Revision as of 20:06, 27 September 2016 editDebresser (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors110,467 edits →Unnecessary: Better.← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 17:52, 20 October 2024 edit undoPrimeBOT (talk | contribs)Bots2,079,569 editsm →top: Task 30: banner adjustment following a discussionTag: AWB | ||
(152 intermediate revisions by 39 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
⚫ | {{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|1= | ||
{{WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography|terrorism=yes|terrorism-imp=Mid|importance=Mid|serialkiller=yes|serialkiller-imp=Mid}} | |||
{{WikiProject Military history| Middle-Eastern = y|Post-Cold-War=yes|class=C|b1=no|b2=yes|b3=yes|b4=yes|b5=yes}} | |||
⚫ | {{WikiProject Disaster management|importance=Low}} | ||
⚫ | {{WikiProject Judaism|importance=Mid}} | ||
{{WikiProject Israel|importance=Mid}} | |||
⚫ | {{WikiProject Palestine|importance=High}} | ||
⚫ | }} | ||
{{ARBPIA}} | {{ARBPIA}} | ||
⚫ | {{OnThisDay|date1=2009-02-25|oldid1=273249922|date2=2011-02-25|oldid2=415897434|date3=2014-02-25|oldid3=596880530|date4=2019-02-25|oldid4=885051120|date5=2024-02-25|oldid5=1210160909}} | ||
⚫ | {{archives|auto=long|search=yes|bot=Lowercase sigmabot III|age=90|units=days}} | ||
⚫ | |||
{{WP Crime|class=|importance=}} | |||
⚫ | {{WikiProject |
||
⚫ | {{WikiProject |
||
⚫ | {{WikiProject |
||
⚫ | }} | ||
⚫ | {{OnThisDay|date1=2009-02-25|oldid1=273249922|date2=2011-02-25|oldid2=415897434|date3=2014-02-25|oldid3=596880530}} | ||
⚫ | {{archives|auto=long|search=yes|bot= |
||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
|archiveheader = {{aan}} | |archiveheader = {{aan}} | ||
Line 18: | Line 20: | ||
}} | }} | ||
==list of attacks before during the tension== | |||
== Responses: Israeli Public == | |||
https://embassies.gov.il/MFA/FOREIGNPOLICY/Terrorism/Palestinian/Pages/Fatal%20Terrorist%20Attacks%20in%20Israel%20Since%20the%20DOP%20-S.aspx | |||
The following quotation is the only statement in this section which may vaguely reflect the Israeli public: | |||
"A poll of 500 Israeli adults for the International Centre for Peace in the Middle East found that 78.8 percent of people condemned the Hebron massacre while 3.6 percent praised Goldstein." | |||
Beyond this, the section talks incessantly on Jewish minority groups like the community at Kiryat Arba, Kahane Chai and the Lubavitch movement. These are neither valid representations of the intended Israeli public nor of the Jewish public; these groups are considerable minorities in both of these groups, as can be found in their respective articles. Kahane Chai and the Lubavitch movement are international organisations, and cannot possibly represent the specific views of even the Israeli Jewry, let alone the whole of Israel's Jewish and non-Jewish population. I would suggest that this section be renamed something equivalent to "Responses From Jewish Minorities" and that further information be supplied so that the opinions of the Israeli public as a whole is represented, as opposed to simply the views of a minority of groups within the Jewish religion. | |||
=== Sister's statement on 20 year anniversary of Baruch Goldman's death === | |||
This document contain information for this article and also for Baruch Goldman's death. However, I will be submitting it via the usual submission process for both articles. It denies the official report given in both articles and claims that Goldstein was assigned to guard duty at the Cave of Patriarchs as a false flag operation to discredit Kach. It also suggests that IDF soldiers shot on Muslims, too. | |||
By following the verified articles about this incident, one of the side effects is to create cult status for Baruch Goldstein as Jewish martyr by the Kach cultists and also JDL in America. | |||
As well, by referring to Goldstein as a radical Jewish militant without associating the Kach and the JDL with terrorism even though "radical militant" is a term associated with terrorism, the effect is to be less objectionable than using the objective term "terrorism", even though that is what Goldstein was assumed to be doing. | |||
It would be closer to the truth that certain religious Jews in the IDF are engaging in criminal behavior against Palestinian Muslims through sympathetic members and radicalization of the Orthodox Jews. The common root of this radicalization is the JDL. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 16:31, 14 April 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
== Smart Editing techniques == | |||
== Reconciling the two sets of coordinates == | |||
This article is filled with subtle antisemitic material and using Smart Editing techniques, I have fixed it. Look at my edits for an example of Smart Editing techniques and hpefully we can get rid of antisemitic material in all articles.--64.250.232.51 (talk) 17:18, 31 August 2014 (UTC) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) </span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
