, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120216235334/http://ihsa.org/SportsActivities/IndividualEvents/RecordsHistory.aspx?url=/data/ie/records/index.htm |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
==Early life== | |||
Roger Joseph Ebert<ref name=YouTubeInterview>{{YouTube|kTYVnuKnJNo|"Roger Ebert – Archive Interview Part 1 of 3 "}}. May 20, 2008. Retrieved June 7, 2012.</ref> was born in ], the only child of Annabel (née Stumm;<ref name=parents /><ref>. encyclopedia.com. Retrieved April 4, 2013.</ref> May 1, 1911 – June 1, 1987), a bookkeeper,<ref name=SunTimesObit /> and Walter Harry Ebert<ref name=parents>{{cite web|url=http://www.filmreference.com/film/91/Roger-Ebert.html |title=Biography of Roger Ebert |publisher=Film Reference|accessdate=October 17, 2009}}</ref><ref name=bookref1></ref> (Nov. 20, 1901-Sept. 22, 1960), an electrician.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20110119/REVIEWS/110119984/1001|author=Roger Ebert|title=The Company Men|publisher=rogerebert.com|date=January 19, 2011 }}</ref><ref name=ChicagoMag /> He was raised Roman Catholic, attending St. Mary's elementary school and serving as an ] in Urbana.<ref name=ChicagoMag /> | |||
{{quote box | |||
His paternal grandparents were ] ]<ref> (April 12, 2002)</ref> and his maternal ancestry was Irish and Dutch.<ref name=bookref1 /><ref>{{cite news| url=http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2010/05/_i_interrupt_my_regularly.html|newspaper=]|title=Oh, say, can you wear?}}</ref><ref>Ebert, Roger (February 22, 2013). ''Chicago Sun-Times''.</ref> Ebert's interest in journalism began when he was a student at ], where he was a sports writer for ''The News-Gazette'' in ]; however, he began his writing career with letters of comment to the ]s of the era.<ref name="site" /> He became involved in ],<ref>See his autobiographical essay in ], </ref> writing articles for ]s, including ]'s '']''. In his senior year, he was class president and editor-in-chief of his ], ''The Echo''.<ref name=ChicagoMag /> In 1958, he won the ] state ] championship in "radio speaking", an event that simulates radio newscasts.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ihsa.org/SportsActivities/IndividualEvents/RecordsHistory.aspx?url=/data/ie/records/index.htm |title=Roger Ebert in the IHSA list of state speech champions, 1957–58 |publisher=Ihsa.org |accessdate=April 5, 2013}}</ref> | |||
| align = right | |||
| width = 25em | |||
| bgcolor = Bisque | |||
| quote = "I learned to be a movie critic by reading '']'' magazine ... ''Mad''{{'s}} parodies made me aware of the machine inside the skin – of the way a movie might look original on the outside, while inside it was just recycling the same old dumb formulas. I did not read the magazine, I plundered it for clues to the universe. ] ]; I lost it at ''Mad'' magazine" | |||
| source = — Roger Ebert, ''Mad About the Movies'' (1998 parody collection)<ref>{{cite book |editor1-first=Nick |editor1-last=Meglin |editor2-first=John |editor2-last=Ficarra |title=Mad About the Movies |year=1998 |publisher=Mad Books |location=New York City |isbn=1-56389-459-9 |url=https://archive.org/details/madaboutmovies00edit}}</ref> | |||
}} | |||
Ebert began taking classes at the ] as an early-entrance student, completing his high school courses while also taking his first university class. After graduating from Urbana High School in 1960,<ref>{{cite news |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |title=Milestones in the life of Roger Ebert |url=http://www.news-gazette.com/news/local/2013-04-05/milestones-life-roger-ebert.html |work=The News-Gazette |location=Champaign, IL |date=April 5, 2013 |access-date=January 20, 2019 |archive-date=January 21, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190121064858/http://www.news-gazette.com/news/local/2013-04-05/milestones-life-roger-ebert.html |url-status=live }}</ref> he attended the University of Illinois and received his undergraduate degree in journalism in 1964.<ref name=NYTObit/> While there, Ebert worked as a reporter for '']'' and served as its editor during his senior year while continuing to work for the ''News-Gazette''. | |||
His college mentor was ], who "introduced me to many of the cornerstones of my life's reading: ']', '']'', '']'', '']'', '']'', '']'', '']'', '']'' ... He approached these works with undisguised admiration. We discussed patterns of symbolism, felicities of language, motivation, revelation of character. This was ''appreciation'', not the savagery of deconstruction, which approaches literature as pliers do a rose."<ref>{{Cite book |last=Ebert |first=Roger |title=Life Itself |year=2011 |pages=94}}</ref> One of his classmates was ], who went on to be the Poet Laureate of North Dakota. At ''The'' ''Daily Illini'' Ebert befriended ], who as a sportswriter would cover ].<ref>{{Cite web |last=Ebert |first=Roger |date=October 17, 2010 |title=The Storyteller and the Stallion |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/the-storyteller-and-the-stallion |access-date=January 30, 2023 |archive-date=January 30, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230130044333/https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/the-storyteller-and-the-stallion |url-status=live }}</ref> As an undergraduate, he was a member of the ] fraternity and president of the ].<ref>{{cite book |title=Life Itself: A Memoir |last=Ebert |first=Roger |location=New York |publisher=Grand Central Publishing |pages=92, 96}}</ref> One of the first reviews he wrote was of '']'', published in ''The Daily Illini'' in October 1961.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/la-dolce-vita |title=La Dolce Vita Movie Review & Film Summary |last=Ebert |first=Roger |date=October 4, 1961 |newspaper=The Daily Illini |via=] |access-date=January 3, 2017 |archive-date=June 12, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160612112023/http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/la-dolce-vita |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
Regarding his early influences in film criticism, Ebert wrote in the 1998 parody collection ''Mad About the Movies'': | |||
:I learned to be a movie critic by reading '']'' magazine... ''Mad'''s parodies made me aware of the machine inside the skin – of the way a movie might look original on the outside, while inside it was just recycling the same old dumb formulas. I did not read the magazine, I plundered it for clues to the universe. ] lost it at the movies; I lost it at ''Mad'' magazine.<ref>Foreword to ''Mad About the Movies'', Mad Books, 1998, ISBN 1-56389-459-9</ref> | |||
As a graduate student, he "had the good fortune to enroll in a class on ]'s ] taught by ] ... It was then that Shakespeare took hold of me, and it became clear he was the nearest we have come to a voice for what it means to be human."<ref>{{cite book |title=Life Itself: A Memoir |last=Ebert |first=Roger |location=New York City |publisher=Grand Central Publishing |page=99}}</ref> Ebert spent a semester as a master's student in the department of English there before attending the ] on a Rotary fellowship for a year.<ref>{{cite book |title=Life Itself: A Memoir |last=Ebert |first=Roger |location=New York |publisher=Grand Central Publishing |page=96}}</ref> He returned from Cape Town to his graduate studies at Illinois for two more semesters and then, after being accepted as a PhD student at the ], he prepared to move to Chicago. He needed a job to support himself while he worked on his doctorate and so applied to the '']'', hoping that, as he had already sold freelance pieces to the ''Daily News'', including an article on the death of writer ], he would be hired by editor ].<ref name="auto">{{cite book |title=Life Itself: A Memoir |last=Ebert |first=Roger |location=New York |publisher=Grand Central Publishing |page=139}}</ref> | |||
Ebert began taking classes at the ] as an early-entrance student, completing his high-school courses while also taking his first university class.<ref>Ebert, Roger. Life Itself: A Memoir. New York: Grand Central Publishing, 2011. p. 91.</ref> After graduating from Urbana High School in 1960, Ebert then attended and received his undergraduate degree in 1964. While at the University of Illinois, Ebert worked as a reporter for the '']'' and then served as its editor during his senior year while also continuing to work as a reporter for the ''News-Gazette'' of Champaign-Urbana, Illinois (he had begun at the ''News-Gazette'' at age 15 covering Urbana High School sports).<ref>Ebert, Roger. ''Life Itself: A Memoir''. New York: Grand Central Publishing, 2011. p. 30.</ref> As an undergraduate, he was a member of the ] fraternity and president of the U.S. Student Press Association at Illinois.<ref>Ebert, Roger. ''Life Itself: A Memoir''. New York: Grand Central Publishing, 2011. pp. 92, 96.</ref> One of the first movie reviews he ever wrote was a review of '']'', published in ''The Daily Illini'' in October 1961.<ref>, October 4, 1961.</ref> | |||
Instead, Kogan referred Ebert to the city editor at the '']'', ], who hired him as a reporter and feature writer in 1966.<ref name="auto"/> He attended doctoral classes at the University of Chicago while working as a general reporter for a year. After movie critic Eleanor Keane left the ''Sun-Times'' in April 1967, editor Robert Zonka gave the job to Ebert.<ref>{{cite news |title=Ebert named film critic |newspaper=] |date=April 5, 1967 |page=57}}</ref> The paper wanted a young critic to cover movies like '']'' and films by ] and ].<ref name=NYTObit/> The load of graduate school and being a film critic proved too much, so Ebert left the University of Chicago to focus his energies on film criticism.<ref>{{cite book |title=Life Itself: A Memoir |last=Ebert |first=Roger |location=New York |publisher=Grand Central Publishing |page=142}}</ref> | |||
==Career== | ==Career== | ||
===1967–1974: Early writings === | |||
{{refimprove section|date=July 2014}} | |||
] in 1970|alt=A black and white photograph of two men in suits. The man on the right is wearing glasses.]] | |||
Ebert began his career as a film critic in 1967, writing for the ''Chicago Sun-Times''. He also met film critic ] for the first time at the New York Film Festival in 1967. After he sent her some of his columns, she told him they were "the best film criticism being done in American newspapers today".<ref name=ChicagoMag /> That same year, Ebert's first book, a history of the ] titled ''Illini Century: One Hundred Years of Campus Life'', was published by the University's press. In 1969, his review of '']''<ref> January 5, 1967</ref> was published in '']''.{{citation needed|date=July 2014}} | |||
Ebert's first review for the '']'' began: "]’s ''Galia'' opens and closes with arty shots of the ocean, mother of us all, but in between it’s pretty clear that what is washing ashore is the ]."<ref>{{cite news| author=Roger Ebert| date=April 7, 1967| title=Gaila| work=]| url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/galia-1967}}</ref> He recalls that "Within a day after Zonka gave me the job, I read ''The Immediate Experience'' by ]", from which he gleaned that "the critic has to set aside theory and ideology, theology and politics, and open himself to—well, the immediate experience."<ref name=ImmediateExperience>{{cite book| author=Roger Ebert| title=Life Itself: A Memoir| date=2011| page=154}}</ref> That same year, he met film critic ] for the first time at the ]. After he sent her some of his columns, she told him they were "the best film criticism being done in American newspapers today."<ref name=ChicagoMag /> He recalls her telling him how she worked: "I go into the movie, I watch it, and I ask myself what happened to me."<ref name=ImmediateExperience/> A formative experience was reviewing ]'s '']'' (1966).<ref>{{cite news| last=Ebert| first=Roger| date=November 7, 1967| title=Persona| work=Chicago Sun-Times| url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/great-movie-persona-1966| access-date=April 8, 2024| archive-date=November 16, 2016| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161116124240/http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/great-movie-persona-1966| url-status=live}}</ref> He told his editor he wasn't sure how to review it when he didn't feel he could explain it. His editor told him he didn't have to explain it, just describe it.<ref>{{cite news| last=Ebert| first=Roger| date=January 7, 2001| title=Great Movies: Persona| work=Chicago Sun-Times| url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/great-movie-persona-1966| access-date=April 8, 2024| archive-date=November 16, 2016| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161116124240/http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/great-movie-persona-1966| url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
He was one of the first critics to champion ]'s '']'' (1967), calling it "a milestone in the history of American movies, a work of truth and brilliance. It is also pitilessly cruel, filled with sympathy, nauseating, funny, heartbreaking and astonishingly beautiful. If it does not seem that those words should be strung together, perhaps that is because movies do not very often reflect the full range of human life." He concluded: "The fact that the story is set 35 years ago doesn't mean a thing. It had to be set some time. But it was made now and it's about us."<ref>{{Cite news |last=Ebert |first=Roger |date=September 25, 1967 |title=Bonnie and Clyde |work=] |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/bonnie-and-clyde-1967 |access-date=July 30, 2022 |archive-date=November 11, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171111205357/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/bonnie-and-clyde-1967 |url-status=live }}</ref> Thirty-one years later, he wrote "When I saw it, I had been a film critic for less than six months, and it was the first masterpiece I had seen on the job. I felt an exhilaration beyond describing. I did not suspect how long it would be between such experiences, but at least I learned that they were possible."<ref>{{Cite news |last=Ebert |first=Roger |date=August 3, 1998 |title=Great Movies: Bonnie and Clyde |work=] |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/great-movie-bonnie-and-clyde-1967 |access-date=February 11, 2023 |archive-date=February 11, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230211222807/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/great-movie-bonnie-and-clyde-1967 |url-status=live }}</ref> He wrote ]'s first review, for '']'' (1967, then titled ''I Call First''), and predicted the young director could become "an American ]."<ref name=Who'sThat>{{Cite news |last=Ebert |first=Roger |date=November 17, 1967 |title=I Call First/ Who's That Knocking at My Door? |work=] |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/i-call-first--whos-that-knocking-at-my-door-1967 |access-date=July 30, 2022 |archive-date=December 27, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201227045136/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/i-call-first--whos-that-knocking-at-my-door-1967 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
Ebert co-wrote the screenplay for the 1970 ] film '']'' and sometimes joked about being responsible for the film, which was poorly received on its release but is now regarded as a ].<ref>{{cite news|url=http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/19700101/REVIEWS/708110301/1023 |title=Beyond the Valley of the Dolls|publisher=Rogerebert.suntimes.com date=1980|author=Ebert, Roger|accessdate=September 3, 2012}}</ref> Ebert and Meyer also made '']'', '']'', and other films, and were involved in the ill-fated ] movie '']'' (In April 2010, Ebert posted his screenplay of ''Who Killed Bambi?'' aka ''Anarchy in the UK'' on his blog.)<ref>, ''Chicago Sun-Times, April 25, 2010</ref> | |||
Ebert co-wrote the screenplay for ]'s '']'' (1970) and sometimes joked about being responsible for it. It was poorly received on its release yet has become a ].<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/beyond-the-valley-of-the-dolls-1980 |title=Beyond the Valley of the Dolls |work=] |first=Roger |last=Ebert |access-date=September 3, 2012 |date=January 1, 1970 |archive-date=December 30, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181230054847/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/beyond-the-valley-of-the-dolls-1980 |url-status=live }}</ref> Ebert and Meyer also made '']'' (1976), '']'' (1979) and other films, and were involved in the ill-fated ] movie '']'' In April 2010, Ebert posted his screenplay of ''Who Killed Bambi?'', also known as ''Anarchy in the UK'', on his blog.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2010/04/who_killed_bambi_-_a_screenpla.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100429015727/http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2010/04/who_killed_bambi_-_a_screenpla.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=April 29, 2010 |last=Ebert |first=Roger |title='Who Killed Bambi?' – A screenplay |website=] |date=April 25, 2010 }}</ref> | |||
From the 1970s on, Ebert worked for the ] as a guest lecturer, teaching a night class on film. For example, his fall 2005 class was on the work of the German director ].{{citation needed|date=July 2014}} | |||
Beginning in 1968, Ebert worked for the ] as an adjunct lecturer, teaching a night class on film at the ].<ref>{{cite web |url=https://news.uchicago.edu/article/2013/04/05/roger-ebert-x-70-film-critic-and-longtime-graham-school-lecturer-1942-2013 |title=Roger Ebert, X'70, film critic and longtime Graham School lecturer, 1942–2013 |date=April 5, 2013 |access-date=December 26, 2016 |website=UChicagoNews |publisher=] |location=Chicago, Illinois |archive-date=December 27, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161227130527/https://news.uchicago.edu/article/2013/04/05/roger-ebert-x-70-film-critic-and-longtime-graham-school-lecturer-1942-2013 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
] in 1970.]] | |||
In 1975, Ebert began co-hosting a weekly film review television show, ''Sneak Previews'', which was locally produced by the Chicago ] station ]. Three years later, ] became a co-host when the show was picked up by ] for national distribution. The duo became famous for their "thumbs up/thumbs down" review summaries.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.people.com/people/archive/article/0,,20129634,00.html|last=Gliatto|first=Tom|title=Despite the Loss of Film-Critic Buddy Gene Siskel, Roger Ebert Gives Life a Thumbs-Up|newspaper=]|date= November 1, 1999}}</ref> Siskel and Ebert trademarked the phrase "Two Thumbs Up".<ref name=Statement /> | |||
=== 1975–1999: Stardom with ''Siskel & Ebert'' === | |||
In 1982, they moved from PBS to launch a similar ] commercial television show named '']''. In 1986, they again moved the show to new ownership, creating '']'' through ] (part of ]).{{citation needed|date=July 2014}} | |||
] at the ]]] | |||
In 1975, Ebert received the ].<ref name="Salt Lake Tribune death" /> In the aftermath of his win, he was offered jobs at '']'' and '']'', but he declined them both, as he did not wish to leave Chicago.{{sfn|Singer|2023|p=28}} That same year, he and ] of the '']'' began co-hosting a weekly film-review television show, ''Opening Soon at a Theater Near You'',<ref name=NYTObit/> later '']'', which was locally produced by the Chicago ] station ].<ref name="s&e mbc">{{cite web|url=http://www.museum.tv/eotvsection.php?entrycode=siskelandeb|title=Siskel and Ebert|website=]|first=Joel|last=Steinberg|access-date=June 17, 2022|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101204224136/http://museum.tv/eotvsection.php?entrycode=siskelandeb|archive-date=December 4, 2010}}</ref> The series was later picked up for national syndication on ].<ref name="s&e mbc"/> The duo became well known for their "thumbs up/thumbs down" reviews.<ref name="s&e mbc"/><ref>{{cite magazine |url=http://www.people.com/people/archive/article/0,,20129634,00.html |last=Gliatto |first=Tom |title=Despite the Loss of Film-Critic Buddy Gene Siskel, Roger Ebert Gives Life a Thumbs-Up |magazine=] |date=November 1, 1999 |access-date=April 20, 2010 |archive-date=February 5, 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090205021101/http://people.com/people/archive/article/0,,20129634,00.html |url-status=live }}</ref> They trademarked the phrase "Two Thumbs Up."<ref name="s&e mbc"/><ref name=Statement /> | |||
In 1982, they moved from PBS to launch a similar ] commercial television show, '']''.<ref name="s&e mbc"/> In 1986, they again moved the show to new ownership, creating '']'' through ], part of the ].<ref name="s&e mbc"/> Ebert and Siskel made many appearances on late night talk shows, appearing on '']'' sixteen times and '']'' fifteen times. They also appeared together on '']'', '']'', '']'', '']'' and '']''. | |||
After Siskel's death in 1999, the producers retitled the show ''Roger Ebert & the Movies'' and used rotating co-hosts. In September 2000, ''Chicago Sun-Times'' columnist ] became the permanent co-host and the show was renamed '']'' (and other later titles).{{citation needed|date=July 2014}} | |||
Siskel and Ebert were sometimes accused of trivializing film criticism. ], in '']'', called the show "a sitcom (with its own noodling, toodling theme song) starring two guys who live in a movie theater and argue all the time".<ref>{{Cite news |last=Corliss |first=Richard |date=March-April 1990 |title=All Thumbs: Or, Is There a Future For Film Criticism? |work=] |url=https://www.filmcomment.com/article/richard-corliss-all-thumbs-or-is-there-a-future-for-film-criticism/}}</ref> Ebert responded that "I am the first to agree with Corliss that the Siskel and Ebert program is not in-depth film criticism" but that "When we have an opinion about a movie, that opinion may light a bulb above the head of an ambitious youth who then understands that people can make up their own minds about movies." He also noted that they did "theme shows" condemning ] and showing the virtues of ]. He argued that "good criticism is commonplace these days. ''Film Comment'' itself is healthier and more widely distributed than ever before. '']'' is, too; it even abandoned eons of tradition to increase its page size. And then look at '']'' and ] and the specialist film magazines (you may not read '']'', but if you did, you would be amazed at the erudition its writers bring to the horror and special effects genres.)"<ref>{{Cite news |last=Ebert |first=Roger |title=All Stars: Or, Is There a Cure For Criticism? |work=]| date=May-June 1990 |url=https://www.filmcomment.com/article/roger-ebert-richard-corliss-cure-for-criticism-of-film-criticism/}}</ref> Corliss wrote that "I do think the program has other merits, and said so in a sentence of my original article that didn't make it into type: 'Sometimes the show does good: in spotlighting foreign and independent films, and in raising issues like censorship and colorization.' The stars' recent excoriation of the MPAA's X rating was salutary to the max."<ref>{{cite news| last=Corliss| first=Richard| title=Then Again| date=May-June 1990| work=Film Comment| url= https://www.filmcomment.com/article/richard-corliss-roger-ebert-cure-for-criticism-of-film-criticism/}}</ref> | |||
Ebert ended his association with the Disney-owned ''At The Movies'' in July 2008,<ref name=Statement>{{cite news|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/22/arts/22arts-EBERTANDROEP_BRF.html|title=Ebert and Roeper No Longer at the Movies |publisher=New York Times|date=July 22, 2008|accessdate=Aug 30, 2013}}</ref> after the studio indicated it wished to take the program in a new direction. On February 18, 2009, Ebert reported that he and Roeper would soon announce a new movie-review program,<ref name=NewShow>{{cite news|url=http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/section?category=ANSWERMAN|title=Roger Ebert. "By the time we get to Phoenix, he'll be laughing" February 18, 2009|publisher=Rogerebert.suntimes.com|date=October 13, 2004|accessdate=July 24, 2011}}</ref> and reiterated this plan after Disney announced that the program's last episode would air in August 2010.<ref>'']''; April 12, 2010; Page 64.</ref> | |||
In 1996, ] asked Ebert to edit an anthology of film writing. This resulted in ''Roger Ebert's Book of Film: From Tolstoy to Tarantino, the Finest Writing From a Century of Film''. The selections are eclectic, ranging from ]'s autobiography to ]'s novel ''Suspects''.<ref>{{cite news| work=]| title=Roger Ebert's Book of Film: Fromm Tolstoy to Tarantino, the Finest Writing From a Century of Film| url=https://www.publishersweekly.com/9780393040005}}</ref> Ebert "wrote to Nigel Wade, then the editor of the ''Chicago Sun-Times'', and proposed a biweekly series of longer articles great movies of the past. He gave his blessing ... Every other week I have revisited a great movie, and the response has been encouraging."<ref>{{cite book| last=Ebert| first=Roger| title=The Great Movies| date=2002| page=xvii}}</ref> The first film he wrote about for the series was ] (1942).<ref>{{cite news| author=Roger Ebert| title=Great Movies: Casablanca| date=September 15, 1996| url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/great-movie-casablanca-1942}}</ref> A hundred of these essays were published as ''The Great Movies'' (2002); he released two more volumes, and a fourth was published posthumously. In 1999, Ebert founded The Overlooked Film Festival (later ]), in his hometown, ].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ebertfest.com/about.html |title=About EbertFest |website=] |access-date=January 2, 2017 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161229103019/http://www.ebertfest.com/about.html |archive-date=December 29, 2016 }}</ref> | |||
On January 31, 2009, Ebert was made an honorary life member of the ].<ref>]/]/'']''; December 17, 2008]</ref> His final television series, '']'', premiered on January 21, 2011, with Ebert contributing a review voiced by ] in a brief segment called "Roger's Office",<ref>, Caryn Rousseau, ] (via ]), January 19, 2011. Retrieved January 20, 2011.</ref> as well as featuring more traditional film reviews in the "At The Movies" format presented by ] and ].{{citation needed|date=July 2014}} | |||
In May 1998, Siskel took a leave of absence from the show to undergo brain surgery. He returned to the show, although viewers noticed a change in his physical appearance. Despite appearing sluggish and tired, Siskel continued reviewing films with Ebert and would appear on ''Late Show with David Letterman''. In February 1999, Siskel died of a brain tumor.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://newspapers.com/clip/58107353/in-tribute-legendary-film-reviewer/|title=In tribute: Legendary film reviewer leaves thumbprint on a nation of moviegoers|date=March 27, 1999|work=]|access-date=June 17, 2022|via=Newspapers.com|archive-date=May 5, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220505132306/https://www.newspapers.com/clip/58107353/in-tribute-legendary-film-reviewer/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |date=February 21, 1999 |title=Gene Siskel, Half of a Famed Movie-Review Team, Dies at 53 |work=] |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1999/02/21/nyregion/gene-siskel-half-of-a-famed-movie-review-team-dies-at-53.html |access-date=June 17, 2022 |archive-date=September 4, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210904210034/https://www.nytimes.com/1999/02/21/nyregion/gene-siskel-half-of-a-famed-movie-review-team-dies-at-53.html |url-status=live }}</ref> The producers renamed the show ''Roger Ebert & the Movies'' and used rotating co-hosts including ],<ref name=Scorsese>{{Cite web|last=Ebert & Scorsese|title=Best films of the 90s|date=February 27, 2000|url=http://www.rogerebert.com/rogers-journal/ebert-and-scorsese-best-films-of-the-1990s|access-date=June 17, 2022|archive-date=August 28, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180828102353/https://www.rogerebert.com/rogers-journal/ebert-and-scorsese-best-films-of-the-1990s|url-status=live}}</ref>]<ref>{{cite web|last=Perrone|first=Pierre|title=Obituary: Gene Siskel|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/obituary-gene-siskel-1072625.html|website=] |date=February 23, 1999|access-date=June 17, 2022|archive-date=August 11, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190811003221/https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/obituary-gene-siskel-1072625.html|url-status=live}}</ref> and ].<ref name=Scott>{{cite news| last=Scott| first=A.O.| title=Roger Ebert, The Critic Behind The Thumb| newspaper=]|pages=Arts & Leisure, 1, 22|date=April 13, 2008|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/13/13scot.html?ex=1365652800&en=f8c0d5eab2237088&ei=5124&partner=permalink&exprod=permalink|access-date=June 17, 2022}}</ref> Ebert wrote of his late colleague: "For the first five years that we knew one another, Gene Siskel and I hardly spoke. Then it seemed like we never stopped." He wrote of Siskel's work ethic, of how quickly he returned to work after surgery: "Someone else might have taken a leave of absence then and there, but Gene worked as long as he could. Being a film critic was important to him. He liked to refer to his job as 'the national dream beat,' and say that in reviewing movies he was covering what people hoped for, dreamed about, and feared."<ref>{{Cite news |last=Ebert |first=Roger |date=February 22, 1999 |title=Farewell, my friend |work=] |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/interviews/farewell-my-friend |access-date=October 22, 2023 |archive-date=September 29, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230929043129/https://www.rogerebert.com/interviews/farewell-my-friend |url-status=live }}</ref> Ebert recalled, "Whenever he interviewed someone for his newspaper or for television, Gene Siskel liked to end with the same question: 'What do you know for sure?' OK Gene, what do I know for sure about you? You were one of the smartest, funniest, quickest men I've ever known and one of the best reporters...I know for sure that seeing a truly great movie made you so happy that you'd tell me a week later your spirits were still high."<ref>{{cite web| title=Siskel & Ebert: Remembering Gene Siskel| website=]| date=February 27, 1999| url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PvlTSxhWGqY}}</ref> Ten years after Siskel's death, Ebert blogged about his colleague: "We once spoke with Disney and CBS about a sitcom to be titled ''Best Enemies''. It would be about two movie critics joined in a love/hate relationship. It never went anywhere, but we both believed it was a good idea. Maybe the problem was that no one else could possibly understand how meaningless was the hate, how deep was the love."<ref>{{Cite web |last=Ebert |first=Roger |date=February 17, 2009 |title=Remembering Gene |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/remembering-gene |access-date=October 22, 2023 |archive-date=February 7, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130207203819/http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2009/02/i_remember_gene.html |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
His final review in the ''Chicago Sun-Times'' was for the film '']'', which he gave 3.5 out of 4 stars. It was published on April 6, 2013.<ref>{{cite web |author=Ebert, Roger|url=http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/to-the-wonder-2013|date=April 6, 2013 |publisher=rogerebert.com|title=To the Wonder Movie Review & Film Summary (2013)}}</ref> In July 2013, a previously-unpublished review of the film '']'' appeared on Ebert's website.<ref>{{cite web |author=Ebert, Roger|url=http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/computer-chess-2013|date=July 18, 2013 |publisher=rogerebert.com|title=Computer Chess Movie Review & Film Summary (2013)}}</ref> The review had been written in March but had remained unpublished until the film's wide-release date.<ref name="compslate">{{citation| author=Shetty, Sharan|url=http://www.slate.com/blogs/browbeat/2013/07/18/roger_ebert_reviews_computer_chess.html|date=July 18, 2013|publisher=Slate|title=A New Review From Roger Ebert}}</ref> Matt Zoller Seitz, the editor for Ebert's website, confirmed that there were other unpublished reviews that would be eventually uploaded to the website.<ref name="compslate" /> A second posthumously-published review, for '']'', was published in August 2013.<ref>{{cite web |author=Ebert, Roger|url=http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/the-spectacular-now-2013|date=August 2, 2013 |publisher=rogerebert.com|title=The Spectacular Now Movie Review & Film Summary (2013)}}</ref> | |||
=== 2000–2006: ''Ebert & Roeper'' === | |||
===Critical style=== | |||
In September 2000, ''Chicago Sun-Times'' columnist ] became the permanent co-host and the show was renamed ''At the Movies with Ebert & Roeper'' and later ''Ebert & Roeper''.<ref name=NYTObit/><ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.newspapers.com/clip/88631117/tampa-bay-times/ |title=Columnist to become foil to Roger Ebert |work=] |date=July 14, 2000 |access-date=May 18, 2022 |via=Newspapers.com |archive-date=May 18, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220518173243/https://www.newspapers.com/clip/88631117/tampa-bay-times/ |url-status=live }}</ref> In 2000, Ebert interviewed President ] about movies at ].<ref>{{cite web |url=https://siskelebert.org/?p=7506 |title=The Bill Clinton Interview 2000 |website=siskelebert.org |access-date=July 17, 2020 |archive-date=July 12, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200712032728/https://siskelebert.org/?p=7506 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
Ebert described his critical approach to films as "relative, not absolute"; he reviewed a film for what he felt it would be to its prospective audience, yet always with at least some consideration as to its value as a whole. He awarded four stars to films of the highest quality, and generally a half star to those of the lowest, unless he considered the film to be "artistically inept" or "morally repugnant", in which case it received no stars.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/19820101/REVIEWS/201010315/1023|title=''Death Wish II'' review by Roger Ebert|publisher=Rogerebert.suntimes.com|accessdate=July 24, 2011}}</ref> | |||
In 2002, Ebert was diagnosed with cancer of the salivary glands. In 2006, cancer surgery resulted in his losing his ability to eat and speak. In 2007, prior to his Overlooked Film Festival, he posted a picture of his new condition. Paraphrasing a line from '']'' (1980), he wrote, "I ain’t a pretty boy no more. (Not that I ever was. The original appeal of ''Siskel & Ebert'' was that we didn’t look like we belonged on TV.)" He added that he would not miss the festival: "At least, not being able to speak, I am spared the need to explain why every film is 'overlooked', or why I wrote ''Beyond the Valley of the Dolls''."<ref>{{cite web |title=Roger Ebert: I ain't a pretty boy no more and so what? |date=April 24, 2007 |url=https://signalvnoise.com/posts/391-roger-ebert-i-aint-a-pretty-boy-no-more-and-so-what}}</ref> | |||
<blockquote>When you ask a friend if '']'' is any good, you're not asking if it's any good compared to '']'', you're asking if it's any good compared to '']''. And my answer would be, on a scale of one to four, if '']'' is four, then ''Hellboy'' is three and ''The Punisher'' is two. In the same way, if '']'' gets four stars, then '']'' clocks in at about two.<ref> (April 23, 2004)</ref></blockquote> | |||
===2007–2013: ''RogerEbert.com''=== | |||
Ebert emphasized that his star ratings had little meaning if not considered in the context of the review itself. Occasionally (as in his review of '']''), Ebert's star rating may have seemed at odds with his written opinion. Ebert acknowledged such cases, stating, "I cannot recommend the movie, but … why the hell can't I? Just because it's godawful? What kind of reason is that for staying away from a movie? Godawful and boring, ''that'' would be a reason".<ref> (March 21, 2006)</ref> In August 2004 ], in a column, criticized what he saw as a growing trend of leniency towards films from critics including Ebert. His main criticism was that films, citing '']'' as an example, were constantly given four star ratings that they did not deserve.<ref>], , August 20, 2004. Retrieved January 31, 2008.</ref> In his review of '']'', Ebert gave the film three stars for achieving what it set out to do, but admitted that did not count as a recommendation ''per se''. He similarly gave the ] of '']'' a positive rating of three stars, but in his review, which he wrote soon after attending the ], he recommended readers not see the film because they had access to more satisfying cinematic experiences.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050526/REVIEWS/50510003/1023 |title=Ebert's review of ''The Longest Yard'' (2005 version) at rogerebert.com; May 27, 2005 |publisher=Rogerebert.suntimes.com |accessdate=July 24, 2011}}</ref> He declined to give a star rating to '']'', arguing that the rating system was "unsuited" to such a film: "Is the movie good? Is it bad? Does it matter? It is what it is and occupies a world where the stars don't shine."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100505/REVIEWS/100509982|title=Ebert's review of ''The Human Centipede'' at rogerebert.com; May 5, 2010|publisher=Rogerebert.suntimes.com |accessdate=July 24, 2011}}</ref> | |||
Ebert ended his association with ''At The Movies'' in July 2008,<ref name=Statement>{{cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/22/arts/22arts-EBERTANDROEP_BRF.html |title=Ebert and Roeper No Longer at the Movies |work=] |date=July 22, 2008 |access-date=August 30, 2013 |first=Julie |last=Bloom |archive-date=November 28, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181128004935/https://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/22/arts/22arts-EBERTANDROEP_BRF.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name=Jones>{{cite web| title=Roger Ebert: The Essential Man| author=Chris Jones| date=February 16, 2010| work=] | url=https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/a6945/roger-ebert-0310/}}</ref> after Disney indicated it wished to take the program in a new direction. As of 2007, his reviews were ] to more than 200 newspapers in the United States and abroad.<ref name="Corliss2007">{{cite magazine |url=http://content.time.com/time/arts/article/0,8599,1636520,00.html |title=Thumbs Up for Roger Ebert |last=Corliss |first=Richard |author-link=Richard Corliss |date=June 23, 2007 |magazine=] |access-date=January 2, 2017 |archive-date=January 3, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170103165323/http://content.time.com/time/arts/article/0,8599,1636520,00.html |url-status=live }}</ref> His '']'' website, launched in 2002 and originally underwritten by the ''Chicago Sun-Times'',<ref name=Guernica>{{cite magazine |last=Miller |first=Quenton |title=Roger Ebert, Misplaced Pages Editor |url=https://www.guernicamag.com/roger-ebert-wikipedia-editor/ |magazine=] |date=February 23, 2017 |access-date=May 20, 2021 |archive-date=April 26, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220426010832/https://www.guernicamag.com/roger-ebert-wikipedia-editor/ |url-status=live }}</ref> remains online as an archive of his published writings and reviews while also hosting new material written by a group of critics who were selected by Ebert before his death. Even as he used TV (and later the Internet) to share his reviews, Ebert continued to write for the ''Chicago Sun-Times'' until he died.<ref>{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=LQKhAwAAQBAJ&q=write+for+the+Chicago+Sun-Times+until+he+died+in+2013&pg=PA101 |title=Obituaries in the Performing Arts, 2013 |first=Harris M. III |last=Lentz |date=May 16, 2014 |publisher=] |location=Jefferson, North Carolina |isbn=9780786476657 |language=en |access-date=November 2, 2020 |archive-date=May 6, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240506050940/https://books.google.com/books?id=LQKhAwAAQBAJ&q=write+for+the+Chicago+Sun-Times+until+he+died+in+2013&pg=PA101 |url-status=live }}</ref> On February 18, 2009, Ebert reported that he and Roeper would soon announce a new movie-review program,<ref name=NewShow>{{cite news |url=http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/section?category=ANSWERMAN |title=Roger Ebert. "By the time we get to Phoenix, he'll be laughing" February 18, 2009 |work=Chicago Sun-Times |date=October 13, 2004 |access-date=July 24, 2011 |archive-date=April 5, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130405095701/http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/section?category=ANSWERMAN |url-status=dead }}</ref> and reiterated this plan after Disney announced that the program's last episode would air in August 2010.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2010/03/see_you_at_the_movies.html|title=See you at the movies|date=March 25, 2010|first=Roger|last=Ebert|work=Roger Ebert's Journal|accessdate=June 22, 2022|url-status=dead|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20100326033808/http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2010/03/see_you_at_the_movies.html|archivedate=March 26, 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://newsblogs.chicagotribune.com/towerticker/2010/03/disneyabc-to-cancel-at-the-movies-siskel-and-eberts-old-show.html|title=Tower Ticker: Disney-ABC cancels 'At the Movies,' Siskel and Ebert's old show|work=]|date=March 24, 2010|first=Phil|last=Rosenthal|accessdate=July 29, 2022|archive-date=July 3, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220703092520/https://newsblogs.chicagotribune.com/towerticker/2010/03/disneyabc-to-cancel-at-the-movies-siskel-and-eberts-old-show.html|url-status=live}}</ref> In 2008, having lost his voice, he turned to blogging to express himself.<ref name=Jones/> Peter Debruge writes that "Ebert was one of the first writers to recognize the potential of discussing film online."<ref name=Variety>{{cite magazine |last=Debruge |first=Peter |date=April 4, 2013 |url=https://variety.com/2013/film/opinion/roger-ebert-dead-variety-critic-tribute-1200333350/ |title=Variety's Peter Debruge Remembers Roger Ebert: A Champion Among Men |magazine=] |access-date=April 29, 2020 |archive-date=August 6, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200806184552/https://variety.com/2013/film/opinion/roger-ebert-dead-variety-critic-tribute-1200333350/ |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
His final television series, '']'', premiered on January 21, 2011, with Ebert contributing a review voiced by ] in a brief segment called "Roger's Office,"<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.deseretnews.com/article/700101980/Roger-Ebert-returns-with-new-PBS-review-show.html |title=Roger Ebert returns with new PBS review show |first=Caryn |last=Rousseau |agency=] |work=] |date=January 19, 2010 |access-date=January 20, 2011 |archive-date=January 22, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110122013235/http://www.deseretnews.com/article/700101980/Roger-Ebert-returns-with-new-PBS-review-show.html |url-status=dead }}</ref> as well as traditional film reviews in the ''At the Movies'' format by ] and ].<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.chicagotribune.com/2011/01/23/ebert-presents-at-the-movies-a-work-in-progress/|work=]|title='Ebert Presents At the Movies' a work in progress|date=January 23, 2011|access-date=June 17, 2022|first=Phil|last=Rosenthal|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110125023903/http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2011-01-23/business/ct-biz-0123-phil-20110123_1_sun-times-ebert-tribune-s-siskel-roger-ebert|archive-date=January 25, 2011}}</ref> The program lasted one season, before being cancelled due to funding constraints.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2011/11/so_long_for_awhile.html|title=So long for awhile|date=November 30, 2011|work=]|first=Roger|last=Ebert|access-date=June 17, 2022|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111203034611/http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2011/11/so_long_for_awhile.html|archive-date=December 3, 2011}}</ref><ref name=NYTObit/> | |||
Ebert reprinted his starred reviews in movie guides. In his appearances on '']'', he was frequently challenged to defend his ratings. Ebert stood by his opinions with one notable exception – when Stern pointed out that Ebert had given '']'' a three-star rating in 1974, but had subsequently given '']'' three and a half stars. Ebert later added ''The Godfather Part II'' to his "Great Movies" list in October 2008 stating that his original review has often been cited as proof of his "worthlessness" but he still had not changed his mind and would not change a word of his original review.<ref name="ebertgm">{{cite web|last=Ebert|first=Roger|title=The Godfather, Part II review|work=Chicago Sun-Times|date=October 2, 2008|url=http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20081002/REVIEWS08/810020300/1023|accessdate=February 28, 2010 }}</ref> When reviewing the ], Ebert noted how he had given the ] three and a half stars and declined to make a comparison between the two versions: "I wrote that original "Last House" review 37 years ago. I am not the same person. I am uninterested in being 'consistent'".<ref>{{cite web |url=http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090311/REVIEWS/903119984|title=Ebert's review of ''The Last House on the Left'' (2009)|date=March 11, 2009|publisher=Rogerebert.suntimes.com|accessdate=January 21, 2013}}</ref> | |||
In 2011, he published his memoir, ''Life Itself'', in which he describes his childhood, his career, his struggles with alcoholism and cancer, his loves and friendships.<ref name=NPR/> On March 7, 2013, Ebert published his last Great Movies essay, for '']'' (1958).<ref>{{cite news| author=Roger Ebert| title=The elderly are left on a mountain to die| date=March 7, 2013| url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/great-movie-the-ballad-of-narayama-1958}}</ref> The last review Ebert published during his lifetime was for ], on March 27, 2013.<ref>{{cite web| url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/the-host-2013| title=Don't listen to inner voices from other planets| work=]| date=March 27, 2013| first=Roger|last=Ebert| accessdate=June 22, 2022|via=]|archive-date=June 22, 2022| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220622133900/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/the-host-2013|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Sperling |first=Nicole |date=April 4, 2013 |title=Roger Ebert's last review: A lukewarm assessment of 'The Host' |url=https://www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/la-xpm-2013-apr-04-la-et-mn-roger-eberts-last-review-the-host-20130404-story.html |access-date=January 1, 2022 |newspaper=] |language=en-US |archive-date=January 1, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220101105436/https://www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/la-xpm-2013-apr-04-la-et-mn-roger-eberts-last-review-the-host-20130404-story.html |url-status=live }}</ref> The last review Ebert filed, published posthumously on April 6, 2013, was for '']''.<ref>{{cite web |author=Ebert, Roger |url=http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/to-the-wonder-2013 |date=April 6, 2013 |publisher=] |title=To the Wonder (2013) |access-date=April 24, 2013 |archive-date=May 13, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130513215811/http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/to-the-wonder-2013 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news| title=Roger Ebert's last thumbs up: Terrence Malick's 'To The Wonder'| author=Mark Olson| date=April 9, 2013| work=]| url=https://www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/la-xpm-2013-apr-09-la-et-mn-roger-ebert-last-review-to-the-wonder-20130409-story.html}}</ref> In July 2013, a previously unpublished review of '']'' appeared on ''RogerEbert.com''.<ref>{{cite web |author=Ebert, Roger |url=http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/computer-chess-2013 |date=July 18, 2013 |publisher=] |title=Computer Chess (2013) |access-date=July 20, 2013 |archive-date=July 21, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130721034138/http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/computer-chess-2013 |url-status=live }}</ref> The review had been written in March but had remained unpublished until the film's wide-release date.<ref name="compslate">{{cite web |author=Shetty, Sharan |url=http://www.slate.com/blogs/browbeat/2013/07/18/roger_ebert_reviews_computer_chess.html| date=July 18, 2013| work=]| title=A New Review From Roger Ebert| access-date=July 20, 2013| archive-date=July 20, 2013| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130720225127/http://www.slate.com/blogs/browbeat/2013/07/18/roger_ebert_reviews_computer_chess.html| url-status=live }}</ref> ], the editor of ''RogerEbert.com'', confirmed that there were other unpublished reviews that would eventually be posted.<ref name="compslate" /> A second review, for '']'', was published in August 2013.<ref>{{cite web |author=Ebert, Roger |url=http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/the-spectacular-now-2013 |date=August 2, 2013 |publisher=] |title=The Spectacular Now (2013) |access-date=October 6, 2013 |archive-date=November 28, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131128064048/http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/the-spectacular-now-2013 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
