Revision as of 01:17, 10 December 2016 editKeith D (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators545,945 edits →AKP political agenda of Islamization: Months← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 02:42, 31 December 2024 edit undoPersian Lad (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,502 edits →See also | ||
(231 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{short description|Separation of religious matters and state affairs in Turkey}} | |||
] took place in 2007 in support of the ], particularly ] and ], against the perceived ] of Turkey under the ruling ].]] | |||
{{use dmy dates|date=July 2024}} | |||
] took place in 2007 in support of the ], avowing ], against the perceived ] of Turkey under the ruling ].]] | |||
{{Religion in Turkey}} | {{Religion in Turkey}} | ||
{{Atatürk sidebar}} In ], ] or laicism (see '']'') was first introduced with the 1928 amendment of the ], which removed the provision declaring that the "Religion of the State is ]", and with the later ] of Turkey's first president ], which set the administrative and political requirements to create a modern, democratic, secular state, aligned with ]. | |||
Nine years after its introduction, ''laïcité'' was explicitly stated in the second article of the then Turkish constitution on February |
Nine years after its introduction, ''laïcité'' was explicitly stated in the second article of the then Turkish constitution on 5 February 1937. The current ] neither recognizes an ] nor promotes any.<ref>{{cite web| title = Turkey | work = The World Factbook | publisher = Central Intelligence Agency (US) | date = 2008-07-24 | url = https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/turkey/ | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20210110073821/https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/turkey | url-status = dead | archive-date = January 10, 2021 | access-date = 2008-08-01}}</ref> | ||
The principles of Turkish secularism, and the ], were historically established in order to ]. This centralized progressive approach was seen as necessary not only for the operation of the ] but also to avoid a cultural life dominated by superstition, dogma, and ignorance.<ref>{{cite web| url =http://www.atam.gov.tr/dergi/sayi-11/secularism-in-turkey| title =Secularism in Turkey| last =Daver| first =BÜLENT| website =Atatürk Araştırma Merkezi Başkanlığı| publisher =PROF. DR. BÜLENT DAVER| access-date =2019-03-21| quote =This principle, unlike in western countries, is not realized by evolutionary currents and philosophers' ideas, spread among most people throughout the century, but rather by direct and decisive action and revolutionary enthusiasm from a very small elite consisting of bureaucrats and young army officer.| archive-date =2019-03-22| archive-url =https://web.archive.org/web/20190322031719/http://www.atam.gov.tr/dergi/sayi-11/secularism-in-turkey| url-status =dead}}</ref> | |||
Turkey's "''laïcité''" does not call for a strict ], but describes the state's stance as one of "active neutrality". Turkey's actions related with religion are carefully analyzed and evaluated through the ] (Diyanet İşleri Başkanlığı or simply Diyanet). The duties of the Presidency of Religious Affairs are "to execute the works concerning the beliefs, worship, and ethics of Islam, enlighten the public about their religion, and administer the sacred worshipping places".<ref>, ]</ref> | |||
Turkey's concept of {{Lang|tr|laiklik}} ("laicism") calls for the ], but also describes the state's stance as one of "active neutrality", which involves state control and legal regulation of religion.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Öztürk|first1=Ahmet Erdi|last2=Sözeri|first2=Semiha|title=Diyanet as a Turkish Foreign Policy Tool: Evidence from the Netherlands and Bulgaria|url=https://www.academia.edu/36059631|journal=Religion and Politics Section of the American Political Science Association|language=en|pages=3, 5|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180919132327/https://www.academia.edu/36059631/Diyanet_as_a_Turkish_Foreign_Policy_Tool_Evidence_from_the_Netherlands_and_Bulgaria|archive-date=19 September 2018}}</ref> Turkey's actions related with religion are carefully analyzed and evaluated through the ] ({{Lang|tr|Diyanet İşleri Başkanlığı}} or simply {{Lang|tr|Diyanet}}).<ref>{{Cite journal|title=Turkey's Diyanet under AKP rule: from protector to imposer of state ideology?|journal = Southeast European and Black Sea Studies|volume = 16|issue = 4|pages = 619–635|last=Ahmet Erdi Öztürk|doi=10.1080/14683857.2016.1233663|year = 2016|s2cid = 151448076|url = http://repository.londonmet.ac.uk/5402/1/Turkeys-Diyanet-under-AKP-rule-from-protector-to-imposer-of-state-ideology.pdf}}</ref> The duties of the Presidency of Religious Affairs are "to execute the works concerning the beliefs, worship, and ethics of Islam, enlighten the public about their religion, and administer the sacred worshipping places".<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080108071157/http://www.diyanet.gov.tr/english/tanitim.asp?id=13 |date=2008-01-08 }}, ]</ref> | |||