Greetings and felicitations. There are two sets of coordinates for the event (I just moved the second into the infobox), and I'm not familiar enough with the incident or terrain to reconcile them. Would someone please be so kind, or help me do so? —] (]) 06:43, 25 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
: What antisemitic materials? ] (]) 17:53, 31 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
: Hopefully fixed. ]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 01:56, 26 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
:: Thank you. ^_^ I just combined the two templates, but infobox isn't displaying the coordinates inline in any of my three browsers. —] (]) 02:42, 26 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Some misplaced or omitted footnotes == | |||
== External links modified == | |||
'Arafat Baya’at, for one, is reported as having been shot dead by Israeli troops outside the hospital when he picked up a stone to throw at soldiers after seeing a friend of his being carried out of an ambulance.' | |||
Hello fellow Wikipedians, | |||
The article cited as a source for the sentence does not seem to contain any information about Arafat Baya’at. It just confirms the overall picture as presented by the previous sentence ('... Israeli soldiers who continued to shoot at those who were trying to flee the mosque, at those who were evacuating the wounded, and at people who were rioting at the Ahli hospital'), so it might perhaps be more appropriately used as a source for it. However, that sentence is already attributed in the Wiki text to Tikva-Honig Parnass, whereas the linked article neither mentions nor is authored by Tikva-Honig Parnass. At the same time, the previous sentence contains no footnote or proper reference to the text where Tikva-Honig Parnass wrote that, nor is a text by that author present in the bibliography. Overall, there seems to be some confusion with the sourcing in this bit. | |||
I have just added archive links to {{plural:3|one external link|3 external links}} on ]. Please take a moment to review . If necessary, add {{tlx|cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{tlx|nobots|deny{{=}}InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes: | |||
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20111103121134/http://www.jdl.org:80/index.php/about-jdl/faqs to http://www.jdl.org/index.php/about-jdl/faqs/ | |||
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20091020083907/http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?aid=123 to http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?aid=123 | |||
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090106162256/http://www.mepc.org////journal_shahak/shahak48.asp to http://www.mepc.org/journal_shahak/shahak48.asp | |||
That said, I actually wanted to see the original article for more context because I didn't understand why Baya’at's friend was being 'carried out of an ambulance'. Was he being arrested, rejected as a patient or something else? If the/a real source is found, that should probably be explained, too. ] (]) 13:37, 25 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' or '''failed''' to let others know (documentation at {{tlx|Sourcecheck}}). | |||
== Should section "Veneration of Goldstein" mention Itamar Ben-Gvir? == | |||
{{sourcecheck|checked=true}} | |||
It's an accepted fact that the current minister of national security of Israel, Itamar Ben-Gvir, previously hung a portrait of Goldstein inside his house. It is in the 2nd paragraph of ]. It seems to me a good example of veneration that is worth mentioning. ] (]) 06:28, 26 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
Cheers.—]<small><sub style="margin-left:-14.9ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">]:Online</sub></small> 03:03, 21 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
== |
== 50-70 casualties == | ||
in the article it's mentioned that Palastinians "count people who died outside the mosque and people who died of their wounds." Excuse me? This is how we count casualties for all other killings, not some "silly thing Palastinians do" as the article is suggesting. The 50-70 casualty count must be mentioned in the article or this article must immediate be struck as being biased. ] (]) 10:49, 27 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
addition of material by Nishidani IMHO adds unnecessary detail. It is not customary to add people who are wounded, or how precisely they ended up being wounded. Compare other articles, e.g. about the 9/11 attacks. I can not escape from the thought that this is a POV inspired edit, trying to overly stress the gore of terrorism in this case. ] (]) 16:29, 24 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