Ebert occasionally accused some films of having an unwholesome political agenda, and the word "fascist" accompanied more than one of Ebert's reviews of the law-and-order films of the 1970s such as '']''. He was wary of films passed off as art, but which he saw as lurid and sensational. He leveled this charge against such films as ''].''<ref>{{cite web|url=http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/19750210/REVIEWS/502100301/1023|title=Ebert's review of ''The Night Porter''|date=February 10, 1975|publisher=Rogerebert.suntimes.com |accessdate=July 24, 2011}}</ref> | |||
In his last blog entry, posted two days before his death, Ebert wrote that his cancer had returned and he was taking "a leave of presence."<ref>{{cite news| title=Announcing a 'Leave of Presence,' Ebert Says He's Reducing His Workload| date=April 3, 2013| author=]| work=]}}</ref> "What in the world is a leave of presence? It means I am not going away. My intent is to continue to write selected reviews but to leave the rest to a talented team of writers handpicked and greatly admired by me. What’s more, I’ll be able at last to do what I’ve always fantasized about doing: reviewing only the movies I want to review." He signed off, "So on this day of reflection I say again, thank you for going on this journey with me. I’ll see you at the movies."<ref>{{cite web| author=Roger Ebert| title=A Leave of Presence| date=April 2, 2013| publisher=RogerEbert.com| url=https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/a-leave-of-presence}}</ref> | |||
Ebert's reviews could clash with the overall reception of movies, as evidenced by his one-star review of the celebrated 1986 ] film '']'' ("marred by sophomoric satire and cheap shots … in a way, behavior is more sadistic than the ] character").<ref>{{cite news| last = Ebert| first = Roger| title = Review of ''Blue Velvet''| url=http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/19860919/REVIEWS/609190301/1023|accessdate= September 4, 2009| work=Chicago Sun-Times}}</ref> He was dismissive of the popular 1988 ] action film '']'' ("inappropriate and wrongheaded interruptions reveal the fragile nature of the plot"),<ref>{{cite news|last=Ebert|first=Roger|title=Review of ''Die Hard''|url=http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/19880715/REVIEWS/807150301/1023|accessdate=September 4, 2009|work=Chicago Sun-Times}}</ref> while his positive 3 out of 4 stars review of 1997's '']'' ("Movies like this embrace goofiness with an almost sensual pleasure")<ref>{{cite news|last=Ebert|first=Roger|title=Review of ''Speed 2: Cruise Control''| url=http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/19970627/REVIEWS/706270305/1023 | |||
|accessdate = September 4, 2009| work=Chicago Sun-Times}}</ref> is one of only two positive reviews accounting for that film's {{Rotten Tomatoes score|0120179|tomatometer}}% approval rating on the reviewer aggregator website ] (the other having been written by his ''At The Movies'' co-star Gene Siskel).<ref>{{Rotten Tomatoes score|0120179|citation|mdy=y}}</ref> | |||
==Critical style== | |||
Ebert's reviews were also characterized by what has been called "dry wit".<ref name=SunTimesObit /><ref name="Tomato">{{cite web|url=http://www.rottentomatoes.com/news/1698147/1.php |title=Yamato, Jen; "Meet a Critic: Roger Ebert!: RT chats with America's favorite critic." December 19, 2007 |publisher=]|accessdate=July 24, 2011}}</ref> In August 2005, after ] insulted '']'' movie critic ] (who had criticized Schneider's film '']'') by commenting that Goldstein was unqualified because he had never won the ], Ebert intervened by stating that, as a Pulitzer winner, he ''was'' qualified to review the film, and bluntly told Schneider, "Your movie sucks."<ref>{{cite news|url=http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=%2F20050811%2FREVIEWS%2F50725001%2F1023&AID1=%2F20050811%2FREVIEWS%2F50725001%2F1023&AID2= |title=Ebert's review of ''Deuce Bigalow: European Gigolo'' |publisher=Rogerebert.suntimes.com |accessdate=July 24, 2011}}</ref> Ebert and Schneider would later reconcile regarding this matter.<ref name=Corliss> '']''; June 23, 2007 Page 2 of 5</ref><ref name="RobBouquet1">{{cite news|url=http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070507/COMMENTARY/70507001 |title=Ebert, Roger. "A bouquet arrives" |date=May 7, 2007 |publisher=Rogerebert.suntimes.com |accessdate=July 24, 2011}}</ref><ref name="RobBouquet2">Champ Clark. "Unlikely Fan Sends Roger Ebert Flowers" '']''; May 10, 2007</ref> | |||
] as an influence.]] | |||
Ebert cited ] and ] as influences, and often quoted ], who said: "A man goes to the movies. A critic must be honest enough to admit he is that man."<ref>{{cite web| title=Roger Ebert, In His Own Words, On the Education of a Film Critic| author=Matt Singer| date=April 5, 2013| work=Indiewire| url=https://www.indiewire.com/news/general-news/roger-ebert-in-his-own-words-on-the-education-of-a-film-critic-128145/}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Ebert |first=Roger |date=October 22, 2011 |title=Knocked up at the movies |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/knocked-up-at-the-movies |access-date=February 19, 2023 |archive-date=December 19, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191219194552/https://www.rogerebert.com/rogers-journal/knocked-up-at-the-movies |url-status=live }}</ref> His own credo was: "Your intellect may be confused, but your emotions never lie to you."<ref name=NYTObit/> He tried to judge a movie on its style rather than its content, and often said "It's not what a movie is about, it's how it's about what it's about."<ref>{{Cite news |last=Ebert |first=Roger |date=November 26, 2003 |title=Bad Santa |work=] |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/bad-santa-2003 |access-date=February 11, 2023 |archive-date=March 10, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220310015703/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/bad-santa-2003 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite news| last=Ebert| first=Roger| date=November 18, 2009| title=The man who stares at iguanas| work=Chicago Sun Times| url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/bad-lieutenant-port-of-call-new-orleans-2009| access-date=December 5, 2023| archive-date=June 22, 2021| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210622204552/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/bad-lieutenant-port-of-call-new-orleans-2009| url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
He awarded four stars to films of the highest quality, and generally a half star to those of the lowest, unless he considered the film to be "artistically inept and morally repugnant", in which case it received no stars, as with '']''.<ref>{{cite news |last=Ebert |first=Roger |date=January 1, 1982 |title=Death Wish II |work=] |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/death-wish-ii-1982 |access-date=November 24, 2020 |via=] |archive-date=November 11, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201111190006/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/death-wish-ii-1982 |url-status=live }}</ref> He explained that his star ratings had little meaning outside the context of the review: | |||
Ebert commented on films using his Catholic upbringing as a point of reference,<ref name=ChicagoMag>Felsenthal, Carol (December 2005). . ''Chicago Magazine''. Kael quote, p. 1; agnosticism, p. 2; Catholic upbringing, p. 3. Retrieved April 6, 2013.</ref> and was critical of films he believed were grossly ignorant of or insulting to Catholicism, such as '']''<ref> (January 1, 1999)</ref> and '']''.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/19950407/REVIEWS/504070308/1023 |title=Roger Ebert. Review of ''Priest''. suntimes.com. April 7, 1995 |publisher=Rogerebert.suntimes.com |accessdate=July 24, 2011}}</ref> He also gave favorable reviews of controversial films with themes or references to Jesus and Catholicism, including '']'', '']'', and to ]'s religious satire '']''.<ref> (November 12, 1999)</ref> Ebert was described as an agnostic in 2005,<ref name=ChicagoMag /> but preferred not being "pigeon-holed".<ref name="EbertGod" /> | |||
{{cquote|When you ask a friend if '']'' is any good, you're not asking if it's any good compared to '']'', you're asking if it's any good compared to '']''. And my answer would be, on a scale of one to four, if '']'' is four, then ''Hellboy'' is three and ''The Punisher'' is two. In the same way, if '']'' gets four stars, then '']'' clocks in at about two.<ref>{{cite web |first=Roger |last=Ebert |url=http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20040423/REVIEWS/404230305/1023 |title=Shaolin Soccer |newspaper=] |via=] |date=April 23, 2004 |access-date=March 8, 2005 |archive-date=October 23, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121023024220/http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20040423/REVIEWS/404230305/1023 |url-status=dead }}</ref>}} | |||
He often included personal anecdotes in his reviews when he considered them relevant. He occasionally wrote reviews in the forms of stories, poems, songs,<ref>{{cite news|url=http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20010831/REVIEWS/108310303/1023 |title=Roger Ebert's review of "Wet Hot American Summer |publisher=Rogerebert.suntimes.com |accessdate=July 24, 2011}}</ref> scripts, open letters,<ref>{{cite news|url=http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/19970914/REVIEWS08/401010316/1023 |title=Roger Ebert's Great Movies review of "E.T. The Extra-Terrestrial" |publisher=Rogerebert.suntimes.com |accessdate=July 24, 2011}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20040716/REVIEWS/407160303/1023 |title=Roger Ebert's Review of "A Cinderella Story" |publisher=Rogerebert.suntimes.com |accessdate=July 24, 2011}}</ref> or imagined conversations.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/19810101/REVIEWS/101010341/1023 |title=Roger Ebert's review of "The Howling" |publisher=Rogerebert.suntimes.com |accessdate=July 24, 2011}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/19940325/REVIEWS/403250301/1023 |title=Roger Ebert's review of "The Hudsucker Proxy" |publisher=Rogerebert.suntimes.com |accessdate=July 24, 2011}}</ref> He wrote many essays and articles exploring in depth the field of film criticism.{{citation needed|date=July 2014}} | |||
Although Ebert rarely wrote outright scathing reviews, he had a reputation for writing memorable ones for the films he really hated, such as '']''.<ref>{{cite magazine |url=https://time.com/2957019/roger-ebert-life-itself-brutal-reviews/ |magazine=] |title=7 of Roger Ebert's most brutal movie reviews |date=July 4, 2014 |access-date=October 20, 2017 |archive-date=October 20, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171020115438/http://time.com/2957019/roger-ebert-life-itself-brutal-reviews/ |url-status=live }}</ref> Of that film, he wrote "I hated this movie. Hated hated hated hated hated this movie. Hated it. Hated every simpering stupid vacant audience-insulting moment of it. Hated the sensibility that thought anyone would like it. Hated the implied insult to the audience by its belief that anyone would be entertained by it."<ref>{{Cite news |last=Ebert |first=Roger |date=July 22, 1994 |title=North |work=] |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/north-1994 |access-date=October 10, 2021 |archive-date=June 9, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210609150838/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/north-1994 |url-status=live }}</ref> He wrote that '']'' "is the first movie I have seen that does not improve on the sight of a blank screen viewed for the same length of time. Oh, I've seen bad movies before. But they usually made me ''care'' about how bad they were. Watching ''Mad Dog Time'' is like waiting for the bus in a city where you're not sure they have a bus line" and concluded that the film "should be cut up to provide free ukulele picks for the poor."<ref>{{Cite news |last=Ebert |first=Roger |date=November 26, 1996 |title=Mad Dog Time |work=] |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/mad-dog-time-1996 |access-date=February 14, 2023 |archive-date=February 14, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230214170859/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/mad-dog-time-1996 |url-status=live }}</ref> Of '']'', he wrote "It is not good art, it is not good cinema, and it is not good porn" and approvingly quoted the woman in front of him at the drinking fountain, who called it "the worst piece of shit I have ever seen."<ref>{{Cite news |last=Ebert |first=Roger |date=September 22, 1980 |title=Caligula |work=] |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/caligula-1980 |access-date= |archive-date=October 7, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201007010030/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/caligula-1980 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
Ebert was also an advocate and supporter of Asian-American cinema, famously coming to the defense of the cast and crew of ]'s '']'' (2001) during a ] screening when a white member of the audience asked how Asians could be portrayed in such a negative light and how a film so empty and amoral could be made for Asian-Americans and Americans. Ebert responded that "nobody would say such a thing to a bunch of white filmmakers: how could you do this to "your people"? ... Asian-American characters have the right to be whoever the hell they want to be. They do not have to represent 'their people'!"<ref>. '']''. January 19, 2012.</ref><ref>Davis, Erik (February 22, 2013). . Movies.com.</ref><ref>Harris, Dana (April 4, 2013). . ].</ref> He was a supporter of the film after the incident at Sundance, and also supported a number of Asian-American films, having them also screen at his film festival (such as ]'s '']'').<ref>Ebert, Roger. . ''Chicago Sun-Times''. Archived at charlottesometimesthemovie.com. Retrieved April 4, 2013.</ref> Ebert was a fan of Asian-American filmmaker ].<ref>Ebert, Roger (October 4, 2008). .</ref> | |||
Ebert's reviews were also characterized by "dry wit."<ref name=SunTimesObit /> He often wrote in a deadpan style when discussing a movie's flaws; in his review of '']'', he wrote that Mrs. Brody's "friends pooh-pooh the notion that a shark could identify, follow or even care about one individual human being, but I am willing to grant the point, for the benefit of the plot. I believe that the shark wants revenge against Mrs. Brody. I do. I really do believe it. After all, her husband was one of the men who hunted this shark and killed it, blowing it to bits. And what shark wouldn't want revenge against the survivors of the men who killed it? Here are some things, however, that I do not believe", going on to list the other ways the film strained credulity.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Ebert |first=Roger |date=June 27, 1987 |title=Jaws: The Revenge |work=] |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/jaws-the-revenge-1987 |access-date=February 14, 2023 |archive-date=August 22, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210822222928/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/jaws-the-revenge-1987 |url-status=live }}</ref> He wrote "] is a two-hour movie squeezed into three hours, about how on Dec. 7, 1941, the Japanese staged a surprise attack on an American love triangle. Its centerpiece is 40 minutes of redundant special effects, surrounded by a love story of stunning banality. The film has been directed without grace, vision, or originality, and although you may walk out quoting lines of dialog, it will not be because you admire them."<ref>{{cite news| title=Pearl Harbor| author=Roger Ebert| date=May 25, 2001| work=]| url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/pearl-harbor-2001}}</ref> | |||
Ebert was accused by some ] fans of elitism in his dismissal of what he calls "Dead Teenager Movies". Ebert clarified that he did not disparage horror movies as a whole, but that he drew a distinction between films like '']'' and '']'', which he regarded as "masterpieces", and films which he felt consisted of nothing more than groups of teenagers being killed off with the exception of one survivor to populate a sequel.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130605083630/http://www.horrorreview.com/essay/egebertsax2007.html|author=Gurnow, Michael|title=Roger Ebert's Bloody Ax: An Examination of the Film Critic's Elitist Dismissal of the Horror Film|publisher=The Horror Review|year=2007|accessdate=October 17, 2009}}</ref> | |||
{{quote box | |||
Ebert indicated that his favorite film was '']'', joking, "That's the official answer", although he preferred to emphasize it as "the most important" film. He insinuated that his real favorite film was '']''.<ref name=FavoriteFilm>{{cite news|last=Dumont |first=Aaron |url=http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2008/09/whats_your_favorite_movie.html |title=Roger Ebert. "What's your favorite movie?" ''Chicago Sun-Times''|publisher=Blogs.suntimes.com|date=September 4, 2008|accessdate=October 17, 2009}}</ref> His favorite actor was ], and his favorite actress was ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.tv.com/roger-ebert/person/81392/biography.html|title=Biography page for Ebert at|publisher=Tv.com|accessdate=October 17, 2009}}</ref> He expressed his general distaste for "top ten" lists, and all movie lists in general,<ref name=FavoriteFilm /> but contributed a top ten list to the 2012 Sight and Sound Critics' poll. Listed alphabetically, those films were '']''; '']''; '']''; '']''; '']''; '']''; '']''; '']''; '']''; and '']''.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://explore.bfi.org.uk/sightandsoundpolls/2012/voter/142|title=The Greatest Films Poll|author=Roger Ebert|publisher=BFI|date=September 2012|accessdate=September 12, 2012}}</ref> | |||
| align = right | |||
| width = 25em | |||
| bgcolor = LightCyan | |||
| quote = " had a plain-spoken Midwestern clarity...a genial, conversational presence on the page...his criticism shows a nearly unequaled grasp of film history and technique, and formidable intellectual range, but he rarely seems to be showing off. He's just trying to tell you what he thinks, and to provoke some thought on your part about how movies work and what they can do". | |||
| source = — ], film critic for '']''<ref name=Scott/> | |||
}} | |||
Ebert often included personal anecdotes in his reviews; reviewing '']'', he recalls his early days as a moviegoer: "For five or six years of my life (the years between when I was old enough to go alone, and when TV came to town) Saturday afternoon at the Princess was a descent into a dark magical cave that smelled of Jujubes, melted Dreamsicles and Crisco in the popcorn machine. It was probably on one of those Saturday afternoons that I formed my first critical opinion, deciding vaguely that there was something about ] that set him apart from ordinary cowboys."<ref>{{Cite news |last=Ebert |first=Roger |date=December 21, 1971 |title=The Last Picture Show |work=] |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/the-last-picture-show-1971 |access-date=February 7, 2023 |archive-date=December 12, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171212015438/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/the-last-picture-show-1971 |url-status=live }}</ref> Reviewing ], he wrote: "Every once in a while I have what I think of as an out-of-the-body experience at a movie. When the ESP people use a phrase like that, they’re referring to the sensation of the mind actually leaving the body and spiriting itself off to China or Peoria or a galaxy far, far away. When I use the phrase, I simply mean that my imagination has forgotten it is actually present in a movie theater and thinks it’s up there on the screen. In a curious sense, the events in the movie seem real, and I seem to be a part of them...My list of other out-of-the-body films is a short and odd one, ranging from the artistry of ] or '']'' to the slick commercialism of ] and the brutal strength of '']''. On whatever level (sometimes I’m not at all sure) they engage me so immediately and powerfully that I lose my detachment, my analytical reserve. The movie’s ''happening'', and it’s happening to me."<ref>{{cite news| title=Star Wars| author=Roger Ebert| date=1977| work=]| url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/star-wars-1977}}</ref> He sometimes wrote reviews in the forms of stories, poems, songs,<ref>{{cite news| author=Roger Ebert| title=Wet Hot American Summer| date=August 31, 2001| url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/wet-hot-american-summer-2001}}</ref> scripts, open letters,<ref>{{cite news |last=Ebert |first=Roger |date=September 14, 1997 |title=Great Movies: E.T. The Extra-Terrestrial |work=] |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/great-movie-et-the-extra-terrestrial-1982 |access-date=February 12, 2023 |archive-date=January 29, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160129132649/http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/great-movie-et-the-extra-terrestrial-1982 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Ebert |first=Roger |date=July 16, 2004 |title=A Cinderella Story |work=] |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/a-cinderella-story-2004 |access-date= |archive-date=January 11, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180111134812/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/a-cinderella-story-2004 |url-status=live }}</ref> or imagined conversations.<ref>{{cite news |last=Ebert |first=Roger |date=March 25, 1994 |title=The Hudsucker Proxy |work=] |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/hudsucker-proxy-1994 |url-status= |access-date= |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110708005214/http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/19940325/REVIEWS/403250301/1023 |archive-date=July 8, 2011}}</ref> | |||
], music critic for '']'', wrote of how Ebert had influenced his writing: "I noticed how much Ebert could put across in a limited space. He didn't waste time clearing his throat. 'They meet for the first time when she is in her front yard practicing baton-twirling,' begins his review of ]. Often, he managed to smuggle the basics of the plot into a larger thesis about the movie, so that you don't notice the exposition taking place: '] is as knowledgeable about the TV news-gathering process as any movie ever made, but it also has insights into the more personal matter of how people use high-pressure jobs as a way of avoiding time alone with themselves.' The reviews start off in all different ways, sometimes with personal confessions, sometimes with sweeping statements. One way or another, he pulls you in. When he feels strongly, he can bang his fist in an impressive way. His review of '']'' ends thus: 'The whole huge grand mystery of the world, so terrible, so beautiful, seems to hang in the balance.'"<ref>{{Cite magazine |last=Ross |first=Alex |date=April 15, 2013 |title=Learning From Ebert |magazine=] |url=https://www.newyorker.com/culture/culture-desk/learning-from-ebert |access-date=July 30, 2022 |archive-date=July 30, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220730174334/https://www.newyorker.com/culture/culture-desk/learning-from-ebert |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
Ebert compiled "best of the year" movie lists beginning in 1967, thereby helping provide an overview of his critical preferences.<ref>{{cite news| url=http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20041215/COMMENTARY/41215001/1023|work=Chicago Sun-Times|title=Ebert's 10 Best Lists: 1967–present}}</ref> His top choices were: | |||
{{col-begin}} | |||
{{col-break}} | |||
* 1967: '']'' | |||
* 1968: '']'' | |||
* 1969: '']'' | |||
* 1970: '']'' | |||
* 1971: '']'' | |||
* 1972: '']'' | |||
* 1973: '']'' | |||
* 1974: '']'' | |||
* 1975: '']'' | |||
* 1976: '']'' | |||
* 1977: '']'' | |||
* 1978: '']'' | |||
* 1979: '']'' | |||
* 1980: '']'' | |||
* 1981: '']'' | |||
* 1982: '']'' | |||
{{col-break}} | |||
* 1983: '']'' | |||
* 1984: '']'' | |||
* 1985: '']'' | |||
* 1986: '']'' | |||
* 1987: '']'' | |||
* 1988: '']'' | |||
* 1989: '']'' | |||
* 1990: '']'' | |||
* 1991: '']'' | |||
* 1992: '']'' | |||
* 1993: '']'' | |||
* 1994: '']'' | |||
* 1995: '']'' | |||
* 1996: '']'' | |||
* 1997: '']'' | |||
* 1998: '']'' | |||
{{col-break}} | |||
* 1999: '']'' | |||
* 2000: '']'' | |||
* 2001: '']'' | |||
* 2002: '']'' | |||
* 2003: '']'' | |||
* 2004: '']'' | |||
* 2005: '']'' | |||
* 2006: '']'' | |||
* 2007: '']'' | |||
* 2008: '']'' | |||
* 2009: '']'' | |||
* 2010: '']'' | |||
* 2011: '']'' | |||
* 2012: '']'' | |||
{{col-end}} | |||
In his introduction to ''The Great Movies III'', he wrote: | |||
Ebert revisited and sometimes revised his opinions. After ranking '']'' third on his 1982 list, it was the only movie from that year to appear on his later "Best Films of the 1980s" list (where it also ranked third). He made similar revaluations of 1981's '']'', and 1985's '']''. '']'' ('']'', '']'', and '']''), and '']'' originally ranked second and third on Ebert's 1994 list; both were included on his "Best Films of the 1990s" list, but their order had reversed.<ref>. innermind.com. Retrieved November 11, 2011.</ref> | |||
{{cquote|People often ask me, "Do you ever change your mind about a movie?" Hardly ever, although I may refine my opinion. Among the films here, I've changed on '']'' and '']''. My original review of ''Part II'' puts me in mind of the "brain cloud" that besets ] in '']''. I was simply wrong. In the case of ''Blade Runner'', I think the director's cut by ] simply plays much better. I also turned around on '']'', which made it into this book when I belatedly caught on that it wasn't about the weatherman's predicament but about the nature of time and will. Perhaps when I first saw it I allowed myself to be distracted by ]'s mainstream comedy reputation. But someone in film school somewhere is probably even now writing a thesis about how Murray's famous cameos represent an injection of philosophy into those pictures.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Ebert |first=Roger |title=The Great Movies III |publisher=University of Chicago Press |year=2010 |pages=xvii}}</ref>}} | |||
Ebert was an admirer of director ], whom he supported through many years when Herzog's popularity had declined. He conducted an onstage public "conversation" with Herzog at the ] in 2004, after a screening of Herzog's film '']'' at the Ebert's Overlooked Film Festival. Herzog dedicated his 2008 film '']'' to Ebert, and Ebert responded with a heartfelt public letter of gratitude.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071117/PEOPLE/71117002 |title=Roger Ebert. "A letter to Werner Herzog: In praise of rapturous truth" rogerebert.com November 17, 2007 |publisher=Rogerebert.suntimes.com |date=November 17, 2007 |accessdate=October 17, 2009}}</ref> Herzog said he once exhorted Ebert to watch '']'' (which Ebert did) so he could gain a better understanding of the decline in American culture.<ref>{{cite web|last=Holdengräber|first=Paul|url=http://www.nypl.org/sites/default/files/events/herzog021607.pdf|title=Was the 20th Century a Mistake? Werner Herzog in conversation with Paul Holdengräber|publisher=New York Public Library, 2007|accessdate=April 7, 2013}}</ref> | |||
In the first ''Great Movies'', he wrote: | |||
In 2005, Ebert opined that video games are not art, and are inferior to media created through authorial control, such as film and literature, stating, "video games can be elegant, subtle, sophisticated, challenging and visually wonderful", but "the nature of the medium prevents it from moving beyond craftsmanship to the stature of art".<ref>Ebert, Roger (November 27, 2005). rogerebert.com.</ref> This resulted in negative reaction from video game enthusiasts,<ref>{{cite news|url=http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20051206/COMMENTARY/51206002|author=Ebert, Roger|title=Gamers fire flaming posts, e-mails...|date=December 6, 2005|publisher=rogerebert.com/''Chicago Sun-Times''}}</ref> such as writer ], who defended ], stating that they have the power to move people, that the views of book or film critics are less important than those of the consumers experiencing them, and that Ebert's were prejudiced. Ebert responded that the charge of prejudice was merely a euphemism for disagreement, that merely being moved by an experience does not denote it as artistic, and that critics are also consumers.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070721/COMMENTARY/70721001 |author=Ebert, Roger|title=Games vs. Art: Ebert vs. Barker|publisher=rogerebert.com|date=July 21, 2007}}</ref> Ebert later defended his position in April 2010, saying, "No video gamer now living will survive long enough to experience the medium as an art form".<ref>Ebert, Roger (April 16, 2010). . Roger Ebert's Journal.</ref> He also stated that he had never found a video game "worthy of (his) time", and thus had never played one.<ref>Brockway, Robert (April 22, 2010). . ].</ref> | |||
{{Blockquote |text= | |||
Movies do not change, but their viewers do. When I first saw '']'' in 1961, I was an adolescent for whom "the sweet life" represented everything I dreamed of: sin, exotic European glamour, the weary romance of the cynical newspaperman. When I saw it again, around 1970, I was living in a version of Marcello's world; Chicago's North Avenue was not the Via Veneto, but at 3 A. M. the denizens were just as colorful, and I was about Marcello's age.}} | |||
{{Blockquote |text=When I saw the movie around 1980, Marcello was the same age, but I was ten years older, had stopped drinking, and saw him not as role model, but as a victim, condemned to an endless search for happiness that could never be found, not that way. By 1991, when I analyzed the film a frame at a time at the ], Marcello seemed younger still, and while I had once admired and then criticized him, now I pitied and loved him. And when I saw the movie right after ] died, I thought that ] and Marcello had taken a moment of discovery and made it immortal. There may be no such thing as the sweet life. But it is necessary to find that out for yourself.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Ebert |first=Roger |title=The Great Movies |date=2002 |url=https://archive.org/details/greatmovies0000eber/page/243/mode/1up?view=theater |location=New York |edition=First |publisher=Broadway Books |page=243 |isbn=9780767910323 |oclc=47989891}}</ref> | |||
In a July 1, 2010, blog entry, Ebert maintained his position that video games can never be art in principle, but conceded that he should not have expressed this skepticism without being more familiar with the actual experience of playing them. He reflected on the reaction to his blog entry, gamers' attempts to recommend to him games such as '']'', and his reluctance to play games due to his lack of interest in the medium. Ebert did say that he enjoyed playing '']''.<ref>Ebert, Roger (July 1, 2010). . rogerebert.com.</ref> | |||
}} | |||
== |
==Preferences== | ||
===Favorites=== | |||
Ebert was an outspoken opponent of the ], repeatedly criticizing its decisions regarding which movies are suitable for children.<ref>{{cite web|last=Ebert |first=Roger |url=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703766704576009343432436296.html |title=Getting Real About Movie Ratings|newspaper=]|date=December 11, 2010 |accessdate=April 5, 2013}}</ref> | |||
In an essay looking back at his first 25 years as a film critic, Ebert wrote: | |||
{{Blockquote |text= | |||
Ebert also frequently lamented that cinemas outside major cities are "booked by computer from Hollywood with no regard for local tastes", making high-quality independent and foreign films virtually unavailable to most American moviegoers.<ref>Ebert, Roger (January 29, 2004). {{Wayback |date=20040604184449 |url=http://www.suntimes.com/output/oscars/ebert27.html |title="They got it right"}}. ''Chicago Sun-Times''.</ref> | |||
If I had to make a generalization, I would say that many of my favorite movies are about Good People ... '']'' is about people who do the right thing. '']'' is about people who do the right thing and can never speak to one another as a result ... Not all good movies are about Good People. I also like movies about bad people who have a sense of humor. ], who does not play either of the good people in ''The Third Man'', has such a winning way, such witty dialogue, that for a scene or two we almost forgive him his crimes. Henry Hill, the hero of '']'', is not a good fella, but he has the ability to be honest with us about why he enjoyed being bad. He is not a hypocrite.}} | |||
{{Blockquote |text=Of the other movies I love, some are simply about the joy of physical movement. When ] splashes through '']'', when ] follows the yellow brick road, when ] dances on the ceiling, when ] puts the reins in his teeth and gallops across the mountain meadow, there is a purity and joy that cannot be resisted. In '']'', a Japanese film by the old master ], there is this sequence of shots: A room with a red teapot in the foreground. Another view of the room. The mother folding clothes. A shot down a corridor with a mother crossing it at an angle, and then a daughter crossing at the back. A reverse shot in the hallway as the arriving father is greeted by the mother and daughter. A shot as the father leaves the frame, then the mother, then the daughter. A shot as the mother and father enter the room, as in the background the daughter picks up the red pot and leaves the frame. This sequence of timed movement and cutting is as perfect as any music ever written, any dance, any poem.<ref name=Twenty-Five>{{Cite news |last=Ebert |first=Roger |date=April 11, 1992 |title=Reflections after 25 years at the movies |work=]| url=https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/reflections-after-25-years-at-the-movies}}</ref>}} | |||
Ebert was a strong advocate for ] 48, in which the movie projector runs at 48 frames per second, as compared to the usual 24 frames per second. He was opposed to the practice whereby theatres lower the intensity of their projector bulbs in order to extend the life of the bulb, arguing that this has little effect other than to make the film harder to see.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060219/ANSWERMAN/602190302/1023 |title=Ebert's "Movie Answer Man column", February 19, 2006|publisher=Rogerebert.suntimes.com|accessdate=October 17, 2009}}</ref> Ebert was skeptical of the recent resurgence of ], which he found unrealistic and distracting.<ref>{{cite news|first=Roger|last=Ebert|url=http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2008/08/dminus_for_3d.html|title=D-minus for 3-D|publisher=]: Blogs|date=August 16, 2008|accessdate=October 17, 2009}}</ref> | |||
Ebert credits film historian ] and the ] for introducing him to Asian cinema through Richie's invitation to join him on the jury of the festival in 1983, which quickly became a favorite of his and would frequently attend along with Richie, lending their support to validate the festival's status as a "festival of record".<ref>{{cite web |last1=Ebert |first1=Roger |title=In memory of Donald Richie |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/far-flung-correspondents/in-memory-of-donald-richie |website=rogerebert.com |date=21 March 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=Sartin |first1=Hank |title=Mahalo Roger!: The Hawaii International Film Festival pays tribute to Roger |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/chazs-blog/mahalo-roger-the-hawaiian-international-film-festival-pays-tribute-to-roger |date=11 October 2013}}</ref> He lamented the decline of campus film societies: "There was once a time when young people made it their business to catch up on the best works by the best directors, but the death of film societies and repertory theaters put an end to that, and for today's younger filmgoers, these are not well-known names: ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ]. Most people still know who ] was, I guess."<ref name=Twenty-Five/> | |||
===Film and TV appearances=== | |||
In 1995, Ebert, along with colleague Gene Siskel, guest-starred on an episode of the animated TV series '']''. In the episode, Siskel and Ebert split and each wants Jay as his new partner. The episode is a parody of the film '']''.<ref> Episode summary: ''The Critic'' – "Siskel & Ebert & Jay & Alice"</ref> The following year, Ebert appeared in ''Pitch'', a documentary by Canadian film makers ] and ].<ref>http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0125459/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1</ref> | |||
Ebert argued for the aesthetic values of ] and against colorization, writing: | |||
He also made an appearance as himself in a 1997 episode of the television series '']'', which took place in Chicago. In the episode, Ebert consoles a young boy who is depressed after he sees a character called Bosco the Bunny die in a movie.<ref name=Questions>{{cite book|title=Questions for the Movie Answer Man|last=Ebert|first=Roger|date=June 1, 1997|publisher=Andrews McMeel Publishing|page=99|ISBN=0-8362-2894-4|quote=In the Spring of 1997, I did a guest appearance on the show, consoling a little boy who was depressed that Bosco the Bunny had died.}}</ref> | |||
{{Blockquote|Black-and-white movies present the deliberate absence of color. This makes them less realistic than color films (for the real world is in color). They are more dreamlike, more pure, composed of shapes and forms and movements and light and shadow. Color films can simply be illuminated. Black-and-white films have to be lighted ... Black and white is a legitimate and beautiful artistic choice in motion pictures, creating feelings and effects that cannot be obtained any other way.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Ebert |first=Roger |date=1989 |title=Why I Love Black and White |work=]}}</ref>}} | |||
In 2003, Ebert had a cameo appearance in the film '']'', in which he recited the white parasol monologue from '']''. Roger Ebert founded his own film festival, ], in his home town of Champaign, Illinois, and was also a regular fixture at the ]. On May 4, 2010, Ebert was announced by the International Academy of Digital Arts and Sciences as the Webby Person of the Year, having taken to the Internet following his battle with cancer.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.webbyawards.com/webbys/specialachievement14.php |title=The Webby Awards |publisher=The Webby Awards |date=June 14, 2010 |accessdate=April 5, 2013}}</ref> On October 22, 2010, Ebert appeared on camera with ] on the ] network during the network's "The Essentials" series. Ebert chose the film '']'' to be shown.{{citation needed|date=July 2014}} | |||
He wrote: "Black-and-white (or, more accurately, silver-and-white) creates a mysterious dream state, a simpler world of form and gesture. Most people do not agree with me. They like color and think a black-and-white film is missing something. Try this. If you have wedding photographs of your parents and grandparents, chances are your parents are in color and your grandparents are in black and white. Put the two photographs side by side and consider them honestly. Your grandparents look timeless. Your parents look goofy. | |||
For many years, on the day of the ] ceremony, Ebert repeatedly appeared with Roeper on the live pre-awards show, ''An Evening at the Academy Awards: The Arrivals''. This aired for over a decade, usually prior to the awards ceremony show, which also featured ] interviews and fashion commentary. They also used to appear on the post-awards show entitled ''An Evening at the Academy Awards: The Winners'', produced and aired by the ]-owned ] in Los Angeles.{{citation needed|date=July 2014}} | |||
The next time you buy film for your camera, buy a roll of black-and-white. Go outside at dusk, when the daylight is diffused. Stand on the side of the house away from the sunset. Shoot some natural-light closeups of a friend. Have the pictures printed big, at least 5 x 7. Ask yourself if this friend, who has always looked ordinary in every color photograph you’ve ever taken, does not suddenly, in black and white, somehow take on an aura of mystery. The same thing happens in the movies."<ref name=Twenty-Five/> | |||
Ebert was one of the principal critics featured in ]'s 2009 documentary film '']''. He is shown discussing the dynamics of appearing with Gene Siskel on the 1970s show ''Coming to a Theatre Near You'', which was the predecessor of ''Sneak Previews'' on Chicago PBS station WTTW. He also expressed his approval of the proliferation of young people writing film reviews today on the Internet.<ref>. ]. Retrieved December 16, 2012.</ref> | |||
Ebert championed animation, particularly the films of ] and ].<ref>{{cite news |last1=Ebert |first1=Roger |title=Japanese animation unleashes the mind |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/japanese-animation-unleashes-the-mind |access-date=February 28, 2023 |work=Chicago Sun-Times |date=October 7, 1999 |language=en |archive-date=August 15, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230815114910/https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/japanese-animation-unleashes-the-mind |url-status=live }}</ref> In his review of Miyazaki's '']'', he wrote: "I go to the movies for many reasons. Here is one of them. I want to see wondrous sights not available in the real world, in stories where myth and dreams are set free to play. Animation opens that possibility, because it is freed from gravity and the chains of the possible. Realistic films show the physical world; animation shows its essence. Animated films are not copies of 'real movies,' are not shadows of reality, but create a new existence in their own right."<ref>{{Cite news |last=Ebert |first=Roger |date=October 29, 1999 |title=Princess Mononoke |work=] |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/princess-mononoke-1999 |access-date=August 4, 2022 |archive-date=March 6, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160306121035/http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/princess-mononoke-1999 |url-status=live }}</ref> He concluded his review of '']'' by writing: "Every time an animated film is successful, you have to read all over again about how animation isn't 'just for children' but 'for the whole family,' and 'even for adults going on their own.' No kidding!"<ref>{{Cite news |last=Ebert |first=Roger |date=August 30, 2007 |title=Waiter, there's a rat in my soup |work=] |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/ratatouille-2007 |access-date=August 4, 2022 |archive-date=October 13, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131013023850/http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/ratatouille-2007 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
Ebert provided DVD ] for several films, including '']'', '']'', '']'', '']'', '']'', and '']'' (for which Ebert also wrote the screenplay, based on a story that he co-wrote with ]). Ebert was also interviewed by ] for an extra feature on the DVD release of the ] film '']''. Ebert appeared as a guest star multiple times on '']''. A bio-documentary about Ebert, called '']'', was released in 2014 to universal acclaim.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/life_itself/ | title=Life Itself | work=] | publisher=] | accessdate=September 11, 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.metacritic.com/movie/life-itself | title=Life Itself Reviews | work=] | publisher=] | accessdate=July 19, 2014}}</ref> | |||
Ebert championed documentaries, notably ]'s '']'': "They say you can make a great documentary about anything, as long as you see it well enough and truly, and this film proves it. ''Gates of Heaven'', which has no connection to the unfortunate '']'', is about a couple of pet cemeteries and their owners. It was filmed in Southern California, so of course we expect a sardonic look at the peculiarities of the Moonbeam State. But then ''Gates of Heaven'' grows ever so much more complex and frightening, until at the end it is about such large issues as love, immortality, failure, and the dogged elusiveness of the American Dream."<ref>{{Cite news |last=Ebert |first=Roger |date=January 1, 1978 |title=Gates of Heaven |work=] |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/gates-of-heaven-1978 |access-date=April 19, 2023 |archive-date=April 19, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230419192139/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/gates-of-heaven-1978 |url-status=live }}</ref> Morris credited Ebert's review with putting him on the map.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Errol Morris On Ebert & Siskel |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q8Zj_bAlyB0 |website=YouTube | date=July 21, 2011 |access-date=October 14, 2023 |archive-date=October 22, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231022003223/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q8Zj_bAlyB0 |url-status=live }}</ref> He championed ]'s ], calling them "an inspired, even noble use of the medium."<ref>{{Cite news |last=Ebert |first=Roger |date=1998 |title=The Up Documentaries |work=] |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/great-movie-the-up-documentaries-1985 |access-date=April 22, 2023 |archive-date=April 22, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230422042138/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/great-movie-the-up-documentaries-1985 |url-status=live }}</ref> Ebert concluded his review of '']'' by writing: "Many filmgoers are reluctant to see documentaries, for reasons I've never understood; the good ones are frequently more absorbing and entertaining than fiction. ''Hoop Dreams'', however, is not only documentary. It is also poetry and prose, muckraking and expose, journalism and polemic. It is one of the great moviegoing experiences of my lifetime."<ref>{{Cite news |last=Ebert |first=Roger |date=October 21, 1994 |title=Hoop Dreams |work=] |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/hoop-dreams-1994 |access-date=April 19, 2023 |archive-date=April 19, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230419192143/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/hoop-dreams-1994 |url-status=live }}</ref>{{quote box|quoted = 1|If a movie can illuminate the lives of other people who share this planet with us and show us not only how different they are but, how even so, they share the same dreams and hurts, then it deserves to be called great.|source=— Ebert, 1986<ref>{{cite news |last=Ebert |first=Roger |date=October 25, 1986 |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/A-love-story-forged-in-hell |title=Sid and Nancy |newspaper=] |access-date=May 31, 2020 |via=] |archive-date=April 5, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200405191646/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/A-love-story-forged-in-hell |url-status=live }}</ref>|width=25%|align=right|style=padding:8px;|border=1px}} | |||
