Revision as of 22:27, 6 September 2016 editJDC808 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers72,304 edits →User-reported← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 05:10, 22 January 2025 edit undoHBC AIV helperbot14 (talk | contribs)Bots30,489 editsm 4 reports remaining. Tagging noticeboard as backlogged | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<noinclude>{{Short description|Noticeboard for persistent vandalism}}__NONEWSECTIONLINK__ | |||
<!-- Adds protection template automatically if page is semi-protected, inside the noinclude, because this page is transcluded. -- |
<!-- Adds protection template automatically if page is semi-protected, inside the noinclude, because this page is transcluded. -->{{#ifeq:{{PROTECTIONLEVEL:edit}}|autoconfirmed|{{pp|1=vandalism|action=edit|small=yes|expiry=}}}}<!-- | ||
{{Noticeboard protected|reason=Persistent ]}}-->]<!-- prevent accidental archiving with OneClickArchiver --> | |||
{{/Header}}<!-- | |||
⚫ | usually no need to manually edit the following line. Please see the talk page for more details if you wish to manually force the removal of the backlog indicator, rather than removing it. --> | ||
⚫ | {{adminbacklog|bot=HBC AIV helperbot14}}<!-- v2.0.29 RemoveBlocked=On MergeDuplicates=On AutoMark=On FixInstructions=On AutoBacklog=On AddLimit=4 RemoveLimit=2 --> | ||
</noinclude> | |||
⚫ | == Reports == | ||
__NEWSECTIONLINK__<!-- __NEWSECTIONLINK__ causes a + button to | |||
appear on the edit page. This is a useful feature, as it allows editors | |||
to add reports without edit conflicts; edit conflicts are very common on this page! --> | |||
<!-- The backlog tag is automatically changed to enabled | |||
({{adminbacklog}}) or disabled ({{noadminbacklog}}) by a bot. There is | |||
⚫ | usually no need to manually edit the following line. Please see the talk page for more details if you wish to manually force the removal of the backlog indicator, rather than removing it. --> | ||
⚫ | {{adminbacklog}}<!-- v2.0. |
||
<!-- Do not remove adminbacklog/noadminbacklog template above! --> | |||
⚫ | ==Reports== | ||
{{Misplaced Pages:Administrator intervention against vandalism/TB2}} | {{Misplaced Pages:Administrator intervention against vandalism/TB2}} | ||
===User-reported=== | === User-reported === | ||
<!-- | |||
<!-- The following are examples of how to report a vandal on this page. | |||
Please copy and paste |
Please copy and paste the following to the *VERY BOTTOM* of the page to report a User or IP. | ||
⚫ | * {{Vandal|Username or IP address}} brief reason for listing (keep it short) ~~~~ | ||
--> | |||
Anonymous Users (IP addresses): | |||
*{{vandal|2804:49A4:4007:6D00:1DDD:70A2:FE57:9EE2}} – On {{No redirect|:List of French serial killers}}: Repeated disruptive and unsourced changes (always the same ones) on the mentioned page, no other constructive contributions, doesn't engage on the talk page. I suggest a temporary block, at least from the article in question. ] (]) 04:06, 22 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
⚫ | * {{ |
||
*:{{AIV|e|2 days}} ] (]) 04:22, 22 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
*::Hmm, I don't check my watchlist every day. The reported IP has never made any constructive edits and repeatedly engaged in disruptive editing. Why should it matter whether that's noticed after one or two days? ] (]) 04:26, 22 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
Registered Users: | |||
*:::@] I sympathize with the frustration. However, blocks are intended as preventative and longstanding consensus is that if the block is not in response to relatively recent behavior, then it becomes punitive which is a ]. If you see any further disruption from this user, you can ping me or drop a line on my talk page. I will leave a final warning on their talk page. -] (]) 04:36, 22 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
* {{Vandal|username}} optional brief reason for listing (keep it short) ~~~~ | |||
*:::Because IPs are dynamic. It may well be different people who use the IP now. ] (<small><sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub></small>) 04:37, 22 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
*{{vandal|MARJEN11}} – On {{No redirect|:Central bank}} ({{diff|Central bank|1270991040|undefined|diff}}): vandalism after final warning. <span style="border-radius:2px;padding:3px;background:#1E816F">]<span style="color:#fff"> ‥ </span>]</span> 04:54, 22 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
List begins BELOW this line --> | |||
* {{Vandal| |
* {{Vandal|User:BASS79}} Repeated, wilful vandalism against site rules, despite my attempts to advise. History of ] speaks for itself. ] (]) 04:57, 22 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
*{{vandal|97.100.34.93}} – On {{No redirect|:Monica Geller}} ({{diff|Monica Geller|1270992911|undefined|diff}}): vandalism after final warning. ] (]) 05:08, 22 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:*'''Note''': User is in the category: ]. ] (]) 18:49, 6 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
*{{vandal|Philosophical Views}} – On ]: account is being used only for promotional purposes. Sole goal is to promote this non-notable philosophy writer. Doesn't seem to have any valid evidence that this person is notable and has repeatedly posted the article without any convincing citations. ] (]) 17:06, 6 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
* {{Vandal|Athar Hussain}} Promotional only. Here to write a non notable autobiography. ] (]) 21:02, 6 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
*{{vandal|KamiaMulhotra1}} – On ]: vandalism after final warning; account is being used only for promotional purposes. Repeated removal of speedy tags on self promoting article. ] (]) 21:23, 6 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
*{{vandal|203.121.73.76}} keeps putting tamil language over unrelated malaysian (and other) pages and setting their native languages to tamil. ] (]) 21:28, 6 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
*{{IPvandal|184.156.164.239}} – On ] ({{diff|User:Zackmann08/userboxes|738089026|738088973|diff}}):. Repeated vandalism of user page. ] (<sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub>) 21:29, 6 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
*{{vandal|JDC808}} User had committed five documented cases of vandalism in the last hour. (Edits: , , , , ) he was warned here: () and has since committed five more acts of vandalism here: (Edits: , , , , ) User was told numerous times that the discussion he continuously referenced was for a page title and not its contents. User continuously ignored this and made edits at his own discretion. ] (]) 22:09, 6 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