:Have a look at ] for the best way to suggest changes. You don't need to include your review of the content. What matters is whether the content reflects the reliable source cited. Given that the source says the following, perhaps you could suggest a specific change that better reflects that source and any other sources you would like to bring. | |||
* I agree; this also violates guidelines of generally not naming people who are not notable. There are further NPOV issues with lumping people killed in violent incidents elsewhere which followed with the victims of the massacre. I reverted recent edit about age of some of the victims as it is not found in source referenced, but Nishidani restored his edit in violation of 1RR. Separately, I would question Al Jazeera article as RS. --] (]) 16:19, 27 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
:* "Locals estimate the final number of deaths at between 50 and 70 – and an estimated 250 were injured over the course of the day. After the initial attack inside the mosque, more Palestinians were killed by the Israeli army during protests outside the mosque, outside Hebron’s Ahli hospital, and even in the local cemetery as the dead were being buried." | |||
::Debresser. Suspicions are not material to an objection. Wiking:none of your objections above are based on policy, and all happen to be wrong. (a) ] nowhere states victims, dead or otherwise, are not to be mentioned. All of the lists of dead in terrorism are given where available, and were it not for the incident remain unnotable. It's about page creation re non notable people.Read it; (b) the massacre had an immediate aftermath and this is always noted; (c) I did not break IR, read the policy and check the edit history; ] is regularly cited on wiki pages, as are ], ] and other similar newspapers. No serious editor questions it. I might waste more time checking for parallels, such as ] where none lethal fatalities are noted in later incidents. (d) you complain that 'several as young as 12' is not in the source. Well, 'several' means generally four or more, and 4 children aged 12 were killed. If you wish to write 4, you're welcome to do so. | |||
:In the meantime, I have - In an article commemorating the event's 20th anniversary, Al Jazeera reported that local Palestinians estimated the total number of deaths to be between 50 and 70, with an additional 250 people injured that day. | |||
::So, there is no policy substance to these objections. Judgments are based on policy, not ], which is evidently the case here.] (]) 16:49, 27 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
:] (]) 11:45, 27 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::No, I do not object to either ''four'' or ''several'', but that's not in the linked source. Please add another source there. I also do not object to including brief info on the casualties of violent protests that followed, as well as of Hamas bombings claimed to have been carried out in retribution, but I object including those killed and injured in separate incidents in the total tally. That's different from including critically injured who died a short while later without recovering in the number of victims. As far as listing the wounded, please see ]. Thank you. --] (]) 17:13, 27 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
::::I saw it (by the way, an editor who changes his policy objection successively, after the first is confuted, is not doing his job. If the removal was based on erroneous policy, and then you adopt another policy objection, the problem is not policy, but the use of policy to keep the stuff out of the article on any pretext). The policy reads: | |||
::::<blockquote>The names of any immediate, ex, or significant family members or any significant relationship of the subject of a BLP may be part of an article, if reliably sourced, subject to editorial discretion that such information is relevant to a reader's complete understanding of the subject. </blockquote> | |||
::::The names of the wounded or survivors come from a widow, or from the wounded, speaking directly in an interview with the press, here Al Jazeera, therefore the information was released to the public domain where it is reliably sourced. The accounts of survivors is self-evidently 'relevant to a reader's complete understanding of the subject.' | |||
::::As to your point that 4 or several is not in the source. Well, all you had to do was glance up at the list of the dead, where the dates are given, see that Nabeel Abraham, Lies of Our Times, May 1994, pp 3-6, provided those details, and either leave it at that, or make a ref name="Abraham" and adjust accordingly. Editing should be efficient, meaning one reads the page and figures things out, adjusting here and there, not removalist. In any case, I have B'tselem's detailed coverage, name by name, of people killed that day and in the immediate aftermath, and will be adding it. And yes, I'll include Hamas's retaliations, if nobody beats me to the 'gun'.] (]) 18:49, 27 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