==History== | ==History== | ||
{{Further| |
{{Further|Kemalism|Atatürk's reforms|History of the Republic of Turkey}} | ||
The history of secularism in Turkey extends to the ] reforms of Ottoman Empire. The second peak in secularism occurred during the ]. The current form was achieved by ]. | The history of secularism in Turkey extends to the ] reforms of Ottoman Empire. The second peak in secularism occurred during the ]. The current form was achieved by ]. | ||
===Ottoman Empire=== | ===Ottoman Empire=== | ||
{{ |
{{Further|Ottoman Caliphate|Religion in the Ottoman Empire}} | ||
The establishing structure (]) of the ] (13th century) was an Islamic state in which the head of the ] state was the Sultan. |
The establishing structure (]) of the ] (13th century) was an Islamic state in which the head of the ] state was the Sultan. The social system was organized around ]. Millet structure allowed a great degree of religious, cultural and ethnic continuity to non-Muslim populations across the ] and at the same time it permitted their incorporation into the Ottoman administrative, economic and political system.<ref name="sec">{{cite web |url=http://www.secularisminturkey.net/docs/Secular-Transcript.pdf |title=Secularism: The Turkish Experience |access-date=2013-09-28 |archive-date=2008-06-27 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080627111442/http://www.secularisminturkey.net/docs/Secular-Transcript.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> The Ottoman-appointed governor collected taxes and provided security, while the local religious or cultural matters were left to the regional communities to decide. On the other hand, the sultans were Muslims and the laws that bound them were based on the ], the body of ]ic law, as well as various cultural customs. The Sultan, beginning in 1517, was also a ], the leader of all the ] ] in the world. By the turn of the 19th century the Ottoman ruling elite recognized the need to restructure the legislative, military and judiciary systems to cope with their new political rivals in Europe. When the millet system started to lose its efficiency due to the ], the Ottoman Empire explored new ways of governing its territory composed of diverse populations. | ||
Sultan ] founded the first secular military schools by establishing the new military unit, ], as early as 1792. However the last century (19th century) of the Ottoman Empire had many far reaching reforms. These reforms peaked with the ] which was the initial reform era of the Ottoman Empire. After the |
Sultan ] founded the first secular military schools by establishing the new military unit, ], as early as 1792. However the last century (19th century) of the Ottoman Empire had many far reaching reforms. These reforms peaked with the ] which was the initial reform era of the Ottoman Empire. After the Tanzimat, rules, such as those relating to the equalized ], the establishment of ], the abandonment of medieval punishments for apostasy,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://faith-matters.org/images/stories/fm-publications/the-tanzimat-final-web.pdf | author=Hussain, Ishtiaq | title=The Tanzimat: Secular Reforms in the Ottoman Empire | work=Faith Matters | date=2011-10-07 |access-date=2013-09-28}}</ref> as well as the codification of the constitution of the empire and the rights of Ottoman subjects were established. The ] brought about the ] and the subsequent ] by the victorious Allies. | ||
===Reforms of Republic=== | ===Reforms of Republic=== | ||
{{Main|Atatürk's Reforms}} | {{Main|Atatürk's Reforms}} | ||