Though not making a personal appearance, an honorary effigy of Ebert co-starred in the 1998 reimagining version of '']'', played by actor ] as New York City Mayor Ebert. In the final action scenes of the movie, as the heroes make their escape in a taxi, the cab displays a campaign ad on top portraying a photo of the mayor with a 'thumbs up' alongside the phrase "Re-elect Mayor Ebert". | |||
Ebert said that his favorite film was '']'', joking, "That's the official answer," although he preferred to emphasize it as "the most important" film. He said seeing ''The Third Man'' cemented his love of cinema: "This movie is on the altar of my love for the cinema. I saw it for the first time in a little fleabox of a theater on the Left Bank in Paris, in 1962, during my first $5 a day trip to Europe. It was so sad, so beautiful, so romantic, that it became at once a part of my own memories — as if it had happened to me."<ref>{{Cite news |last=Ebert |first=Roger |date=April 1, 1991 |title=Ten Greatest Films of All Time |work=] |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/ten-greatest-films-of-all-time |access-date=July 30, 2022 |archive-date=June 5, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200605174332/https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/ten-greatest-films-of-all-time |url-status=live }}</ref> He implied that his real favorite film was '']''.<ref name="FavoriteFilm">{{cite news |last=Ebert |first=Roger |date=September 4, 2008 |title="What's your favorite movie?" |work=Chicago Sun-Times |url=http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2008/09/whats_your_favorite_movie.html |url-status=dead |access-date=October 17, 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080905150448/http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2008/09/whats_your_favorite_movie.html |archive-date=September 5, 2008}}</ref> | |||
==Personal life== | |||
] (right) at the ] on October 20, 2010]] | |||
His favorite actor was ] and his favorite actress was ].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.tv.com/roger-ebert/person/81392/biography.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120517061609/http://www.tv.com/roger-ebert/person/81392/biography.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=May 17, 2012 |title=Biography page for Ebert at |publisher=Tv.com |access-date=October 17, 2009}}</ref> He named ], Yasujirō Ozu, ], ] and ] as his favorite directors.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://editorial.rottentomatoes.com/article/meet-a-critic-roger-ebert/ |title=Meet a Critic: Roger Ebert |website=] |access-date=January 3, 2017 |archive-date=August 30, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170830123412/http://editorial.rottentomatoes.com/article/meet-a-critic-roger-ebert/ |url-status=live }}</ref> He expressed his distaste for "top-10" lists, and all movie lists in general, but did make an annual list of the year's best films, joking that film critics are "required by unwritten law" to do so. He also contributed an all-time top-10 list for the decennial '']'' Critics' poll in 1982, 1992, 2002 and 2012. In 1982, he chose, alphabetically, '']'', '']'', '']'', '']'', ''Citizen Kane'', ''La Dolce Vita'', '']'', '']'', '']'' and ''The Third Man''. In 2012, he chose ''2001: A Space Odyssey'', ''Aguirre, the Wrath of God'', '']'', ''Citizen Kane'', ''La Dolce Vita'', '']'', '']'', '']'', '']'' and '']''.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://explore.bfi.org.uk/sightandsoundpolls/2012/voter/142 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120819021224/http://explore.bfi.org.uk/sightandsoundpolls/2012/voter/142 |url-status=dead |archive-date=August 19, 2012 |title=The Greatest Films Poll |author=Roger Ebert |publisher=BFI |date=September 2012 |access-date=September 12, 2012}}</ref> Several of the contributors to Ebert's website participated in a video tribute to him, featuring films that made his ''Sight & Sound'' list in 1982 and 2012.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://vimeo.com/42638994?embedded=true&source=vimeo_logo&owner=6994428 |title=The Sight and Sound Film Poll: An International Tribute to Roger Ebert and His Favorite Films |last=Lee |first=Kevin B. |date=2013 |website=Vimeo.com |access-date=February 8, 2023 |archive-date=February 6, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230206234048/https://vimeo.com/42638994?embedded=true&source=vimeo_logo&owner=6994428 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
At age 50, Ebert married trial attorney Charlie "Chaz" Hammelsmith (formerly Chaz Hammel-Smith) in 1992.<ref name=ChicagoMag> Mrs. Ebert's name is noted on Page 3.</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://dailyentertainmentnews.com/movies/chaz-ebert-roger-eberts-wife-photos/|title= Chaz Ebert Bio |publisher=DailyEntertainmentNews |date= January 12, 2013 |accessdate= March 4, 2013}}</ref> He explained in his memoir, ''Life Itself'', that he "would never marry before mother died", as he was afraid of displeasing her.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://rogerebert.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20130404/MEMORY/130409989|title = Roger Ebert (1942–2013)|author = Neil Steinberg|publisher = Chicago Sun-Times via RogerEbert.com|date = April 4, 2013}}</ref> In a July 2012 blog entry titled "Roger loves Chaz", Ebert wrote, "She fills my horizon, she is the great fact of my life, she has my love, she saved me from the fate of living out my life alone, which is where I seemed to be heading".<ref name="Chicago Sun-Times Roger Loves Chaz">{{cite news|last=Ebert|first=Roger|title=Roger loves Chaz|url=http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2012/07/roger_loves_chaz.html|newspaper=Chicago Sun-Times|date=July 17, 2012}}</ref> Chaz Ebert is now vice president of the Ebert Company and has ] Ebertfest.<ref name=Esquire>Jones, Chris (February 16, 2010). . '']''</ref> | |||
===Best films of the year=== | |||
Ebert was a recovering alcoholic, having quit drinking in 1979. He was a member of ] and had written some blog entries on the subject.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2009/08/my_name_is_roger_and_im_an_alc.html|title=My Name is Roger, and I'm an alcoholic|date=August 25, 2009|accessdate=August 25, 2009|author=Roger Ebert|publisher=]}}</ref> He was a longtime friend of, and briefly dated, ], who credited him with persuading her to syndicate '']'',<ref>, Ebert, Roger; Chicago Sun-Times, November 16, 2005</ref> which became the highest-rated talk show in American television history.<ref name="Forbes Oprah">{{cite news|last=Rose|first=Lacey|title=America's Top-Earning Black Stars|url=http://www.forbes.com/2009/01/29/oprah-will-smith-business-media-0129_black_stars.html|newspaper=Forbes|date=January 29, 2009}}</ref> He was also good friends with film historian and critic ] and considered the book ''Leonard Maltin's Movie and Video Guide'' to be the standard of film guide books.{{citation needed|date=July 2014}} | |||
Ebert made annual "ten best lists" from 1967 to 2012.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20041215/COMMENTARY/41215001/1023 |work=Chicago Sun-Times |title=Ebert's 10 Best Lists: 1967–present |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060908200137/http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=%2F20041215%2FCOMMENTARY%2F41215001%2F1023 |archive-date=September 8, 2006}}</ref> His choices for best film of the year were: | |||
{{div col|colwidth=20em}} | |||
* 1967: '']'' | |||
* 1968: '']'' | |||
* 1969: '']'' | |||
* 1970: '']'' | |||
* 1971: '']'' | |||
* 1972: '']'' | |||
* 1973: '']'' | |||
* 1974: '']'' | |||
* 1975: '']'' | |||
* 1976: '']'' | |||
* 1977: '']'' | |||
* 1978: '']'' | |||
* 1979: '']'' | |||
* 1980: '']'' | |||
* 1981: '']'' | |||
* 1982: '']'' | |||
* 1983: '']'' | |||
* 1984: '']'' | |||
* 1985: '']'' | |||
* 1986: '']'' | |||
* 1987: '']'' | |||
* 1988: '']'' | |||
* 1989: '']'' | |||
* 1990: '']'' | |||
* 1991: '']'' | |||
* 1992: '']'' | |||
* 1993: '']'' | |||
* 1994: '']'' | |||
* 1995: '']'' | |||
* 1996: '']'' | |||
* 1997: '']'' | |||
* 1998: '']'' | |||
* 1999: '']'' | |||
* 2000: '']'' | |||
* 2001: '']'' | |||
* 2002: '']'' | |||
* 2003: '']'' | |||
* 2004: '']'' | |||
* 2005: '']'' | |||
* 2006: '']'' | |||
* 2007: '']'' | |||
* 2008: '']'' | |||
* 2009: '']'' | |||
* 2010: '']'' | |||
* 2011: '']'' | |||
* 2012: '']'' | |||
{{div col end}} | |||
Ebert revisited and sometimes revised his opinions. After ranking '']'' third on his 1982 list, it was the only movie from that year to appear on his later "Best Films of the 1980s" list (where it also ranked third).<ref name = ListArchive>{{cite web |url=http://alumnus.caltech.edu/~ejohnson/critics/ebert.html#best80s |title=Roger Ebert's Top Ten Lists, 1967-2006 |website=Eric C. Johnson's archive |publisher=] |access-date=January 2, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071231063216/http://alumnus.caltech.edu/~ejohnson/critics/ebert.html#best80s |archive-date=December 31, 2007 |url-status=dead}}</ref> He made similar reevaluations of '']'' (1981) and '']'' (1985).<ref name = ListArchive/> The '']'' ('']'' (1993), '']'' (1994), and '']'' (also 1994), and '']'' (1994) originally ranked second and third on Ebert's 1994 list; both were included on his "Best Films of the 1990s" list, but their order had reversed.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.innermind.com/misc/s_e_top.htm |title=Siskel and Ebert Top Ten Lists (1969–1998) |website=innermind.com |access-date=November 11, 2011 |archive-date=November 8, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201108124328/http://www.innermind.com/misc/s_e_top.htm |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
A supporter of the ],<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.newsmeat.com/media_political_donations/Roger_Ebert.php |title=Ebert's political donations |publisher=Newsmeat.com |date=September 30, 2009}}</ref> Ebert publicly urged ] filmmaker ] to give a politically charged acceptance speech at the Academy Awards: "I'd like to see Michael Moore get up there and let 'em have it with both barrels and really let loose and give them a real rabble-rousing speech."<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1295/is_8_67/ai_106225217/pg_1 |title=Interview with Matthew Rothschild, ''The Progressive'', August 2003 |publisher=Findarticles.com |date=June 2, 2009}}</ref> During a 1996 panel at the ] at ]'s ], Ebert coined the Boulder Pledge, by which he vowed never to purchase anything offered through the result of an unsolicited email message, or to forward chain emails or mass emails to others.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.panix.com/~tbetz/boulder.shtml |title=Critical eye by Roger Ebert — Enough! A Modest Proposal to End the Junk Mail Plague |publisher=Panix.com |accessdate=October 17, 2009}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.lumbercartel.ca/glossary/boulderpledge.pl |publisher=The Lumber Cartel, local 42 |title=Roger Ebert gets "two thumbs up" from the Lumber Cartel for this distinct, well-written pledge |accessdate=November 14, 2006}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://bw.org/ube/boulder.html |title=Bill Weinman · Why I Keep The Boulder Pledge |publisher=Bw.org }}</ref> Ebert endorsed ] for re-election as President in 2012.<ref name=90days90reasons>{{cite web|title=Reason 02: President Obama faced down the GOP and the health industry to finally reform American healthcare|url=http://90days90reasons.com/02.php|publisher=90days90reasons.com|accessdate=October 25, 2012}}</ref> | |||
In 2006, Ebert noted his own "tendency to place what I now consider the year's best film in second place, perhaps because I was trying to make some kind of point with my top pick,"<ref>{{cite book |last=Ebert |first=Roger |title=Awake in the Dark |url=https://archive.org/details/awakedarkbestrog00eber |url-access=limited |publisher=University of Chicago Press |date=2006 |page=}}</ref> adding, "In 1968, I should have ranked '']'' above ''The Battle of Algiers''. In 1971, '']'' was better than ''The Last Picture Show''. In 1974, '']'' was probably better, in a different way, than ''Scenes from a Marriage''. In 1976, how could I rank ''Small Change'' above '']''? In 1978, I would put '']'' above ''An Unmarried Woman''. And in 1980, of course, '']'' was a better film than ''The Black Stallion'' ... although I later chose ''Raging Bull'' as the best film of the entire decade of the 1980s, it was only the second-best film of 1980 ... am I the same person I was in 1968, 1971, or 1980? I hope not." | |||
Ebert was critical of ] ],<ref name=Evolves>{{cite news|url= http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2009/09/the_longest_thread_evolves.html|title= The Longest Thread Evolves|accessdate= September 4, 2009|author= Roger Ebert|date= September 4, 2009|work=Chicago Sun-Times}}</ref> and stated that people who believe in either creationism or ] beliefs such as ] or ] are not qualified to be President.<ref>{{cite news | |||
|url= http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2009/12/new_agers_and_creationists_sho.html|title=Roger Ebert's Journal: New Agers and Creationists should not be President |accessdate=December 3, 2009 |author=Ebert, Roger |date=December 2, 2009|work=Chicago Sun-Times}}</ref> Ebert also expressed disbelief in ] or supernatural claims in general, calling them "]".<ref>Ebert, Roger. . rogerebert.com. December 14, 2011</ref> | |||
Ebert's ten best lists resumed in 2014, the first full year after his death, as a ] system by his writers. | |||
{{div col|colwidth=20em}} | |||
* 2014: '']'' | |||
* 2015: '']'' | |||
* 2016: '']'' | |||
* 2017: '']'' | |||
* 2018: '']'' | |||
* 2019: '']'' | |||
* 2020: '']'' | |||
* 2021: '']'' | |||
* 2022: '']'' | |||
* 2023: '']'' | |||
* 2024: '']'' | |||
{{div col end}} | |||
===Best films of the decade=== | |||
Ebert compiled "best of the decade" movie lists in the 2000s for the 1970s to the 2000s, thereby helping provide an overview of his critical preferences. Only three films for this listing were named by Ebert as the best film of the year, ''Five Easy Pieces'' (1970), ''Hoop Dreams'' (1994), and ''Synecdoche, New York'' (2008). In 2019, the editors of RogerEbert.com continued the tradition as a joint review of the RogerEbert.com writers. | |||
* '']'' (1970s)<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/great-movie-five-easy-pieces-1970|title=Five Easy Pieces|work=RogerEbert.com|date=March 16, 2003|access-date=March 22, 2023|archive-date=July 28, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200728051330/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/great-movie-five-easy-pieces-1970|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
* '']'' (1980s)<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.rogerebert.com/chazs-blog/rogers-top-ten-lists-best-films-of-the-1980s|title=Roger's Top Ten Lists: Best Films of the 1980s|date=April 19, 2022|access-date=March 22, 2023|archive-date=March 23, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230323002708/https://www.rogerebert.com/chazs-blog/rogers-top-ten-lists-best-films-of-the-1980s|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
* '']'' (1990s)<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/the-best-10-movies-of-1990s|title=The Best 10 Movies of 1990s|work=RogerEbert.com|date=February 23, 2000|access-date=March 22, 2023|archive-date=March 9, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230309150029/https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/the-best-10-movies-of-1990s|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
* '']'' (2000s)<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/the-best-films-of-the-decade|title=The best films of the decade|work=RoberEbert.com|date=December 30, 2009|access-date=March 22, 2023|archive-date=April 13, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230413024222/https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/the-best-films-of-the-decade|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
* '']'' (2010s) <REF> {{cite web|url=https://www.rogerebert.com/features/the-best-films-of-the-2010s|work=RogerEbert.com|date=November 3, 2019|accessdate=December 17, 2024 |title=The Best Films of the 2010s | Features | Roger Ebert }} </REF> | |||
===Genres and content=== | |||
Ebert was often critical of the ] (MPAA). His main arguments were that they were too strict on sex and profanity, too lenient on violence, secretive with their guidelines, inconsistent in applying them and not willing to consider the wider context and meaning of the film.<ref name="uglyreality">{{cite web |last=Ebert |first=Roger |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/rogers-journal/ugly-reality-in-movie-ratings |title=Ugly reality in movie ratings |publisher=] |date=September 24, 2000 |access-date=May 1, 2018 |archive-date=May 1, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180501225754/https://www.rogerebert.com/rogers-journal/ugly-reality-in-movie-ratings |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Ebert |first=Roger |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748703766704576009343432436296 |title=Getting Real About Movie Ratings |newspaper=] |date=December 11, 2010 |access-date=April 5, 2013 |archive-date=July 6, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150706203750/http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748703766704576009343432436296 |url-status=live }}</ref> He advocated replacing the ] rating with separate ratings for pornographic and nonpornographic adult films.<ref name="uglyreality"/> He praised '']'', a documentary critiquing the MPAA, adding that their rules are "]."<ref>{{Cite news |last=Ebert |first=Roger |date=September 14, 2006 |title=How do the ratings rate? |work=] |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/this-film-is-not-yet-rated-2006 |access-date=April 19, 2023 |archive-date=April 19, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230419192140/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/this-film-is-not-yet-rated-2006 |url-status=live }}</ref> He signed off on his review of '']'' by asking, "Why did they give an R rating to a movie so perfect for teenagers?"<ref>{{Cite news |last=Ebert |first=Roger |date=September 15, 2000 |title=Almost Famous |work=] |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/almost-famous-2000 |access-date=February 7, 2023 |archive-date=February 24, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230224142345/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/almost-famous-2000 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
Ebert also frequently lamented that cinemas outside major cities are "booked by computer from Hollywood with no regard for local tastes," making high-quality independent and foreign films virtually unavailable to most American moviegoers.<ref>{{cite web |first=Roger |last=Ebert |url=http://www.suntimes.com/output/oscars/ebert27.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040604184449/http://www.suntimes.com/output/oscars/ebert27.html |archive-date=June 4, 2004 |date=June 4, 2004 |title=They got it right |website=]}}</ref> | |||
He wrote that "I've always preferred generic approach to film criticism; I ask myself how good a movie is of its type."<ref>{{Cite news |last=Ebert |first=Roger |date=December 26, 1973 |title=The Exorcist |work=] |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/the-exorcist-1973 |access-date=August 4, 2022 |archive-date=November 2, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191102153840/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/the-exorcist-1973 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
He gave '']'' four stars: "Seeing it, I was reminded of the favorable review I gave a few years ago to ''Last House on the Left'', another really terrifying thriller. Readers wrote to ask how I could possibly support such a movie. But I wasn't supporting it so much as describing it: You don't want to be scared? Don't see it. Credit must be paid to directors who want to really frighten us, to make a good thriller when quite possibly a bad one would have made as much money. Hitchcock is acknowledged as a master of suspense; it's hypocrisy to disapprove of other directors in the same genre who want to scare us too."<ref>{{Cite news |last=Ebert |first=Roger |date=October 31, 1978 |title=Halloween |work=]}}</ref> | |||
Ebert did not believe in grading children's movies on a curve, as he thought children were smarter than given credit for and deserved quality entertainment. He began his review of '']'': "Kids are not stupid. They are among the sharpest, cleverest, most eagle-eyed creatures on God's green Earth, and very little escapes their notice. You may not have observed that your neighbor is still using his snow-tires in mid-July, but every four-year-old on the block has, and kids pay the same attention when they go to the movies. They don't miss a thing, and have an instinctive contempt for shoddy and shabby work. I make this observation because nine out of ten kids' movies are stupid, witless and display contempt for their audiences. Is that all parents want from kids' movies? That they not have anything bad in them? Shouldn't they have something good in them — some life, imagination, fantasy, inventiveness, something to tickle the imagination? If a movie isn't going to do your kids any good, why let them watch it? Just to kill a Saturday afternoon? That shows a subtle contempt for a child's mind, I think." He went on to say he thought ''Willy Wonka'' was the best movie of its kind since '']''.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Ebert |first=Roger |date=1971 |title=Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory |work=] |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/willy-wonka-and-the-chocolate-factory-1971 |access-date=April 22, 2023 |archive-date=September 30, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230930233251/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/willy-wonka-and-the-chocolate-factory-1971 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
Ebert tried not to judge a film on its ideology. Reviewing '']'', he writes: "I am not particularly interested in the 'ideas' in Coppola's film...Like all great works of art about war, ''Apocalypse Now'' essentially contains only one idea or message, the not-especially-enlightening observation that war is hell. We do not go to see Coppola's movie for that insight — something Coppola, but not some of his critics, knows well. Coppola also well knows (and demonstrated in ''The Godfather'' films) that movies aren't especially good at dealing with abstract ideas — for those you'd be better off turning to the written word — but they are superb for presenting moods and feelings, the look of a battle, the expression on a face, the mood of a country. ''Apocalypse Now'' achieves greatness not by analyzing our 'experience in Vietnam,' but by re-creating, in characters and images, something of that experience."<ref>{{cite news| last=Ebert| first=Roger| date=June 1, 1979| title=Apocalypse Now| work=Chicago Sun-Times| url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/apocalypse-now-1979| access-date=April 27, 2024| archive-date=November 14, 2020| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201114145551/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/apocalypse-now-1979| url-status=live}}</ref> Ebert commented on films using his ] upbringing as a point of reference,<ref name=ChicagoMag>{{cite magazine |first=Carol |last=Felsenthal |date=December 2005 |url=http://www.chicagomag.com/Chicago-Magazine/December-2005/A-Life-in-the-Movies/index.php?cp=1&si=0 |title=A Life In The Movies |magazine=] |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110823172045/http://www.chicagomag.com/Chicago-Magazine/December-2005/A-Life-in-the-Movies/index.php?cp=1&si=0 |archive-date=August 23, 2011 |access-date=April 6, 2013}}</ref> and was critical of films he believed were grossly ignorant of or insulting to Catholicism, such as '']'' (1999)<ref>{{cite web |first=Roger |last=Ebert |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/stigmata-1999 |title=Stigmata |date=January 1, 1999 |newspaper=] |via=] |access-date=April 23, 2022 |archive-date=June 9, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220609203034/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/stigmata-1999 |url-status=live }}</ref> and '']'' (1994).<ref>{{cite news |first=Roger |last=Ebert |url=http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/19950407/REVIEWS/504070308/1023 |title=Priest |newspaper=] |date=April 7, 1995 |access-date=July 24, 2011 |archive-date=November 26, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101126181317/http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/19950407/REVIEWS/504070308/1023 |url-status=dead}}</ref> He also gave favorable reviews of controversial films relating to ] or Catholicism, including '']'' (1988),<ref>{{cite news| last=Ebert| first=Roger| date=August 12, 1988| title=The Last Temptation of Christ| work=Chicago Sun-Times| url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/the-last-temptation-of-christ-1998| access-date=May 3, 2024| archive-date=February 23, 2024| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240223153806/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/the-last-temptation-of-christ-1998| url-status=live}}</ref> '']'' (2004), and ]'s religious satire '']'' (1999).<ref>{{cite news |first=Roger |last=Ebert |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/dogma-1999 |title=Dogma |date=November 12, 1999 |newspaper=] |via=] |access-date=April 23, 2022 |archive-date=April 23, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220423230809/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/dogma-1999 |url-status=live }}</ref> He defended ]'s '']'': "Some of the advance articles about this movie have suggested that it is an incitement to racial violence. Those articles say more about their authors than about the movie. I believe that any good-hearted person, white or black, will come out of this movie with sympathy for all of the characters. Lee does not ask us to forgive them, or even to understand everything they do, but he wants us to identify with their fears and frustrations. ''Do the Right Thing'' doesn't ask its audiences to choose sides; it is scrupulously fair to both sides, in a story where it is our society itself that is not fair."<ref>{{cite news| last=Ebert| first=Roger| date=June 30, 1989| title=Do the Right Thing| work=Chicago Sun-Times}}</ref> | |||
===Contrarian reviews=== | |||
] later noted that Ebert tended to give more lenient ratings than most critics. His average film rating was 71%, if translated into a percentage, compared to 59% for the site as a whole. Of his reviews, 75% were positive and 75% of his ratings were better than his colleagues.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.metacritic.com/feature/remembering-roger-ebert |website=] |title=Remembering Roger Ebert: His reviews |access-date=October 20, 2017 |archive-date=November 23, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171123140724/http://www.metacritic.com/feature/remembering-roger-ebert |url-status=dead }}</ref> Ebert had acknowledged in 2008 that he gave higher ratings on average than other critics, though he said this was in part because he considered a rating of 3 out of 4 stars to be the general threshold for a film to get a "thumbs up."<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/you-give-out-too-many-stars |title=You give out too many stars |first=Roger |last=Ebert |website=www.rogerebert.com/ |date=December 14, 2012 |access-date=July 15, 2021 |archive-date=August 16, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210816125632/https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/you-give-out-too-many-stars |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
Writing in '']'' about Ebert's reviews, Will Sloan argued that "here were inevitably movies where he veered from consensus, but he was not provocative or idiosyncratic by nature."<ref name="sloan-hazlitt">{{cite web |url=https://hazlitt.net/feature/roger-eberts-zero-star-movies |title=Roger Ebert's Zero-Star Movies |website=] |last=Sloan |first=Will |date=February 21, 2017 |access-date=March 10, 2019 |archive-date=September 4, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180904192043/https://hazlitt.net/feature/roger-eberts-zero-star-movies |url-status=live }}</ref> Examples of Ebert dissenting from other critics include his negative reviews of such celebrated films as ] ("marred by sophomoric satire and cheap shots"),<ref>{{cite news |last=Ebert |first=Roger |title=Blue Velvet |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/blue-velvet-1986 |newspaper=] |access-date=January 2, 2021 |date=September 19, 1986 |via=] |archive-date=April 27, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210427124003/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/blue-velvet-1986 |url-status=live }}</ref> '']'' ("a paranoid right-wing fantasy masquerading as an ] warning"),<ref>{{cite news |first=Roger |last=Ebert |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/a-clockwork-orange-1972 |title=A Clockwork Orange |newspaper=] |date=February 2, 1972 |access-date=April 23, 2022 |archive-date=July 1, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190701195957/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/a-clockwork-orange-1972 |url-status=live }}</ref> and '']'' ("To the degree that I do understand, I don't care").<ref>{{cite news |first=Roger |last=Ebert |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/the-usual-suspects-1995 |title=The Usual Suspects |newspaper=] |date=August 18, 1995 |access-date=April 23, 2022 |archive-date=April 26, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200426171724/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/the-usual-suspects-1995 |url-status=live }}</ref> He gave only two out of four stars to the widely acclaimed '']'', calling it "very hard to follow"<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/brazil-1986 | title=Brazil movie review & film summary (1986) | Roger Ebert | access-date=July 28, 2023 | archive-date=February 13, 2021 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210213230759/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/brazil-1986 | url-status=live }}</ref> and is the only critic on ] to not like it.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/1003033-brazil | title=Brazil - Rotten Tomatoes | website=] | access-date=July 28, 2023 | archive-date=November 7, 2023 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231107110259/https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/1003033-brazil | url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
He gave a one-star review to the critically acclaimed ] film '']'', which won the '']'' at the ].<ref>{{cite news |last=Ebert |first=Roger |title=Taste of Cherry |newspaper=] |date=February 27, 1998 |url=http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/taste-of-cherry-1998 |access-date=July 31, 2017 |via=] |archive-date=April 27, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210427124019/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/taste-of-cherry-1998 |url-status=live }}</ref> Ebert later added the film to a list of his most-hated movies of all time.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.rogerebert.com/rogers-journal/eberts-most-hated |work=] |title=Ebert's Most Hated |access-date=July 31, 2017 |archive-date=August 2, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130802044414/http://www.rogerebert.com/rogers-journal/eberts-most-hated |url-status=live }}</ref> He was dismissive of the 1988 ] action film '']'', stating that "inappropriate and wrongheaded interruptions reveal the fragile nature of the plot".<ref>{{cite news |last=Ebert |first=Roger |title=Die Hard |url=http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/19880715/REVIEWS/807150301/1023 |access-date=September 4, 2009 |work=] |date=July 15, 1988 |archive-date=March 2, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110302012747/http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/19880715/REVIEWS/807150301/1023 |url-status=dead |via=]}}</ref> His positive 3 out of 4 stars review of 1997's '']'', "Movies like this embrace goofiness with an almost sensual pleasure"<ref>{{cite web |last1=Ebert |first1=Roger |title=Speed 2: Cruise Control movie review (1997) {{!}} Roger Ebert |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/speed-2-cruise-control-1997 |website=] |access-date=February 14, 2023 |language=en |archive-date=July 23, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130723055317/http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/speed-2-cruise-control-1997 |url-status=live }}</ref> is one of only three positive reviews accounting for that film's 4% approval rating on the reviewer aggregator website ], one of the two others having been written by his ''At the Movies'' co-star Gene Siskel.<ref>{{cite web |title=Speed 2 - Cruise Control (1997) |url=http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/speed_2_cruise_control/ |website=] |access-date=March 3, 2019 |archive-date=April 30, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190430074753/https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/speed_2_cruise_control |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
Ebert reflected on his ''Speed 2'' review in 2013, and wrote that it was "Frequently cited as an example of what a lousy critic I am," but defended his opinion, and noted, "I'm grateful to movies that show me what I haven't seen before, and ''Speed 2'' had a cruise ship plowing right up the main street of a Caribbean village."<ref name="speed3">{{cite web |last1=Ebert |first1=Roger |title="Speed 3"--Winner of my 1999 contest {{!}} Roger Ebert {{!}} Roger Ebert |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/speed-3-winner-of-my-1999-contest |website=] |date=February 11, 2013 |access-date=February 14, 2023 |language=en |archive-date=February 14, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230214211237/https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/speed-3-winner-of-my-1999-contest |url-status=live }}</ref> In 1999, Ebert held a contest for ] students to create short films with a ''Speed 3'' theme about an object that could not stop moving.<ref name="speed3"/> The winning entrant was set on a roller coaster and was screened at Ebertfest that year.<ref name="speed3"/> | |||
===Other interests=== | |||
In addition to film, Ebert occasionally wrote about other topics for the ''Sun-Times'', such as music. In 1970, Ebert wrote the first published concert review of singer-songwriter ], who at the time was working as a mailman and performing at Chicago folk clubs.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Ebert |first1=Roger |title=John Prine: American Legend {{!}} Balder and Dash {{!}} Roger Ebert |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/balder-and-dash/john-prine-american-legend |website=www.rogerebert.com |date=November 14, 2010 |access-date=March 30, 2020 |language=en |archive-date=March 31, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200331072627/https://www.rogerebert.com/balder-and-dash/john-prine-american-legend |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
Ebert was a lifelong reader, and said he had "more or less every book I have owned since I was seven, starting with '']''." Among the authors he considered indispensable were ], ], ], ] and ].<ref>{{Cite web |last=Ebert |first=Roger |date=October 5, 2009 |title=Books do furnish a life |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/books-do-furnish-a-life |access-date=February 12, 2023 |archive-date=February 12, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230212233554/https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/books-do-furnish-a-life |url-status=live }}</ref> He writes of his friend ]: "He approached literature like a gourmet. He relished it, savored it, inhaled it, and after memorizing it rolled it on his tongue and spoke it aloud. It was Nack who already knew in the early 1960s, when he was a very young man, that ] was perhaps the supreme stylist of modern novelists. He recited to me from ''],'' and from '']'' and ]. I was spellbound." Every time Ebert saw Nack, he'd ask him to recite the last lines of '']''.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Ebert |first=Roger |date=October 17, 2010 |title=The storyteller and the stallion |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/the-storyteller-and-the-stallion |access-date=January 30, 2023 |archive-date=January 30, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230130044333/https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/the-storyteller-and-the-stallion |url-status=live }}</ref> Reviewing '']'', he wrote: "get me in conversation with another reader, and I'll recite titles, too. Have you ever read '']''? '']''? '']''? Ever heard of that most despairing of all travel books, ''The Saddest Pleasure'', by Moritz Thomsen? Does anybody hold up better than ] and Willa Cather? Know any ] by heart? Surely ] is as great at what he does as Shakespeare was at what he did."<ref>{{cite news| last=Ebert| first=Roger| title=Stone Reader| date=July 11, 2003| work=Chicago Sun Times| url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/stone-reader-2003| access-date=April 10, 2024| archive-date=June 2, 2023| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230602122346/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/stone-reader-2003| url-status=live}}</ref> Among contemporary authors he admired ], and credited '']'' with reviving his love of reading after his illness.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Ebert |first=Roger |date=October 24, 2008 |title=I think I'm musing my mind |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/i-think-im-musing-my-mind |access-date=February 25, 2023 |archive-date=February 25, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230225160338/https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/i-think-im-musing-my-mind |url-status=live }}</ref> He also loved ], particularly praising ]'s reading of ].<ref>{{cite web| last=Ebert| first=Roger| title=My new job. In his own words.| date=December 14, 2012| url=https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/my-new-job-in-his-own-words| access-date=April 10, 2024| archive-date=December 5, 2023| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231205093341/https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/my-new-job-in-his-own-words| url-status=live}}</ref> He was a fan of ]'s '']'', which he read in French.<ref>{{cite news| last=Ebert| first=Roger| title=Tintin! Tonnere de Brest! Mille sebords!| date=December 20, 2011| work=Chicago Sun-Times| url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/the-adventures-of-tintin-2011| access-date=April 8, 2024| archive-date=May 7, 2013| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130507121446/http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/the-adventures-of-tintin-2011| url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
Ebert first visited ] in 1966 with his professor ], who "started me on a lifelong practice of wandering around London. From 1966 to 2006, I visited London never less than once a year and usually more than that. Walking the city became a part of my education, and in this way I learned a little about architecture, British watercolors, music, theater and above all people. I felt a freedom in London I've never felt elsewhere. I made lasting friends. The city lends itself to walking, can be intensely exciting at eye level, and is being eaten alive block by block by brutal corporate leg-lifting." Ebert and Curley coauthored ''The Perfect London Walk''.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Engelhart |first=Katie |date=July 12, 2013 |title=Roger Ebert's Pilgrimage |work=] |url=https://slate.com/culture/2013/07/roger-eberts-lost-book-the-perfect-london-walk-reviewed.html |access-date=January 30, 2023 |archive-date=January 30, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230130044333/https://slate.com/culture/2013/07/roger-eberts-lost-book-the-perfect-london-walk-reviewed.html |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
Ebert attended the ] at the ] for many years. It was there that he coined the Boulder Pledge: "Under no circumstances will I ever purchase anything offered to me as the result of an unsolicited e-mail message. Nor will I forward chain letters, petitions, mass mailings, or virus warnings to large numbers of others. This is my contribution to the survival of the online community."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.panix.com/~tbetz/boulder.shtml |title=Critical eye by Roger Ebert – Enough! A Modest Proposal to End the Junk Mail Plague |website=Panix.com |access-date=October 17, 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090916074641/http://www.panix.com/~tbetz/boulder.shtml |archive-date=September 16, 2009 |url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.lumbercartel.ca/glossary/boulderpledge.pl |publisher=The Lumber Cartel, local 42 |title=Roger Ebert gets 'two thumbs up' from the Lumber Cartel for this distinct, well-written pledge |access-date=November 14, 2006 |archive-date=July 6, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110706185005/http://www.lumbercartel.ca/glossary/boulderpledge.pl |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |first=Bill |last=Weiman |url=http://bw.org/ube/boulder.html |title=Bill Weinman · Why I Keep The Boulder Pledge |website=Bw.org |access-date=January 27, 2017 |archive-date=December 27, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161227194551/http://bw.org/ube/boulder.html |url-status=live }}</ref> Starting in 1975, he hosted a program called Cinema Interruptus, where would analyze a film with an audience, and anyone could say "Stop!" to point out anything they found interesting. He wrote "] is my hometown in an alternate universe. I have walked its streets by day and night, in rain, snow, and sunshine. I have made life-long friends there. I was in my twenties when I first came to the Conference on World Affairs and was greeted by ], its choleric founder, with 'Who invited you back?' Since then I have appeared on countless panels panels where I have learned and rehearsed debatemanship, the art of talking to anybody about anything." In 2009, Ebert invited ] to join him in analyzing Bahrani's film ] a frame at a time. The next year, they invited Werner Herzog to join them in analyzing '']''. After that, Ebert announced that he would not return to the conference: "It is fueled by speech, and I'm out of gas ... But I went there for my adult lifetime and had a hell of a good time."<ref>{{Cite book |last=Ebert |first=Roger |title=Life Itself |year=2011 |pages=189–191}}</ref> | |||
===Relations with filmmakers=== | |||
Ebert wrote ]'s first review, for '']'', and predicted the director could be "an American Fellini someday."<ref name=Who'sThat/> He later wrote, "Of the directors who started making films since I came on the job, the best is Martin Scorsese. His camera is active, not passive. It doesn’t regard events, it participates in them. There is a sequence in '']'' that follows Henry Hill’s last day of freedom, before the cops swoop down. Scorsese uses an accelerating pacing and a paranoid camera that keeps looking around, and makes us feel what Hill feels. It is easy enough to make an audience feel basic emotions ('Play them like a piano,' Hitchcock advised), but hard to make them share a state of mind. Scorsese can do it."<ref name=Twenty-Five/> In 2000, Scorsese joined Ebert on his show in choosing the best films of the 1990s.<ref name=Scorsese/> | |||
Ebert was an admirer of ], and conducted a Q&A session with him at the ] in 1999. It was there that Herzog read his "Minnesota Declaration" which defined his idea of "ecstatic truth."<ref>{{Cite web |last=Ebert |first=Roger |date=April 30, 1999 |title=Herzog's Minnesota Declaration: Defining 'ecstatic truth' |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/herzogs-minnesota-declaration-defining-ecstatic-truth |website=RogerEbert.com |access-date=April 18, 2023 |archive-date=April 18, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230418224831/https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/herzogs-minnesota-declaration-defining-ecstatic-truth |url-status=live }}</ref> Herzog dedicated his '']'' to Ebert, and Ebert responded with an open letter of gratitude.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=%2F20071117%2FPEOPLE%2F71117002 |title=Roger Ebert. "A letter to Werner Herzog: In praise of rapturous truth" rogerebert.com November 17, 2007 |work=Chicago Sun-Times |date=November 17, 2007 |access-date=October 17, 2009 |archive-date=December 31, 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081231100314/http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071117/PEOPLE/71117002 |url-status=dead }}</ref> Ebert often quoted something Herzog told him: "our civilization is starving for new images."<ref>{{Cite web |last=Ebert |first=Roger |date=August 28, 2005 |title=A conversation with Werner Herzog |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/interviews/a-conversation-with-werner-herzog |access-date=April 18, 2023 |archive-date=April 18, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230418224832/https://www.rogerebert.com/interviews/a-conversation-with-werner-herzog |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
When ]'s '']'' (2003) premiered at ], Ebert called it the worst film in the history of the festival. Gallo responded by putting a curse on his colon and a hex on his prostate. Ebert replied, "I had a colonoscopy once, and they let me watch it on TV. It was more entertaining than ''The Brown Bunny.''" Gallo called Ebert a "fat pig". Ebert replied: "It is true that I am fat, but one day I will be thin, and he will still be the director of ''The Brown Bunny.''"<ref>{{cite news| author=Roger Ebert| title=Gallo goes on the offensive after 'Bunny' flop| work=Chicago Sun Times| url=https://www.rogerebert.com/festivals/gallo-goes-on-the-offensive-after-bunny-flop}}</ref> Ebert gave the director's cut a positive review, writing that Gallo "is not the director of the same ''Brown Bunny'' I saw at Cannes, and the film now plays so differently that I suggest the original Cannes cut be included as part of the eventual DVD, so that viewers can see for themselves how 26 minutes of aggressively pointless and empty footage can sink a potentially successful film...Make no mistake: The Cannes version was a bad film, but now Gallo's editing has set free the good film inside."<ref>{{cite news| author=Roger Ebert| title=Revised editing releases a much improved 'Brown Bunny'| work=Chicago Sun-Times| date=September 3, 2004| url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/the-brown-bunny-2004}}</ref> | |||