:::::I did not know which source had explicit info about victims' ages, hence could not add that ref; it appeared as WP:SYNT at first glance, and certainly is not present in source referenced immediately after the statement. Will wait for you to add it. | |||
:::::As far as their names, the issue is has nothing to do with info being in public domain or with source reliability (bolding is mine): | |||
:::::<blockquote>'''Caution should be applied when identifying individuals who are discussed primarily in terms of a single event.''' When the name of a private individual has not been widely disseminated or has been intentionally concealed, such as in certain court cases or occupations, it is often preferable to omit it, '''especially when doing so does not result in a significant loss of context.''' When deciding whether to include a name, its publication in '''secondary sources other than news media''', such as scholarly journals or the work of recognized experts, should be afforded greater weight than the brief appearance of names in news stories. Consider whether the inclusion of names of living private individuals who are not directly involved in an article's topic adds significant value.</blockquote> | |||
:::::So, I think my (and Debresser's) objection is well grounded and I am not sure what you are referring to as ''changing his policy objection successively''. --] (]) 19:14, 27 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
:::::That is your 5th mistake, you are confusing your several arguments with those of Dovid whose objection differed. Debresser made one argument, you are making several others. The fact that 2 object has no weight. What has weight is making a policy based objection, consistent with wiki practice, and getting agreement. Otherwise any Tom, Dick or Harry can show up, and cast a vote arbitrary to swing stuff in or out according to the numbers game. | |||
:::::Debresser objected, on the basis of a suspicion about my ulterior motives, as to the purpose of adding details about the wounded or survivors. That itself was improper. I've never seen him object to the use, in a perfect parallel article to this, of photos of wounded survivors on the ]. I don't either. In fact, I helped put some of the uglier details in. So Dovid can't have it both ways: objecting to an innocuous addition of details about the wounded when they are Palestinian, while keeping mum with an article that deals with the Jewish victims of a similar scale massacre in the same place, Hebron. In my view, one must be consistent here to avoid being an ethnonationalist partisan. | |||
:::::You quoted one part of the policy, I quoted the other. In both cases however, read properly, the WP:BLP entry does not say one cannot use such names. It says caution and judgment should be used. You say the content lost by erasure is 'insignificant'. Tell that to the survivors, who informed the larger world via a mainstream article of what they suffered. You may think wounded Palestinian are 'insignificant' and need not be mentioned. But the article is incomplete unless we include them, since the documentary record we base the article on mentions them. Finally, you have no answered my points. Address them. ] (]) 19:51, 27 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
:::::: No, Nishidani, I objected not because of your motives! Don't put words in my mouth that never left it. :) | |||
:::::: I object because those names and especially the details about the wounded are superfluous, and not encyclopedical. I wrote that very clearly. ] (]) 19:59, 27 September 2016 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 17:52, 20 October 2024
This article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
|
A fact from this article was featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the On this day section on February 25, 2009, February 25, 2011, February 25, 2014, February 25, 2019, and February 25, 2024. |
Archives | ||
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
list of attacks before during the tension
Reconciling the two sets of coordinates
Greetings and felicitations. There are two sets of coordinates for the event (I just moved the second into the infobox), and I'm not familiar enough with the incident or terrain to reconcile them. Would someone please be so kind, or help me do so? —DocWatson42 (talk) 06:43, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hopefully fixed. Zero 01:56, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. ^_^ I just combined the two templates, but infobox isn't displaying the coordinates inline in any of my three browsers. —DocWatson42 (talk) 02:42, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Some misplaced or omitted footnotes
'Arafat Baya’at, for one, is reported as having been shot dead by Israeli troops outside the hospital when he picked up a stone to throw at soldiers after seeing a friend of his being carried out of an ambulance.'