Reforms and policies designed to modernize Turkey adopted by Kemal Atatürk (1881–1938), the founder and the first president of Republic of Turkey, were known as "Kemalism", and had "six principles: republicanism, nationalism, populism, secularism, revolutionism and statism".<ref name="Jakir Al Faruki 2017-22">{{cite journal |last1=Al Faruki |first1=Jakir |last2= Siddiky|first2=Md. Roknuzzaman |title=Secularism and the Muslim World: An Overview July 2017 Authors |journal=Journal of Social Science, Rajshahi College |date=July 2017 |volume=1 |issue=1 |page=22 |url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330320431 |access-date=23 November 2021}}</ref> Unlike some "softer" forms of secularism, Kemalist secularism "did not mean the separation of religion only from the state, rather it meant the separation of religion from whole public spheres—politics, jurisprudence, education, society and so on".<ref name="Wu, 2007">Wu, B. (2007). Secularism and secularization in the Arab world. Journal of Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies (in Asia). 1(1), 55-65</ref><ref name="Bagdonas, 2008">Bagdonas, O.D. (2008). A Poststructuralist to ideology and foreign policy: Kemalism in Turkish foreign policy discourse. A Doctoral Thesis, Central European University.</ref> | |||
] envisaged Turkey as a secular republic, an ideology known as ]]] | |||
Kemalism excluded "religious symbols from public domain" and put religion "under the strict control of the state".<ref name="(Karakas, 2007">Karakas, C. (2007). Turkey: Islam and laicism between the interests of state, politics and society. PRIF Report No. 78, Peace Institute Frankfurt.</ref><ref name=" Burak, 2012)">Burak, Begum. (2012). Can secularism hinder democracy? The Turkish experiment. İnsan & Toplum, 2(4), 65-82</ref> The weekly holiday was changed from Friday to Sunday, the calendar changed from the Muslim lunar to Gregorian, and the alphabet changed from Arabic to Latin.<ref name="(Toprak, 2005">Toprak, B. (2005). Secularism and Islam: the building of modern Turkey. Macalester International: Vol. 15, Article 9, 27-43.</ref><ref name=" Burak, 2012)"/><ref name="Jakir Al Faruki 2017-22"/> | |||
During the establishment of the Republic, there were two sections of the elite group at the helm of the discussions for the future. These were the Islamist reformists and Westerners.<ref name="sec"/> They shared a similar goal, the modernization of the new state. Many basic goals were common to both groups. The founder of the modern Turkish Republic Mustafa Kemal Atatürk's achievement was to amplify this common ground and put the country on a fast track of reforms, now known as Atatürk's Reforms. | During the establishment of the Republic, there were two sections of the elite group at the helm of the discussions for the future. These were the Islamist reformists and Westerners.<ref name="sec"/> They shared a similar goal, the modernization of the new state. Many basic goals were common to both groups. The founder of the modern Turkish Republic Mustafa Kemal Atatürk's achievement was to amplify this common ground and put the country on a fast track of reforms, now known as Atatürk's Reforms. | ||
Their first act was to give the Turkish nation the right to exercise ] via ]. Prior to declaring the new Republic, the ] abolished the ] on November |
Their first act was to give the Turkish nation the right to exercise ] via ]. Prior to declaring the new Republic, the ] abolished the ] on 1 November 1922. The ] then moved to replace the extant Islamic law structure with the laws it had passed during the ], beginning in 1919. The modernization of the Law had already begun at the point that the project was undertaken in earnest. A milestone in this process was the passage of the ]. Upon the establishment of the Republic on 29 October 1923, the institution of the ] (a title held by the Ottoman Sultanate since 1517) remained, but the passage of a ] in 1924 effectively ]. Even as the new constitution eliminated the caliphate it, at the same time, declared Islam as the official religion of the Turkish Republic. According to the law text passed by the Turkish Parliament, "Since the Caliphate was essentially present in the meaning and concept of the Government and the Republic, the office of the Caliphate was abolished."<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://tr.wikisource.org/Hilafetin_%C4%B0lgas%C4%B1na_ve_Hanedan%C4%B1_Osmaninin_T%C3%BCrkiye_Cumhuriyeti_Memaliki_Haricine_%C3%87%C4%B1kar%C4%B1lmas%C4%B1na_Dair_Kanun|title=Hilafetin İlgasına ve Hanedanı Osmaninin Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Memaliki Haricine Çıkarılmasına Dair Kanun - Vikikaynak|website=tr.wikisource.org}}</ref> | ||