In 2005, '']'' critic ] wrote that the year’s Best Picture Nominees were "ignored, unloved and turned down flat by most of the same studios that … bankroll hundreds of sequels, including a follow-up to ''Deuce Bigalow: Male Gigolo,'' a film that was sadly overlooked at Oscar time because apparently nobody had the foresight to invent a category for Best Running Penis Joke Delivered by a Third-Rate Comic." Rob Schneider responded in an open letter: "Well, Mr. Goldstein, I decided to do some research to find out what awards you have won. I went online and found that you have won nothing. Absolutely nothing. No journalistic awards of any kind … Maybe you didn’t win a Pulitzer Prize because they haven’t invented a category for Best Third-Rate, Unfunny Pompous Reporter Who’s Never Been Acknowledged by His Peers." Reviewing '']'', Ebert responded: "Reading this, I was about to observe that Schneider can dish it out but he can’t take it. Then I found he’s not so good at dishing it out, either. I went online and found that Patrick Goldstein has won a National Headliner Award, a Los Angeles Press Club Award, a RockCritics.com award, and the Publicists’ Guild award for lifetime achievement ... Schneider is correct, and Patrick Goldstein has not yet won a Pulitzer Prize. Therefore, Goldstein is not qualified to complain that Columbia financed ''Deuce Bigalow: European Gigolo'' while passing on the opportunity to participate in ''],'' '']'', ''],'' '']'' and ''].'' As chance would have it, I ''have'' won the Pulitzer Prize, and so I am qualified. Speaking in my official capacity as a Pulitzer Prize winner, Mr. Schneider, your movie sucks."<ref>{{cite news| title='Bigalow' reaches new giga-low| author=Roger Ebert| date=August 11, 2005| work=]| url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/deuce-bigalow-european-gigolo-2005}}</ref> After Ebert's cancer surgery, he received a bouquet from "Your Least Favorite Movie Star, Rob Schneider". Ebert wrote of the flowers, "They were a reminder, if I needed one, that although Rob Schneider might (in my opinion) have made a bad movie, he is not a bad man, and no doubt tried to make a wonderful movie, and hopes to again. I hope so, too."<ref>{{cite news| title=A bouquet arrives...| work=Roger Ebert's Journal| url=https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/a-bouquet-arrives}}</ref> | |||
===Views on technology=== | |||
Ebert was a strong advocate for ] 48, in which the movie projector runs at 48 frames per second, as compared to the usual 24 frames per second. He was opposed to the practice whereby theaters lower the intensity of their projector bulbs in order to extend the life of the bulb, arguing that this has little effect other than to make the film harder to see.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060219/ANSWERMAN/602190302/1023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070420012335/http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060219/ANSWERMAN/602190302/1023 |url-status=dead |archive-date=April 20, 2007 |title=Ebert's "Movie Answer Man column", February 19, 2006 |work=Chicago Sun-Times |access-date=October 17, 2009 }}</ref> Ebert was skeptical of the resurgence of ], which he found unrealistic and distracting.<ref>{{cite news |first=Roger |last=Ebert |url=http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2008/08/dminus_for_3d.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080817035951/http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2008/08/dminus_for_3d.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=August 17, 2008 |title=D-minus for 3-D |newspaper=] |date=August 16, 2008 |access-date=October 17, 2009 }}</ref> | |||
In 2005, Ebert opined that video games are not art, and are inferior to media created through authorial control, such as film and literature, stating, "video games can be elegant, subtle, sophisticated, challenging and visually wonderful," but "the nature of the medium prevents it from moving beyond craftsmanship to the stature of art."<ref>{{cite web |first=Roger |last=Ebert |url=http://www.rogerebert.com/answer-man/why-did-the-chicken-cross-the-genders |title=Why did the chicken cross the genders? |website=] |date=November 27, 2005 |access-date=December 19, 2013 |archive-date=December 20, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131220104729/http://www.rogerebert.com/answer-man/why-did-the-chicken-cross-the-genders |url-status=live }}</ref> This resulted in negative reaction from video game enthusiasts,<ref>{{cite news |url=http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20051206/COMMENTARY/51206002 |first=Roger |last=Ebert |title=Gamers fire flaming posts, e-mails ... |date=December 6, 2005 |website=] |access-date=March 8, 2022 |archive-date=June 22, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120622031553/http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20051206/COMMENTARY/51206002 |url-status=dead}}</ref> such as writer ], who defended ]. Ebert wrote a further piece in response to Barker.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070721/COMMENTARY/70721001 |first=Roger |last=Ebert |title=Games vs. Art: Ebert vs. Barker |publisher=] |date=July 21, 2007 |access-date=March 8, 2022 |archive-date=February 11, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130211235435/http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070721/COMMENTARY/70721001 |url-status=dead}}</ref> Ebert maintained his position in 2010, but conceded that he should not have expressed this skepticism without being more familiar with the actual experience of playing them. He admitted that he barely played video games: "I have played '']'' which I enormously enjoyed, and '']'' for which I lacked the patience."<ref name="lawn">{{cite web |author=Ebert, Roger |date=July 1, 2010 |url=http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2010/07/okay_kids_play_on_my_lawn.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100703023952/http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2010/07/okay_kids_play_on_my_lawn.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=July 3, 2010 |title=Okay, Kids, Play on my Lawn |website=Roger Ebert's Journal }}</ref> In the article, Ebert wrote, "It is quite possible a game could someday be great art."<ref name="lawn"/> | |||
Ebert had reviewed ''Cosmology of Kyoto'' for '']'' in 1994, and had praised the exploration, depth, and graphics found in the game, writing "This is the most beguiling computer game I have encountered, a seamless blend of information, adventure, humor, and imagination — the gruesome side-by-side with the divine."<ref name="cosmo1">{{cite magazine |last1=Ebert |first1=Roger |title=Cosmology of Kyoto |url=https://www.wired.com/1994/09/cosmology-of-kyoto/ |magazine=Wired |access-date=February 14, 2023 |archive-date=February 14, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230214204358/https://www.wired.com/1994/09/cosmology-of-kyoto/ |url-status=live }}</ref> Ebert filed one other video game-related article for ''Wired'' in 1994, in which he described his visit to ]'s ] arcade in Tokyo.<ref name="wired2">{{cite magazine |last1=Ebert |first1=Roger |title=Sega's Tokyo Joypolis |url=https://www.wired.com/1994/12/segas-tokyo-joypolis/ |magazine=Wired |access-date=February 14, 2023 |archive-date=February 14, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230214204358/https://www.wired.com/1994/12/segas-tokyo-joypolis/ |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
=== Appearances in other media === | |||
Ebert provided DVD ] for '']'' (1941), ] (1942), '']'' (1970) and '']'' (1998). For the ], he recorded commentaries for '']'' (1959) and ] (1994), the latter with director ]. Ebert was also interviewed by ] for an extra feature on the DVD release of '']'' (1988). | |||
In 1982, 1983 and 1985, ] and Ebert appeared as themselves on '']''.<ref>{{cite episode|title=Chevy Chase|series=]|air-date=September 25, 1982|season=8|number=1}}</ref><ref>{{cite episode|title=Brandon Tartikoff|series=]|air-date=October 8, 1983|season=9|number=1}}</ref> For their first two appearances, they reviewed sketches from that night's telecast; for their last, they reviewed sketches from the "SNL Film Festival".<ref>{{cite web|url=https://vulture.com/2015/11/the-night-siskel-and-ebert-took-over-snl.html|title=The Night Siskel and Ebert Took Over 'SNL'|work=] |date=November 18, 2015|first=Joe|last=Blevins|accessdate=July 19, 2022|archive-date=July 1, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220701192453/https://www.vulture.com/2015/11/the-night-siskel-and-ebert-took-over-snl.html|url-status=live}}</ref> In 1991, Siskel and Ebert appeared in the '']'' segment "Sneak Peek Previews" (a parody of ''Sneak Previews'').<ref name="Sesame Street">{{Cite web|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RMlioyKsaQg|title=Sesame Street - "Sneak Peek Previews" with SISKEL & EBERT!|date=December 12, 2006 |via=www.youtube.com|access-date=August 12, 2023|archive-date=August 15, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230815115636/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RMlioyKsaQg|url-status=live}}</ref> That year, the two were in the show's celebrity version of "]".<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=maYnqbdo2jw|title=Sesame Street - Monster in the Mirror (celebrity version)|date=March 26, 2007 |via=www.youtube.com|access-date=August 12, 2023|archive-date=August 12, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230812195853/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=maYnqbdo2jw|url-status=live}}</ref> In 1995, Siskel and Ebert guest-starred on an episode of the animated sitcom '']''. In the episode, a parody of ''],'' Siskel and Ebert split and each wants protagonist Jay Sherman, a fellow film critic, as his new partner.<ref name="The Critic">{{cite web|url=https://siskelebert.org/?p=6377|title=The Critic (cartoon) with the Voices of Gene and Roger, 1995|website=Siskel And Ebert Movie Reviews|accessdate=June 21, 2022|archive-date=July 2, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220702013558/https://siskelebert.org/?p=6377|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
In 1997, Ebert appeared in ], a documentary by ] and ]<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0125459/fullcredits?ref_=tt_ov_st_sm |title=Pitch (1997) Full cast & crew |website=IMDb |access-date=January 27, 2017 |archive-date=March 16, 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160316044758/http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0125459/fullcredits?ref_=tt_ov_st_sm |url-status=live }}</ref> and the Chicago-set television series '']'',<ref name="The Cat">{{cite episode|title=The Cat|series=]|airdate=April 13, 1997|season=1|number=19}}</ref> where consoles a young boy who is depressed after he sees the character Bosco the Bunny die in a movie.<ref name=Questions>{{cite book |title=Questions for the Movie Answer Man |last=Ebert |first=Roger |date=June 1, 1997 |publisher=Andrews McMeel Publishing |location=Kansas City, Missouri |page= |isbn=0-8362-2894-4 |quote=In the Spring of 1997, I did a guest appearance on the show, consoling a little boy who was depressed that Bosco the Bunny had died. |url=https://archive.org/details/questionsformovi00eber/page/99}}</ref> Ebert made a ] in '']'' (2003).<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.hometheatersound.com/dvd/abby_singer.htm |title=Abby Singer |website=Home Theater & Sound |date=November 2007 |access-date=January 2, 2017 |archive-date=March 22, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190322165726/http://www.hometheatersound.com/dvd/abby_singer.htm |url-status=live }}</ref> In 2004, Ebert appeared in ''Sesame Street'''s direct-to-video special ''A Celebration of Me, Grover'', delivering a review of the '']'' segment "The King and I".<ref>{{cite web|url=https://imdb.com/title/tt31224538/|title=Sesame Street: A Celebration of Me, Grover (Video 2004)|website=]|accessdate=July 19, 2022|archive-date=May 6, 2024|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240506050941/https://www.imdb.com/title/tt31224538/|url-status=live}}</ref> Ebert was one of the principal critics featured in ]'s 2009 documentary '']''. He discusses the dynamics of appearing with Gene Siskel on the 1970s show ''Coming to a Theatre Near You'', the predecessor of ''Sneak Previews'' on Chicago PBS station WTTW, and expresses approval of the proliferation of young people writing film reviews today on the internet.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title.jsp?stid=775058 |title=For the Love of Movies: The Story of American Film Criticism |website=] |access-date=December 16, 2012 |archive-date=May 16, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200516023321/http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/775058/For-the-Love-of-Movies-The-Story-of-American-Film-Criticism/ |url-status=live }}</ref> On October 22, 2010, Ebert appeared with ] on ] during their "The Essentials" series. Ebert selected '']'' (1957) and '']'' (1941).<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.tcm.com/this-month/article/339775%7c0/Critic-s-Choice-TCM-Spotlight-.html |title=Critic's Choice Introduction |author=Fristoe, Roger |publisher=TCM Film Article |access-date=April 30, 2015 |archive-date=September 4, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150904052102/http://www.tcm.com/this-month/article/339775%7c0/Critic-s-Choice-TCM-Spotlight-.html |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
A "Mayor Ebert" (]) appeared in the ] '']''. In his review, Ebert wrote: "Now that I've inspired a character in a Godzilla movie, all I really still desire is for several ] characters to sit in a circle and read my reviews to one another in hushed tones."<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/godzilla-1998 |last=Ebert |first=Roger |title=Godzilla movie review & film summary (1998) | Roger Ebert |access-date=April 8, 2024 |archive-date=April 4, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200404101113/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/godzilla-1998 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
==Personal life== | |||
] (left) giving the thumbs up to ] (right) at the ] in 2010|alt=Three people are smiling with Hawaiian leis around their necks.]] | |||
=== Marriage === | |||
Discussing his beliefs, in 2009 Ebert wrote that he did not "want to provide a category for people to apply to " because he "would not want convictions reduced to a word", and stated, "I have never said, although readers have freely informed me I am an atheist, an agnostic, or at the very least a ] – which I am".<ref name="EbertGod">{{cite news|url= http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2009/04/how_i_believe_in_g.html | |||
At age 50, Ebert married trial attorney ]<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.newspapers.com/clip/67702842/1991-roger-ebert-to-marry-chaz/ |title=Roger Ebert getting married |work=Messenger-Inquirer |date=July 9, 1991 |access-date=June 2, 2022 |archive-date=June 2, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220602133320/https://www.newspapers.com/clip/67702842/1991-roger-ebert-to-marry-chaz/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.newspapers.com/clip/67703511/1992-ebert-marries-hammelsmith/ |title=Clipping from Public Opinion |work=Public Opinion |date=July 20, 1992 |access-date=June 2, 2022 |archive-date=June 2, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220602133321/https://www.newspapers.com/clip/67703511/1992-ebert-marries-hammelsmith/ |url-status=live }}</ref> in 1992.<ref name=ChicagoMag/><ref>{{Cite news |last=Lewine |first=Edward |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/13/magazine/a-film-critics-windy-city-home.html |title=A Film Critic's Windy City Home |date=February 13, 2005 |work=The New York Times |access-date=May 2, 2022 |language=en-US |issn=0362-4331 |archive-date=May 3, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220503214300/https://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/13/magazine/a-film-critics-windy-city-home.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Hunt |first1=Drew |url=http://people2014.chicagoreader.com/chaz-ebert/ |title=Chaz Ebert: The Media Mogul |work=The Chicago Reader |access-date=May 2, 2022 |archive-date=May 26, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220526202531/http://people2014.chicagoreader.com/chaz-ebert/ |url-status=live }}</ref> Chaz Ebert became vice president of the Ebert Company and has ] Ebertfest.<ref>{{cite news |last=Merli |first=Melissa |date=April 25, 2007 |title=Ebert will have best seat in the house |newspaper=News-Gazette |location=Champaign, Illinois |url=http://www.news-gazette.com/news/local/2007-04-25/ebert-will-have-best-seat-house.html |access-date=May 15, 2022 |archive-date=May 6, 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240506051111/https://www.news-gazette.com/news/ebert-will-have-best-seat-in-the-house/article_7cb8efcf-daef-501d-9cd3-678867a58307.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="Esquire">{{cite web |last=Jones |first=Chris |date=February 16, 2010 |title=Roger Ebert: The Essential Man |url=http://www.esquire.com/features/roger-ebert-0310 |website=] |access-date=February 16, 2010 |archive-date=September 23, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110923172438/http://www.esquire.com/features/roger-ebert-0310 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Caruso |first=Michael |date=January 21, 2020 |title=New year, new semester: what's in store for Spring 2020 |url=https://dailyillini.com/news/2020/01/21/spring-2020-campus-events/ |access-date=April 27, 2022 |website=The Daily Illini |archive-date=May 18, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210518211801/https://dailyillini.com/news/2020/01/21/spring-2020-campus-events/ |url-status=live }}</ref> He explained in his memoir, ''Life Itself'', that he did not want to marry before his mother died, as he was afraid of displeasing her.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://rogerebert.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20130404/MEMORY/130409989 |title=Roger Ebert (1942–2013) |first=Neil |last=Steinberg |newspaper=] |via=] |date=April 4, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130407034401/http://rogerebert.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20130404/MEMORY/130409989 |archive-date=April 7, 2013 |url-status=dead |access-date=May 16, 2022}}</ref> In a July 2012 blog entry, Ebert wrote about Chaz, "She fills my horizon, she is the great fact of my life, she has my love, she saved me from the fate of living out my life alone, which is where I seemed to be heading... She has been with me in sickness and in health, certainly far more sickness than we could have anticipated. I will be with her, strengthened by her example. She continues to make my life possible, and her presence fills me with love and a deep security. That's what a marriage is for. Now I know."<ref name="Chicago Sun-Times Roger Loves Chaz">{{cite news |last=Ebert |first=Roger |title=Roger loves Chaz |url=http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2012/07/roger_loves_chaz.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120719072437/http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2012/07/roger_loves_chaz.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=July 19, 2012 |newspaper=] |date=July 17, 2012}}</ref> | |||
|title= How I believe in God|accessdate= November 5, 2009|author= Roger Ebert|date= April 17, 2009|work=Chicago Sun-Times}}</ref> In the same blog entry, he also said "I am not a believer, not an atheist, not an agnostic. I am still awake at night, asking ''how''?{{efn|The question ''how'' in these last sentences of the blog entry refers back to its first paragraph in which Ebert writes that as a second-grader he would lie awake at night asking himself the questions "''But how could God have no beginning? And how could he have no end?''".<ref name="EbertGod" />}} I am more content with the question than I would be with an answer."<ref name="EbertGod" /><ref name="Mass">Caro, Mark (April 9, 2013) ''Chicago Tribune''. Retrieved April 9, 2013.</ref> In March 2013, he wrote: "I support freedom of choice. My choice is to not support abortion, except in cases of a clear-cut choice between the lives of the mother and child. A child conceived through incest or rape is innocent and deserves the right to be born." He also stated: "I consider myself Catholic, lock, stock and barrel, with this technical loophole: I cannot believe in God. I refuse to call myself an atheist however, because that indicates too great a certainty about the unknowable."<ref>Ebert, Roger (March 1, 2013) ''Roger Ebert's Journal''. Retrieved April 11, 2013.</ref> | |||
=== Alcoholism recovery === | |||
On April 25, 2011, he achieved one of his long-time goals: winning one of the weekly caption contests in '']'' after more than 100 attempts.<ref>, Robert Mankoff, '']'', April 25, 2011</ref> | |||
Ebert was a recovering alcoholic, having quit drinking in 1979. He was a member of ] and had written some blog entries on the subject.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.rogerebert.com/rogers-journal/my-name-is-roger-and-im-an-alcoholic |title=My Name is Roger, and I'm an alcoholic |date=August 25, 2009 |access-date=August 25, 2009 |first=Roger |last=Ebert |archive-date=April 27, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210427123959/https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/my-name-is-roger-and-im-an-alcoholic |url-status=live }}</ref> Ebert was a longtime friend of ], and Winfrey credited him with persuading her to syndicate '']'',<ref>{{cite web |url=http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20051116/COMMENTARY/511160301 |title=How I gave Oprah her start |first=Roger |last=Ebert |newspaper=] |date=November 16, 2005 |access-date=March 8, 2022 |archive-date=June 21, 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080621204816/http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20051116/COMMENTARY/511160301 |url-status=dead}}</ref> which became the highest-rated talk show in American television history.<ref name="Forbes Oprah">{{cite news |last=Rose |first=Lacey |title=America's Top-Earning Black Stars |url=https://www.forbes.com/2009/01/29/oprah-will-smith-business-media-0129_black_stars.html |website=] |date=January 29, 2009 |access-date=September 11, 2017 |archive-date=June 20, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120620041722/http://www.forbes.com/2009/01/29/oprah-will-smith-business-media-0129_black_stars.html |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
===Health=== | ===Health=== | ||
] in September 2002, shortly after his cancer diagnosis]] | ] in September 2002, shortly after his cancer diagnosis|alt=An image of a woman in a red dress speaking with a man, both sitting down.]] | ||
In |
In February 2002, Ebert was diagnosed with ] which was successfully removed.{{sfn|Singer|2023|p=243}} In 2003, he underwent surgery for ], which was followed up by ]. He was again diagnosed with cancer in 2006. In June of that year, he had a ] to remove cancerous tissue in the right side of his jaw.<ref name="email">{{cite web |last=Ebert |first=Roger |date=August 17, 2006 |title=Email from Roger |url=http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060817/PEOPLE/60817001 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060820123705/http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060817/PEOPLE/60817001 |archive-date=August 20, 2006 |access-date=January 18, 2024 |website=RogerEbert.com}}</ref> A week later he had a life-threatening complication when his ] burst near the surgery site.<ref>{{cite web |last=Ebert |first=Roger |date=June 29, 2007 |title=Sicko Movie Review & Film Summary |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/sicko-2007 |access-date=February 9, 2021 |website=] |archive-date=February 9, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210209054957/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/sicko-2007 |url-status=live }}</ref> He was confined to bed rest and was unable to speak, eat, or drink for a time, necessitating the use of a ].<ref name="blogs.suntimes.com">{{cite web |author=Ebert, Roger |date=January 6, 2010 |url=http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2010/01/nil_by_mouth.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100109083637/http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2010/01/nil_by_mouth.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=January 9, 2010 |title=Nil by mouth |website=Roger Ebert's Journal }}</ref> | ||
Ebert made his first public appearance since mid-2006 at Ebertfest on April 25, 2007. He was unable to speak, instead communicating through his wife.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070329/FILMFESTIVALS06/70329001| |
The complications kept Ebert off the air for an extended period. Ebert made his first public appearance since mid-2006 at Ebertfest on April 25, 2007. He was unable to speak, instead communicating through his wife.<ref>{{cite news |author=Jim Emerson |date=March 29, 2007 |title=Ebertfest '07: 'It's his happening and it freaks him out!' |url=http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=%2F20070329%2FFILMFESTIVALS06%2F70329001 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111114140735/http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070329/FILMFESTIVALS06/70329001 |archive-date=November 14, 2011 |access-date=September 4, 2009 |work=Chicago Sun-Times}}</ref> He returned to reviewing on May 18, 2007, when three of his reviews were published in print.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/frontpage |title=RogerEbert.com Front Page |author=Ebert, Roger |access-date=May 22, 2007 |work=Chicago Sun-Times |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070521015959/http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/frontpage/ |archive-date=May 21, 2007}}</ref> In July 2007, he revealed that he was still unable to speak.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070721/COMMENTARY/70721001 |title=RogerEbert.com commentary |access-date=July 23, 2007 |work=Chicago Sun-Times |archive-date=February 11, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130211235435/http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070721/COMMENTARY/70721001 |url-status=dead}}</ref> Ebert adopted a computerized voice system to communicate, eventually using a copy of his own voice created from his recordings by ].<ref>{{cite news |last=Lund |first=Jordan |url=http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2009/08/finding_my_own_voice.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090815000910/http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2009/08/finding_my_own_voice.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=August 15, 2009 |title=Roger Ebert's Journal: Finding my own voice 8 December 2009 |work=Chicago Sun-Times |access-date=October 17, 2009 }}</ref> | ||
In March 2010, his health trials and new computerized voice were featured on '']''.<ref>{{cite web |author=Ebert, Roger |date=February 26, 2010 |url=http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100226/PEOPLE/100229986 |title=Hello, this is me speaking |website=Roger Ebert's Journal |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100309081208/http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100226/PEOPLE/100229986 |archive-date=March 9, 2010 |url-status=dead}}</ref><ref name=KenTucker>{{cite magazine |author=] |date=March 2, 2010 |url=http://watching-tv.ew.com/2010/03/02/oprah-roger-ebert-oscars/ |title=Roger Ebert predicts the Oscars, movingly: 'No more surgery for me.' |magazine=] |access-date=March 3, 2010 |archive-date=March 5, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100305081546/http://watching-tv.ew.com/2010/03/02/oprah-roger-ebert-oscars/ |url-status=live }}</ref> In 2011, Ebert gave a ] assisted by his wife, Chaz, and friends ] and John Hunter, called "Remaking my voice"<ref>{{Cite web |last=Ebert |first=Roger |date=2011 |title=Remaking my voice |url=https://www.ted.com/talks/roger_ebert_remaking_my_voice |access-date=February 25, 2023 |archive-date=February 25, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230225022026/https://www.ted.com/talks/roger_ebert_remaking_my_voice |url-status=live }}</ref> in which, he ] to determine the verisimilitude of a synthesized voice.<ref>{{cite news |title=Roger Ebert Tests His Vocal Cords, and Comedic Delivery |url=http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/03/07/roger-ebert-tests-his-vocal-cords-and-comedic-delivery/ |newspaper=The New York Times |date=March 7, 2011 |access-date=April 4, 2013 |archive-date=April 5, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130405012559/http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/03/07/roger-ebert-tests-his-vocal-cords-and-comedic-delivery/ |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
Ebert underwent further surgery in January 2008 to hopefully restore his voice and address the complications from his previous surgeries.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080125/EDITOR/795706793|author= Emerick, Laura|title=Ebert doing well after surgery|publisher=rogerebert.com/''Chicago Sun-Times''|date=January 25, 2008}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.cbc.ca/arts/film/story/2008/01/25/ebert-roger-surgery.html|title=Thumbs up for Roger Ebert after latest bout of surgery, lawyer reports|publisher=CBC|date=January 25, 2008|accessdate=October 17, 2009}}</ref> On April 1, Ebert announced his speech had not been restored.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.suntimes.com/entertainment/870571,ebert040108.article|title="Roger Ebert: Let's go to the movies"; Chicago Sun-Times; April 1, 2008|work=Chicago Sun-Times|accessdate=October 17, 2009|archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20080404034550/http://www.suntimes.com/entertainment/870571,ebert040108.article|archivedate=Apr 4, 2008}}</ref> A further surgery was performed in April 2008 after Ebert fractured his hip in a fall.<ref name=HipSurgery>{{cite news|url=http://ebert.suntimes.com/rogers-journal/ebert-recovering-from-hip-surgery|title=Ebert recovering from hip surgery|publisher=Chicago Sun-Times |date=April 18, 2008|accessdate=Aug 20, 2013}}</ref> By 2011, Ebert was using a prosthetic chin to hide some of the damage done by his many chin, mouth, and throat surgeries.<ref>Ebert, Roger (January 19, 2011). , Roger Ebert's Journal.</ref> | |||
Ebert underwent further surgery in January 2008 to try to restore his voice and address the complications from his previous surgeries.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=%2F20080125%2FEDITOR%2F795706793 |author=Emerick, Laura |title=Ebert doing well after surgery |publisher=]/Chicago Sun-Times |date=January 25, 2008 |access-date=January 26, 2008 |archive-date=June 22, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120622015139/http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080125/EDITOR/795706793 |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/entertainment/thumbs-up-for-roger-ebert-after-latest-bout-of-surgery-lawyer-reports-1.695384 |title=Thumbs up for Roger Ebert after latest bout of surgery, lawyer reports |publisher=Canadian Broadcasting Corporation |date=January 25, 2008 |access-date=October 17, 2009 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080605081213/http://www.cbc.ca/arts/film/story/2008/01/25/ebert-roger-surgery.html |archive-date=June 5, 2008}}</ref> On April 1, Ebert announced his speech had not been restored.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.suntimes.com/entertainment/870571,ebert040108.article |title="Roger Ebert: Let's go to the movies"; ''Chicago Sun-Times''; April 1, 2008 |work=Chicago Sun-Times |access-date=October 17, 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080404034550/http://www.suntimes.com/entertainment/870571,ebert040108.article |archive-date=April 4, 2008}}</ref> Ebert underwent further surgery in April 2008 after fracturing his hip in a fall.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Ebert |first=Roger |date=April 18, 2008 |title=Ebert recovering from hip surgery |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/ebert-recovering-from-hip-surgery |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210209033027/https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/ebert-recovering-from-hip-surgery |archive-date=February 9, 2021 |access-date=February 9, 2021 |website=] |language=en}}</ref> By 2011, Ebert had a prosthetic chin made to hide some of the damage done by his many surgeries.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Ebert |first=Roger |date=January 19, 2011 |title=Leading with my chin |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/leading-with-my-chin |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210209032815/https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/leading-with-my-chin |archive-date=February 9, 2021 |access-date=February 9, 2021 |website=] |language=en}}</ref> | |||
In December 2012, Ebert was hospitalized with a fractured hip.<ref>{{cite news| url= http://www.3news.co.nz/Roger-Ebert-hospitalised-with-fractured-hip/tabid/418/articleID/279599/Default.aspx|work=3 News NZ|title=Roger Ebert hospitalised with fractured hip|date=December 7, 2012}}</ref> On April 2, 2013, he announced that he would be taking a "leave of presence" from his duties because the hip fracture was determined to be cancerous and would require radiation treatment.<ref name="NBC News cancer returns">{{cite news|last=Dawn|first=Randee|title=Roger Ebert's cancer recurs, critic takes 'leave of presence' from writing duties|url=http://todayentertainment.today.com/_news/2013/04/03/17583335-roger-eberts-cancer-recurs-critic-takes-leave-of-presence-from-writing-duties?lite|newspaper=NBC News|date=April 3, 2013}}</ref><ref name="Ebert final blog post">{{cite news|last=Ebert|first=Roger|title=A Leave of Presence|url=http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2013/04/a_leave_of_presense.html|newspaper=Chicago Sun-Times|date=April 2, 2013}}</ref> He remarked, "I'll be able at last to do what I've always fantasized about doing: reviewing only the movies I want to review."<ref name="Ebert final blog post" /> | |||
In December 2012, Ebert was hospitalized due to the fractured hip, which was subsequently determined to be the ].<ref>{{cite web |last1=Ebert |first1=Roger |date=April 2, 2013 |title=A Leave of Presence |url=http://www.rogerebert.com/rogers-journal/a-leave-of-presence |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210209032510/https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/a-leave-of-presence |archive-date=February 9, 2021 |access-date=February 9, 2021 |website=]}}</ref> | |||
==Death== | |||
Three years before his death, Ebert wrote: | |||
Ebert wrote that "what's sad about not eating" was:<blockquote>The loss of dining, not the loss of food. It may be personal, but for me, unless I'm alone, it doesn't involve dinner if it doesn't involve talking. The food and drink I can do without easily. The jokes, gossip, laughs, arguments and shared memories I miss. Sentences beginning with the words, "Remember that time?" I ran in crowds where anyone was likely to break out in a poetry recitation at any time. Me too. But not me anymore. So yes, it's sad. Maybe that's why I enjoy this blog. You don't realize it, but we're at dinner right now.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Ebert |first=Roger |date=January 6, 2010 |title=Nil by mouth |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/nil-by-mouth |website=RogerEbert.com |access-date=February 13, 2023 |archive-date=February 13, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230213232804/https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/nil-by-mouth |url-status=live }}</ref></blockquote> | |||
{{quote|I know it is coming, and I do not fear it, because I believe there is nothing on the other side of death to fear. I hope to be spared as much pain as possible on the approach path. I was perfectly content before I was born, and I think of death as the same state. What I am grateful for is the gift of intelligence, and for life, love, wonder, and laughter. You can't say it wasn't interesting. My lifetime's memories are what I have brought home from the trip. I will require them for eternity no more than that little souvenir of the ] I brought home from Paris.<ref name=Esquire />}} | |||
=== Politics === | |||
Two days before his death, Ebert ended his final blog post by saying, "So on this day of reflection I say again, thank you for going on this journey with me. I'll see you at the movies."<ref name="Ebert final blog post" /> On April 4, 2013, Ebert died at the age of 70 in Chicago as he was preparing to come home from the hospital, ending his 11-year battle with cancer.<ref name=SunTimesObit /><ref name="NPR death">{{cite news|last=Corely|first=Cheryl|title=For Pulitzer-Winning Critic Roger Ebert, Films Were A Journey|url=http://www.npr.org/2013/04/04/176194903/for-pulitzer-winner-critic-roger-ebert-films-were-a-journey|newspaper=NPR|date=April 4, 2013}}</ref><ref>http://www.esquire.com/blogs/news/roger-ebert-final-moments</ref> | |||
A supporter of the ],<ref>{{Cite web |last=Cooke |first=Rachel |date=November 6, 2011 |title=Roger Ebert: 'I'm an optimistic person' |url=http://www.theguardian.com/film/2011/nov/06/roger-ebert-cancer-life-cinema |access-date=February 13, 2022 |website=] |language=en |archive-date=February 13, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220213093759/https://www.theguardian.com/film/2011/nov/06/roger-ebert-cancer-life-cinema |url-status=live }}</ref> he wrote of how his ] schooling led him to his politics: "Through a mental process that has by now become almost instinctive, those nuns guided me into supporting ], the rightness of ], fair taxation, prudence in warfare, kindness in peacetime, help for the hungry and homeless, and equal opportunity for the races and genders. It continues to surprise me that many who consider themselves religious seem to tilt away from me."<ref name="EbertCatholic"/> | |||
Ebert was critical of ], "a rigid feeling that you have to keep your ideas and your ways of looking at things within very narrow boundaries, or you'll offend someone. Certainly one of the purposes of journalism is to challenge that kind of thinking. And certainly one of the purposes of criticism is to break boundaries. It's also one of the purposes of art."<ref>{{cite video| title=Siskel & Ebert Advise Young Movie Critics| url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=__L9DzZIkwI}}</ref> He lamented that '']'' "has regrettably been under fire in recent years from myopic advocates of Political Correctness, who do not have a bone of irony (or humor) in their bodies, and cannot tell the difference between what is said or done in the novel, and what Twain means by it."<ref>{{cite news| author=Roger Ebert| title=The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn| date=April 2, 1993| work=Chicago Sun Times| url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/the-adventures-of-huck-finn-1993}}</ref> Ebert defended the cast and crew of ]'s '']'' (2002) during a ] screening when a white member of the audience asked “Why, with the talent yup there and yourself, make a film so empty and amoral for Asian Americans and for Americans?” Ebert responded that "What I find very offensive and condescending about your statement is nobody would say to a bunch of white filmmakers, ‘How could you do this to 'your people'?...Asian-American characters have the right to be whoever the hell they want to be. They do not have to represent 'their people'!"<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.filmthreat.com/festivals/737/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150311235020/http://www.filmthreat.com/festivals/737/ |archive-date=March 11, 2015 |date=January 19, 2012 |website=] |title=When Audiences Attack at Sundance}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Davis |first=Erik |url=http://www.movies.com/movie-news/about-that-time-roger-ebert-fought-heckler-over-justin-lin39s-39better-luck-tomorrow39/11338?wssac=164&wssaffid=news |title=About That Time Roger Ebert Fought a Heckler over Justin Lin's 'Better Luck Tomorrow |website=Movies.com |access-date=January 27, 2017 |archive-date=October 19, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171019215808/http://www.movies.com/movie-news/about-that-time-roger-ebert-fought-heckler-over-justin-lin39s-39better-luck-tomorrow39/11338?wssac=164&wssaffid=news |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Harris |first=Dana |url=http://www.indiewire.com/article/this-video-shows-exactly-what-we-lost-with-the-death-of-roger-ebert |title=This Video Shows Exactly What We Lost With the Death of Roger Ebert |website=] |date=April 4, 2013 |access-date=April 4, 2013 |archive-date=April 6, 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130406061932/http://www.indiewire.com/article/this-video-shows-exactly-what-we-lost-with-the-death-of-roger-ebert |url-status=live }}</ref> He was a supporter of the film after the incident at Sundance. | |||
His death prompted wide reaction from celebrities both in and out of the entertainment industry. U.S. President ] wrote, "Roger was the movies ... the unique power of the movies to take us somewhere magical ... The movies won't be the same without Roger".<ref name="Boston Herald reactions to death">{{cite news|title=Death of film critic Ebert elicits wide reaction|url=http://bostonherald.com/entertainment/movies/movie_news/2013/04/death_of_film_critic_ebert_elicits_wide_reaction|accessdate=April 4, 2013|newspaper=Boston Herald|agency=Associated Press|date=April 4, 2013}}</ref><ref> Retrieved April 5, 2013</ref> ] called Ebert "one of the great champions of freedom of artistic expression" and said "His personal passion for cinema was boundless, and that is sure to be his legacy for generations to come."<ref name="Boston Herald reactions to death" /> ] called Ebert's death the "end of an era", as did ], who also said that Ebert's "reviews went far deeper than simply thumbs up or thumbs down. He wrote with passion through a real knowledge of film and film history, and in doing so, helped many movies find their audiences... put television criticism on the map".<ref name="Boston Herald reactions to death" /> | |||
Ebert opposed the ], writing: "Am I against the war? Of course. Do I support our troops? Of course. They were sent to endanger their lives by zealots with occult objectives."<ref>{{cite news| last=Ebert| first=Roger| date=November 4, 2008| title=This land was made for you and me| url=https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/this-land-was-made-for-you-and-me| access-date=May 6, 2024| archive-date=March 27, 2023| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230327045924/https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/this-land-was-made-for-you-and-me| url-status=live}}</ref> He endorsed ] for re-election in ], citing the ] as one important reason for his support of Obama.<ref name=90days90reasons>{{cite web |first=Roger |last=Ebert |title=Reason 02: President Obama faced down the GOP and the health industry to finally reform American healthcare |url=http://90days90reasons.com/02.php |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120813211002/http://90days90reasons.com/02.php |url-status=dead |archive-date=August 13, 2012 |publisher=90days90reasons.com |access-date=October 25, 2012}}</ref> He was concerned about income inequality, writing: "I have no objection to financial success. I've had a lot of it myself. All of my income came from paychecks from jobs I held and books I published. I have the quaint idea that wealth should be obtained by legal and conventional means–by working, in other words–and not through the manipulation of financial scams. You're familiar with the ways bad mortgages were urged upon people who couldn't afford them, by banks who didn't care that the loans were bad. The banks made the loans and turned a profit by selling them to investors while at the same time betting against them on their own account. While Wall Street was knowingly trading the worthless paper that led to the financial collapse of 2008, executives were being paid huge bonuses."<ref>{{cite news| last=Ebert| first=Roger| title=The One Percenters| date=April 9, 2011| url=https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/the-one-percenters}}</ref> He voiced tentative support for the ] movement: "I believe the Occupiers are opposed to the lawless and destructive greed in the financial industry, and the unhealthy spread in this country between the rich and the rest." Referring to the ], he wrote: "I have also felt despair at the way financial instruments were created and manipulated to deliberately defraud the ordinary people in this country. At how home buyers were peddled mortgages they couldn't afford, and civilian investors were sold worthless 'securities' based on those bad mortgages. Wall Street felt no shame in backing paper that was intended to fail, and selling it to customers who trusted them. This is clear and documented. It is theft and fraud on a staggering scale."<ref>{{cite news| last=Ebert| first=Roger| title=Where I stand on the Occupy movement| date=December 7, 2011| url=https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/where-i-stand-on-the-occupy-movement}}</ref> He was also sympathetic to ], noting that he "speaks directly and clearly without a lot of hot air and lip flap".<ref>{{Cite web |last=Mcdevitt |first=Caitlin |title=Roger Ebert gives Ron Paul a thumbs up |url=https://www.politico.com/blogs/click/2012/01/roger-ebert-gives-ron-paul-a-thumbs-up-112544 |access-date=November 14, 2022 |website=POLITICO |date=January 27, 2012 |language=en |archive-date=November 14, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221114000613/https://www.politico.com/blogs/click/2012/01/roger-ebert-gives-ron-paul-a-thumbs-up-112544 |url-status=live }}</ref> In a review of the 2008 documentary '']'', he credited Paul with being "a lonely voice talking about the ]", proposing based on the film that the US government was "already broke".<ref>{{Cite web |last=Ebert |first=Roger |title=I.O.U.S.A. movie review & film summary (2008) {{!}} Roger Ebert |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/iousa-2008 |access-date=November 14, 2022 |website=www.rogerebert.com/ |language=en |archive-date=November 14, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221114002113/https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/iousa-2008 |url-status=live }}</ref> He opposed the ]<ref>{{cite news| last=Ebert| first=Roger| title=Traffic| date=2001| work=Chicago Sun-Times| url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/traffic-2001| access-date=May 3, 2024| archive-date=April 19, 2008| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080419071411/http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=%2F20010101%2FREVIEWS%2F101010301%2F1023| url-status=live}}</ref> and ].<ref>{{cite web| last=Ebert| first=Roger| date=January 12, 2012| title="Nobody has the right to take another life"| url=https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/nobody-has-the-right-to-take-another-life| access-date=May 3, 2024| archive-date=May 3, 2024| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240503172535/https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/nobody-has-the-right-to-take-another-life| url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
On April 7, 2013, a private memorial vigil with an open casket was held at the chapel of ] on the city's north side.<ref name="HollywoodRptrYahoo">{{cite news|last=Stamets|first=Bill|title=Roger Ebert's Funeral: 'The Vanilla Sky Opens To Welcome One of its Own Home'|url=http://movies.yahoo.com/news/roger-eberts-funeral-vanilla-sky-opens-welcome-one-050000140.html|accessdate=April 16, 2013|newspaper=The Hollywood Reporter, via Yahoo Movies|date=April 8, 2013}}</ref> | |||
Laura Emerick, his ''Sun Times'' editor, recalled: “His union sympathies began at an early age. His father, Walter, worked as an electrician, and Roger remained a member of the ] throughout his career — though after he became an independent contractor, he probably could have opted out. He famously stood with the Guild in 2004, when he wrote to then publisher John Cruickshank that ‘it would be with a heavy heart that I would go on strike against my beloved Sun-Times, but strike I will if a strike is called.'”<ref>{{cite web| title=Remembrances of Roger| date=April 9, 2012| url=https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/remembrances-of-roger}}</ref> He lamented that "Most Americans don’t understand the ], don’t understand the idea of freedom of speech, and don’t understand that it’s the responsibility of the citizen to speak out." Regarding his own freedom of speech, he said: "I write op-ed columns for the Chicago Sun-Times, and people send me e-mails saying, 'You're a movie critic. You don't know anything about politics.' Well, you know what, I'm 60 years old, and I've been interested in politics since I was on my daddy's knee.... I know a lot about politics."<ref>{{cite magazine| title=Roger Ebert Remembered| last=Rothschild| first=Matthew| date=April 4, 2013| magazine=]| url=https://progressive.org/op-eds/roger-ebert-remembered/}}</ref> | |||