The article cited as a source for the sentence does not seem to contain any information about Arafat Baya’at. It just confirms the overall picture as presented by the previous sentence ('... Israeli soldiers who continued to shoot at those who were trying to flee the mosque, at those who were evacuating the wounded, and at people who were rioting at the Ahli hospital'), so it might perhaps be more appropriately used as a source for it. However, that sentence is already attributed in the Wiki text to Tikva-Honig Parnass, whereas the linked article neither mentions nor is authored by Tikva-Honig Parnass. At the same time, the previous sentence contains no footnote or proper reference to the text where Tikva-Honig Parnass wrote that, nor is a text by that author present in the bibliography. Overall, there seems to be some confusion with the sourcing in this bit.
That said, I actually wanted to see the original article for more context because I didn't understand why Baya’at's friend was being 'carried out of an ambulance'. Was he being arrested, rejected as a patient or something else? If the/a real source is found, that should probably be explained, too. 62.73.69.121 (talk) 13:37, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Should section "Veneration of Goldstein" mention Itamar Ben-Gvir?
It's an accepted fact that the current minister of national security of Israel, Itamar Ben-Gvir, previously hung a portrait of Goldstein inside his house. It is in the 2nd paragraph of Ben-Gvir's own Misplaced Pages page. It seems to me a good example of veneration that is worth mentioning. BenwayPHD (talk) 06:28, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
50-70 casualties
in the article it's mentioned that Palastinians "count people who died outside the mosque and people who died of their wounds." Excuse me? This is how we count casualties for all other killings, not some "silly thing Palastinians do" as the article is suggesting. The 50-70 casualty count must be mentioned in the article or this article must immediate be struck as being biased. 75.118.12.202 (talk) 10:49, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Have a look at WP:EDITXY for the best way to suggest changes. You don't need to include your review of the content. What matters is whether the content reflects the reliable source cited. Given that the source says the following, perhaps you could suggest a specific change that better reflects that source and any other sources you would like to bring.
- "Locals estimate the final number of deaths at between 50 and 70 – and an estimated 250 were injured over the course of the day. After the initial attack inside the mosque, more Palestinians were killed by the Israeli army during protests outside the mosque, outside Hebron’s Ahli hospital, and even in the local cemetery as the dead were being buried."
- In the meantime, I have changed it to - In an article commemorating the event's 20th anniversary, Al Jazeera reported that local Palestinians estimated the total number of deaths to be between 50 and 70, with an additional 250 people injured that day.
- Sean.hoyland (talk) 11:45, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- B-Class Crime-related articles
- Mid-importance Crime-related articles
- B-Class Serial killer-related articles
- Mid-importance Serial killer-related articles
- Serial Killer task force
- B-Class Terrorism articles
- Mid-importance Terrorism articles
- Terrorism task force articles
- WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography articles
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class Middle Eastern military history articles
- Middle Eastern military history task force articles
- C-Class Post-Cold War articles
- Post-Cold War task force articles
- B-Class Disaster management articles
- Low-importance Disaster management articles
- B-Class Judaism articles
- Mid-importance Judaism articles
- B-Class Israel-related articles
- Mid-importance Israel-related articles
- WikiProject Israel articles
- B-Class Palestine-related articles
- High-importance Palestine-related articles
- WikiProject Palestine articles
- Selected anniversaries (February 2009)
- Selected anniversaries (February 2011)
- Selected anniversaries (February 2014)
- Selected anniversaries (February 2019)
- Selected anniversaries (February 2024)