Misplaced Pages

User talk:Dr0p th3 pr3ssur3: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:46, 2 June 2016 editPadgriffin (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Rollbackers17,342 edits Warning: Vandalism. (TW)← Previous edit Latest revision as of 04:58, 2 June 2016 edit undoPadgriffin (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Rollbackers17,342 edits Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion 
(8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:


] Please stop your ]. If you continue to ] Misplaced Pages, you may be ]. <!-- Template:uw-vandalism3 --> ] ] 04:46, 2 June 2016 (UTC) ] Please stop your ]. If you continue to ] Misplaced Pages, you may be ]. <!-- Template:uw-vandalism3 --> ] ] 04:46, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ].

'''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] ] 04:47, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

== Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion ==
]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at ] regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on ]. The thread is ]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. ] ] 04:52, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
:Please read ]. ] ] 04:54, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Please don't make unprovoked threats, use proper logic in your reversions and discuss on talk page!
:You have violated ]. That is a valid reason for a block. ] ] 04:58, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 04:58, 2 June 2016

June 2016

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Clubjustin 04:42, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Misplaced Pages, you may be blocked from editing. Clubjustin 04:46, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Juan Cole shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Clubjustin 04:47, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. The thread is Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Dr0p_th3_pr3ssur3 reported by User:Clubjustin (Result: ). Thank you. Clubjustin 04:52, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Please read WP:3RR. Clubjustin 04:54, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Please don't make unprovoked threats, use proper logic in your reversions and discuss on talk page!

You have violated WP:3RR. That is a valid reason for a block. Clubjustin 04:58, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
User talk:Dr0p th3 pr3ssur3: Difference between revisions Add topic