In September 2013, organizers in Champaign, Illinois announced plans to raise $125,000 to build a life-size ] of Ebert in the town, to be unveiled in front of the ] at Ebertfest in 2014. The composition was selected by his widow, Chaz Ebert, and depicts Ebert sitting in the middle of three theater seats giving a "thumbs up".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.suntimes.com/entertainment/22482627-421/story.html|title=Ebert statue planned in Champaign|work=Chicago Sun-Times|date=September 12, 2013|accessdate=September 11, 2013}}</ref> | |||
=== Beliefs === | |||
The 2013 ] opened with a video tribute of Ebert at ] during the world premiere of the WikiLeaks based film '']''. Ebert had been an avid supporter of the festival since its early days. Chaz was in attendance to accept a plaque on Roger's behalf.{{citation needed|date=July 2014}} | |||
Ebert was critical of ],<ref>{{cite news| last=Ebert| first=Roger| date=December 3, 2008| title=Win Ben Stein's Mind| url=https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/win-ben-steins-mind| access-date=May 3, 2024| archive-date=May 3, 2024| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240503204052/https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/win-ben-steins-mind| url-status=live}}</ref><ref name=Evolves>{{cite news |url=http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2009/09/the_longest_thread_evolves.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090908043144/http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2009/09/the_longest_thread_evolves.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=September 8, 2009 |title=The Longest Thread Evolves |access-date=September 4, 2009 |author=Roger Ebert |date=September 4, 2009 |work=Chicago Sun-Times }}</ref> and stated that people who believe in either ] or ] beliefs such as ] or ] should not be president.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/new-agers-and-creationists-should-not-be-president |title=New Agers and Creationists should not be President |access-date=May 9, 2021 |author=Ebert, Roger |date=December 2, 2009 |work=Roger Ebert's Journal |archive-date=May 10, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210510045630/https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/new-agers-and-creationists-should-not-be-president |url-status=live }}</ref> He wrote that in Catholic school he learned of the "], which in its elegance and blinding obviousness became one of the pillars of my reasoning, explaining so many things in so many ways. It was an introduction not only to logic but to symbolism, thus opening a window into poetry, literature and the arts in general. All my life I have deplored those who interpret something only on its most simplistic level."<ref name="EbertCatholic">{{cite web| title=How I am a Roman Catholic| author=Roger Ebert| date=March 1, 2013| url=https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/how-i-am-a-roman-catholic| access-date=April 23, 2024| archive-date=March 9, 2024| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240309193226/https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/how-i-am-a-roman-catholic| url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
Ebert described himself as an agnostic on at least one occasion,<ref name=ChicagoMag /> but at other times explicitly rejected that designation; biographer Matt Singer wrote that Ebert opposed any categorization of his beliefs.{{sfn|Singer|2023|p=265}} In 2009, Ebert wrote that he did not "want convictions reduced to a word," and stated, "I have never said, although readers have freely informed me I am an atheist, an agnostic, or at the very least a ] – which I am."<ref name="EbertGod">{{cite news |url=http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2009/04/how_i_believe_in_g.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090420132015/http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2009/04/how_i_believe_in_g.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=April 20, 2009 |title=How I believe in God |access-date=November 5, 2009 |first=Roger |last=Ebert |date=April 17, 2009 |work=] }}</ref> He wrote of his ] upbringing: "I believed in the basic Church teachings because I thought they were correct, not because God wanted me to. In my mind, in the way I interpret them, I still live by them today. Not by the rules and regulations, but by the principles. For example, in the matter of abortion, I am pro-choice, but my personal choice would be to have nothing to do with an abortion, certainly not of a child of my own. I believe in free will, and believe I have no right to tell anyone else what to do. Above all, the state does not." He wrote "I am not a believer, not an atheist, not an agnostic. I am still awake at night, asking ''how''?{{efn|The question ''how'' in these last sentences of the blog entry refers back to its first paragraph in which Ebert writes that as a second-grader he would lie awake at night asking himself the questions "''But how could God have no beginning? And how could he have no end?''".<ref name="EbertGod" />}} I am more content with the question than I would be with an answer."<ref name="EbertGod" /> He writes: "I was asked at lunch today who or what I worshiped. The question was asked sincerely, and in the same spirit I responded that I worshiped whatever there might be outside knowledge. I worship the void. The mystery. And the ability of our human minds to perceive an unanswerable mystery. To reduce such a thing to simplistic names is an insult to it, and to our intelligence."<ref>{{cite web| last=Ebert| first=Roger| date=August 13, 2010| title=Traveler to the undiscovere'd country| url=https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/traveler-to-the-undiscovered-country| access-date=May 3, 2024| archive-date=May 3, 2024| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240503204051/https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/traveler-to-the-undiscovered-country| url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
===Funeral=== | |||
Hundreds attended the April 8, 2013 funeral Mass held at Chicago's ], where Ebert was celebrated as a film critic, newspaperman, advocate for social justice, and husband.<ref name="Mass" /> Father ] concluded the service with: "the balconies of heaven are filled with angels singing ''Thumbs Up''."<ref name="HollywoodRptrYahoo" /> | |||
He wrote: "I drank for many years in a tavern that had a photograph of ] on the wall, and under it is this quotation, which I memorized: '''I respect kindness in human beings first of all, and kindness to animals. I don't respect the law; I have a total irreverence for anything concerned with society except that which makes the roads safer, the beer stronger, the food cheaper and the old men and the old women warmer in the winter and happier in the summer.''<nowiki/>' For 57 words, that does a pretty good job of summing it up."<ref name="GoGently"> {{Cite web |last=Ebert |first=Roger |date=May 2, 2009 |title=Go Gentle Into That Good Night |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/go-gentle-into-that-good-night |access-date=May 16, 2022 |archive-date=May 16, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220516161102/https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/go-gentle-into-that-good-night |url-status=live }}</ref> Summarizing his beliefs, Ebert wrote: | |||
A 2-hour-and-45-minute public tribute, entitled ''Roger Ebert: A Celebration of Life'', was held at 7 p.m. on Thursday, April 11, 2013 at the ]. It featured in-person remembrances, video testimonials, video and film clips, gospel choirs, and was, according to the ''Chicago Tribune'''s Mark Caro, "a laughter- and sorrow-filled send-off from the entertainment and media worlds".<ref>{{cite news|last=Caro|first=Mark|title=Roger Ebert honored by Hollywood stars for his 'tenacity', 'zest for life'|url=http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2013-04-12/entertainment/chi-roger-ebert-tribute-20130411_1_chaz-ebert-roger-ebert-chicago-sun-times-film-critic|accessdate=April 16, 2013|newspaper=The Chicago Tribune: Arts & Entertainment section|date=April 12, 2013}}</ref> At the ] ceremony, Ebert was included in the ''In Memoriam'' montage, a rare honor for a film critic.{{citation needed|date=July 2014}} | |||
<blockquote>I believe that if, at the end of it all, according to our abilities, we have done something to make others a little happier, and something to make ourselves a little happier, that is about the best we can do. To make others less happy is a crime. To make ourselves unhappy is where all crime starts. We must try to contribute joy to the world. That is true no matter what our problems, our health, our circumstances. We must try. I didn't always know this, and am happy I lived long enough to find it out.<ref name="GoGently" /></blockquote> | |||
At the April 2014 ], the Pulitzer Prize-winner was honored with a life size bronze statue outside the ] in ]. A fan of Ebert, Scott Anderson, Jr. and the Public Art League, have commissioned the project and donations are being collected for The Roger Ebert Film Center at the University of Illinois.<ref>{{cite news|last=Patches |first=Matt|title=Roger Ebert Statue Planned for 2014 Ebertfest Unveiling|url=http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/roger-ebert-statue-planned-2014-650342|accessdate=October 23, 2013|newspaper=The Hollywood Reporter|date=October 23, 2013}}</ref> | |||
He wrote: "I correspond with a dear friend, the wise and gentle Australian director ]. Our subject sometimes turns to death. In 2010 he came very close to dying before receiving a liver transplant. In 1988 he made a documentary named '']''. Paul wrote that in his ] days, van Gogh called himself 'a simple worshiper of the external ].' Paul told me that in those days, Vincent wrote: | |||
==Bibliography== | |||
Each year from 1999 to 2013, except in 2008, Ebert published ''Roger Ebert's Movie Yearbook'', a collection of all of his movie reviews from the previous two and a half years (for example, the 2011 edition, ISBN 978-0-7407-9769-9, covers January 2008 – July 2010), as well as essays and other writings. He has also written the following books: | |||
<blockquote>Looking at the stars always makes me dream, as simply as I dream over the black dots representing towns and villages on a map. | |||
* ''An Illini Century: One Hundred Years of Campus Life'' (1967) – A history of the first 100 years of the ]. (no ISBN) | |||
* ''A Kiss Is Still a Kiss'' (1984) (ISBN 0-8362-7957-3) | |||
Why, I ask myself, shouldn't the shining dots of the sky be as accessible as the black dots on the map of France? | |||
* ''The Perfect London Walk'' (1986) – A tour of London, Ebert's favorite foreign city. (ISBN 0-8362-7929-8) | |||
* ''Two Weeks In Midday Sun : A Cannes Notebook'' (1987) Coverage of the ] which was also the 40th anniversary of the festival plus comments about the previous twelve festivals Ebert had attended. Interviews with ], ], and ]. (ISBN 0-8362-7942-5) | |||
Just as we take a train to get to ] or ], we take death to reach a star. We cannot get to a star any more when we are alive than we can take the train when we are dead. So to me it seems possible that cholera, tuberculosis and cancer are the celestial means of locomotion. Just as steamboats, buses and railways are the terrestrial means. | |||
* ''Behind the Phantom's Mask'' (1993) This is Ebert's only work of fiction which is about an on-stage murder and the resulting attention put on a previously unknown actor. (ISBN 0-8362-8021-0) | |||
* ''Ebert's Little Movie Glossary'' (1994) – a book of movie clichés. (ISBN 0-8362-8071-7) | |||
To die simply of old age would be to go there on foot. </blockquote> | |||
* ''Roger Ebert's Book of Film'' (1996) – a '']'' of a century of writing about the movies. (ISBN 0-393-04000-3) | |||
* ''Ebert's Bigger Little Movie Glossary'' (1999) – a "greatly expanded" book of movie clichés. (ISBN 0-8362-8289-2) | |||
That is a lovely thing to read, and a relief to find I will probably take the celestial locomotive. Or, as the little dog, ], says whenever ] proposes a journey, 'Not by foot, I hope!'"<ref>{{cite book| last=Ebert| first=Roger| title=Life Itself: A Memoir| page=415}}</ref> | |||
* ''I Hated, Hated, Hated This Movie'' (2000) – a collection of reviews of films that received two stars or fewer. (The title comes from his zero-star review of the 1994 film '']''.) (ISBN 0-7407-0672-1) | |||
* ''Questions for the Movie Answer Man'' (1997) – his responses to questions sent from his readers. (ISBN 0-8362-2894-4) | |||
==Death and legacy == | |||
* ''The Great Movies'' (2002), ''The Great Movies II'' (2005), and ''The Great Movies III'' (2010) – Three books of essays about great films. (ISBN 0-7679-1038-9, ISBN 0-7679-1950-5, and ISBN 978-0-226-18208-7) | |||
On April 4, 2013, Ebert died at age 70 at a hospital in Chicago, shortly before he was set to return to his home and enter ] care.<ref name="SunTimesObit" /><ref name="NPR death">{{cite news |last=Corely |first=Cheryl |title=For Pulitzer-Winning Critic Roger Ebert, Films Were A Journey |url=https://www.npr.org/2013/04/04/176194903/for-pulitzer-winner-critic-roger-ebert-films-were-a-journey |publisher=NPR |date=April 4, 2013 |access-date=April 4, 2018 |archive-date=March 30, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180330075840/https://www.npr.org/2013/04/04/176194903/for-pulitzer-winner-critic-roger-ebert-films-were-a-journey |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.cnn.com/2013/04/04/showbiz/roger-ebert-obituary/index.html|title=Roger Ebert, renowned film critic, dies at age 70|publisher=]|date=April 4, 2013|accessdate=June 24, 2022|first=Alan|last=Duke|archive-date=June 24, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220624134933/https://www.cnn.com/2013/04/04/showbiz/roger-ebert-obituary/index.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://esquire.com/entertainment/tv/news/a26606/roger-ebert-final-moments/|title=Oral Histories of 2013: Roger Ebert's Wife, Chaz, on His Final Moments|work=]|date=December 24, 2013|first=Chris|last=Jones|accessdate=July 19, 2022|archive-date=July 19, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220719135046/https://www.esquire.com/entertainment/tv/news/a26606/roger-ebert-final-moments/|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
* ''Awake in the Dark: The Best of Roger Ebert'' (2006) – a collection of essays from his 40 years as a film critic, featuring interviews, profiles, essays, his initial reviews upon a film's release, as well as critical exchanges between the film critics ] and ]. The foreword was written by ].<ref>{{cite web|last=Bordwell|first=David|title=The Foreword by David Bordwell to Awake in the Dark|url=http://press.uchicago.edu/books/excerpt/2013/ebert_awake.html|publisher=University of Chicago Press}}</ref> (ISBN 0-226-18200-2) | |||
* ''Your Movie Sucks'' (2007) – A collection of less-than-two-star reviews. (The title comes from his zero-star review of the 2005 film '']''.) (ISBN 0-7407-6366-0) | |||
President ] wrote, "For a generation of Americans — and especially Chicagoans — Roger was the movies... the unique power of the movies to take us somewhere magical. ... The movies won't be the same without Roger."<ref>{{cite web |last=Obama |first=Barack |author-link=Barack Obama |date=April 4, 2013 |title=Statement by the President on the Passing of Roger Ebert |url=https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2013/04/04/statement-president-passing-roger-ebert |access-date=February 9, 2021 |website=The White House |archive-date=March 14, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210314144719/https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2013/04/04/statement-president-passing-roger-ebert |url-status=live }}</ref> ] released a statement saying, "The death of Roger Ebert is an incalculable loss for movie culture and for film criticism. And it's a loss for me personally... there was a professional distance between us, but then I could talk to him much more freely than I could to other critics. Really, Roger was my friend. It's that simple."<ref>{{Cite web |date=April 4, 2014 |title=Filmmakers and Film Critics on Roger Ebert |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/filmmakers-on-roger-ebert |access-date=February 9, 2021 |website=] |language=en |archive-date=February 14, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210214234337/https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/filmmakers-on-roger-ebert |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
* ''Roger Ebert's Four-Star Reviews 1967–2007'' (2007) (ISBN 0-7407-7179-5) | |||
* ''Scorsese by Ebert'' (2008) – Covers works by director ] from 1967 to 2008 plus 11 interviews with the director over that time period. (ISBN 978-0-226-18202-5) | |||
] stated that Ebert's "reviews went far deeper than simply thumbs up or thumbs down. He wrote with passion through a real knowledge of film and film history, and in doing so, helped many movies find their audiences... put television criticism on the map."<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |last=Child |first=Ben |date=April 5, 2013 |title=Roger Ebert dies at 70: 'Roger was the movies,' says Obama |url=http://www.theguardian.com/film/2013/apr/05/roger-ebert-obama-spielberg-tributes |access-date=February 13, 2022 |website=] |language=en |archive-date=February 13, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220213085242/https://www.theguardian.com/film/2013/apr/05/roger-ebert-obama-spielberg-tributes |url-status=live }}</ref> Numerous celebrities paid tribute including ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], and ].<ref>{{cite web|url= https://www.businessinsider.com/roger-ebert-death-twitter-reactions-2013-4|title= Hollywood Mourns The Loss Of Roger Ebert|website= ]|accessdate= June 9, 2023|archive-date= June 10, 2023|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20230610004037/https://www.businessinsider.com/roger-ebert-death-twitter-reactions-2013-4|url-status= live}}</ref> | |||
* ''The Pot and How to Use It: The Mystery and Romance of the ]'' (2010) (ISBN 0-7407-9142-7)<ref>{{cite news |title=Roger Ebert: No Longer an Eater, Still a Cook |first=Kim |last=Severson |newspaper=] |date=August 31, 2010 |url=http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/01/dining/01ebert.html |accessdate=October 30, 2010}}</ref> | |||
* ''Life Itself: A Memoir''. (2011) New York: ]. (ISBN 0-4465-8497-5) | |||
] of the '']'' recalled that "I came late to film criticism in Chicago, after writing about the theater. Roger loved the theater. His was a theatrical personality: a raconteur, a spinner of dinner-table stories, a man who was not shy about his accomplishments. But he made room in that theatrical, improbable, outsized life for others."<ref>{{Cite news |last=Philipps |first=Michael |date=April 3, 2013 |title=Farewell to a generous colleague and friend |work=] |url=https://www.chicagotribune.com/entertainment/ct-xpm-2013-04-04-chi-roger-ebert-talking-pictures-20130404-story.html |access-date=February 28, 2023 |archive-date=February 28, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230228000918/https://www.chicagotribune.com/entertainment/ct-xpm-2013-04-04-chi-roger-ebert-talking-pictures-20130404-story.html |url-status=live }}</ref> Andrew O'Hehir of '']'' wrote that "He's up there with ], ], ] and not too far short of ] as one of the great plainspoken commentators on American life."<ref>{{Cite web |last=O'Hehir |first=Andrew |date=April 5, 2013 |title=RIP Roger Ebert: Movie criticism's Great Communicator |url=https://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/rip_roger_ebert_movie_criticisms_great_communicator/ |website=Salon.com |access-date=February 28, 2023 |archive-date=February 28, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230228000915/https://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/rip_roger_ebert_movie_criticisms_great_communicator/ |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
* ''A Horrible Experience of Unbearable Length'' (2012) – A third book of less-than-two-star reviews, for movies released after 2006. (The title comes from his one-star review of the 2009 film '']''.) (ISBN 1-4494-1025-1) | |||
Peter Debruge wrote "Ebert’s negative reviews were invariably his most entertaining, and yet, he never insulted those who found something to admire in lesser films. Instead, he hoped to enlighten readers, challenging them to think, while whetting their appetite for stronger work ... It’s a testament to Ebert’s gift that, after a life spent writing about film, he made us love the movies all the more. ...I’ve always suspected the reason he settled into this profession is that film reviews, as he wrote them, served as a Trojan horse for the delivery of bigger philosophical ideas, of which he had an inexhaustible supply to share."<ref name=Variety/> | |||
{{quote box | |||
| align = right | |||
| width = 25em | |||
| bgcolor = LightCyan | |||
| quote = "No one has done as much as Roger to connect the creators of movies with their consumers. He has immense power, and he’s used it for good, as an apostle of cinema. Reading his work, or listening to him parse the shots of some notable film, the movie lover is also engaged with an alert mind constantly discovering things — discovering them to share them. That’s what a great teacher does, and what Roger’s done as a writer, public personality and friend to film for all these years. And, dammit, keep on doing." | |||
| source = — ], film critic for '']''<ref name="Corliss2007"/> | |||
}} | |||
'']'' paid tribute to Ebert: "Calling the overall human existence 'poignant,' 'thought-provoking,' and 'a complete tour de force,' film critic Roger Ebert praised existence as 'an audacious and thrilling triumph.'...'At times brutally sad, yet surprisingly funny, and always completely honest, I wholeheartedly recommend existence. If you haven't experienced it yet, what are you waiting for? It is not to be missed.' Ebert later said that while human existence's running time was 'a little on the long side' it could have gone on much, much longer and he would have been perfectly happy."<ref>{{Cite web|title=Roger Ebert Hails Human Existence As 'A Triumph'|url=https://www.theonion.com/roger-ebert-hails-human-existence-as-a-triumph-1819574774|website=The Onion|date=April 4, 2013|access-date=January 30, 2023|archive-date=January 30, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230130044333/https://www.theonion.com/roger-ebert-hails-human-existence-as-a-triumph-1819574774|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
Hundreds of people attended the ] held at Chicago's ] on April 8, 2013, where Ebert was celebrated as a film critic, newspaperman, advocate for social justice, and husband. Father ] concluded the service with "the balconies of heaven are filled with angels singing 'Thumbs Up' ".<ref name="Mass">{{cite news |last=Caro |first=Mark |date=April 9, 2013 |title=Roger Ebert's funeral: 'He had a heart big enough to love all' |newspaper=] |url=https://www.chicagotribune.com/entertainment/chi-roger-ebert-funeral-story.html |access-date=February 9, 2021 |archive-date=January 26, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210126135757/https://www.chicagotribune.com/entertainment/chi-roger-ebert-funeral-story.html |url-status=live }}</ref> Reverend John F. Costello of Loyola University delivered a ] for Ebert.<ref>{{cite news| last=Costello| first=John F.| title=Roger Ebert Homily| date=April 8, 2013| work=Chicago Sun-Times| url=https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/roger-ebert-homily| access-date=April 15, 2024| archive-date=May 28, 2023| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230528122922/https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/roger-ebert-homily| url-status=live}}</ref> After the funeral service, he was buried at ] in ]<ref>{{cite web |last1=Ebert |first1=Roger |title=Chicago's most famous |url=https://wischlist.com/2013/10/30/graves-ghosts-and-chicagos-most-famous-cemeteries/ |website=wischlist |date=October 30, 2013 |access-date=November 10, 2024}}</ref> | |||
A ] (2014), directed by ], premiered at the ].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/life_itself/ |title=Life Itself |work=] |publisher=] |access-date=September 11, 2014 |archive-date=February 15, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210215064658/http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/life_itself |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.metacritic.com/movie/life-itself |title=Life Itself Reviews |website=] |access-date=July 19, 2014 |archive-date=January 8, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210108111755/https://www.metacritic.com/movie/life-itself |url-status=live }}</ref> The film was executive produced by ] and includes interviews with Scorsese, ], ], ] and numerous critics. The film received critical acclaim and received numerous accolades including a ], ] and ]. | |||
== Memorials == | |||
] giving his "]" outside the ] in Champaign, Illinois]] | |||
A nearly-three-hour public tribute, entitled ''Roger Ebert: A Celebration of Life'', was held on April 11, 2013, at the ]. It featured in-person remembrances, video testimonials, video and film clips, and gospel choirs, and was, according to the ''Chicago Tribune''{{'s}} Mark Caro, "a laughter- and sorrow-filled send-off from the entertainment and media worlds."<ref>{{cite news |last=Caro |first=Mark |date=April 12, 2013 |title=Roger Ebert honored by Hollywood stars for his 'tenacity', 'zest for life' |newspaper=] |url=https://www.chicagotribune.com/entertainment/ct-xpm-2013-04-12-chi-roger-ebert-tribute-20130411-story.html |access-date=February 9, 2021 |archive-date=March 8, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210308102652/https://www.chicagotribune.com/entertainment/ct-xpm-2013-04-12-chi-roger-ebert-tribute-20130411-story.html |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
In September 2013, organizers in ], announced plans to raise $125,000 to build a life-size bronze ] in the town, which was unveiled in front of the ] at Ebertfest on April 24, 2014.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Rothman |first=Lily |date=April 25, 2014 |title=Roger Ebert Statue Unveiled Outside Illinois Theater |magazine=] |url=https://time.com/76577/roger-ebert-statue-illinois/ |access-date=February 9, 2021 |archive-date=February 24, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210224131427/https://time.com/76577/roger-ebert-statue-illinois/ |url-status=live }}</ref> The composition was selected by his widow, Chaz Ebert, and depicts Ebert sitting in the middle of three theater seats giving a "thumbs up."<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.suntimes.com/entertainment/22482627-421/story.html |title=Ebert statue planned in Champaign |work=Chicago Sun-Times |date=September 12, 2013 |access-date=September 11, 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141029235043/http://www.suntimes.com/entertainment/22482627-421/story.html |archive-date=October 29, 2014}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |title=Roger Ebert Statue Unveiled Outside Illinois Theater |url=https://time.com/76577/roger-ebert-statue-illinois/ |access-date=June 1, 2015 |magazine=Time |first=Lily |last=Rothman |date=April 25, 2014 |archive-date=June 13, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150613004917/http://time.com/76577/roger-ebert-statue-illinois/ |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
The 2013 ] opened with a video tribute of Ebert at ] during the world premiere of the WikiLeaks-based film '']''. Ebert had been an avid supporter of the festival since its inception in the 1970s.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/moviesnow/la-et-mn-toronto-roger-ebert-tribute-20130905-story.html |title=TIFF 2013: Roger Ebert tribute: 'He's probably ... somewhere in here' |date=September 6, 2013 |access-date=January 2, 2017 |website=] |last=Whipp |first=Glenn |archive-date=January 3, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170103172051/http://articles.latimes.com/2013/sep/06/entertainment/la-et-mn-toronto-roger-ebert-tribute-20130905 |url-status=live }}</ref> Chaz was in attendance to accept a plaque on Roger's behalf.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.rogerebert.com/chazs-blog/toronto-international-film-festival-launches-with-a-tribute-to-roger |title=Toronto International Film Festival Launches with a Tribute to Roger |date=September 4, 2013 |access-date=April 30, 2015 |author= |publisher=] |archive-date=April 3, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150403165915/http://www.rogerebert.com/chazs-blog/toronto-international-film-festival-launches-with-a-tribute-to-roger |url-status=live }}</ref> At the same festival, ] dedicated his film '']'' to Ebert, saying "He was a really fabulous part of my life, a good friend, a champion, an inspiring writer. I loved Roger."<ref>{{Cite news |date=September 10, 2013 |title=Errol Morris dedicates his new film to Roger Ebert at TIFF |work=] |url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/awards-and-festivals/tiff/errol-morris-dedicates-his-new-film-to-roger-ebert-at-tiff/article14238910/ |access-date=March 24, 2023 |archive-date=March 24, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230324212019/https://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/awards-and-festivals/tiff/errol-morris-dedicates-his-new-film-to-roger-ebert-at-tiff/article14238910/ |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
In August 2013, the Plaza Classic Film Festival in ], paid homage to Ebert by screening seven films that played a role in his life: '']'', ''], ], ]'', '']'', '']'' and '']''.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Ebert |first=Chaz |date=August 5, 2013 |title=Ebert Everlasting: Classic Film Festival in El Paso Honors Roger Ebert |url=https://www.rogerebert.com/chazs-blog/ebert-everlasting-classic-film-festival-inel-paso-honors-roger-ebert |access-date=February 28, 2023 |archive-date=February 28, 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230228000918/https://www.rogerebert.com/chazs-blog/ebert-everlasting-classic-film-festival-inel-paso-honors-roger-ebert |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
At the ] ceremony, Ebert was included in the ''in memoriam'' montage, a rare honor for a film critic.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://oscar.go.com/photos/2014-oscars-in-memoriam/media/ebert_roger_film_critic |title=Oscar Remembers – Photo Gallery, Roger Ebert, Film Critic |publisher=The Oscars |date=February 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140304190936/http://oscar.go.com/photos/2014-oscars-in-memoriam/media/ebert_roger_film_critic |archive-date=March 4, 2014 |url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GUgIodydDXg |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140310125649/http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GUgIodydDXg |url-status=dead |archive-date=March 10, 2014 |title=Oscars 2014 – In Memoriam Montage (Full) |website=YouTube |access-date=April 30, 2015 |date=March 2, 2014}}</ref> | |||
In 2014, the documentary '']'' was released. Director ], whose films had been widely advocated by Ebert, started making the documentary while Ebert was still alive. ] served as an executive producer. The film studies Ebert's life and career, while also filming Ebert during his final months, and includes interviews with his family and friends. It was universally praised by critics. It has a 98% approval rating on ].<ref>{{rottentomatoes|life_itself|Life Itself}}</ref> | |||
] told '']'' that Ebert was "a soldier of the cinema": "I always loved Roger for being the good soldier, not only the good soldier of cinema, but he was a wounded soldier who for years in his affliction held out and plowed on and soldiered on and held the outpost that was given up by almost everyone: The monumental shift now is that intelligent, deep discourse about cinema has been something that has been vanishing over the last maybe two decades...I've always tried to be a good soldier of cinema myself, so of course since he's gone, I will plow on, as I have plowed on all my life, but I will do what I have to do as if Roger was looking over my shoulder. And I am not gonna disappoint him."<ref>{{Cite magazine |last=Rome |first=Emily |date=April 4, 2013 |title=Werner Herzog on Roger Ebert, 'the good soldier of cinema' |magazine=] |url=https://ew.com/article/2013/04/04/roger-ebert-werner-herzog/ |access-date=August 14, 2022 |archive-date=August 14, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220814001643/https://ew.com/article/2013/04/04/roger-ebert-werner-herzog/ |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
Ebert was inducted as a laureate of ]. In 2001, the governor of Illinois awarded him the state's highest honor, the Order of Lincoln, in the area of performing arts.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://thelincolnacademyofillinois.org/4632-2/#toggle-id-15 |title=Laureates by Year - The Lincoln Academy of Illinois |website=The Lincoln Academy of Illinois |access-date=March 7, 2016 |archive-date=September 23, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150923204516/http://thelincolnacademyofillinois.org/4632-2/#toggle-id-15 |url-status=dead }}</ref> In 2016, Ebert was inducted into the Chicago Literary Hall of Fame.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://chicagoliteraryhof.org/inductees/profile/roger-ebert |title=Roger Ebert |year=2016 |website=Chicago Literary Hall of Fame |access-date=October 8, 2017 |archive-date=October 8, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171008231203/https://chicagoliteraryhof.org/inductees/profile/roger-ebert |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
The website '']'' contains an archive of every review Ebert wrote, as well as many essays and opinion pieces. The site, operated by Ebert Digital (a partnership between Chaz and friend Josh Golden), continues to publish new material written by a group of critics who were selected by Ebert before his death.<ref name="Mashable-20130409">{{cite web |last1=Hernandez |first1=Brian Anthony |title=Roger Ebert's Website for Film Reviews Gets Makeover |url=https://mashable.com/2013/04/09/rogerebert-website-redesign |website=] |access-date=March 15, 2019 |date=April 9, 2013 |archive-date=July 23, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180723122659/https://mashable.com/2013/04/09/rogerebert-website-redesign/ |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
== Awards and honors == | |||
Ebert received many awards during his long and distinguished career as a film critic and television host. He was the first film critic to ever win a ], receiving the ] in 1975 while working for the ''Chicago Sun-Times'', "for his film criticism during 1974".<ref>{{cite web |title=1975 Pulitzer Prize Winners & Finalists |url=https://www.pulitzer.org/prize-winners-by-year/1975 |access-date=July 8, 2021 |website=The Pulitzer Prizes |publisher=Columbia University |archive-date=July 9, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210709184318/https://www.pulitzer.org/prize-winners-by-year/1975 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=Ebert |first1=Roger |title=American film critic |url=https://www.britannica.com/biography/Roger-Ebert |access-date=July 8, 2021 |website=Encyclopaedia Britannica |publisher=Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. |archive-date=July 7, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210707173847/https://www.britannica.com/biography/Roger-Ebert |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
In 2003, Ebert was honored by the ], winning a Special Achievement Award. In 2005, Ebert became the first film critic to receive a star on the ], for his work on television. His star is located at 6834 Hollywood Boulevard.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/gallery/roger-ebert-photos-his-life-406146/1-roger-ebert-19422013 |title=Remembering Roger Ebert: The Iconic Film Critic's Life and Career in Pictures |website=] |date=April 4, 2013 |access-date=May 21, 2020 |archive-date=August 18, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200818034346/https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/gallery/roger-ebert-photos-his-life-406146/1-roger-ebert-19422013 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="Salt Lake Tribune death">{{cite news |last=Rousseau |first=Caryn |title=Roger Ebert, first movie critic to win Pulitzer, dies at 70 |url=http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/entertainment2/56107300-223/ebert-movie-siskel-chicago.html.csp |newspaper=] |date=April 4, 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160130005857/http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/entertainment2/56107300-223/ebert-movie-siskel-chicago.html.csp |archive-date=January 30, 2016 }}</ref> In 2009, Ebert received the ]'s for Honorary Life Member Award.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://variety.com/2008/film/awards/directors-guild-honors-roger-ebert-1117997468/ |title=Directors Guild honors Roger Ebert |website=] |date=December 16, 2008 |access-date=May 21, 2020 |first=Dave |last=McNary |archive-date=August 6, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200806203342/https://variety.com/2008/film/awards/directors-guild-honors-roger-ebert-1117997468/ |url-status=live }}</ref> In 2010, Ebert received the ] for Person of the Year.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.webbyawards.com/winners/2010/special-achievement/special-achievement/person-of-the-year/roger-ebert/?/ |title=Roger Ebert - The Webby Awards |website=webbyawards.com |access-date=May 21, 2020 |archive-date=November 28, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211128230242/https://www.webbyawards.com/winners/2010/special-achievement/special-achievement/person-of-the-year/roger-ebert/?/ |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
In 2007, Ebert was honored by the ] receiving a tribute and award for his lifetime contributions to independent film.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.vulture.com/2007/11/last_nights_gotham_awards.html |title=Last Night's Gotham Awards Deemed Indie Enough |website=] |date=November 28, 2007 |access-date=May 21, 2020 |archive-date=June 25, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200625050432/https://www.vulture.com/2007/11/last_nights_gotham_awards.html |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
On January 31, 2009, Ebert was made an honorary life member of the ].<ref>{{cite web |title=Directors Guild to honor Roger Ebert |agency=] |url=https://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20081217/film_nm/us_ebert |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081228051048/http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20081217/film_nm/us_ebert |archive-date=December 28, 2008 |date=December 28, 2008}}</ref>,On May 15, 2009, Ebert was honored by the American Pavilion at the ] by the renaming of its conference room, "The Roger Ebert Conference Center." ] joined Ebert and his wife Chaz at the ribbon-cutting ceremony.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.filmjerk.com/news/2009/05/18/cannes-martin-scorsese-at-dedication-of-the-roger-ebert-conference-room/ |title=Cannes: Martin Scorsese at Dedication of the Roger Ebert Conference Room |website=filmjerk.com |date=May 18, 2009 |access-date=May 20, 2020 |archive-date=August 6, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200806172719/https://www.filmjerk.com/news/2009/05/18/cannes-martin-scorsese-at-dedication-of-the-roger-ebert-conference-room/ |url-status=live }}</ref> On May 4, 2010, Ebert was announced by the International Academy of Digital Arts and Sciences as the Webby Person of the Year, having found a voice on the Internet following his battle with cancer.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.webbyawards.com/webbys/specialachievement14.php |title=The Webby Awards |publisher=The Webby Awards |date=June 14, 2010 |access-date=April 5, 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130404205528/http://www.webbyawards.com/webbys/specialachievement14.php |archive-date=April 4, 2013}}</ref> | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
|- | |||
!| Year | |||
!| Award | |||
!| Category | |||
!| Nominated work | |||
!| Result | |||
|- | |||
|1979 || ] || Outstanding Special Program || '']'' || {{won}} | |||
|- | |||
|] || rowspan=4|] || rowspan=4|] || rowspan=2|'']'' || {{nom}} | |||
|- | |||
|] || {{nom}} | |||
|- | |||
|] || rowspan=8|'']'' || {{nom}} | |||
|- | |||
|] || {{nom}} | |||
|- | |||
|1989 || rowspan=3|] || rowspan=3|] || {{nom}} | |||
|- | |||
|1990 || {{nom}} | |||
|- | |||
|1991 || {{nom}} | |||
|- | |||
|] || rowspan=3|] || rowspan=3|] || {{nom}} | |||
|- | |||
|] || {{nom}} | |||
|- | |||
|] || {{nom}} | |||
|- | |||
|2005 || ] || Silver Circle Award || {{n/a}} || {{won}} | |||
|- | |||
|} | |||
'''Honors''' | |||
*1975 – Pulitzer Prize for Criticism | |||
*1995 – Publicists Guild of America Press Award | |||
*2003 – ]'s Special Achievement Award | |||
*2004 – Savannah Film Festival's Lifetime Achievement Award | |||
*2007 – ]'s Lifetime Achievement Award | |||
*2009 – ]' Honorary Life Member Award | |||
*2010 – ] for Person of the Year | |||
==Published works== | |||
Each year from 1986 to 1998, Ebert published ''Roger Ebert's Movie Home Companion'' (retitled ''Roger Ebert's Video Companion'' for its last five installments), which collected all of his movie reviews to that point. From 1999 to 2013 (except in 2008), Ebert instead published ''Roger Ebert's Movie Yearbook'', a collection of all of his movie reviews from the previous two and a half years (for example, the 2011 edition, {{ISBN|978-0-7407-9769-9}}, covers January 2008 – July 2010.) Both series also included yearly essays, interviews, and other writings. He also wrote the following books: | |||
* ''An Illini Century: One Hundred Years of Campus Life'' (1967) – a history of the first 100 years of the ]. (no ISBN) | |||
* ''A Kiss Is Still a Kiss'' (1984) ({{ISBN|0-8362-7957-3}}) | |||
* ''The Perfect London Walk'' (1986), with Daniel Curley – a tour of London, Ebert's favorite foreign city. ({{ISBN|0-8362-7929-8}}) | |||
* ''Two Weeks In Midday Sun: A Cannes Notebook'' (1987) – coverage of the ], which was also the 40th anniversary of the festival, plus comments about the previous 12 festivals Ebert had attended. Interviews with ], ], and ]. ({{ISBN|0-8362-7942-5}}) | |||
* ''The Future of The Movies'' (1991), with ] – collected interviews with ], ], and ] about the future of motion pictures and film preservation. It is the only book co-authored by Siskel and Ebert. ({{ISBN|978-0-8362-6216-2}}) | |||
* ''Behind the Phantom's Mask'' (1993) – Ebert's only work of fiction, which is about an on-stage murder and the resulting attention put on a previously unknown actor. ({{ISBN|0-8362-8021-0}}) | |||
* ''Ebert's Little Movie Glossary'' (1994) – a book of movie clichés. ({{ISBN|0-8362-8071-7}}) | |||
* ''Roger Ebert's Book of Film'' (1996) – a '']'' of a century of writing about the movies. ({{ISBN|0-393-04000-3}}) | |||
* ''Questions for the Movie Answer Man'' (1997) – his responses to questions sent from his readers. ({{ISBN|0-8362-2894-4}}) | |||
* ''Ebert's Bigger Little Movie Glossary'' (1999) – a "greatly expanded" book of movie clichés. ({{ISBN|0-8362-8289-2}}) | |||
* ''I Hated, Hated, Hated This Movie'' (2000) – a collection of reviews of films that received two stars or fewer, dating to the beginning of his ''Sun-Times'' career. (The title comes from his of the 1994 film '']''.) ({{ISBN|0-7407-0672-1}}) | |||
* ''The Great Movies'' (2002), ''The Great Movies II'' (2005), ''The Great Movies III'' (2010) and The Great Movies IV (2016) – four books of essays about great films. ({{ISBN|0-7679-1038-9}}, {{ISBN|0-7679-1950-5}}, {{ISBN|978-0-226-18208-7}}), and {{ISBN|978-0-226-40398-4}} | |||
* ''Awake in the Dark: The Best of Roger Ebert'' (2006) – a collection of essays from his 40 years as a film critic, featuring interviews, profiles, essays, his initial reviews upon a film's release, as well as critical exchanges between the film critics ] and ]. | |||
* ''Your Movie Sucks'' (2007) – a collection of fewer-than-two-star reviews, for movies released between 2000 and 2006. (The title comes from his of the 2005 film '']''.) ({{ISBN|0-7407-6366-0}}) | |||
* ''Roger Ebert's Four-Star Reviews 1967–2007'' (2007) ({{ISBN|0-7407-7179-5}}) | |||
* ''Scorsese by Ebert'' (2008) – covers works by director ] from 1967 to 2008, plus 11 interviews with the director over that period. ({{ISBN|978-0-226-18202-5}}) | |||
* ''The Pot and How to Use It: The Mystery and Romance of the Rice Cooker'' (2010) ({{ISBN|0-7407-9142-7}})<ref>{{cite news |title=Roger Ebert: No Longer an Eater, Still a Cook |first=Kim |last=Severson |newspaper=] |date=August 31, 2010 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/01/dining/01ebert.html |access-date=October 30, 2010 |archive-date=September 2, 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100902042429/http://www.nytimes.com//2010//09//01//dining//01ebert.html |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
* ''Life Itself: A Memoir''. (2011) New York: ]. ({{ISBN|0-446-58497-5}}) | |||
* ''A Horrible Experience of Unbearable Length'' (2012) – a third book of fewer-than-two-star reviews, for movies released in 2006 and onward. (The title comes from his of the 2009 film '']''.) ({{ISBN|1-4494-1025-1}}) | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
Line 281: | Line 470: | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist |
{{reflist}} | ||
== Further reading== | |||
* Bruce J. Evensen. "Ebert, Roger (18 June 1942–04 April 2013)" ''American National Biography'' (2015) | |||
* {{cite book|last = Singer|first = Matt|title = Opposable Thumbs: How Siskel & Ebert Changed Movies Forever|publisher = ]|location = New York|date = 2023|isbn = 978-0-593-54015-2}} | |||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
{{Commons}} | |||
{{Wikiquote}} | {{Wikiquote}} | ||
* {{Official website}} | |||
{{Commons category|Roger Ebert}} | |||
* {{EmmyTVLegends name}} | |||
* {{Official website|http://www.rogerebert.com/}} | |||
* |
* {{Rotten Tomatoes|critics/roger-ebert|title=Roger Ebert's critic page}} | ||
* {{Rotten Tomatoes|celebrity/roger_ebert|title=Roger Ebert's celebrity page}} | |||
* {{EmmyTVLegends name|roger-ebert}} | |||
* {{IMDb name |
* {{IMDb name}} | ||
* {{TED speaker}} | |||
* (1975–1999) | |||
* {{ |
* {{C-SPAN|39982}} | ||
* {{Charlie Rose guest|96}} | |||
** | |||
* {{ |
* {{Muckrack}} | ||
* at Find A Grave | |||
{{SiskelandEbert}} | {{SiskelandEbert}} | ||
{{PulitzerPrize Criticism 1970–1975}} | {{PulitzerPrize Criticism 1970–1975}} | ||
{{Portal bar|Biography|Journalism|Film|Chicago|Illinois}} | |||
{{Wrapports}} | |||
{{Authority control}} | |||
{{Authority control |VIAF=15926824 |LCCN=n/80/15780 |GND=132272741}} | |||
{{Persondata <!-- Metadata: see ] --> | |||
| NAME = Ebert, Roger Joseph | |||
| ALTERNATIVE NAMES = | |||
| SHORT DESCRIPTION = American film critic | |||
| DATE OF BIRTH = 1942-06-18 | |||
| PLACE OF BIRTH = ], US | |||
| DATE OF DEATH = 2013-04-04 | |||
| PLACE OF DEATH = ], US | |||
}} | |||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Ebert, Roger}} | {{DEFAULTSORT:Ebert, Roger}} | ||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] |
Latest revision as of 19:54, 16 January 2025
American film critic and author (1942–2013) For the website named after Ebert, see RogerEbert.com.