Following quickly upon these developments, a number of social reforms were undertaken. Many of these reforms affected every aspect of Turkish life, moving to erase the legacy of dominance long held by religion and tradition. The unification of education, installation of a secular education system, and the closure of many religious orders took place on 3 March 1924. This extended to closure of religious convents and dervish lodges on 30 November 1925. These reforms also included the extension to women of voting rights in 1931 and the right be to elected to public office on 5 December 1934. The inclusion of reference to '']'' into the ] was achieved by an amendment on 5 February 1937, a move regarded as the final act in the project of instituting complete separation between governmental and religious affairs in Turkey. | |||
===Erdoğan's policies of Islamization=== | |||
Following quickly upon these developments, a number of social reforms were undertaken. Many of these reforms affected every aspect of Turkish life, moving to erase the legacy of dominance long held by religion and tradition. The unification of education, installation of a secular education system, and the closure of many religious orders took place on March 3, 1924. This extended to closure of religious convents and dervish lodges on November 30, 1925. These reforms also included the extension to women of voting rights in 1931 and the right be to elected to public office on December 5, 1934. The inclusion of reference to '']'' into the ] was achieved by an amendment on February 5, 1937, a move regarded as the final act in the project of instituting complete separation between governmental and religious affairs in Turkey. | |||
] promotes a form of ] in Turkey, which allows women to choose to wear ]s in public.|146x146px]] | |||
According to at least one observer (]), under the Islamist ] (AKP) government of ], "hundreds of secularist officers and their civilian allies" were jailed starting in 2007, and by 2012 the "old secularist guard" were removed from positions of authority and replaced by members/supporters of the AKP and the Islamist ].<ref name="NYT-23-7-16">{{cite news|last1=Akyol|first1=Mustafa|title=Who Was Behind the Coup Attempt in Turkey?|newspaper=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/22/opinion/who-was-behind-the-coup-attempt-in-turkey.html?_r=0|access-date=23 July 2016|agency=New York Times|date=July 22, 2016}}</ref> On 25 April 2016, the Turkish Parliament Speaker ] told a conference of Islamic scholars and writers in Istanbul that "secularism would not have a place in a new constitution", as Turkey is "a Muslim country and so we should have a religious constitution". (One of the duties of Parliament Speaker is to pen a new draft constitution for Turkey.)<ref name="removed-Milliyet-27 April 2016">{{cite news |title=Secularism must be removed from constitution, Turkey's Parliament Speaker says |url=https://www.milliyet.com.tr/en/vadim-the-suicide-bomber-2271599 |access-date=31 January 2021 |agency=Milliyet |date=27 April 2016}}</ref> | |||
Traditionally, the function of the '']'' was to maintain control over and limit the religious sphere of Islam in Turkey. Some (David Lepeska, ]) have complained that under Erdoğan that role has "largely been turned on its head",<ref name="Lepeska-2015">{{cite journal |last1=Lepeska |first1=David |title=Turkey Casts the Diyanet |journal=Foreign Affairs |date=17 May 2015 |url=https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/turkey/2015-05-17/turkey-casts-diyanet |access-date=27 July 2016}}</ref> with the ''Diyanet'', now greatly increased in size, promoting Islam in Turkey, specifically a certain type of conservative Islam—issuing '']'' forbidding such activities as "feeding dogs at home, celebrating the western New Year, lotteries, and tattoos";<ref name=rise>{{cite web|url=http://www.turkeyanalyst.org/publications/turkey-analyst-articles/item/463-the-rise-of-diyanet-the-politicization-of-turkey%E2%80%99s-directorate-of-religious-affairs.html |title=The Rise of Diyanet: the Politicization of Turkey's Directorate of Religious Affairs |last1=Cornell |first1=Svante |publisher=turkeyanalyst.org |date=2015-10-09 |access-date=2016-07-27}}</ref> and projecting this "Turkish Islam"<ref name="Lepeska-2015"/> abroad.<ref name="al-monitor-29-4-16">{{cite news|last1=Tremblay|first1=Pinar|title=Is Erdogan signaling end of secularism in Turkey?|url=http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2015/04/turkey-is-erdogan-signaling-end-of-secularism.html|access-date=25 July 2016|agency=Al Monitor|date=April 29, 2015|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160808130552/http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2015/04/turkey-is-erdogan-signaling-end-of-secularism.html|archive-date=8 August 2016}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Sözeri|first1=Semiha|last2=Öztürk|first2=Ahmet Erdi|date=September 2018|title=Diyanet as a Turkish Foreign Policy Tool: Evidence from the Netherlands and Bulgaria|journal=Politics and Religion|language=en|volume=11|issue=3|pages=624–648|doi=10.1017/S175504831700075X|s2cid=148657630|issn=1755-0483|url=http://repository.londonmet.ac.uk/5404/1/Diyanet_Ozturk-Sozeri.pdf}}</ref> | |||
