| Revision as of 11:49, 26 March 2016 editThewolfchild (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers51,952 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Gagauz people. (TW)← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 15:17, 22 June 2023 edit undoDyanega (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers37,101 edits →GBIF distribution maps: new sectionTag: New topic | ||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| Please mind your own business en don't be patronizing nor to try to increase the # of your contribution by editing this page using spam-like templates. ] (]) 05:21, 18 March 2016 (UTC) | Please mind your own business en don't be patronizing nor to try to increase the # of your contribution by editing this page using spam-like templates. ] (]) 05:21, 18 March 2016 (UTC) | ||
| == Discretionary sanctions notice - Balkans == | |||
| ⚫ | == March 2016 == | ||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| {{Ivm|2=''This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does '''not''' imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.'' | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> - '']'' 11:48, 26 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| '''Please carefully read this information:''' | |||
| The ] has authorised ] to be used for pages regarding the ], a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is ]. | |||
| Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. | |||
| }}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> --]<small><sup>\ ] /</sup></small> 04:20, 29 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | == March 2016 == | ||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''60 hours''' for ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by first reading the ], then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. ] (]) 14:51, 29 March 2016 (UTC)</p></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> | |||
| == GBIF distribution maps == | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| Hi. You need to be aware that distribution maps in GBIF are not subject to any form of standardized quality control, and contain '''numerous data points that are erroneous''', such as points representing terrestrial species but mapping in the middle of the ocean, or in polar regions. Please do not use GBIF maps as the basis for any edits in Misplaced Pages, they are not ]. Thanks. ] (]) 15:17, 22 June 2023 (UTC) | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> - '']'' 11:49, 26 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 15:17, 22 June 2023
Please mind your own business en don't be patronizing nor to try to increase the # of your contribution by editing this page using spam-like templates. احمد الليبي (talk) 05:21, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions notice - Balkans
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Balkans, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.--slakr 04:20, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
March 2016
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Widr (talk) 14:51, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
GBIF distribution maps
Hi. You need to be aware that distribution maps in GBIF are not subject to any form of standardized quality control, and contain numerous data points that are erroneous, such as points representing terrestrial species but mapping in the middle of the ocean, or in polar regions. Please do not use GBIF maps as the basis for any edits in Misplaced Pages, they are not reliable sources as defined by Misplaced Pages policy. Thanks. Dyanega (talk) 15:17, 22 June 2023 (UTC)