Roger Ebert | |
---|---|
Ebert in 2006 | |
Born | Roger Joseph Ebert (1942-06-18)June 18, 1942 Urbana, Illinois, U.S. |
Died | April 4, 2013(2013-04-04) (aged 70) Chicago, Illinois, U.S. |
Occupation |
|
Alma mater | University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign (BA) |
Subject | Film |
Years active | 1967–2013 |
Notable works |
|
Notable awards | Pulitzer Prize for Criticism (1975) |
Spouse |
Chaz Hammel-Smith (m. 1992) |
Signature | |
Website | |
rogerebert |
Roger Joseph Ebert (/ˈiːbərt/ EE-bərt; June 18, 1942 – April 4, 2013) was an American film critic, film historian, journalist, essayist, screenwriter and author. He was the film critic for the Chicago Sun-Times from 1967 until his death in 2013. Ebert was known for his intimate, Midwestern writing style and critical views informed by values of populism and humanism. Writing in a prose style intended to be entertaining and direct, he made sophisticated cinematic and analytical ideas more accessible to non-specialist audiences. Ebert endorsed foreign and independent films he believed would be appreciated by mainstream viewers, championing filmmakers like Werner Herzog, Errol Morris and Spike Lee, as well as Martin Scorsese, whose first published review he wrote. In 1975, Ebert became the first film critic to win the Pulitzer Prize for Criticism. Neil Steinberg of the Chicago Sun-Times said Ebert "was without question the nation's most prominent and influential film critic," and Kenneth Turan of the Los Angeles Times called him "the best-known film critic in America." Per The New York Times, "The force and grace of his opinions propelled film criticism into the mainstream of American culture. Not only did he advise moviegoers about what to see, but also how to think about what they saw."
Early in his career, Ebert co-wrote the Russ Meyer movie Beyond the Valley of the Dolls (1970). Starting in 1975 and continuing for decades, Ebert and Chicago Tribune critic Gene Siskel helped popularize nationally televised film reviewing when they co-hosted the PBS show Sneak Previews, followed by several variously named At the Movies programs on commercial TV broadcast syndication. The two verbally sparred and traded humorous barbs while discussing films. They created and trademarked the phrase "two thumbs up," used when both gave the same film a positive review. After Siskel died from a brain tumor in 1999, Ebert continued hosting the show with various co-hosts and then, starting in 2000, with Richard Roeper. In 1996, Ebert began publishing essays on great films of the past; the first hundred were published as The Great Movies. He published two more volumes, and a fourth was published posthumously. In 1999, he founded the Overlooked Film Festival in his hometown of Champaign, Illinois.
In 2002, Ebert was diagnosed with cancer of the thyroid and salivary glands. He required treatment that included removing a section of his lower jaw in 2006, leaving him severely disfigured and unable to speak or eat normally. However, his ability to write remained unimpaired and he continued to publish frequently online and in print until his death in 2013. His RogerEbert.com website, launched in 2002, remains online as an archive of his published writings. Richard Corliss wrote, "Roger leaves a legacy of indefatigable connoisseurship in movies, literature, politics and, to quote the title of his 2011 autobiography, Life Itself." In 2014, Life Itself was adapted as a documentary of the same title, released to positive reviews.
Early life and education
Roger Joseph Ebert was born on June 18, 1942, in Urbana, Illinois, the only child of Annabel (née Stumm), a bookkeeper, and Walter Harry Ebert, an electrician. He was raised Roman Catholic, attending St. Mary's elementary school and serving as an altar boy in Urbana.
His paternal grandparents were German immigrants and his maternal ancestry was Irish and Dutch. His first movie memory was of his parents taking him to see the Marx Brothers in A Day at the Races (1937). He wrote that Adventures of Huckleberry Finn was "the first real book I ever read, and still the best." He began his writing career with his own newspaper, The Washington Street News, printed in his basement. He wrote letters of comment to the science-fiction fanzines of the era and founded his own, Stymie. At age 15, he was a sportswriter for The News-Gazette covering Urbana High School sports. He attended Urbana High School, where in his senior year he was class president and co-editor of his high school newspaper, The Echo. In 1958, he won the Illinois High School Association state speech championship in "radio speaking," an event that simulates radio newscasts.
— Roger Ebert, Mad About the Movies (1998 parody collection)"I learned to be a movie critic by reading Mad magazine ... Mad's parodies made me aware of the machine inside the skin – of the way a movie might look original on the outside, while inside it was just recycling the same old dumb formulas. I did not read the magazine, I plundered it for clues to the universe. Pauline Kael lost it at the movies; I lost it at Mad magazine"
Ebert began taking classes at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign as an early-entrance student, completing his high school courses while also taking his first university class. After graduating from Urbana High School in 1960, he attended the University of Illinois and received his undergraduate degree in journalism in 1964. While there, Ebert worked as a reporter for The Daily Illini and served as its editor during his senior year while continuing to work for the News-Gazette.
His college mentor was Daniel Curley, who "introduced me to many of the cornerstones of my life's reading: 'The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock', Crime and Punishment, Madame Bovary, The Ambassadors, Nostromo, The Professor's House, The Great Gatsby, The Sound and the Fury ... He approached these works with undisguised admiration. We discussed patterns of symbolism, felicities of language, motivation, revelation of character. This was appreciation, not the savagery of deconstruction, which approaches literature as pliers do a rose." One of his classmates was Larry Woiwode, who went on to be the Poet Laureate of North Dakota. At The Daily Illini Ebert befriended William Nack, who as a sportswriter would cover Secretariat. As an undergraduate, he was a member of the Phi Delta Theta fraternity and president of the United States Student Press Association. One of the first reviews he wrote was of La Dolce Vita, published in The Daily Illini in October 1961.
As a graduate student, he "had the good fortune to enroll in a class on Shakespeare's tragedies taught by G. Blakemore Evans ... It was then that Shakespeare took hold of me, and it became clear he was the nearest we have come to a voice for what it means to be human." Ebert spent a semester as a master's student in the department of English there before attending the University of Cape Town on a Rotary fellowship for a year. He returned from Cape Town to his graduate studies at Illinois for two more semesters and then, after being accepted as a PhD student at the University of Chicago, he prepared to move to Chicago. He needed a job to support himself while he worked on his doctorate and so applied to the Chicago Daily News, hoping that, as he had already sold freelance pieces to the Daily News, including an article on the death of writer Brendan Behan, he would be hired by editor Herman Kogan.
Instead, Kogan referred Ebert to the city editor at the Chicago Sun-Times, Jim Hoge, who hired him as a reporter and feature writer in 1966. He attended doctoral classes at the University of Chicago while working as a general reporter for a year. After movie critic Eleanor Keane left the Sun-Times in April 1967, editor Robert Zonka gave the job to Ebert. The paper wanted a young critic to cover movies like The Graduate and films by Jean-Luc Godard and François Truffaut. The load of graduate school and being a film critic proved too much, so Ebert left the University of Chicago to focus his energies on film criticism.
Career
1967–1974: Early writings
Ebert's first review for the Chicago Sun-Times began: "Georges Lautner’s Galia opens and closes with arty shots of the ocean, mother of us all, but in between it’s pretty clear that what is washing ashore is the French New Wave." He recalls that "Within a day after Zonka gave me the job, I read The Immediate Experience by Robert Warshow", from which he gleaned that "the critic has to set aside theory and ideology, theology and politics, and open himself to—well, the immediate experience." That same year, he met film critic Pauline Kael for the first time at the New York Film Festival. After he sent her some of his columns, she told him they were "the best film criticism being done in American newspapers today." He recalls her telling him how she worked: "I go into the movie, I watch it, and I ask myself what happened to me." A formative experience was reviewing Ingmar Bergman's Persona (1966). He told his editor he wasn't sure how to review it when he didn't feel he could explain it. His editor told him he didn't have to explain it, just describe it.
He was one of the first critics to champion Arthur Penn's Bonnie and Clyde (1967), calling it "a milestone in the history of American movies, a work of truth and brilliance. It is also pitilessly cruel, filled with sympathy, nauseating, funny, heartbreaking and astonishingly beautiful. If it does not seem that those words should be strung together, perhaps that is because movies do not very often reflect the full range of human life." He concluded: "The fact that the story is set 35 years ago doesn't mean a thing. It had to be set some time. But it was made now and it's about us." Thirty-one years later, he wrote "When I saw it, I had been a film critic for less than six months, and it was the first masterpiece I had seen on the job. I felt an exhilaration beyond describing. I did not suspect how long it would be between such experiences, but at least I learned that they were possible." He wrote Martin Scorsese's first review, for Who's That Knocking at My Door (1967, then titled I Call First), and predicted the young director could become "an American Fellini."
Ebert co-wrote the screenplay for Russ Meyer's Beyond the Valley of the Dolls (1970) and sometimes joked about being responsible for it. It was poorly received on its release yet has become a cult film. Ebert and Meyer also made Up! (1976), Beneath the Valley of the Ultra-Vixens (1979) and other films, and were involved in the ill-fated Sex Pistols movie Who Killed Bambi? In April 2010, Ebert posted his screenplay of Who Killed Bambi?, also known as Anarchy in the UK, on his blog.
Beginning in 1968, Ebert worked for the University of Chicago as an adjunct lecturer, teaching a night class on film at the Graham School of Continuing Liberal and Professional Studies.
1975–1999: Stardom with Siskel & Ebert
In 1975, Ebert received the Pulitzer Prize for Criticism. In the aftermath of his win, he was offered jobs at The New York Times and The Washington Post, but he declined them both, as he did not wish to leave Chicago. That same year, he and Gene Siskel of the Chicago Tribune began co-hosting a weekly film-review television show, Opening Soon at a Theater Near You, later Sneak Previews, which was locally produced by the Chicago public broadcasting station WTTW. The series was later picked up for national syndication on PBS. The duo became well known for their "thumbs up/thumbs down" reviews. They trademarked the phrase "Two Thumbs Up."
In 1982, they moved from PBS to launch a similar syndicated commercial television show, At the Movies With Gene Siskel & Roger Ebert. In 1986, they again moved the show to new ownership, creating Siskel & Ebert & the Movies through Buena Vista Television, part of the Walt Disney Company. Ebert and Siskel made many appearances on late night talk shows, appearing on The Late Show with David Letterman sixteen times and The Tonight Show Starring Johnny Carson fifteen times. They also appeared together on The Oprah Winfrey Show, The Arsenio Hall Show, The Howard Stern Show, The Tonight Show with Jay Leno and Late Night with Conan O'Brien.
Siskel and Ebert were sometimes accused of trivializing film criticism. Richard Corliss, in Film Comment, called the show "a sitcom (with its own noodling, toodling theme song) starring two guys who live in a movie theater and argue all the time". Ebert responded that "I am the first to agree with Corliss that the Siskel and Ebert program is not in-depth film criticism" but that "When we have an opinion about a movie, that opinion may light a bulb above the head of an ambitious youth who then understands that people can make up their own minds about movies." He also noted that they did "theme shows" condemning colorization and showing the virtues of letterboxing. He argued that "good criticism is commonplace these days. Film Comment itself is healthier and more widely distributed than ever before. Film Quarterly is, too; it even abandoned eons of tradition to increase its page size. And then look at Cinéaste and American Film and the specialist film magazines (you may not read Fangoria, but if you did, you would be amazed at the erudition its writers bring to the horror and special effects genres.)" Corliss wrote that "I do think the program has other merits, and said so in a sentence of my original article that didn't make it into type: 'Sometimes the show does good: in spotlighting foreign and independent films, and in raising issues like censorship and colorization.' The stars' recent excoriation of the MPAA's X rating was salutary to the max."
In 1996, W. W. Norton & Company asked Ebert to edit an anthology of film writing. This resulted in Roger Ebert's Book of Film: From Tolstoy to Tarantino, the Finest Writing From a Century of Film. The selections are eclectic, ranging from Louise Brooks's autobiography to David Thomson's novel Suspects. Ebert "wrote to Nigel Wade, then the editor of the Chicago Sun-Times, and proposed a biweekly series of longer articles great movies of the past. He gave his blessing ... Every other week I have revisited a great movie, and the response has been encouraging." The first film he wrote about for the series was Casablanca (1942). A hundred of these essays were published as The Great Movies (2002); he released two more volumes, and a fourth was published posthumously. In 1999, Ebert founded The Overlooked Film Festival (later Ebertfest), in his hometown, Champaign, Illinois.
In May 1998, Siskel took a leave of absence from the show to undergo brain surgery. He returned to the show, although viewers noticed a change in his physical appearance. Despite appearing sluggish and tired, Siskel continued reviewing films with Ebert and would appear on Late Show with David Letterman. In February 1999, Siskel died of a brain tumor. The producers renamed the show Roger Ebert & the Movies and used rotating co-hosts including Martin Scorsese,Janet Maslin and A.O. Scott. Ebert wrote of his late colleague: "For the first five years that we knew one another, Gene Siskel and I hardly spoke. Then it seemed like we never stopped." He wrote of Siskel's work ethic, of how quickly he returned to work after surgery: "Someone else might have taken a leave of absence then and there, but Gene worked as long as he could. Being a film critic was important to him. He liked to refer to his job as 'the national dream beat,' and say that in reviewing movies he was covering what people hoped for, dreamed about, and feared." Ebert recalled, "Whenever he interviewed someone for his newspaper or for television, Gene Siskel liked to end with the same question: 'What do you know for sure?' OK Gene, what do I know for sure about you? You were one of the smartest, funniest, quickest men I've ever known and one of the best reporters...I know for sure that seeing a truly great movie made you so happy that you'd tell me a week later your spirits were still high." Ten years after Siskel's death, Ebert blogged about his colleague: "We once spoke with Disney and CBS about a sitcom to be titled Best Enemies. It would be about two movie critics joined in a love/hate relationship. It never went anywhere, but we both believed it was a good idea. Maybe the problem was that no one else could possibly understand how meaningless was the hate, how deep was the love."
2000–2006: Ebert & Roeper
In September 2000, Chicago Sun-Times columnist Richard Roeper became the permanent co-host and the show was renamed At the Movies with Ebert & Roeper and later Ebert & Roeper. In 2000, Ebert interviewed President Bill Clinton about movies at The White House.
In 2002, Ebert was diagnosed with cancer of the salivary glands. In 2006, cancer surgery resulted in his losing his ability to eat and speak. In 2007, prior to his Overlooked Film Festival, he posted a picture of his new condition. Paraphrasing a line from Raging Bull (1980), he wrote, "I ain’t a pretty boy no more. (Not that I ever was. The original appeal of Siskel & Ebert was that we didn’t look like we belonged on TV.)" He added that he would not miss the festival: "At least, not being able to speak, I am spared the need to explain why every film is 'overlooked', or why I wrote Beyond the Valley of the Dolls."
2007–2013: RogerEbert.com
Ebert ended his association with At The Movies in July 2008, after Disney indicated it wished to take the program in a new direction. As of 2007, his reviews were syndicated to more than 200 newspapers in the United States and abroad. His RogerEbert.com website, launched in 2002 and originally underwritten by the Chicago Sun-Times, remains online as an archive of his published writings and reviews while also hosting new material written by a group of critics who were selected by Ebert before his death. Even as he used TV (and later the Internet) to share his reviews, Ebert continued to write for the Chicago Sun-Times until he died. On February 18, 2009, Ebert reported that he and Roeper would soon announce a new movie-review program, and reiterated this plan after Disney announced that the program's last episode would air in August 2010. In 2008, having lost his voice, he turned to blogging to express himself. Peter Debruge writes that "Ebert was one of the first writers to recognize the potential of discussing film online."
His final television series, Ebert Presents: At the Movies, premiered on January 21, 2011, with Ebert contributing a review voiced by Bill Kurtis in a brief segment called "Roger's Office," as well as traditional film reviews in the At the Movies format by Christy Lemire and Ignatiy Vishnevetsky. The program lasted one season, before being cancelled due to funding constraints.
In 2011, he published his memoir, Life Itself, in which he describes his childhood, his career, his struggles with alcoholism and cancer, his loves and friendships. On March 7, 2013, Ebert published his last Great Movies essay, for The Ballad of Narayama (1958). The last review Ebert published during his lifetime was for The Host, on March 27, 2013. The last review Ebert filed, published posthumously on April 6, 2013, was for To the Wonder. In July 2013, a previously unpublished review of Computer Chess appeared on RogerEbert.com. The review had been written in March but had remained unpublished until the film's wide-release date. Matt Zoller Seitz, the editor of RogerEbert.com, confirmed that there were other unpublished reviews that would eventually be posted. A second review, for The Spectacular Now, was published in August 2013.
In his last blog entry, posted two days before his death, Ebert wrote that his cancer had returned and he was taking "a leave of presence." "What in the world is a leave of presence? It means I am not going away. My intent is to continue to write selected reviews but to leave the rest to a talented team of writers handpicked and greatly admired by me. What’s more, I’ll be able at last to do what I’ve always fantasized about doing: reviewing only the movies I want to review." He signed off, "So on this day of reflection I say again, thank you for going on this journey with me. I’ll see you at the movies."
Critical style
Ebert cited Andrew Sarris and Pauline Kael as influences, and often quoted Robert Warshow, who said: "A man goes to the movies. A critic must be honest enough to admit he is that man." His own credo was: "Your intellect may be confused, but your emotions never lie to you." He tried to judge a movie on its style rather than its content, and often said "It's not what a movie is about, it's how it's about what it's about."
He awarded four stars to films of the highest quality, and generally a half star to those of the lowest, unless he considered the film to be "artistically inept and morally repugnant", in which case it received no stars, as with Death Wish II. He explained that his star ratings had little meaning outside the context of the review:
When you ask a friend if Hellboy is any good, you're not asking if it's any good compared to Mystic River, you're asking if it's any good compared to The Punisher. And my answer would be, on a scale of one to four, if Superman is four, then Hellboy is three and The Punisher is two. In the same way, if American Beauty gets four stars, then The United States of Leland clocks in at about two.
Although Ebert rarely wrote outright scathing reviews, he had a reputation for writing memorable ones for the films he really hated, such as North. Of that film, he wrote "I hated this movie. Hated hated hated hated hated this movie. Hated it. Hated every simpering stupid vacant audience-insulting moment of it. Hated the sensibility that thought anyone would like it. Hated the implied insult to the audience by its belief that anyone would be entertained by it." He wrote that Mad Dog Time "is the first movie I have seen that does not improve on the sight of a blank screen viewed for the same length of time. Oh, I've seen bad movies before. But they usually made me care about how bad they were. Watching Mad Dog Time is like waiting for the bus in a city where you're not sure they have a bus line" and concluded that the film "should be cut up to provide free ukulele picks for the poor." Of Caligula, he wrote "It is not good art, it is not good cinema, and it is not good porn" and approvingly quoted the woman in front of him at the drinking fountain, who called it "the worst piece of shit I have ever seen."
Ebert's reviews were also characterized by "dry wit." He often wrote in a deadpan style when discussing a movie's flaws; in his review of Jaws: The Revenge, he wrote that Mrs. Brody's "friends pooh-pooh the notion that a shark could identify, follow or even care about one individual human being, but I am willing to grant the point, for the benefit of the plot. I believe that the shark wants revenge against Mrs. Brody. I do. I really do believe it. After all, her husband was one of the men who hunted this shark and killed it, blowing it to bits. And what shark wouldn't want revenge against the survivors of the men who killed it? Here are some things, however, that I do not believe", going on to list the other ways the film strained credulity. He wrote "Pearl Harbor is a two-hour movie squeezed into three hours, about how on Dec. 7, 1941, the Japanese staged a surprise attack on an American love triangle. Its centerpiece is 40 minutes of redundant special effects, surrounded by a love story of stunning banality. The film has been directed without grace, vision, or originality, and although you may walk out quoting lines of dialog, it will not be because you admire them."
— A.O. Scott, film critic for The New York Times" had a plain-spoken Midwestern clarity...a genial, conversational presence on the page...his criticism shows a nearly unequaled grasp of film history and technique, and formidable intellectual range, but he rarely seems to be showing off. He's just trying to tell you what he thinks, and to provoke some thought on your part about how movies work and what they can do".
Ebert often included personal anecdotes in his reviews; reviewing The Last Picture Show, he recalls his early days as a moviegoer: "For five or six years of my life (the years between when I was old enough to go alone, and when TV came to town) Saturday afternoon at the Princess was a descent into a dark magical cave that smelled of Jujubes, melted Dreamsicles and Crisco in the popcorn machine. It was probably on one of those Saturday afternoons that I formed my first critical opinion, deciding vaguely that there was something about John Wayne that set him apart from ordinary cowboys." Reviewing Star Wars, he wrote: "Every once in a while I have what I think of as an out-of-the-body experience at a movie. When the ESP people use a phrase like that, they’re referring to the sensation of the mind actually leaving the body and spiriting itself off to China or Peoria or a galaxy far, far away. When I use the phrase, I simply mean that my imagination has forgotten it is actually present in a movie theater and thinks it’s up there on the screen. In a curious sense, the events in the movie seem real, and I seem to be a part of them...My list of other out-of-the-body films is a short and odd one, ranging from the artistry of Bonnie and Clyde or Cries and Whispers to the slick commercialism of Jaws and the brutal strength of Taxi Driver. On whatever level (sometimes I’m not at all sure) they engage me so immediately and powerfully that I lose my detachment, my analytical reserve. The movie’s happening, and it’s happening to me." He sometimes wrote reviews in the forms of stories, poems, songs, scripts, open letters, or imagined conversations.
Alex Ross, music critic for The New Yorker, wrote of how Ebert had influenced his writing: "I noticed how much Ebert could put across in a limited space. He didn't waste time clearing his throat. 'They meet for the first time when she is in her front yard practicing baton-twirling,' begins his review of Badlands. Often, he managed to smuggle the basics of the plot into a larger thesis about the movie, so that you don't notice the exposition taking place: 'Broadcast News is as knowledgeable about the TV news-gathering process as any movie ever made, but it also has insights into the more personal matter of how people use high-pressure jobs as a way of avoiding time alone with themselves.' The reviews start off in all different ways, sometimes with personal confessions, sometimes with sweeping statements. One way or another, he pulls you in. When he feels strongly, he can bang his fist in an impressive way. His review of Apocalypse Now ends thus: 'The whole huge grand mystery of the world, so terrible, so beautiful, seems to hang in the balance.'"
In his introduction to The Great Movies III, he wrote:
People often ask me, "Do you ever change your mind about a movie?" Hardly ever, although I may refine my opinion. Among the films here, I've changed on The Godfather Part II and Blade Runner. My original review of Part II puts me in mind of the "brain cloud" that besets Tom Hanks in Joe Versus the Volcano. I was simply wrong. In the case of Blade Runner, I think the director's cut by Ridley Scott simply plays much better. I also turned around on Groundhog Day, which made it into this book when I belatedly caught on that it wasn't about the weatherman's predicament but about the nature of time and will. Perhaps when I first saw it I allowed myself to be distracted by Bill Murray's mainstream comedy reputation. But someone in film school somewhere is probably even now writing a thesis about how Murray's famous cameos represent an injection of philosophy into those pictures.
In the first Great Movies, he wrote:
Movies do not change, but their viewers do. When I first saw La Dolce Vita in 1961, I was an adolescent for whom "the sweet life" represented everything I dreamed of: sin, exotic European glamour, the weary romance of the cynical newspaperman. When I saw it again, around 1970, I was living in a version of Marcello's world; Chicago's North Avenue was not the Via Veneto, but at 3 A. M. the denizens were just as colorful, and I was about Marcello's age.
When I saw the movie around 1980, Marcello was the same age, but I was ten years older, had stopped drinking, and saw him not as role model, but as a victim, condemned to an endless search for happiness that could never be found, not that way. By 1991, when I analyzed the film a frame at a time at the University of Colorado, Marcello seemed younger still, and while I had once admired and then criticized him, now I pitied and loved him. And when I saw the movie right after Mastroianni died, I thought that Fellini and Marcello had taken a moment of discovery and made it immortal. There may be no such thing as the sweet life. But it is necessary to find that out for yourself.
Preferences
Favorites
In an essay looking back at his first 25 years as a film critic, Ebert wrote:
If I had to make a generalization, I would say that many of my favorite movies are about Good People ... Casablanca is about people who do the right thing. The Third Man is about people who do the right thing and can never speak to one another as a result ... Not all good movies are about Good People. I also like movies about bad people who have a sense of humor. Orson Welles, who does not play either of the good people in The Third Man, has such a winning way, such witty dialogue, that for a scene or two we almost forgive him his crimes. Henry Hill, the hero of Goodfellas, is not a good fella, but he has the ability to be honest with us about why he enjoyed being bad. He is not a hypocrite.
Of the other movies I love, some are simply about the joy of physical movement. When Gene Kelly splashes through Singin' in the Rain, when Judy Garland follows the yellow brick road, when Fred Astaire dances on the ceiling, when John Wayne puts the reins in his teeth and gallops across the mountain meadow, there is a purity and joy that cannot be resisted. In Equinox Flower, a Japanese film by the old master Yasujirō Ozu, there is this sequence of shots: A room with a red teapot in the foreground. Another view of the room. The mother folding clothes. A shot down a corridor with a mother crossing it at an angle, and then a daughter crossing at the back. A reverse shot in the hallway as the arriving father is greeted by the mother and daughter. A shot as the father leaves the frame, then the mother, then the daughter. A shot as the mother and father enter the room, as in the background the daughter picks up the red pot and leaves the frame. This sequence of timed movement and cutting is as perfect as any music ever written, any dance, any poem.
Ebert credits film historian Donald Richie and the Hawaii International Film Festival for introducing him to Asian cinema through Richie's invitation to join him on the jury of the festival in 1983, which quickly became a favorite of his and would frequently attend along with Richie, lending their support to validate the festival's status as a "festival of record". He lamented the decline of campus film societies: "There was once a time when young people made it their business to catch up on the best works by the best directors, but the death of film societies and repertory theaters put an end to that, and for today's younger filmgoers, these are not well-known names: Buñuel, Fellini, Bergman, Ford, Kurosawa, Ray, Renoir, Lean, Bresson, Wilder, Welles. Most people still know who Hitchcock was, I guess."
Ebert argued for the aesthetic values of black-and-white photography and against colorization, writing:
Black-and-white movies present the deliberate absence of color. This makes them less realistic than color films (for the real world is in color). They are more dreamlike, more pure, composed of shapes and forms and movements and light and shadow. Color films can simply be illuminated. Black-and-white films have to be lighted ... Black and white is a legitimate and beautiful artistic choice in motion pictures, creating feelings and effects that cannot be obtained any other way.
He wrote: "Black-and-white (or, more accurately, silver-and-white) creates a mysterious dream state, a simpler world of form and gesture. Most people do not agree with me. They like color and think a black-and-white film is missing something. Try this. If you have wedding photographs of your parents and grandparents, chances are your parents are in color and your grandparents are in black and white. Put the two photographs side by side and consider them honestly. Your grandparents look timeless. Your parents look goofy.
The next time you buy film for your camera, buy a roll of black-and-white. Go outside at dusk, when the daylight is diffused. Stand on the side of the house away from the sunset. Shoot some natural-light closeups of a friend. Have the pictures printed big, at least 5 x 7. Ask yourself if this friend, who has always looked ordinary in every color photograph you’ve ever taken, does not suddenly, in black and white, somehow take on an aura of mystery. The same thing happens in the movies."
Ebert championed animation, particularly the films of Hayao Miyazaki and Isao Takahata. In his review of Miyazaki's Princess Mononoke, he wrote: "I go to the movies for many reasons. Here is one of them. I want to see wondrous sights not available in the real world, in stories where myth and dreams are set free to play. Animation opens that possibility, because it is freed from gravity and the chains of the possible. Realistic films show the physical world; animation shows its essence. Animated films are not copies of 'real movies,' are not shadows of reality, but create a new existence in their own right." He concluded his review of Ratatouille by writing: "Every time an animated film is successful, you have to read all over again about how animation isn't 'just for children' but 'for the whole family,' and 'even for adults going on their own.' No kidding!"
Ebert championed documentaries, notably Errol Morris's Gates of Heaven: "They say you can make a great documentary about anything, as long as you see it well enough and truly, and this film proves it. Gates of Heaven, which has no connection to the unfortunate Heaven's Gate, is about a couple of pet cemeteries and their owners. It was filmed in Southern California, so of course we expect a sardonic look at the peculiarities of the Moonbeam State. But then Gates of Heaven grows ever so much more complex and frightening, until at the end it is about such large issues as love, immortality, failure, and the dogged elusiveness of the American Dream." Morris credited Ebert's review with putting him on the map. He championed Michael Apted's Up films, calling them "an inspired, even noble use of the medium." Ebert concluded his review of Hoop Dreams by writing: "Many filmgoers are reluctant to see documentaries, for reasons I've never understood; the good ones are frequently more absorbing and entertaining than fiction. Hoop Dreams, however, is not only documentary. It is also poetry and prose, muckraking and expose, journalism and polemic. It is one of the great moviegoing experiences of my lifetime."
— Ebert, 1986If a movie can illuminate the lives of other people who share this planet with us and show us not only how different they are but, how even so, they share the same dreams and hurts, then it deserves to be called great.
Ebert said that his favorite film was Citizen Kane, joking, "That's the official answer," although he preferred to emphasize it as "the most important" film. He said seeing The Third Man cemented his love of cinema: "This movie is on the altar of my love for the cinema. I saw it for the first time in a little fleabox of a theater on the Left Bank in Paris, in 1962, during my first $5 a day trip to Europe. It was so sad, so beautiful, so romantic, that it became at once a part of my own memories — as if it had happened to me." He implied that his real favorite film was La Dolce Vita.
His favorite actor was Robert Mitchum and his favorite actress was Ingrid Bergman. He named Buster Keaton, Yasujirō Ozu, Robert Altman, Werner Herzog and Martin Scorsese as his favorite directors. He expressed his distaste for "top-10" lists, and all movie lists in general, but did make an annual list of the year's best films, joking that film critics are "required by unwritten law" to do so. He also contributed an all-time top-10 list for the decennial Sight & Sound Critics' poll in 1982, 1992, 2002 and 2012. In 1982, he chose, alphabetically, 2001: A Space Odyssey, Aguirre, the Wrath of God, Bonnie and Clyde, Casablanca, Citizen Kane, La Dolce Vita, Notorious, Persona, Taxi Driver and The Third Man. In 2012, he chose 2001: A Space Odyssey, Aguirre, the Wrath of God, Apocalypse Now, Citizen Kane, La Dolce Vita, The General, Raging Bull, Tokyo Story, The Tree of Life and Vertigo. Several of the contributors to Ebert's website participated in a video tribute to him, featuring films that made his Sight & Sound list in 1982 and 2012.
Best films of the year
Ebert made annual "ten best lists" from 1967 to 2012. His choices for best film of the year were:
- 1967: Bonnie and Clyde
- 1968: The Battle of Algiers
- 1969: Z
- 1970: Five Easy Pieces
- 1971: The Last Picture Show
- 1972: The Godfather
- 1973: Cries and Whispers
- 1974: Scenes from a Marriage
- 1975: Nashville
- 1976: Small Change
- 1977: 3 Women
- 1978: An Unmarried Woman
- 1979: Apocalypse Now
- 1980: The Black Stallion
- 1981: My Dinner with Andre
- 1982: Sophie's Choice
- 1983: The Right Stuff
- 1984: Amadeus
- 1985: The Color Purple
- 1986: Platoon
- 1987: House of Games
- 1988: Mississippi Burning
- 1989: Do the Right Thing
- 1990: Goodfellas
- 1991: JFK
- 1992: Malcolm X
- 1993: Schindler's List
- 1994: Hoop Dreams
- 1995: Leaving Las Vegas
- 1996: Fargo
- 1997: Eve's Bayou
- 1998: Dark City
- 1999: Being John Malkovich
- 2000: Almost Famous
- 2001: Monster's Ball
- 2002: Minority Report
- 2003: Monster
- 2004: Million Dollar Baby
- 2005: Crash
- 2006: Pan's Labyrinth
- 2007: Juno
- 2008: Synecdoche, New York
- 2009: The Hurt Locker
- 2010: The Social Network
- 2011: A Separation
- 2012: Argo
Ebert revisited and sometimes revised his opinions. After ranking E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial third on his 1982 list, it was the only movie from that year to appear on his later "Best Films of the 1980s" list (where it also ranked third). He made similar reevaluations of Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981) and Ran (1985). The Three Colours trilogy (Blue (1993), White (1994), and Red (also 1994), and Pulp Fiction (1994) originally ranked second and third on Ebert's 1994 list; both were included on his "Best Films of the 1990s" list, but their order had reversed.
In 2006, Ebert noted his own "tendency to place what I now consider the year's best film in second place, perhaps because I was trying to make some kind of point with my top pick," adding, "In 1968, I should have ranked 2001 above The Battle of Algiers. In 1971, McCabe & Mrs. Miller was better than The Last Picture Show. In 1974, Chinatown was probably better, in a different way, than Scenes from a Marriage. In 1976, how could I rank Small Change above Taxi Driver? In 1978, I would put Days of Heaven above An Unmarried Woman. And in 1980, of course, Raging Bull was a better film than The Black Stallion ... although I later chose Raging Bull as the best film of the entire decade of the 1980s, it was only the second-best film of 1980 ... am I the same person I was in 1968, 1971, or 1980? I hope not."
Ebert's ten best lists resumed in 2014, the first full year after his death, as a Borda count system by his writers.
- 2014: Under the Skin
- 2015: Mad Max: Fury Road
- 2016: Moonlight
- 2017: Lady Bird
- 2018: Roma
- 2019: The Irishman
- 2020: Lovers Rock
- 2021: The Power of the Dog
- 2022: The Banshees of Inisherin
- 2023: Killers of the Flower Moon
- 2024: The Brutalist
Best films of the decade
Ebert compiled "best of the decade" movie lists in the 2000s for the 1970s to the 2000s, thereby helping provide an overview of his critical preferences. Only three films for this listing were named by Ebert as the best film of the year, Five Easy Pieces (1970), Hoop Dreams (1994), and Synecdoche, New York (2008). In 2019, the editors of RogerEbert.com continued the tradition as a joint review of the RogerEbert.com writers.
- Five Easy Pieces (1970s)
- Raging Bull (1980s)
- Hoop Dreams (1990s)
- Synecdoche, New York (2000s)
- The Tree of Life (2010s)
Genres and content
Ebert was often critical of the Motion Picture Association of America film rating system (MPAA). His main arguments were that they were too strict on sex and profanity, too lenient on violence, secretive with their guidelines, inconsistent in applying them and not willing to consider the wider context and meaning of the film. He advocated replacing the NC-17 rating with separate ratings for pornographic and nonpornographic adult films. He praised This Film is Not Yet Rated, a documentary critiquing the MPAA, adding that their rules are "Kafkaesque." He signed off on his review of Almost Famous by asking, "Why did they give an R rating to a movie so perfect for teenagers?"
Ebert also frequently lamented that cinemas outside major cities are "booked by computer from Hollywood with no regard for local tastes," making high-quality independent and foreign films virtually unavailable to most American moviegoers.
He wrote that "I've always preferred generic approach to film criticism; I ask myself how good a movie is of its type." He gave Halloween four stars: "Seeing it, I was reminded of the favorable review I gave a few years ago to Last House on the Left, another really terrifying thriller. Readers wrote to ask how I could possibly support such a movie. But I wasn't supporting it so much as describing it: You don't want to be scared? Don't see it. Credit must be paid to directors who want to really frighten us, to make a good thriller when quite possibly a bad one would have made as much money. Hitchcock is acknowledged as a master of suspense; it's hypocrisy to disapprove of other directors in the same genre who want to scare us too."
Ebert did not believe in grading children's movies on a curve, as he thought children were smarter than given credit for and deserved quality entertainment. He began his review of Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory: "Kids are not stupid. They are among the sharpest, cleverest, most eagle-eyed creatures on God's green Earth, and very little escapes their notice. You may not have observed that your neighbor is still using his snow-tires in mid-July, but every four-year-old on the block has, and kids pay the same attention when they go to the movies. They don't miss a thing, and have an instinctive contempt for shoddy and shabby work. I make this observation because nine out of ten kids' movies are stupid, witless and display contempt for their audiences. Is that all parents want from kids' movies? That they not have anything bad in them? Shouldn't they have something good in them — some life, imagination, fantasy, inventiveness, something to tickle the imagination? If a movie isn't going to do your kids any good, why let them watch it? Just to kill a Saturday afternoon? That shows a subtle contempt for a child's mind, I think." He went on to say he thought Willy Wonka was the best movie of its kind since The Wizard of Oz.
Ebert tried not to judge a film on its ideology. Reviewing Apocalypse Now, he writes: "I am not particularly interested in the 'ideas' in Coppola's film...Like all great works of art about war, Apocalypse Now essentially contains only one idea or message, the not-especially-enlightening observation that war is hell. We do not go to see Coppola's movie for that insight — something Coppola, but not some of his critics, knows well. Coppola also well knows (and demonstrated in The Godfather films) that movies aren't especially good at dealing with abstract ideas — for those you'd be better off turning to the written word — but they are superb for presenting moods and feelings, the look of a battle, the expression on a face, the mood of a country. Apocalypse Now achieves greatness not by analyzing our 'experience in Vietnam,' but by re-creating, in characters and images, something of that experience." Ebert commented on films using his Catholic upbringing as a point of reference, and was critical of films he believed were grossly ignorant of or insulting to Catholicism, such as Stigmata (1999) and Priest (1994). He also gave favorable reviews of controversial films relating to Jesus Christ or Catholicism, including The Last Temptation of Christ (1988), The Passion of the Christ (2004), and Kevin Smith's religious satire Dogma (1999). He defended Spike Lee's Do the Right Thing: "Some of the advance articles about this movie have suggested that it is an incitement to racial violence. Those articles say more about their authors than about the movie. I believe that any good-hearted person, white or black, will come out of this movie with sympathy for all of the characters. Lee does not ask us to forgive them, or even to understand everything they do, but he wants us to identify with their fears and frustrations. Do the Right Thing doesn't ask its audiences to choose sides; it is scrupulously fair to both sides, in a story where it is our society itself that is not fair."