===AKP political agenda of Islamization=== | |||
According to at least one observer (]), under the Islamic ] (AKP) government of President ], starting in 2007, "hundreds of secularist officers and their civilian allies" were jailed, and by 2012 the "old secularist guard" in positions of authority was replaced by members/supporters of the AKP party and the ]ic ].<ref name="NYT-23-7-16">{{cite news|last1=Akyol|first1=Mustafa|title=Who Was Behind the Coup Attempt in Turkey?|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/22/opinion/who-was-behind-the-coup-attempt-in-turkey.html?_r=0|accessdate=23 July 2016|agency=New York Times|date=July 22, 2016}}</ref> On 25 April 2016, the Turkish Parliament Speaker ] told a conference of Islamic scholars and writers in Istanbul that "secularism would not have a place in a new constitution”, as Turkey is “a Muslim country and so we should have a religious constitution". (One of the duties of Parliament Speaker is to pen a new draft constitution for Turkey.)<ref name="rt-26-4-2016">{{cite news|title=‘We are a Muslim country’: Turkey’s parliament speaker advocates religious constitution|url=https://www.rt.com/news/340937-turkey-secular-constitution-dropped/|accessdate=25 July 2016|agency=RT|date=26 April 2016}}</ref> | |||
In education, the AKP government pursued the explicit policy agenda of Islamization to "raise a devout generation" against secular resistance,<ref>{{cite web|author=Sukru Kucuksahin|url=http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2016/06/turkey-high-schools-student-stand-up-against-islamism.html|title=Turkish students up in arms over Islamization of education|publisher=Al-Monitor|date=20 June 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|author=Zülfikar Doğan|url=http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2016/06/turkey-education-erdogan-devout-generation-plan.html|title=Erdogan pens education plan for Turkey's 'devout generation'|publisher=Al-Monitor|date=29 June 2016}}</ref> in the process causing many non-religious citizens of Turkey to lose their jobs and schooling.<ref>{{cite web|author=Sibel Hurtas|url=http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2016/10/turkey-post-putsch-crackdown-transform-education.html|title=Turkey's 'devout generation' project means lost jobs, schools for many|publisher=Al-Monitor|date=13 October 2016}}</ref> Following the ]—which President Erdoğan called "a gift from God"<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-07-17/coup-was-a-gift-from-god-says-erdogan-who-plans-a-new-turkey|title=Coup Was 'Gift From God' for Erdogan Planning a New Turkey|date=2016-07-17|newspaper=Bloomberg.com|access-date=2017-01-09}}</ref>—thousands were purged by the AKP government. The victims were primarily followers of the Gülen movement — which is alleged to have launched the coup<ref>{{Cite journal|title=From 'Diaspora by Design' to Transnational Political Exile: The Gülen Movement in Transition|journal = Politics, Religion & Ideology|volume = 19|pages = 33–52|last=Simon P. Watmough and Ahmet Erdi Öztürk|doi=10.1080/21567689.2018.1453254|year = 2018|doi-access = free}}</ref>—but also secularists who had not already been sacked in earlier purges.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://turkeypurge.com/leftists-kemalists-suspended-from-posts-for-being-gulenists-says-chp-report|title=Leftists, Kemalists suspended from posts for being Gülenists, says CHP report {{!}} Turkey Purge|website=turkeypurge.com|access-date=2017-01-09}}</ref> One explanation for the replacement of secularist policies<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Yavuz|first1=M. Hakan|last2=Öztürk|first2=Ahmet Erdi|date=2019-02-18|title=Turkish secularism and Islam under the reign of Erdoğan|journal=Southeast European and Black Sea Studies|volume=19|pages=1–9|doi=10.1080/14683857.2019.1580828|issn=1468-3857|doi-access=free}}</ref> in Turkey is that business interests who felt threatened by socialism saw Islamic values as "best suited to neutralize any challenges from the left to capitalist supremacy."<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.yourmiddleeast.com/culture/turkeys-journey-from-secularism-to-islamization-a-capitalist-story_41004|title=Turkey's journey from secularism to Islamization: A capitalist story|date=May 23, 2016|newspaper=Your Middle East|access-date=2017-01-09}}</ref> | |||