**NOTE: Since this report was filed, the same user has since violated the 3RR on page ] as he's made four reverts in the last 24 hours. (Edits: , , , ) Unfortunately, now a ban isn't up for discussion, only the length of said ban. ] (]) 22:12, 6 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
***{{yo|Weweremarshall}} edit warring should be reported at ]. ]<sub>(])</sub> 22:14, 6 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
****Comment: ] has been disrupting the page by continuously removing content when a discussion on said matter is currently in place. He is claiming I have vandalized, but it appears that this user does not know what vandalism means, and has in fact himself teetered into the waters of committing vandalism by continuously reverting the page to his preferred version before a consensus has been met. I am not the only editor who has pointed the discussion out to him. Yes, I did revert him multiple times, but only to put the articles back at the version of pre-consensus. Here are the article histories for the articles in question: , , , and . Also, I had left a comment on his , but he just brushed it off and ignored it. --] ] 22:15, 6 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
*****Comment: As the user literally just proved for me, he continues to make edits without reading comments from other editors. On this exact page he claims "a discussion on the matter is currently in place", I pointed out in this exact thread that the discussion was only for the page title and not its contents, he ignored it on this page, he ignored it in the edit summary. Additionally placed his comment out of chronological order so it could be read ahead of other comments. ] (]) 22:21, 6 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
******{{Comment}} Please stop assuming things. The discussions do in fact apply to the whole articles. My comment was placed "out of chronological order" as you've stated because it was a direct reply to the report, not the two replies following it (those comments were also saying where this report should have been made, and were not commenting on the contents of the report itself). Sufficient information has been supplied to the administrators. --] ] 22:27, 6 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
*{{vandal|Weweremarshall}} in trying to stop the vandalism conducted by the user reported, I believe I myself have committed vandalism because of the amount of times I had to undo his vandalism. Though I didn't violate 3RR on a specific page, I did across multiple pages. I don't know if this counts but felt it necessary to submit myself for review. ] (]) 22:09, 6 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
:*This is a case for ] or ], this noticeboard is only for obvious vandalism.] (]) 22:18, 6 September 2016 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 05:10, 22 January 2025
Noticeboard for persistent vandalismNoticeboards | |
---|---|
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes. | |
General | |
Articles, content | |
Page handling | |
User conduct | |
Other | |
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards |
Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention.
Important!- The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam.
- Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s).
- The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future.
- If you decide that a report should be filed, place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section:
* {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~
- Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
- Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing.
- This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action.
This page was last updated at 05:10 on 22 January 2025 (UTC). Purge the cache of this page if it is out of date.
This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. This notice will be automatically removed by HBC AIV helperbot14 (talk) when the backlog is cleared. |
Reports
Bot-reported
- 74.194.126.3 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 03:15, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Warned user. Peaceray (talk) 04:38, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- 2601:8c0:480:67c0:5457:4511:184a:d05a (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 03:29, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Warned user. Peaceray (talk) 04:42, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
- 2804:49A4:4007:6D00:1DDD:70A2:FE57:9EE2 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On List of French serial killers: Repeated disruptive and unsourced changes (always the same ones) on the mentioned page, no other constructive contributions, doesn't engage on the talk page. I suggest a temporary block, at least from the article in question. Gawaon (talk) 04:06, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Stale report. User has not edited in 2 days. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:22, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hmm, I don't check my watchlist every day. The reported IP has never made any constructive edits and repeatedly engaged in disruptive editing. Why should it matter whether that's noticed after one or two days? Gawaon (talk) 04:26, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Gawaon I sympathize with the frustration. However, blocks are intended as preventative and longstanding consensus is that if the block is not in response to relatively recent behavior, then it becomes punitive which is a no no. If you see any further disruption from this user, you can ping me or drop a line on my talk page. I will leave a final warning on their talk page. -Ad Orientem (talk) 04:36, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Because IPs are dynamic. It may well be different people who use the IP now. Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI (/my edits) 04:37, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hmm, I don't check my watchlist every day. The reported IP has never made any constructive edits and repeatedly engaged in disruptive editing. Why should it matter whether that's noticed after one or two days? Gawaon (talk) 04:26, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Stale report. User has not edited in 2 days. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:22, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- MARJEN11 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Central bank (diff): vandalism after final warning. Remsense ‥ 论 04:54, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- User:BASS79 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Repeated, wilful vandalism against site rules, despite my attempts to advise. History of Shabooh Shoobah speaks for itself. 51.19.140.156 (talk) 04:57, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- 97.100.34.93 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Monica Geller (diff): vandalism after final warning. Flat Out (talk) 05:08, 22 January 2025 (UTC)