Contrarian reviews
Metacritic later noted that Ebert tended to give more lenient ratings than most critics. His average film rating was 71%, if translated into a percentage, compared to 59% for the site as a whole. Of his reviews, 75% were positive and 75% of his ratings were better than his colleagues. Ebert had acknowledged in 2008 that he gave higher ratings on average than other critics, though he said this was in part because he considered a rating of 3 out of 4 stars to be the general threshold for a film to get a "thumbs up."
Writing in Hazlitt about Ebert's reviews, Will Sloan argued that "here were inevitably movies where he veered from consensus, but he was not provocative or idiosyncratic by nature." Examples of Ebert dissenting from other critics include his negative reviews of such celebrated films as Blue Velvet ("marred by sophomoric satire and cheap shots"), A Clockwork Orange ("a paranoid right-wing fantasy masquerading as an Orwellian warning"), and The Usual Suspects ("To the degree that I do understand, I don't care"). He gave only two out of four stars to the widely acclaimed Brazil, calling it "very hard to follow" and is the only critic on RottenTomatoes to not like it.
He gave a one-star review to the critically acclaimed Abbas Kiarostami film Taste of Cherry, which won the Palme d'Or at the 1997 Cannes Film Festival. Ebert later added the film to a list of his most-hated movies of all time. He was dismissive of the 1988 Bruce Willis action film Die Hard, stating that "inappropriate and wrongheaded interruptions reveal the fragile nature of the plot". His positive 3 out of 4 stars review of 1997's Speed 2: Cruise Control, "Movies like this embrace goofiness with an almost sensual pleasure" is one of only three positive reviews accounting for that film's 4% approval rating on the reviewer aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes, one of the two others having been written by his At the Movies co-star Gene Siskel.
Ebert reflected on his Speed 2 review in 2013, and wrote that it was "Frequently cited as an example of what a lousy critic I am," but defended his opinion, and noted, "I'm grateful to movies that show me what I haven't seen before, and Speed 2 had a cruise ship plowing right up the main street of a Caribbean village." In 1999, Ebert held a contest for University of Colorado Boulder students to create short films with a Speed 3 theme about an object that could not stop moving. The winning entrant was set on a roller coaster and was screened at Ebertfest that year.
Other interests
In addition to film, Ebert occasionally wrote about other topics for the Sun-Times, such as music. In 1970, Ebert wrote the first published concert review of singer-songwriter John Prine, who at the time was working as a mailman and performing at Chicago folk clubs.
Ebert was a lifelong reader, and said he had "more or less every book I have owned since I was seven, starting with Huckleberry Finn." Among the authors he considered indispensable were Shakespeare, Henry James, Willa Cather, Colette and Simenon. He writes of his friend William Nack: "He approached literature like a gourmet. He relished it, savored it, inhaled it, and after memorizing it rolled it on his tongue and spoke it aloud. It was Nack who already knew in the early 1960s, when he was a very young man, that Nabokov was perhaps the supreme stylist of modern novelists. He recited to me from Lolita, and from Speak, Memory and Pnin. I was spellbound." Every time Ebert saw Nack, he'd ask him to recite the last lines of The Great Gatsby. Reviewing Stone Reader, he wrote: "get me in conversation with another reader, and I'll recite titles, too. Have you ever read The Quincunx? The Raj Quartet? A Fine Balance? Ever heard of that most despairing of all travel books, The Saddest Pleasure, by Moritz Thomsen? Does anybody hold up better than Joseph Conrad and Willa Cather? Know any Yeats by heart? Surely P. G. Wodehouse is as great at what he does as Shakespeare was at what he did." Among contemporary authors he admired Cormac McCarthy, and credited Suttree with reviving his love of reading after his illness. He also loved audiobooks, particularly praising Sean Barrett's reading of Perfume. He was a fan of Hergé's The Adventures of Tintin, which he read in French.
Ebert first visited London in 1966 with his professor Daniel Curley, who "started me on a lifelong practice of wandering around London. From 1966 to 2006, I visited London never less than once a year and usually more than that. Walking the city became a part of my education, and in this way I learned a little about architecture, British watercolors, music, theater and above all people. I felt a freedom in London I've never felt elsewhere. I made lasting friends. The city lends itself to walking, can be intensely exciting at eye level, and is being eaten alive block by block by brutal corporate leg-lifting." Ebert and Curley coauthored The Perfect London Walk.
Ebert attended the Conference on World Affairs at the University of Colorado Boulder for many years. It was there that he coined the Boulder Pledge: "Under no circumstances will I ever purchase anything offered to me as the result of an unsolicited e-mail message. Nor will I forward chain letters, petitions, mass mailings, or virus warnings to large numbers of others. This is my contribution to the survival of the online community." Starting in 1975, he hosted a program called Cinema Interruptus, where would analyze a film with an audience, and anyone could say "Stop!" to point out anything they found interesting. He wrote "Boulder is my hometown in an alternate universe. I have walked its streets by day and night, in rain, snow, and sunshine. I have made life-long friends there. I was in my twenties when I first came to the Conference on World Affairs and was greeted by Howard Higman, its choleric founder, with 'Who invited you back?' Since then I have appeared on countless panels panels where I have learned and rehearsed debatemanship, the art of talking to anybody about anything." In 2009, Ebert invited Ramin Bahrani to join him in analyzing Bahrani's film Chop Shop a frame at a time. The next year, they invited Werner Herzog to join them in analyzing Aguirre, the Wrath of God. After that, Ebert announced that he would not return to the conference: "It is fueled by speech, and I'm out of gas ... But I went there for my adult lifetime and had a hell of a good time."
Relations with filmmakers
Ebert wrote Martin Scorsese's first review, for Who's That Knocking at My Door, and predicted the director could be "an American Fellini someday." He later wrote, "Of the directors who started making films since I came on the job, the best is Martin Scorsese. His camera is active, not passive. It doesn’t regard events, it participates in them. There is a sequence in GoodFellas that follows Henry Hill’s last day of freedom, before the cops swoop down. Scorsese uses an accelerating pacing and a paranoid camera that keeps looking around, and makes us feel what Hill feels. It is easy enough to make an audience feel basic emotions ('Play them like a piano,' Hitchcock advised), but hard to make them share a state of mind. Scorsese can do it." In 2000, Scorsese joined Ebert on his show in choosing the best films of the 1990s.
Ebert was an admirer of Werner Herzog, and conducted a Q&A session with him at the Walker Arts Center in 1999. It was there that Herzog read his "Minnesota Declaration" which defined his idea of "ecstatic truth." Herzog dedicated his Encounters at the End of the World to Ebert, and Ebert responded with an open letter of gratitude. Ebert often quoted something Herzog told him: "our civilization is starving for new images."
When Vincent Gallo's The Brown Bunny (2003) premiered at Cannes, Ebert called it the worst film in the history of the festival. Gallo responded by putting a curse on his colon and a hex on his prostate. Ebert replied, "I had a colonoscopy once, and they let me watch it on TV. It was more entertaining than The Brown Bunny." Gallo called Ebert a "fat pig". Ebert replied: "It is true that I am fat, but one day I will be thin, and he will still be the director of The Brown Bunny." Ebert gave the director's cut a positive review, writing that Gallo "is not the director of the same Brown Bunny I saw at Cannes, and the film now plays so differently that I suggest the original Cannes cut be included as part of the eventual DVD, so that viewers can see for themselves how 26 minutes of aggressively pointless and empty footage can sink a potentially successful film...Make no mistake: The Cannes version was a bad film, but now Gallo's editing has set free the good film inside."
In 2005, Los Angeles Times critic Patrick Goldstein wrote that the year’s Best Picture Nominees were "ignored, unloved and turned down flat by most of the same studios that … bankroll hundreds of sequels, including a follow-up to Deuce Bigalow: Male Gigolo, a film that was sadly overlooked at Oscar time because apparently nobody had the foresight to invent a category for Best Running Penis Joke Delivered by a Third-Rate Comic." Rob Schneider responded in an open letter: "Well, Mr. Goldstein, I decided to do some research to find out what awards you have won. I went online and found that you have won nothing. Absolutely nothing. No journalistic awards of any kind … Maybe you didn’t win a Pulitzer Prize because they haven’t invented a category for Best Third-Rate, Unfunny Pompous Reporter Who’s Never Been Acknowledged by His Peers." Reviewing Deuce Bigalow: European Gigolo, Ebert responded: "Reading this, I was about to observe that Schneider can dish it out but he can’t take it. Then I found he’s not so good at dishing it out, either. I went online and found that Patrick Goldstein has won a National Headliner Award, a Los Angeles Press Club Award, a RockCritics.com award, and the Publicists’ Guild award for lifetime achievement ... Schneider is correct, and Patrick Goldstein has not yet won a Pulitzer Prize. Therefore, Goldstein is not qualified to complain that Columbia financed Deuce Bigalow: European Gigolo while passing on the opportunity to participate in Million Dollar Baby, Ray, The Aviator, Sideways and Finding Neverland. As chance would have it, I have won the Pulitzer Prize, and so I am qualified. Speaking in my official capacity as a Pulitzer Prize winner, Mr. Schneider, your movie sucks." After Ebert's cancer surgery, he received a bouquet from "Your Least Favorite Movie Star, Rob Schneider". Ebert wrote of the flowers, "They were a reminder, if I needed one, that although Rob Schneider might (in my opinion) have made a bad movie, he is not a bad man, and no doubt tried to make a wonderful movie, and hopes to again. I hope so, too."
Views on technology
Ebert was a strong advocate for Maxivision 48, in which the movie projector runs at 48 frames per second, as compared to the usual 24 frames per second. He was opposed to the practice whereby theaters lower the intensity of their projector bulbs in order to extend the life of the bulb, arguing that this has little effect other than to make the film harder to see. Ebert was skeptical of the resurgence of 3D effects in film, which he found unrealistic and distracting.
In 2005, Ebert opined that video games are not art, and are inferior to media created through authorial control, such as film and literature, stating, "video games can be elegant, subtle, sophisticated, challenging and visually wonderful," but "the nature of the medium prevents it from moving beyond craftsmanship to the stature of art." This resulted in negative reaction from video game enthusiasts, such as writer Clive Barker, who defended video games as an art form. Ebert wrote a further piece in response to Barker. Ebert maintained his position in 2010, but conceded that he should not have expressed this skepticism without being more familiar with the actual experience of playing them. He admitted that he barely played video games: "I have played Cosmology of Kyoto which I enormously enjoyed, and Myst for which I lacked the patience." In the article, Ebert wrote, "It is quite possible a game could someday be great art."
Ebert had reviewed Cosmology of Kyoto for Wired in 1994, and had praised the exploration, depth, and graphics found in the game, writing "This is the most beguiling computer game I have encountered, a seamless blend of information, adventure, humor, and imagination — the gruesome side-by-side with the divine." Ebert filed one other video game-related article for Wired in 1994, in which he described his visit to Sega's Joypolis arcade in Tokyo.
Appearances in other media
Ebert provided DVD audio commentaries for Citizen Kane (1941), Casablanca (1942), Beyond the Valley of the Dolls (1970) and Dark City (1998). For the Criterion Collection, he recorded commentaries for Floating Weeds (1959) and Crumb (1994), the latter with director Terry Zwigoff. Ebert was also interviewed by Central Park Media for an extra feature on the DVD release of Grave of the Fireflies (1988).
In 1982, 1983 and 1985, Gene Siskel and Ebert appeared as themselves on Saturday Night Live. For their first two appearances, they reviewed sketches from that night's telecast; for their last, they reviewed sketches from the "SNL Film Festival". In 1991, Siskel and Ebert appeared in the Sesame Street segment "Sneak Peek Previews" (a parody of Sneak Previews). That year, the two were in the show's celebrity version of "Monster in the Mirror". In 1995, Siskel and Ebert guest-starred on an episode of the animated sitcom The Critic. In the episode, a parody of Sleepless in Seattle, Siskel and Ebert split and each wants protagonist Jay Sherman, a fellow film critic, as his new partner.
In 1997, Ebert appeared in Pitch, a documentary by Spencer Rice and Kenny Hotz and the Chicago-set television series Early Edition, where consoles a young boy who is depressed after he sees the character Bosco the Bunny die in a movie. Ebert made a cameo in Abby Singer (2003). In 2004, Ebert appeared in Sesame Street's direct-to-video special A Celebration of Me, Grover, delivering a review of the Monsterpiece Theater segment "The King and I". Ebert was one of the principal critics featured in Gerald Peary's 2009 documentary For the Love of Movies: The Story of American Film Criticism. He discusses the dynamics of appearing with Gene Siskel on the 1970s show Coming to a Theatre Near You, the predecessor of Sneak Previews on Chicago PBS station WTTW, and expresses approval of the proliferation of young people writing film reviews today on the internet. On October 22, 2010, Ebert appeared with Robert Osborne on Turner Classic Movies during their "The Essentials" series. Ebert selected Sweet Smell of Success (1957) and The Lady Eve (1941).
A "Mayor Ebert" (Michael Lerner) appeared in the 1998 remake of Godzilla. In his review, Ebert wrote: "Now that I've inspired a character in a Godzilla movie, all I really still desire is for several Ingmar Bergman characters to sit in a circle and read my reviews to one another in hushed tones."
Personal life
Marriage
At age 50, Ebert married trial attorney Charlie "Chaz" Hammel-Smith in 1992. Chaz Ebert became vice president of the Ebert Company and has emceed Ebertfest. He explained in his memoir, Life Itself, that he did not want to marry before his mother died, as he was afraid of displeasing her. In a July 2012 blog entry, Ebert wrote about Chaz, "She fills my horizon, she is the great fact of my life, she has my love, she saved me from the fate of living out my life alone, which is where I seemed to be heading... She has been with me in sickness and in health, certainly far more sickness than we could have anticipated. I will be with her, strengthened by her example. She continues to make my life possible, and her presence fills me with love and a deep security. That's what a marriage is for. Now I know."
Alcoholism recovery
Ebert was a recovering alcoholic, having quit drinking in 1979. He was a member of Alcoholics Anonymous and had written some blog entries on the subject. Ebert was a longtime friend of Oprah Winfrey, and Winfrey credited him with persuading her to syndicate The Oprah Winfrey Show, which became the highest-rated talk show in American television history.
Health
In February 2002, Ebert was diagnosed with papillary thyroid cancer which was successfully removed. In 2003, he underwent surgery for salivary gland cancer, which was followed up by radiation therapy. He was again diagnosed with cancer in 2006. In June of that year, he had a mandibulectomy to remove cancerous tissue in the right side of his jaw. A week later he had a life-threatening complication when his carotid artery burst near the surgery site. He was confined to bed rest and was unable to speak, eat, or drink for a time, necessitating the use of a feeding tube.
The complications kept Ebert off the air for an extended period. Ebert made his first public appearance since mid-2006 at Ebertfest on April 25, 2007. He was unable to speak, instead communicating through his wife. He returned to reviewing on May 18, 2007, when three of his reviews were published in print. In July 2007, he revealed that he was still unable to speak. Ebert adopted a computerized voice system to communicate, eventually using a copy of his own voice created from his recordings by CereProc.
In March 2010, his health trials and new computerized voice were featured on The Oprah Winfrey Show. In 2011, Ebert gave a TED talk assisted by his wife, Chaz, and friends Dean Ornish and John Hunter, called "Remaking my voice" in which, he proposed a test to determine the verisimilitude of a synthesized voice.
Ebert underwent further surgery in January 2008 to try to restore his voice and address the complications from his previous surgeries. On April 1, Ebert announced his speech had not been restored. Ebert underwent further surgery in April 2008 after fracturing his hip in a fall. By 2011, Ebert had a prosthetic chin made to hide some of the damage done by his many surgeries.
In December 2012, Ebert was hospitalized due to the fractured hip, which was subsequently determined to be the result of cancer.
Ebert wrote that "what's sad about not eating" was:
The loss of dining, not the loss of food. It may be personal, but for me, unless I'm alone, it doesn't involve dinner if it doesn't involve talking. The food and drink I can do without easily. The jokes, gossip, laughs, arguments and shared memories I miss. Sentences beginning with the words, "Remember that time?" I ran in crowds where anyone was likely to break out in a poetry recitation at any time. Me too. But not me anymore. So yes, it's sad. Maybe that's why I enjoy this blog. You don't realize it, but we're at dinner right now.
Politics
A supporter of the Democratic Party, he wrote of how his Catholic schooling led him to his politics: "Through a mental process that has by now become almost instinctive, those nuns guided me into supporting universal health care, the rightness of labor unions, fair taxation, prudence in warfare, kindness in peacetime, help for the hungry and homeless, and equal opportunity for the races and genders. It continues to surprise me that many who consider themselves religious seem to tilt away from me."
Ebert was critical of political correctness, "a rigid feeling that you have to keep your ideas and your ways of looking at things within very narrow boundaries, or you'll offend someone. Certainly one of the purposes of journalism is to challenge that kind of thinking. And certainly one of the purposes of criticism is to break boundaries. It's also one of the purposes of art." He lamented that Adventures of Huckleberry Finn "has regrettably been under fire in recent years from myopic advocates of Political Correctness, who do not have a bone of irony (or humor) in their bodies, and cannot tell the difference between what is said or done in the novel, and what Twain means by it." Ebert defended the cast and crew of Justin Lin's Better Luck Tomorrow (2002) during a Sundance Film Festival screening when a white member of the audience asked “Why, with the talent yup there and yourself, make a film so empty and amoral for Asian Americans and for Americans?” Ebert responded that "What I find very offensive and condescending about your statement is nobody would say to a bunch of white filmmakers, ‘How could you do this to 'your people'?...Asian-American characters have the right to be whoever the hell they want to be. They do not have to represent 'their people'!" He was a supporter of the film after the incident at Sundance.
Ebert opposed the Iraq War, writing: "Am I against the war? Of course. Do I support our troops? Of course. They were sent to endanger their lives by zealots with occult objectives." He endorsed Barack Obama for re-election in 2012, citing the Affordable Care Act as one important reason for his support of Obama. He was concerned about income inequality, writing: "I have no objection to financial success. I've had a lot of it myself. All of my income came from paychecks from jobs I held and books I published. I have the quaint idea that wealth should be obtained by legal and conventional means–by working, in other words–and not through the manipulation of financial scams. You're familiar with the ways bad mortgages were urged upon people who couldn't afford them, by banks who didn't care that the loans were bad. The banks made the loans and turned a profit by selling them to investors while at the same time betting against them on their own account. While Wall Street was knowingly trading the worthless paper that led to the financial collapse of 2008, executives were being paid huge bonuses." He voiced tentative support for the Occupy Wall Street movement: "I believe the Occupiers are opposed to the lawless and destructive greed in the financial industry, and the unhealthy spread in this country between the rich and the rest." Referring to the subprime mortgage crisis, he wrote: "I have also felt despair at the way financial instruments were created and manipulated to deliberately defraud the ordinary people in this country. At how home buyers were peddled mortgages they couldn't afford, and civilian investors were sold worthless 'securities' based on those bad mortgages. Wall Street felt no shame in backing paper that was intended to fail, and selling it to customers who trusted them. This is clear and documented. It is theft and fraud on a staggering scale." He was also sympathetic to Ron Paul, noting that he "speaks directly and clearly without a lot of hot air and lip flap". In a review of the 2008 documentary I.O.U.S.A., he credited Paul with being "a lonely voice talking about the debt", proposing based on the film that the US government was "already broke". He opposed the war on drugs and capital punishment.
Laura Emerick, his Sun Times editor, recalled: “His union sympathies began at an early age. His father, Walter, worked as an electrician, and Roger remained a member of the Newspaper Guild throughout his career — though after he became an independent contractor, he probably could have opted out. He famously stood with the Guild in 2004, when he wrote to then publisher John Cruickshank that ‘it would be with a heavy heart that I would go on strike against my beloved Sun-Times, but strike I will if a strike is called.'” He lamented that "Most Americans don’t understand the First Amendment, don’t understand the idea of freedom of speech, and don’t understand that it’s the responsibility of the citizen to speak out." Regarding his own freedom of speech, he said: "I write op-ed columns for the Chicago Sun-Times, and people send me e-mails saying, 'You're a movie critic. You don't know anything about politics.' Well, you know what, I'm 60 years old, and I've been interested in politics since I was on my daddy's knee.... I know a lot about politics."
Beliefs
Ebert was critical of intelligent design, and stated that people who believe in either creationism or New Age beliefs such as crystal healing or astrology should not be president. He wrote that in Catholic school he learned of the "Theory of Evolution, which in its elegance and blinding obviousness became one of the pillars of my reasoning, explaining so many things in so many ways. It was an introduction not only to logic but to symbolism, thus opening a window into poetry, literature and the arts in general. All my life I have deplored those who interpret something only on its most simplistic level."
Ebert described himself as an agnostic on at least one occasion, but at other times explicitly rejected that designation; biographer Matt Singer wrote that Ebert opposed any categorization of his beliefs. In 2009, Ebert wrote that he did not "want convictions reduced to a word," and stated, "I have never said, although readers have freely informed me I am an atheist, an agnostic, or at the very least a secular humanist – which I am." He wrote of his Catholic upbringing: "I believed in the basic Church teachings because I thought they were correct, not because God wanted me to. In my mind, in the way I interpret them, I still live by them today. Not by the rules and regulations, but by the principles. For example, in the matter of abortion, I am pro-choice, but my personal choice would be to have nothing to do with an abortion, certainly not of a child of my own. I believe in free will, and believe I have no right to tell anyone else what to do. Above all, the state does not." He wrote "I am not a believer, not an atheist, not an agnostic. I am still awake at night, asking how? I am more content with the question than I would be with an answer." He writes: "I was asked at lunch today who or what I worshiped. The question was asked sincerely, and in the same spirit I responded that I worshiped whatever there might be outside knowledge. I worship the void. The mystery. And the ability of our human minds to perceive an unanswerable mystery. To reduce such a thing to simplistic names is an insult to it, and to our intelligence."
He wrote: "I drank for many years in a tavern that had a photograph of Brendan Behan on the wall, and under it is this quotation, which I memorized: 'I respect kindness in human beings first of all, and kindness to animals. I don't respect the law; I have a total irreverence for anything concerned with society except that which makes the roads safer, the beer stronger, the food cheaper and the old men and the old women warmer in the winter and happier in the summer.' For 57 words, that does a pretty good job of summing it up." Summarizing his beliefs, Ebert wrote:
I believe that if, at the end of it all, according to our abilities, we have done something to make others a little happier, and something to make ourselves a little happier, that is about the best we can do. To make others less happy is a crime. To make ourselves unhappy is where all crime starts. We must try to contribute joy to the world. That is true no matter what our problems, our health, our circumstances. We must try. I didn't always know this, and am happy I lived long enough to find it out.
He wrote: "I correspond with a dear friend, the wise and gentle Australian director Paul Cox. Our subject sometimes turns to death. In 2010 he came very close to dying before receiving a liver transplant. In 1988 he made a documentary named Vincent: The Life and Death of Vincent Van Gogh. Paul wrote that in his Arles days, van Gogh called himself 'a simple worshiper of the external Buddha.' Paul told me that in those days, Vincent wrote:
Looking at the stars always makes me dream, as simply as I dream over the black dots representing towns and villages on a map.
Why, I ask myself, shouldn't the shining dots of the sky be as accessible as the black dots on the map of France?
Just as we take a train to get to Tarascon or Rouen, we take death to reach a star. We cannot get to a star any more when we are alive than we can take the train when we are dead. So to me it seems possible that cholera, tuberculosis and cancer are the celestial means of locomotion. Just as steamboats, buses and railways are the terrestrial means.
To die simply of old age would be to go there on foot.
That is a lovely thing to read, and a relief to find I will probably take the celestial locomotive. Or, as the little dog, Milou, says whenever Tintin proposes a journey, 'Not by foot, I hope!'"
Death and legacy
On April 4, 2013, Ebert died at age 70 at a hospital in Chicago, shortly before he was set to return to his home and enter hospice care.
President Barack Obama wrote, "For a generation of Americans — and especially Chicagoans — Roger was the movies... the unique power of the movies to take us somewhere magical. ... The movies won't be the same without Roger." Martin Scorsese released a statement saying, "The death of Roger Ebert is an incalculable loss for movie culture and for film criticism. And it's a loss for me personally... there was a professional distance between us, but then I could talk to him much more freely than I could to other critics. Really, Roger was my friend. It's that simple."
Steven Spielberg stated that Ebert's "reviews went far deeper than simply thumbs up or thumbs down. He wrote with passion through a real knowledge of film and film history, and in doing so, helped many movies find their audiences... put television criticism on the map." Numerous celebrities paid tribute including Christopher Nolan, Oprah Winfrey, Steve Martin, Albert Brooks, Jason Reitman, Ron Howard, Darren Aronofsky, Larry King, Cameron Crowe, Werner Herzog, Howard Stern, Steve Carell, Stephen Fry, Diablo Cody, Anna Kendrick, Jimmy Kimmel, and Patton Oswalt.
Michael Phillips of the Chicago Tribune recalled that "I came late to film criticism in Chicago, after writing about the theater. Roger loved the theater. His was a theatrical personality: a raconteur, a spinner of dinner-table stories, a man who was not shy about his accomplishments. But he made room in that theatrical, improbable, outsized life for others." Andrew O'Hehir of Salon wrote that "He's up there with Will Rogers, H. L. Mencken, A. J. Liebling and not too far short of Mark Twain as one of the great plainspoken commentators on American life."
Peter Debruge wrote "Ebert’s negative reviews were invariably his most entertaining, and yet, he never insulted those who found something to admire in lesser films. Instead, he hoped to enlighten readers, challenging them to think, while whetting their appetite for stronger work ... It’s a testament to Ebert’s gift that, after a life spent writing about film, he made us love the movies all the more. ...I’ve always suspected the reason he settled into this profession is that film reviews, as he wrote them, served as a Trojan horse for the delivery of bigger philosophical ideas, of which he had an inexhaustible supply to share."
— Richard Corliss, film critic for Time"No one has done as much as Roger to connect the creators of movies with their consumers. He has immense power, and he’s used it for good, as an apostle of cinema. Reading his work, or listening to him parse the shots of some notable film, the movie lover is also engaged with an alert mind constantly discovering things — discovering them to share them. That’s what a great teacher does, and what Roger’s done as a writer, public personality and friend to film for all these years. And, dammit, keep on doing."
The Onion paid tribute to Ebert: "Calling the overall human existence 'poignant,' 'thought-provoking,' and 'a complete tour de force,' film critic Roger Ebert praised existence as 'an audacious and thrilling triumph.'...'At times brutally sad, yet surprisingly funny, and always completely honest, I wholeheartedly recommend existence. If you haven't experienced it yet, what are you waiting for? It is not to be missed.' Ebert later said that while human existence's running time was 'a little on the long side' it could have gone on much, much longer and he would have been perfectly happy."
Hundreds of people attended the funeral Mass held at Chicago's Holy Name Cathedral on April 8, 2013, where Ebert was celebrated as a film critic, newspaperman, advocate for social justice, and husband. Father Michael Pfleger concluded the service with "the balconies of heaven are filled with angels singing 'Thumbs Up' ". Reverend John F. Costello of Loyola University delivered a homily for Ebert. After the funeral service, he was buried at Graceland Cemetery in Chicago, Illinois
A documentary adaptation of Life Itself (2014), directed by Steve James, premiered at the Sundance Film Festival. The film was executive produced by Martin Scorsese and includes interviews with Scorsese, Ava DuVernay, Werner Herzog, Errol Morris and numerous critics. The film received critical acclaim and received numerous accolades including a Emmy Award, Producers Guild of America Award and Critics' Choice Movie Award.
Memorials
A nearly-three-hour public tribute, entitled Roger Ebert: A Celebration of Life, was held on April 11, 2013, at the Chicago Theatre. It featured in-person remembrances, video testimonials, video and film clips, and gospel choirs, and was, according to the Chicago Tribune's Mark Caro, "a laughter- and sorrow-filled send-off from the entertainment and media worlds."
In September 2013, organizers in Champaign, Illinois, announced plans to raise $125,000 to build a life-size bronze statue of Roger Ebert in the town, which was unveiled in front of the Virginia Theatre at Ebertfest on April 24, 2014. The composition was selected by his widow, Chaz Ebert, and depicts Ebert sitting in the middle of three theater seats giving a "thumbs up."
The 2013 Toronto International Film Festival opened with a video tribute of Ebert at Roy Thomson Hall during the world premiere of the WikiLeaks-based film The Fifth Estate. Ebert had been an avid supporter of the festival since its inception in the 1970s. Chaz was in attendance to accept a plaque on Roger's behalf. At the same festival, Errol Morris dedicated his film The Unknown Known to Ebert, saying "He was a really fabulous part of my life, a good friend, a champion, an inspiring writer. I loved Roger."
In August 2013, the Plaza Classic Film Festival in El Paso, Texas, paid homage to Ebert by screening seven films that played a role in his life: Citizen Kane, The Third Man, Tokyo Story, La Dolce Vita, Beyond the Valley of the Dolls, Fitzcarraldo and Goodfellas.
At the 86th Academy Awards ceremony, Ebert was included in the in memoriam montage, a rare honor for a film critic.
In 2014, the documentary Life Itself was released. Director Steve James, whose films had been widely advocated by Ebert, started making the documentary while Ebert was still alive. Martin Scorsese served as an executive producer. The film studies Ebert's life and career, while also filming Ebert during his final months, and includes interviews with his family and friends. It was universally praised by critics. It has a 98% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes.
Werner Herzog told Entertainment Weekly that Ebert was "a soldier of the cinema": "I always loved Roger for being the good soldier, not only the good soldier of cinema, but he was a wounded soldier who for years in his affliction held out and plowed on and soldiered on and held the outpost that was given up by almost everyone: The monumental shift now is that intelligent, deep discourse about cinema has been something that has been vanishing over the last maybe two decades...I've always tried to be a good soldier of cinema myself, so of course since he's gone, I will plow on, as I have plowed on all my life, but I will do what I have to do as if Roger was looking over my shoulder. And I am not gonna disappoint him."
Ebert was inducted as a laureate of The Lincoln Academy of Illinois. In 2001, the governor of Illinois awarded him the state's highest honor, the Order of Lincoln, in the area of performing arts. In 2016, Ebert was inducted into the Chicago Literary Hall of Fame.
The website RogerEbert.com contains an archive of every review Ebert wrote, as well as many essays and opinion pieces. The site, operated by Ebert Digital (a partnership between Chaz and friend Josh Golden), continues to publish new material written by a group of critics who were selected by Ebert before his death.
Awards and honors
Ebert received many awards during his long and distinguished career as a film critic and television host. He was the first film critic to ever win a Pulitzer Prize, receiving the Pulitzer Prize for Criticism in 1975 while working for the Chicago Sun-Times, "for his film criticism during 1974".
In 2003, Ebert was honored by the American Society of Cinematographers, winning a Special Achievement Award. In 2005, Ebert became the first film critic to receive a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame, for his work on television. His star is located at 6834 Hollywood Boulevard. In 2009, Ebert received the Directors Guild of America Award's for Honorary Life Member Award. In 2010, Ebert received the Webby Award for Person of the Year.
In 2007, Ebert was honored by the Gotham Awards receiving a tribute and award for his lifetime contributions to independent film.
On January 31, 2009, Ebert was made an honorary life member of the Directors Guild of America.,On May 15, 2009, Ebert was honored by the American Pavilion at the Cannes Film Festival by the renaming of its conference room, "The Roger Ebert Conference Center." Martin Scorsese joined Ebert and his wife Chaz at the ribbon-cutting ceremony. On May 4, 2010, Ebert was announced by the International Academy of Digital Arts and Sciences as the Webby Person of the Year, having found a voice on the Internet following his battle with cancer.
Year | Award | Category | Nominated work | Result |
---|---|---|---|---|
1979 | Chicago Emmy Awards | Outstanding Special Program | Sneak Previews | Won |
1984 | Primetime Emmy Award | Outstanding Informational Series | At the Movies | Nominated |
1985 | Nominated | |||
1987 | Siskel & Ebert & the Movies | Nominated | ||
1988 | Nominated | |||
1989 | Daytime Emmy Awards | Outstanding Special Class Program | Nominated | |
1990 | Nominated | |||
1991 | Nominated | |||
1992 | Primetime Emmy Awards | Outstanding Informational Series | Nominated | |
1994 | Nominated | |||
1997 | Nominated | |||
2005 | Chicago Emmy Awards | Silver Circle Award | — | Won |
Honors
- 1975 – Pulitzer Prize for Criticism
- 1995 – Publicists Guild of America Press Award
- 2003 – American Society of Cinematographers's Special Achievement Award
- 2004 – Savannah Film Festival's Lifetime Achievement Award
- 2007 – Gotham Award's Lifetime Achievement Award
- 2009 – Directors Guild of America Award' Honorary Life Member Award
- 2010 – Webby Award for Person of the Year
Published works
Each year from 1986 to 1998, Ebert published Roger Ebert's Movie Home Companion (retitled Roger Ebert's Video Companion for its last five installments), which collected all of his movie reviews to that point. From 1999 to 2013 (except in 2008), Ebert instead published Roger Ebert's Movie Yearbook, a collection of all of his movie reviews from the previous two and a half years (for example, the 2011 edition, ISBN 978-0-7407-9769-9, covers January 2008 – July 2010.) Both series also included yearly essays, interviews, and other writings. He also wrote the following books:
- An Illini Century: One Hundred Years of Campus Life (1967) – a history of the first 100 years of the University of Illinois. (no ISBN)
- A Kiss Is Still a Kiss (1984) (ISBN 0-8362-7957-3)
- The Perfect London Walk (1986), with Daniel Curley – a tour of London, Ebert's favorite foreign city. (ISBN 0-8362-7929-8)
- Two Weeks In Midday Sun: A Cannes Notebook (1987) – coverage of the 1987 Cannes Film Festival, which was also the 40th anniversary of the festival, plus comments about the previous 12 festivals Ebert had attended. Interviews with John Malkovich, Barbara Hershey, and Isabella Rossellini. (ISBN 0-8362-7942-5)
- The Future of The Movies (1991), with Gene Siskel – collected interviews with Martin Scorsese, Steven Spielberg, and George Lucas about the future of motion pictures and film preservation. It is the only book co-authored by Siskel and Ebert. (ISBN 978-0-8362-6216-2)
- Behind the Phantom's Mask (1993) – Ebert's only work of fiction, which is about an on-stage murder and the resulting attention put on a previously unknown actor. (ISBN 0-8362-8021-0)
- Ebert's Little Movie Glossary (1994) – a book of movie clichés. (ISBN 0-8362-8071-7)
- Roger Ebert's Book of Film (1996) – a Norton Anthology of a century of writing about the movies. (ISBN 0-393-04000-3)
- Questions for the Movie Answer Man (1997) – his responses to questions sent from his readers. (ISBN 0-8362-2894-4)
- Ebert's Bigger Little Movie Glossary (1999) – a "greatly expanded" book of movie clichés. (ISBN 0-8362-8289-2)
- I Hated, Hated, Hated This Movie (2000) – a collection of reviews of films that received two stars or fewer, dating to the beginning of his Sun-Times career. (The title comes from his zero-star review of the 1994 film North.) (ISBN 0-7407-0672-1)
- The Great Movies (2002), The Great Movies II (2005), The Great Movies III (2010) and The Great Movies IV (2016) – four books of essays about great films. (ISBN 0-7679-1038-9, ISBN 0-7679-1950-5, ISBN 978-0-226-18208-7), and ISBN 978-0-226-40398-4
- Awake in the Dark: The Best of Roger Ebert (2006) – a collection of essays from his 40 years as a film critic, featuring interviews, profiles, essays, his initial reviews upon a film's release, as well as critical exchanges between the film critics Richard Corliss and Andrew Sarris.
- Your Movie Sucks (2007) – a collection of fewer-than-two-star reviews, for movies released between 2000 and 2006. (The title comes from his zero-star review of the 2005 film Deuce Bigalow: European Gigolo.) (ISBN 0-7407-6366-0)
- Roger Ebert's Four-Star Reviews 1967–2007 (2007) (ISBN 0-7407-7179-5)
- Scorsese by Ebert (2008) – covers works by director Martin Scorsese from 1967 to 2008, plus 11 interviews with the director over that period. (ISBN 978-0-226-18202-5)
- The Pot and How to Use It: The Mystery and Romance of the Rice Cooker (2010) (ISBN 0-7407-9142-7)
- Life Itself: A Memoir. (2011) New York: Grand Central Publishing. (ISBN 0-446-58497-5)
- A Horrible Experience of Unbearable Length (2012) – a third book of fewer-than-two-star reviews, for movies released in 2006 and onward. (The title comes from his one-star review of the 2009 film Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen.) (ISBN 1-4494-1025-1)
See also
Notes
- The question how in these last sentences of the blog entry refers back to its first paragraph in which Ebert writes that as a second-grader he would lie awake at night asking himself the questions "But how could God have no beginning? And how could he have no end?".
References
- Zak, Dan (April 5, 2013). "Roger Ebert, lover of life, taught me to write". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on November 5, 2020. Retrieved April 29, 2020.
- Zeitchik, Steven (April 5, 2013). "Five unexpected ways Roger Ebert changed film journalism". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on August 6, 2020. Retrieved April 29, 2020.
- ^ Steinberg, Neil (April 4, 2013). "Roger Ebert dies at 70 after battle with cancer". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on December 16, 2014.
- Turan, Kenneth (April 4, 2013). "Remembrance: Roger Ebert, film's hero to the end". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on April 27, 2013. Retrieved April 5, 2013.
- ^ Douglas Martin (April 4, 2013). "Roger Ebert Dies at 70; a Critic for the Common Man". The New York Times.
- Corliss, Richard (April 4, 2013). "Roger Ebert: Farewell to a Film Legend and Friend". Time. Archived from the original on February 12, 2023. Retrieved February 12, 2023.
- "Roger Ebert – Archive Interview Part 1 of 3 " on YouTube. May 20, 2008. Retrieved June 7, 2012.
- "Ebert, Roger (R. Hyde, Reinhold Timme)". encyclopedia.com. April 4, 2013. Archived from the original on December 15, 2012. Retrieved August 31, 2012.
- ^ Ebert, Roger (2011). Life Itself: A Memoir. New York City: Grand Central Publishing. ISBN 9780446584975.
- Ebert, Roger (January 19, 2011). "What do you make at work, Daddy?". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on April 24, 2022. Retrieved April 23, 2022 – via RogerEbert.com.
- ^ Felsenthal, Carol (December 2005). "A Life In The Movies". Chicago Magazine. Archived from the original on August 23, 2011. Retrieved April 6, 2013.
- Ebert, Roger (April 12, 2002). "Maryam Movie Review & Film Summary". RogerEbert.com. Archived from the original on March 16, 2017. Retrieved January 2, 2017.
- Ebert, Roger (May 13, 2010). "Oh, say, can you wear?". RogerEbert.com. Archived from the original on January 3, 2017. Retrieved January 3, 2017.
- Ebert, Roger (February 22, 2013). "What was my Aunt Martha trying to ask me?". Roger Ebert's Journal. Archived from the original on February 26, 2013.
- ^ Melissa Block. "Roger Ebert: A 'Life' Still Being Lived, and Fully". National Public Radio.
- Roger Ebert. Life Itself: A Memoir. p. 11.
- Ebert, Roger. Life Itself: A Memoir. New York: Grand Central Publishing. p. 30.
- Ebert, Roger (March 18, 2010). "My old man". Archived from the original on July 11, 2019. Retrieved July 11, 2019.
I always worked on newspapers. Harold Holmes, the father of my best friend Hal, was an editor at The News-Gazette, and took us down to the paper. A linotype operator set my byline in lead, and I used a stamp pad to imprint everything with "By Roger Ebert." I was electrified. I wrote for the St. Mary's grade school paper. Nancy Smith and I were co-editors of the Urbana High School Echo. At Illinois, I published "Spectator," a liberal weekly, my freshman year, and then sold it and went over to The Daily Illini. But that was after my father's death.
- "Roger Ebert in the IHSA list of state speech champions, 1957–58". Ihsa.org. Archived from the original on February 16, 2012. Retrieved April 5, 2013.
- Meglin, Nick; Ficarra, John, eds. (1998). Mad About the Movies. New York City: Mad Books. ISBN 1-56389-459-9.
- "Milestones in the life of Roger Ebert". The News-Gazette. Champaign, IL. April 5, 2013. Archived from the original on January 21, 2019. Retrieved January 20, 2019.
- Ebert, Roger (2011). Life Itself. p. 94.
- Ebert, Roger (October 17, 2010). "The Storyteller and the Stallion". Archived from the original on January 30, 2023. Retrieved January 30, 2023.
- Ebert, Roger. Life Itself: A Memoir. New York: Grand Central Publishing. pp. 92, 96.
- Ebert, Roger (October 4, 1961). "La Dolce Vita Movie Review & Film Summary". The Daily Illini. Archived from the original on June 12, 2016. Retrieved January 3, 2017 – via RogerEbert.com.
- Ebert, Roger. Life Itself: A Memoir. New York City: Grand Central Publishing. p. 99.