Some have also complained (see cite) that under Erdoğan, the old role of the '']'' -- maintaining control over the religious sphere of Islam in Turkey -- has "largely been turned on its head".<ref name="Lepeska-2015">{{cite journal |last1=Lepeska |first1=David |title=Turkey Casts the Diyanet |journal=Foreign Affairs |date=17 May 2015 |url=https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/turkey/2015-05-17/turkey-casts-diyanet |accessdate=27 July 2016}}</ref> Now greatly increased in size, the ''Diyanet'' promotes a certain type of conservative ('']'' ]) Islam inside Turkey, issuing '']'' forbidding such activities as "feeding dogs at home, celebrating the western New Year, lotteries, and tattoos";<ref name=rise>{{cite web|url=http://www.turkeyanalyst.org/publications/turkey-analyst-articles/item/463-the-rise-of-diyanet-the-politicization-of-turkey%E2%80%99s-directorate-of-religious-affairs.html | title=The Rise of Diyanet: the Politicization of Turkey’s Directorate of Religious Affairs | last1=Cornell |first1=Svante |publisher=turkeyanalyst.org | date=2015-10-09 | accessdate=2016-07-27}}</ref> | |||
and projecting this "Turkish Islam"<ref name="Lepeska-2015"/> abroad.<ref name="al-monitor-29-4-16">{{cite news|last1=Tremblay|first1=Pinar|title=Is Erdogan signaling end of secularism in Turkey? |url=http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2015/04/turkey-is-erdogan-signaling-end-of-secularism.html |accessdate=25 July 2016|agency=Al Monitor |date=April 29, 2015}}</ref> | |||
Some (such as Turan Kayaoğlu) see interest and support of secularism in Turkey as strengthening, not decreasing.<ref name=":0">{{Cite news|url=https://www.brookings.edu/opinions/secularism-in-turkey-stronger-than-ever/|title=Secularism in Turkey: Stronger than Ever?|last=Kayaoğlu|first=Turan|date=10 April 2012|work=Brookings Institution|access-date=25 April 2017|language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2015/03/turkey-is-getting-more-secular.html|title=Turkey is becoming more secular, not less|date=2015-03-02|work=Al-Monitor|access-date=2017-04-25|language=en-us}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/6554851.stm|title=Secular rally targets Turkish PM|date=14 April 2007|website=BBC News|access-date=25 April 2017}}</ref> After Erdoğan stated his desire to "raise a religious youth," politicians of all parties condemned his statements as abandoning Turkish values. A petition reading "f Muslim, Christian, Jewish, Zoroastrian, Alawite, Shafi’i, religious and nonreligious, atheist and agnostic backgrounds, all joined with a firm belief in secularism, find your recent remarks about raising a religious and conservative youth most alarming and dangerous" was signed by over 2,000 people. The pro-government newspaper ''Bugün'' ran a story stating "no one has the right to convert this society into a religious one, or the opposite." Surveys of the Turkish people also show a great support for maintaining a secular country. The Turkish Economic and Social Studies Foundation found that only 9% of Turks supported a religious state in 2006.<ref name=":0" /> A more recent 2015 poll by Metropoll found that over 80% of Turkish people supported the continuation of Turkey as a secular state, with even the majority of ] voters supporting a secular state too.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.metropoll.com.tr/upload/content/files/1779-turkiyenin-nabzi-ocak-2015--site.pdf|title=Türkiye'nin Nabzı: Din, Şiddet ve Özgürlük |last=Sencar|first=Özer|date=January 2015|website=Metropoll|page=34}}</ref> | |||
The government of ] and the ] (AKP) pursue the explicit policy agenda of Islamization of education to "raise a devout generation" against secular resistance,<ref>{{cite web|author=Sukru Kucuksahin|url=http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2016/06/turkey-high-schools-student-stand-up-against-islamism.html|title=Turkish students up in arms over Islamization of education|publisher=Al-Monitor|date=20 June 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|author=Zülfikar Doğan|url=http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2016/06/turkey-education-erdogan-devout-generation-plan.html|title=Erdogan pens education plan for Turkey's 'devout generation'|publisher=Al-Monitor|date=29 June 2016}}</ref> in the process causing lost jobs and school for many non-religious citizens of Turkey.<ref>{{cite web|author=Sibel Hurtas|url=http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2016/10/turkey-post-putsch-crackdown-transform-education.html|title=Turkey’s 'devout generation' project means lost jobs, schools for many|publisher=Al-Monitor|date=13 October 2016}}</ref> | |||