- Ebert, Roger. Life Itself: A Memoir. New York: Grand Central Publishing. p. 96.
- ^ Ebert, Roger. Life Itself: A Memoir. New York: Grand Central Publishing. p. 139.
- "Ebert named film critic". Chicago Sun-Times. April 5, 1967. p. 57.
- Ebert, Roger. Life Itself: A Memoir. New York: Grand Central Publishing. p. 142.
- Roger Ebert (April 7, 1967). "Gaila". Chicago Sun Times.
- ^ Roger Ebert (2011). Life Itself: A Memoir. p. 154.
- Ebert, Roger (November 7, 1967). "Persona". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on November 16, 2016. Retrieved April 8, 2024.
- Ebert, Roger (January 7, 2001). "Great Movies: Persona". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on November 16, 2016. Retrieved April 8, 2024.
- Ebert, Roger (September 25, 1967). "Bonnie and Clyde". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on November 11, 2017. Retrieved July 30, 2022.
- Ebert, Roger (August 3, 1998). "Great Movies: Bonnie and Clyde". Chicago Sun Times. Archived from the original on February 11, 2023. Retrieved February 11, 2023.
- ^ Ebert, Roger (November 17, 1967). "I Call First/ Who's That Knocking at My Door?". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on December 27, 2020. Retrieved July 30, 2022.
- Ebert, Roger (January 1, 1970). "Beyond the Valley of the Dolls". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on December 30, 2018. Retrieved September 3, 2012.
- Ebert, Roger (April 25, 2010). "'Who Killed Bambi?' – A screenplay". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on April 29, 2010.
- "Roger Ebert, X'70, film critic and longtime Graham School lecturer, 1942–2013". UChicagoNews. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago. April 5, 2013. Archived from the original on December 27, 2016. Retrieved December 26, 2016.
- ^ Rousseau, Caryn (April 4, 2013). "Roger Ebert, first movie critic to win Pulitzer, dies at 70". The Salt Lake Tribune. Archived from the original on January 30, 2016.
- Singer 2023, p. 28.
- ^ Steinberg, Joel. "Siskel and Ebert". Museum of Broadcast Communications. Archived from the original on December 4, 2010. Retrieved June 17, 2022.
- Gliatto, Tom (November 1, 1999). "Despite the Loss of Film-Critic Buddy Gene Siskel, Roger Ebert Gives Life a Thumbs-Up". People. Archived from the original on February 5, 2009. Retrieved April 20, 2010.
- ^ Bloom, Julie (July 22, 2008). "Ebert and Roeper No Longer at the Movies". The New York Times. Archived from the original on November 28, 2018. Retrieved August 30, 2013.
- Corliss, Richard (March–April 1990). "All Thumbs: Or, Is There a Future For Film Criticism?". Film Comment.
- Ebert, Roger (May–June 1990). "All Stars: Or, Is There a Cure For Criticism?". Film Comment.
- Corliss, Richard (May–June 1990). "Then Again". Film Comment.
- "Roger Ebert's Book of Film: Fromm Tolstoy to Tarantino, the Finest Writing From a Century of Film". Publishers Weekly.
- Ebert, Roger (2002). The Great Movies. p. xvii.
- Roger Ebert (September 15, 1996). "Great Movies: Casablanca".
- "About EbertFest". Roger Ebert's Film Festival. Archived from the original on December 29, 2016. Retrieved January 2, 2017.
- "In tribute: Legendary film reviewer leaves thumbprint on a nation of moviegoers". The Star Press. March 27, 1999. Archived from the original on May 5, 2022. Retrieved June 17, 2022 – via Newspapers.com.
- "Gene Siskel, Half of a Famed Movie-Review Team, Dies at 53". The New York Times. February 21, 1999. Archived from the original on September 4, 2021. Retrieved June 17, 2022.
- ^ Ebert & Scorsese (February 27, 2000). "Best films of the 90s". Archived from the original on August 28, 2018. Retrieved June 17, 2022.
- Perrone, Pierre (February 23, 1999). "Obituary: Gene Siskel". The Independent. Archived from the original on August 11, 2019. Retrieved June 17, 2022.
- ^ Scott, A.O. (April 13, 2008). "Roger Ebert, The Critic Behind The Thumb". The New York Times. pp. Arts & Leisure, 1, 22. Retrieved June 17, 2022.
- Ebert, Roger (February 22, 1999). "Farewell, my friend". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on September 29, 2023. Retrieved October 22, 2023.
- "Siskel & Ebert: Remembering Gene Siskel". YouTube. February 27, 1999.
- Ebert, Roger (February 17, 2009). "Remembering Gene". Archived from the original on February 7, 2013. Retrieved October 22, 2023.
- "Columnist to become foil to Roger Ebert". Tampa Bay Times. July 14, 2000. Archived from the original on May 18, 2022. Retrieved May 18, 2022 – via Newspapers.com.
- "The Bill Clinton Interview 2000". siskelebert.org. Archived from the original on July 12, 2020. Retrieved July 17, 2020.
- "Roger Ebert: I ain't a pretty boy no more and so what?". April 24, 2007.
- ^ Chris Jones (February 16, 2010). "Roger Ebert: The Essential Man". Esquire.
- ^ Corliss, Richard (June 23, 2007). "Thumbs Up for Roger Ebert". Time. Archived from the original on January 3, 2017. Retrieved January 2, 2017.
- Miller, Quenton (February 23, 2017). "Roger Ebert, Misplaced Pages Editor". Guernica. Archived from the original on April 26, 2022. Retrieved May 20, 2021.
- Lentz, Harris M. III (May 16, 2014). Obituaries in the Performing Arts, 2013. Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland. ISBN 9780786476657. Archived from the original on May 6, 2024. Retrieved November 2, 2020.
- "Roger Ebert. "By the time we get to Phoenix, he'll be laughing" February 18, 2009". Chicago Sun-Times. October 13, 2004. Archived from the original on April 5, 2013. Retrieved July 24, 2011.
- Ebert, Roger (March 25, 2010). "See you at the movies". Roger Ebert's Journal. Archived from the original on March 26, 2010. Retrieved June 22, 2022.
- Rosenthal, Phil (March 24, 2010). "Tower Ticker: Disney-ABC cancels 'At the Movies,' Siskel and Ebert's old show". Chicago Tribune. Archived from the original on July 3, 2022. Retrieved July 29, 2022.
- ^ Debruge, Peter (April 4, 2013). "Variety's Peter Debruge Remembers Roger Ebert: A Champion Among Men". Variety. Archived from the original on August 6, 2020. Retrieved April 29, 2020.
- Rousseau, Caryn (January 19, 2010). "Roger Ebert returns with new PBS review show". Deseret News. Associated Press. Archived from the original on January 22, 2011. Retrieved January 20, 2011.
- Rosenthal, Phil (January 23, 2011). "'Ebert Presents At the Movies' a work in progress". Chicago Tribune. Archived from the original on January 25, 2011. Retrieved June 17, 2022.
- Ebert, Roger (November 30, 2011). "So long for awhile". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on December 3, 2011. Retrieved June 17, 2022.
- Roger Ebert (March 7, 2013). "The elderly are left on a mountain to die".
- Ebert, Roger (March 27, 2013). "Don't listen to inner voices from other planets". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on June 22, 2022. Retrieved June 22, 2022 – via RogerEbert.com.
- Sperling, Nicole (April 4, 2013). "Roger Ebert's last review: A lukewarm assessment of 'The Host'". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on January 1, 2022. Retrieved January 1, 2022.
- Ebert, Roger (April 6, 2013). "To the Wonder (2013)". RogerEbert.com. Archived from the original on May 13, 2013. Retrieved April 24, 2013.
- Mark Olson (April 9, 2013). "Roger Ebert's last thumbs up: Terrence Malick's 'To The Wonder'". Los Angeles Times.
- Ebert, Roger (July 18, 2013). "Computer Chess (2013)". RogerEbert.com. Archived from the original on July 21, 2013. Retrieved July 20, 2013.
- ^ Shetty, Sharan (July 18, 2013). "A New Review From Roger Ebert". Slate. Archived from the original on July 20, 2013. Retrieved July 20, 2013.
- Ebert, Roger (August 2, 2013). "The Spectacular Now (2013)". RogerEbert.com. Archived from the original on November 28, 2013. Retrieved October 6, 2013.
- Dave Itzkoff (April 3, 2013). "Announcing a 'Leave of Presence,' Ebert Says He's Reducing His Workload". The New York Times.
- Roger Ebert (April 2, 2013). "A Leave of Presence". RogerEbert.com.
- Matt Singer (April 5, 2013). "Roger Ebert, In His Own Words, On the Education of a Film Critic". Indiewire.
- Ebert, Roger (October 22, 2011). "Knocked up at the movies". Archived from the original on December 19, 2019. Retrieved February 19, 2023.
- Ebert, Roger (November 26, 2003). "Bad Santa". Chicago Sun Times. Archived from the original on March 10, 2022. Retrieved February 11, 2023.
- Ebert, Roger (November 18, 2009). "The man who stares at iguanas". Chicago Sun Times. Archived from the original on June 22, 2021. Retrieved December 5, 2023.
- Ebert, Roger (January 1, 1982). "Death Wish II". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on November 11, 2020. Retrieved November 24, 2020 – via RogerEbert.com.
- Ebert, Roger (April 23, 2004). "Shaolin Soccer". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on October 23, 2012. Retrieved March 8, 2005 – via RogerEbert.com.
- "7 of Roger Ebert's most brutal movie reviews". Time. July 4, 2014. Archived from the original on October 20, 2017. Retrieved October 20, 2017.
- Ebert, Roger (July 22, 1994). "North". Chicago Sun Times. Archived from the original on June 9, 2021. Retrieved October 10, 2021.
- Ebert, Roger (November 26, 1996). "Mad Dog Time". Chicago Sun Times. Archived from the original on February 14, 2023. Retrieved February 14, 2023.
- Ebert, Roger (September 22, 1980). "Caligula". Chicago Sun Times. Archived from the original on October 7, 2020.
- Ebert, Roger (June 27, 1987). "Jaws: The Revenge". Chicago Sun Times. Archived from the original on August 22, 2021. Retrieved February 14, 2023.
- Roger Ebert (May 25, 2001). "Pearl Harbor". Chicago Sun Times.
- Ebert, Roger (December 21, 1971). "The Last Picture Show". Chicago Sun Times. Archived from the original on December 12, 2017. Retrieved February 7, 2023.
- Roger Ebert (1977). "Star Wars". Chicago Sun-Times.
- Roger Ebert (August 31, 2001). "Wet Hot American Summer".
- Ebert, Roger (September 14, 1997). "Great Movies: E.T. The Extra-Terrestrial". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on January 29, 2016. Retrieved February 12, 2023.
- Ebert, Roger (July 16, 2004). "A Cinderella Story". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on January 11, 2018.
- Ebert, Roger (March 25, 1994). "The Hudsucker Proxy". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on July 8, 2011.
- Ross, Alex (April 15, 2013). "Learning From Ebert". The New Yorker. Archived from the original on July 30, 2022. Retrieved July 30, 2022.
- Ebert, Roger (2010). The Great Movies III. University of Chicago Press. pp. xvii.
- Ebert, Roger (2002). The Great Movies (First ed.). New York: Broadway Books. p. 243. ISBN 9780767910323. OCLC 47989891.
- ^ Ebert, Roger (April 11, 1992). "Reflections after 25 years at the movies". Chicago Sun-Times.
- Ebert, Roger (March 21, 2013). "In memory of Donald Richie". rogerebert.com.
- Sartin, Hank (October 11, 2013). "Mahalo Roger!: The Hawaii International Film Festival pays tribute to Roger".
- Ebert, Roger (1989). "Why I Love Black and White". Chicago Sun-Times.
- Ebert, Roger (October 7, 1999). "Japanese animation unleashes the mind". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved February 28, 2023.
- Ebert, Roger (October 29, 1999). "Princess Mononoke". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on March 6, 2016. Retrieved August 4, 2022.
- Ebert, Roger (August 30, 2007). "Waiter, there's a rat in my soup". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on October 13, 2013. Retrieved August 4, 2022.
- Ebert, Roger (January 1, 1978). "Gates of Heaven". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved April 19, 2023.
- "Errol Morris On Ebert & Siskel". YouTube. July 21, 2011. Archived from the original on October 22, 2023. Retrieved October 14, 2023.
- Ebert, Roger (1998). "The Up Documentaries". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on April 22, 2023. Retrieved April 22, 2023.
- Ebert, Roger (October 21, 1994). "Hoop Dreams". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved April 19, 2023.
- Ebert, Roger (October 25, 1986). "Sid and Nancy". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on April 5, 2020. Retrieved May 31, 2020 – via RogerEbert.com.
- Ebert, Roger (April 1, 1991). "Ten Greatest Films of All Time". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on June 5, 2020. Retrieved July 30, 2022.
- Ebert, Roger (September 4, 2008). ""What's your favorite movie?"". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on September 5, 2008. Retrieved October 17, 2009.
- "Biography page for Ebert at". Tv.com. Archived from the original on May 17, 2012. Retrieved October 17, 2009.
- "Meet a Critic: Roger Ebert". Rotten Tomatoes. Archived from the original on August 30, 2017. Retrieved January 3, 2017.
- Roger Ebert (September 2012). "The Greatest Films Poll". BFI. Archived from the original on August 19, 2012. Retrieved September 12, 2012.
- Lee, Kevin B. (2013). "The Sight and Sound Film Poll: An International Tribute to Roger Ebert and His Favorite Films". Vimeo.com. Archived from the original on February 6, 2023. Retrieved February 8, 2023.
- "Ebert's 10 Best Lists: 1967–present". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on September 8, 2006.
- ^ "Roger Ebert's Top Ten Lists, 1967-2006". Eric C. Johnson's archive. California Institute of Technology. Archived from the original on December 31, 2007. Retrieved January 2, 2017.
- "Siskel and Ebert Top Ten Lists (1969–1998)". innermind.com. Archived from the original on November 8, 2020. Retrieved November 11, 2011.
- Ebert, Roger (2006). Awake in the Dark. University of Chicago Press. p. 103.
- "Five Easy Pieces". RogerEbert.com. March 16, 2003. Archived from the original on July 28, 2020. Retrieved March 22, 2023.
- "Roger's Top Ten Lists: Best Films of the 1980s". April 19, 2022. Archived from the original on March 23, 2023. Retrieved March 22, 2023.
- "The Best 10 Movies of 1990s". RogerEbert.com. February 23, 2000. Archived from the original on March 9, 2023. Retrieved March 22, 2023.
- "The best films of the decade". RoberEbert.com. December 30, 2009. Archived from the original on April 13, 2023. Retrieved March 22, 2023.
- "The Best Films of the 2010s | Features | Roger Ebert". RogerEbert.com. November 3, 2019. Retrieved December 17, 2024.
- ^ Ebert, Roger (September 24, 2000). "Ugly reality in movie ratings". RogerEbert.com. Archived from the original on May 1, 2018. Retrieved May 1, 2018.
- Ebert, Roger (December 11, 2010). "Getting Real About Movie Ratings". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on July 6, 2015. Retrieved April 5, 2013.
- Ebert, Roger (September 14, 2006). "How do the ratings rate?". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved April 19, 2023.
- Ebert, Roger (September 15, 2000). "Almost Famous". Chicago Sun Times. Archived from the original on February 24, 2023. Retrieved February 7, 2023.
- Ebert, Roger (June 4, 2004). "They got it right". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on June 4, 2004.
- Ebert, Roger (December 26, 1973). "The Exorcist". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on November 2, 2019. Retrieved August 4, 2022.
- Ebert, Roger (October 31, 1978). "Halloween". Chicago Sun Times.
- Ebert, Roger (1971). "Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on September 30, 2023. Retrieved April 22, 2023.
- Ebert, Roger (June 1, 1979). "Apocalypse Now". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on November 14, 2020. Retrieved April 27, 2024.
- Ebert, Roger (January 1, 1999). "Stigmata". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on June 9, 2022. Retrieved April 23, 2022 – via RogerEbert.com.
- Ebert, Roger (April 7, 1995). "Priest". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on November 26, 2010. Retrieved July 24, 2011.
- Ebert, Roger (August 12, 1988). "The Last Temptation of Christ". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on February 23, 2024. Retrieved May 3, 2024.
- Ebert, Roger (November 12, 1999). "Dogma". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on April 23, 2022. Retrieved April 23, 2022 – via RogerEbert.com.
- Ebert, Roger (June 30, 1989). "Do the Right Thing". Chicago Sun-Times.
- "Remembering Roger Ebert: His reviews". Metacritic. Archived from the original on November 23, 2017. Retrieved October 20, 2017.
- Ebert, Roger (December 14, 2012). "You give out too many stars". www.rogerebert.com/. Archived from the original on August 16, 2021. Retrieved July 15, 2021.
- Sloan, Will (February 21, 2017). "Roger Ebert's Zero-Star Movies". Hazlitt. Archived from the original on September 4, 2018. Retrieved March 10, 2019.
- Ebert, Roger (September 19, 1986). "Blue Velvet". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on April 27, 2021. Retrieved January 2, 2021 – via RogerEbert.com.
- Ebert, Roger (February 2, 1972). "A Clockwork Orange". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on July 1, 2019. Retrieved April 23, 2022.
- Ebert, Roger (August 18, 1995). "The Usual Suspects". The Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on April 26, 2020. Retrieved April 23, 2022.
- "Brazil movie review & film summary (1986) | Roger Ebert". Archived from the original on February 13, 2021. Retrieved July 28, 2023.
- "Brazil - Rotten Tomatoes". Rotten Tomatoes. Archived from the original on November 7, 2023. Retrieved July 28, 2023.
- Ebert, Roger (February 27, 1998). "Taste of Cherry". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on April 27, 2021. Retrieved July 31, 2017 – via RogerEbert.com.
- "Ebert's Most Hated". RogerEbert.com. Archived from the original on August 2, 2013. Retrieved July 31, 2017.
- Ebert, Roger (July 15, 1988). "Die Hard". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on March 2, 2011. Retrieved September 4, 2009 – via RogerEbert.com.
- Ebert, Roger. "Speed 2: Cruise Control movie review (1997) | Roger Ebert". RogerEbert.com. Archived from the original on July 23, 2013. Retrieved February 14, 2023.
- "Speed 2 - Cruise Control (1997)". Rotten Tomatoes. Archived from the original on April 30, 2019. Retrieved March 3, 2019.
- ^ Ebert, Roger (February 11, 2013). ""Speed 3"--Winner of my 1999 contest | Roger Ebert | Roger Ebert". RogerEbert.com. Archived from the original on February 14, 2023. Retrieved February 14, 2023.
- Ebert, Roger (November 14, 2010). "John Prine: American Legend | Balder and Dash | Roger Ebert". www.rogerebert.com. Archived from the original on March 31, 2020. Retrieved March 30, 2020.
- Ebert, Roger (October 5, 2009). "Books do furnish a life". Archived from the original on February 12, 2023. Retrieved February 12, 2023.
- Ebert, Roger (October 17, 2010). "The storyteller and the stallion". Archived from the original on January 30, 2023. Retrieved January 30, 2023.
- Ebert, Roger (July 11, 2003). "Stone Reader". Chicago Sun Times. Archived from the original on June 2, 2023. Retrieved April 10, 2024.
- Ebert, Roger (October 24, 2008). "I think I'm musing my mind". Archived from the original on February 25, 2023. Retrieved February 25, 2023.
- Ebert, Roger (December 14, 2012). "My new job. In his own words". Archived from the original on December 5, 2023. Retrieved April 10, 2024.
- Ebert, Roger (December 20, 2011). "Tintin! Tonnere de Brest! Mille sebords!". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on May 7, 2013. Retrieved April 8, 2024.
- Engelhart, Katie (July 12, 2013). "Roger Ebert's Pilgrimage". Slate. Archived from the original on January 30, 2023. Retrieved January 30, 2023.
- "Critical eye by Roger Ebert – Enough! A Modest Proposal to End the Junk Mail Plague". Panix.com. Archived from the original on September 16, 2009. Retrieved October 17, 2009.
- "Roger Ebert gets 'two thumbs up' from the Lumber Cartel for this distinct, well-written pledge". The Lumber Cartel, local 42. Archived from the original on July 6, 2011. Retrieved November 14, 2006.
- Weiman, Bill. "Bill Weinman · Why I Keep The Boulder Pledge". Bw.org. Archived from the original on December 27, 2016. Retrieved January 27, 2017.
- Ebert, Roger (2011). Life Itself. pp. 189–191.
- Ebert, Roger (April 30, 1999). "Herzog's Minnesota Declaration: Defining 'ecstatic truth'". RogerEbert.com. Archived from the original on April 18, 2023. Retrieved April 18, 2023.
- "Roger Ebert. "A letter to Werner Herzog: In praise of rapturous truth" rogerebert.com November 17, 2007". Chicago Sun-Times. November 17, 2007. Archived from the original on December 31, 2008. Retrieved October 17, 2009.
- Ebert, Roger (August 28, 2005). "A conversation with Werner Herzog". Archived from the original on April 18, 2023. Retrieved April 18, 2023.
- Roger Ebert. "Gallo goes on the offensive after 'Bunny' flop". Chicago Sun Times.
- Roger Ebert (September 3, 2004). "Revised editing releases a much improved 'Brown Bunny'". Chicago Sun-Times.
- Roger Ebert (August 11, 2005). "'Bigalow' reaches new giga-low". Chicago Sun Times.
- "A bouquet arrives..." Roger Ebert's Journal.
- "Ebert's "Movie Answer Man column", February 19, 2006". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on April 20, 2007. Retrieved October 17, 2009.
- Ebert, Roger (August 16, 2008). "D-minus for 3-D". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on August 17, 2008. Retrieved October 17, 2009.
- Ebert, Roger (November 27, 2005). "Why did the chicken cross the genders?". RogerEbert.com. Archived from the original on December 20, 2013. Retrieved December 19, 2013.
- Ebert, Roger (December 6, 2005). "Gamers fire flaming posts, e-mails ..." RogerEbert.com. Archived from the original on June 22, 2012. Retrieved March 8, 2022.
- Ebert, Roger (July 21, 2007). "Games vs. Art: Ebert vs. Barker". RogerEbert.com. Archived from the original on February 11, 2013. Retrieved March 8, 2022.
- ^ Ebert, Roger (July 1, 2010). "Okay, Kids, Play on my Lawn". Roger Ebert's Journal. Archived from the original on July 3, 2010.
- Ebert, Roger. "Cosmology of Kyoto". Wired. Archived from the original on February 14, 2023. Retrieved February 14, 2023.
- Ebert, Roger. "Sega's Tokyo Joypolis". Wired. Archived from the original on February 14, 2023. Retrieved February 14, 2023.
- "Chevy Chase". Saturday Night Live. Season 8. Episode 1. September 25, 1982.
- "Brandon Tartikoff". Saturday Night Live. Season 9. Episode 1. October 8, 1983.
- Blevins, Joe (November 18, 2015). "The Night Siskel and Ebert Took Over 'SNL'". Vulture. Archived from the original on July 1, 2022. Retrieved July 19, 2022.
- "Sesame Street - "Sneak Peek Previews" with SISKEL & EBERT!". December 12, 2006. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 12, 2023 – via www.youtube.com.
- "Sesame Street - Monster in the Mirror (celebrity version)". March 26, 2007. Archived from the original on August 12, 2023. Retrieved August 12, 2023 – via www.youtube.com.
- "The Critic (cartoon) with the Voices of Gene and Roger, 1995". Siskel And Ebert Movie Reviews. Archived from the original on July 2, 2022. Retrieved June 21, 2022.
- "Pitch (1997) Full cast & crew". IMDb. Archived from the original on March 16, 2016. Retrieved January 27, 2017.
- "The Cat". Early Edition. Season 1. Episode 19. April 13, 1997.
- Ebert, Roger (June 1, 1997). Questions for the Movie Answer Man. Kansas City, Missouri: Andrews McMeel Publishing. p. 99. ISBN 0-8362-2894-4.
In the Spring of 1997, I did a guest appearance on the show, consoling a little boy who was depressed that Bosco the Bunny had died.
- "Abby Singer". Home Theater & Sound. November 2007. Archived from the original on March 22, 2019. Retrieved January 2, 2017.
- "Sesame Street: A Celebration of Me, Grover (Video 2004)". IMDb. Archived from the original on May 6, 2024. Retrieved July 19, 2022.
- "For the Love of Movies: The Story of American Film Criticism". TCM Movie Database. Archived from the original on May 16, 2020. Retrieved December 16, 2012.
- Fristoe, Roger. "Critic's Choice Introduction". TCM Film Article. Archived from the original on September 4, 2015. Retrieved April 30, 2015.
- Ebert, Roger. "Godzilla movie review & film summary (1998) | Roger Ebert". Archived from the original on April 4, 2020. Retrieved April 8, 2024.
- "Roger Ebert getting married". Messenger-Inquirer. July 9, 1991. Archived from the original on June 2, 2022. Retrieved June 2, 2022.
- "Clipping from Public Opinion". Public Opinion. July 20, 1992. Archived from the original on June 2, 2022. Retrieved June 2, 2022.
- Lewine, Edward (February 13, 2005). "A Film Critic's Windy City Home". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on May 3, 2022. Retrieved May 2, 2022.
- Hunt, Drew. "Chaz Ebert: The Media Mogul". The Chicago Reader. Archived from the original on May 26, 2022. Retrieved May 2, 2022.
- Merli, Melissa (April 25, 2007). "Ebert will have best seat in the house". News-Gazette. Champaign, Illinois. Archived from the original on May 6, 2024. Retrieved May 15, 2022.
- Jones, Chris (February 16, 2010). "Roger Ebert: The Essential Man". Esquire. Archived from the original on September 23, 2011. Retrieved February 16, 2010.
- Caruso, Michael (January 21, 2020). "New year, new semester: what's in store for Spring 2020". The Daily Illini. Archived from the original on May 18, 2021. Retrieved April 27, 2022.
- Steinberg, Neil (April 4, 2013). "Roger Ebert (1942–2013)". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on April 7, 2013. Retrieved May 16, 2022 – via RogerEbert.com.
- Ebert, Roger (July 17, 2012). "Roger loves Chaz". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on July 19, 2012.
- Ebert, Roger (August 25, 2009). "My Name is Roger, and I'm an alcoholic". Archived from the original on April 27, 2021. Retrieved August 25, 2009.
- Ebert, Roger (November 16, 2005). "How I gave Oprah her start". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on June 21, 2008. Retrieved March 8, 2022.
- Rose, Lacey (January 29, 2009). "America's Top-Earning Black Stars". Forbes. Archived from the original on June 20, 2012. Retrieved September 11, 2017.
- Singer 2023, p. 243.
- Ebert, Roger (August 17, 2006). "Email from Roger". RogerEbert.com. Archived from the original on August 20, 2006. Retrieved January 18, 2024.
- Ebert, Roger (June 29, 2007). "Sicko Movie Review & Film Summary". RogerEbert.com. Archived from the original on February 9, 2021. Retrieved February 9, 2021.
- Ebert, Roger (January 6, 2010). "Nil by mouth". Roger Ebert's Journal. Archived from the original on January 9, 2010.
- Jim Emerson (March 29, 2007). "Ebertfest '07: 'It's his happening and it freaks him out!'". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on November 14, 2011. Retrieved September 4, 2009.
- Ebert, Roger. "RogerEbert.com Front Page". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on May 21, 2007. Retrieved May 22, 2007.
- "RogerEbert.com commentary". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on February 11, 2013. Retrieved July 23, 2007.
- Lund, Jordan. "Roger Ebert's Journal: Finding my own voice 8 December 2009". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on August 15, 2009. Retrieved October 17, 2009.
- Ebert, Roger (February 26, 2010). "Hello, this is me speaking". Roger Ebert's Journal. Archived from the original on March 9, 2010.
- Tucker, Ken (March 2, 2010). "Roger Ebert predicts the Oscars, movingly: 'No more surgery for me.'". Entertainment Weekly. Archived from the original on March 5, 2010. Retrieved March 3, 2010.
- Ebert, Roger (2011). "Remaking my voice". Archived from the original on February 25, 2023. Retrieved February 25, 2023.
- "Roger Ebert Tests His Vocal Cords, and Comedic Delivery". The New York Times. March 7, 2011. Archived from the original on April 5, 2013. Retrieved April 4, 2013.
- Emerick, Laura (January 25, 2008). "Ebert doing well after surgery". RogerEbert.com/Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on June 22, 2012. Retrieved January 26, 2008.
- "Thumbs up for Roger Ebert after latest bout of surgery, lawyer reports". Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. January 25, 2008. Archived from the original on June 5, 2008. Retrieved October 17, 2009.
- ""Roger Ebert: Let's go to the movies"; Chicago Sun-Times; April 1, 2008". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on April 4, 2008. Retrieved October 17, 2009.
- Ebert, Roger (April 18, 2008). "Ebert recovering from hip surgery". RogerEbert.com. Archived from the original on February 9, 2021. Retrieved February 9, 2021.
- Ebert, Roger (January 19, 2011). "Leading with my chin". RogerEbert.com. Archived from the original on February 9, 2021. Retrieved February 9, 2021.
- Ebert, Roger (April 2, 2013). "A Leave of Presence". RogerEbert.com. Archived from the original on February 9, 2021. Retrieved February 9, 2021.
- Ebert, Roger (January 6, 2010). "Nil by mouth". RogerEbert.com. Archived from the original on February 13, 2023. Retrieved February 13, 2023.
- Cooke, Rachel (November 6, 2011). "Roger Ebert: 'I'm an optimistic person'". The Guardian. Archived from the original on February 13, 2022. Retrieved February 13, 2022.
- ^ Roger Ebert (March 1, 2013). "How I am a Roman Catholic". Archived from the original on March 9, 2024. Retrieved April 23, 2024.
- Siskel & Ebert Advise Young Movie Critics.
- Roger Ebert (April 2, 1993). "The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn". Chicago Sun Times.
- "When Audiences Attack at Sundance". Film Threat. January 19, 2012. Archived from the original on March 11, 2015.
- Davis, Erik. "About That Time Roger Ebert Fought a Heckler over Justin Lin's 'Better Luck Tomorrow". Movies.com. Archived from the original on October 19, 2017. Retrieved January 27, 2017.
- Harris, Dana (April 4, 2013). "This Video Shows Exactly What We Lost With the Death of Roger Ebert". IndieWire. Archived from the original on April 6, 2013. Retrieved April 4, 2013.
- Ebert, Roger (November 4, 2008). "This land was made for you and me". Archived from the original on March 27, 2023. Retrieved May 6, 2024.
- Ebert, Roger. "Reason 02: President Obama faced down the GOP and the health industry to finally reform American healthcare". 90days90reasons.com. Archived from the original on August 13, 2012. Retrieved October 25, 2012.
- Ebert, Roger (April 9, 2011). "The One Percenters".
- Ebert, Roger (December 7, 2011). "Where I stand on the Occupy movement".
- Mcdevitt, Caitlin (January 27, 2012). "Roger Ebert gives Ron Paul a thumbs up". POLITICO. Archived from the original on November 14, 2022. Retrieved November 14, 2022.
- Ebert, Roger. "I.O.U.S.A. movie review & film summary (2008) | Roger Ebert". www.rogerebert.com/. Archived from the original on November 14, 2022. Retrieved November 14, 2022.
- Ebert, Roger (2001). "Traffic". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on April 19, 2008. Retrieved May 3, 2024.
- Ebert, Roger (January 12, 2012). ""Nobody has the right to take another life"". Archived from the original on May 3, 2024. Retrieved May 3, 2024.
- "Remembrances of Roger". April 9, 2012.
- Rothschild, Matthew (April 4, 2013). "Roger Ebert Remembered". The Progressive.
- Ebert, Roger (December 3, 2008). "Win Ben Stein's Mind". Archived from the original on May 3, 2024. Retrieved May 3, 2024.
- Roger Ebert (September 4, 2009). "The Longest Thread Evolves". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on September 8, 2009. Retrieved September 4, 2009.
- Ebert, Roger (December 2, 2009). "New Agers and Creationists should not be President". Roger Ebert's Journal. Archived from the original on May 10, 2021. Retrieved May 9, 2021.
- Singer 2023, p. 265.
- ^ Ebert, Roger (April 17, 2009). "How I believe in God". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on April 20, 2009. Retrieved November 5, 2009.
- Ebert, Roger (August 13, 2010). "Traveler to the undiscovere'd country". Archived from the original on May 3, 2024. Retrieved May 3, 2024.
- ^ Ebert, Roger (May 2, 2009). "Go Gentle Into That Good Night". Archived from the original on May 16, 2022. Retrieved May 16, 2022.
- Ebert, Roger. Life Itself: A Memoir. p. 415.
- Corely, Cheryl (April 4, 2013). "For Pulitzer-Winning Critic Roger Ebert, Films Were A Journey". NPR. Archived from the original on March 30, 2018. Retrieved April 4, 2018.
- Duke, Alan (April 4, 2013). "Roger Ebert, renowned film critic, dies at age 70". CNN. Archived from the original on June 24, 2022. Retrieved June 24, 2022.
- Jones, Chris (December 24, 2013). "Oral Histories of 2013: Roger Ebert's Wife, Chaz, on His Final Moments". Esquire. Archived from the original on July 19, 2022. Retrieved July 19, 2022.
- Obama, Barack (April 4, 2013). "Statement by the President on the Passing of Roger Ebert". The White House. Archived from the original on March 14, 2021. Retrieved February 9, 2021.
- "Filmmakers and Film Critics on Roger Ebert". RogerEbert.com. April 4, 2014. Archived from the original on February 14, 2021. Retrieved February 9, 2021.
- Child, Ben (April 5, 2013). "Roger Ebert dies at 70: 'Roger was the movies,' says Obama". The Guardian. Archived from the original on February 13, 2022. Retrieved February 13, 2022.
- "Hollywood Mourns The Loss Of Roger Ebert". Business Insider. Archived from the original on June 10, 2023. Retrieved June 9, 2023.
- Philipps, Michael (April 3, 2013). "Farewell to a generous colleague and friend". Chicago Tribune. Archived from the original on February 28, 2023. Retrieved February 28, 2023.
- O'Hehir, Andrew (April 5, 2013). "RIP Roger Ebert: Movie criticism's Great Communicator". Salon.com. Archived from the original on February 28, 2023. Retrieved February 28, 2023.
- "Roger Ebert Hails Human Existence As 'A Triumph'". The Onion. April 4, 2013. Archived from the original on January 30, 2023. Retrieved January 30, 2023.
- Caro, Mark (April 9, 2013). "Roger Ebert's funeral: 'He had a heart big enough to love all'". Chicago Tribune. Archived from the original on January 26, 2021. Retrieved February 9, 2021.
- Costello, John F. (April 8, 2013). "Roger Ebert Homily". Chicago Sun-Times. Archived from the original on May 28, 2023. Retrieved April 15, 2024.
- Ebert, Roger (October 30, 2013). "Chicago's most famous". wischlist. Retrieved November 10, 2024.
- "Life Itself". Rotten Tomatoes. Flixster. Archived from the original on February 15, 2021. Retrieved September 11, 2014.
- "Life Itself Reviews". Metacritic. Archived from the original on January 8, 2021. Retrieved July 19, 2014.
- Caro, Mark (April 12, 2013). "Roger Ebert honored by Hollywood stars for his 'tenacity', 'zest for life'". Chicago Tribune. Archived from the original on March 8, 2021. Retrieved February 9, 2021.
- Rothman, Lily (April 25, 2014). "Roger Ebert Statue Unveiled Outside Illinois Theater". Time. Archived from the original on February 24, 2021. Retrieved February 9, 2021.
- "Ebert statue planned in Champaign". Chicago Sun-Times. September 12, 2013. Archived from the original on October 29, 2014. Retrieved September 11, 2013.
- Rothman, Lily (April 25, 2014). "Roger Ebert Statue Unveiled Outside Illinois Theater". Time. Archived from the original on June 13, 2015. Retrieved June 1, 2015.
- Whipp, Glenn (September 6, 2013). "TIFF 2013: Roger Ebert tribute: 'He's probably ... somewhere in here'". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on January 3, 2017. Retrieved January 2, 2017.
- "Toronto International Film Festival Launches with a Tribute to Roger". RogerEbert.com. September 4, 2013. Archived from the original on April 3, 2015. Retrieved April 30, 2015.
- "Errol Morris dedicates his new film to Roger Ebert at TIFF". The Globe and Mail. September 10, 2013. Archived from the original on March 24, 2023. Retrieved March 24, 2023.
- Ebert, Chaz (August 5, 2013). "Ebert Everlasting: Classic Film Festival in El Paso Honors Roger Ebert". Archived from the original on February 28, 2023. Retrieved February 28, 2023.
- "Oscar Remembers – Photo Gallery, Roger Ebert, Film Critic". The Oscars. February 2013. Archived from the original on March 4, 2014.
- "Oscars 2014 – In Memoriam Montage (Full)". YouTube. March 2, 2014. Archived from the original on March 10, 2014. Retrieved April 30, 2015.
- Life Itself at Rotten Tomatoes
- Rome, Emily (April 4, 2013). "Werner Herzog on Roger Ebert, 'the good soldier of cinema'". Entertainment Weekly. Archived from the original on August 14, 2022. Retrieved August 14, 2022.
- "Laureates by Year - The Lincoln Academy of Illinois". The Lincoln Academy of Illinois. Archived from the original on September 23, 2015. Retrieved March 7, 2016.
- "Roger Ebert". Chicago Literary Hall of Fame. 2016. Archived from the original on October 8, 2017. Retrieved October 8, 2017.
- Hernandez, Brian Anthony (April 9, 2013). "Roger Ebert's Website for Film Reviews Gets Makeover". Mashable. Archived from the original on July 23, 2018. Retrieved March 15, 2019.
- "1975 Pulitzer Prize Winners & Finalists". The Pulitzer Prizes. Columbia University. Archived from the original on July 9, 2021. Retrieved July 8, 2021.
- Ebert, Roger. "American film critic". Encyclopaedia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. Archived from the original on July 7, 2021. Retrieved July 8, 2021.
- "Remembering Roger Ebert: The Iconic Film Critic's Life and Career in Pictures". The Hollywood Reporter. April 4, 2013. Archived from the original on August 18, 2020. Retrieved May 21, 2020.
- McNary, Dave (December 16, 2008). "Directors Guild honors Roger Ebert". Variety. Archived from the original on August 6, 2020. Retrieved May 21, 2020.
- "Roger Ebert - The Webby Awards". webbyawards.com. Archived from the original on November 28, 2021. Retrieved May 21, 2020.
- "Last Night's Gotham Awards Deemed Indie Enough". Vulture. November 28, 2007. Archived from the original on June 25, 2020. Retrieved May 21, 2020.
- "Directors Guild to honor Roger Ebert". Reuters. December 28, 2008. Archived from the original on December 28, 2008.
- "Cannes: Martin Scorsese at Dedication of the Roger Ebert Conference Room". filmjerk.com. May 18, 2009. Archived from the original on August 6, 2020. Retrieved May 20, 2020.
- "The Webby Awards". The Webby Awards. June 14, 2010. Archived from the original on April 4, 2013. Retrieved April 5, 2013.
- Severson, Kim (August 31, 2010). "Roger Ebert: No Longer an Eater, Still a Cook". The New York Times. Archived from the original on September 2, 2010. Retrieved October 30, 2010.
Further reading
- Bruce J. Evensen. "Ebert, Roger (18 June 1942–04 April 2013)" American National Biography (2015)
- Singer, Matt (2023). Opposable Thumbs: How Siskel & Ebert Changed Movies Forever. New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons. ISBN 978-0-593-54015-2.
External links
- Official website
- Roger Ebert at The Interviews: An Oral History of Television
- Roger Ebert's critic page at Rotten Tomatoes
- Roger Ebert's celebrity page at Rotten Tomatoes
- Roger Ebert at IMDb
- Roger Ebert at TED
- Appearances on C-SPAN
- Roger Ebert on Charlie Rose
- Roger Ebert on the Muck Rack journalist listing site
Siskel and Ebert | |
---|---|
Television series |
|
Roger Ebert | |
Gene Siskel | |
Related |
Pulitzer Prize for Criticism (1970–1975) | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
- Roger Ebert
- 1942 births
- 2013 deaths
- 20th-century American male writers
- 20th-century American non-fiction writers
- 21st-century American male writers
- 21st-century American non-fiction writers
- American bloggers
- American film critics
- American film historians
- American humanists
- American male bloggers
- American male non-fiction writers
- American male screenwriters
- American memoirists
- American people of Dutch descent
- American people of German descent
- American people of Irish descent
- American writers with disabilities
- Chicago Sun-Times people
- American critics of creationism
- Deaths from cancer in Illinois
- Deaths from salivary gland cancer
- Deaths from thyroid cancer
- Film theorists
- Former Roman Catholics
- Illinois Democrats
- People from Urbana, Illinois
- Pulitzer Prize for Criticism winners
- Screenwriters from Illinois
- Secular humanists
- Television personalities from Chicago
- University of Cape Town alumni
- University of Chicago alumni
- University of Chicago faculty
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign College of Media alumni
- Writers from Chicago
- Writers from Urbana, Illinois
- Phi Delta Theta members