==Constitutional principles== | ==Constitutional principles== | ||
{{See also|Constitution of Turkey}} | {{See also|Constitution of Turkey}} | ||
The Constitution asserts that Turkey is a ] and ] ], deriving its ] from the people. The sovereignty rests with the Turkish Nation, who delegates its exercise to an elected unicameral parliament, the ]. Moreover, Article 4 |
The Constitution asserts that Turkey is supposed to be a ] and ] ], deriving its ] from the people. The sovereignty rests with the Turkish Nation, who delegates its exercise to an elected unicameral parliament, the ]. Moreover, Article 4 declares the immovability of the founding principles of the Republic defined in the first three Articles: | ||
#"], ], ]" | #"], ], ]" | ||
#"]" | #"]" | ||
#"]", | #"]", | ||
The Constitution bans any proposals for the modification of these articles. Each of these concepts which were distributed in the three articles of the constitution can not be achieved without the other two concepts.{{Citation needed|date=November 2008}} | The Constitution bans any proposals for the modification of these articles (see ]). Each of these concepts which were distributed in the three articles of the constitution can not be achieved without the other two concepts.{{Citation needed|date=November 2008}} The constitution requires a central administration which would lose its meaning (effectiveness, coverage, etc.) if the system is not based on ''laïcité'', social equality, and equality before law. Vice versa, if the Republic differentiate itself based on social, religious differences, administration can not be equal to the population when the administration is central.{{Citation needed|date=November 2008}} The system which tried to be established in the constitution sets out to found a unitary nation-state based on the principles of secular democracy.{{citation needed|date=December 2023}} | ||
The constitution requires a central administration which would lose its meaning (effectiveness, coverage, etc.) if the system is not based on ''laïcité'', social equality, and equality before law. Vice versa, if the Republic differentiate itself based on social, religious differences, administration can not be equal to the population when the administration is central.{{Citation needed|date=November 2008}} The system which tried to be established in the constitution sets out to found a unitary nation-state based on the principles of secular democracy. | |||
==Impact on society== | ==Impact on society== | ||
{{See also|Politics of Turkey}} | {{See also|Politics of Turkey}} | ||
The ] recognizes ] for ''individuals'' whereas |
The ] recognizes ] for ''individuals'' whereas identified ''religious communities'' are placed under the protection of state. The constitution explicitly states that it is illegal for a religious community to get involved in politics, or to form a Party openly representing a religious group.{{citation needed|date=December 2016}} | ||
In recent history, two parties have been ordered to close (] |
In recent history, two parties have been ordered to close (] in 1998, and ] in 2001) by the ] for Islamist activities and attempts to "redefine the secular nature of the republic". The first party to be closed for suspected anti-secularist activities was the ] on 3 June 1925.{{citation needed|date=December 2016}} | ||
Issues relating to Turkey's secularism were discussed in the lead up to the ], in which the ruling party chose a candidate with Islamist connections, ], for the first time in the history of the secular republic. While some in Turkey have expressed concern that the nomination could represent a move away from Turkey's secularist traditions, including particularly Turkey's priority on equality between the sexes, others have suggested that the conservative party has effectively promoted modernization while reaching out to more traditional and religious elements in Turkish society.<ref>]. "," '']'', April 25, 2007.</ref><ref name=Must>, '']'', April 24, 2007.</ref> On 22 July 2007, it was reported that the more religiously conservative ruling party won a larger than expected electoral victory in the ].<ref>]. "," '']'', July 23, 2007.</ref> | |||
The current governing party in Turkey, the conservative ] ({{lang-tr|Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi}} or {{lang|tr|''AKP''}}) has often been accused of following an Islamist agenda. | |||
Turkey's preservation and maintenance of its secular identity has been a profound issue and source of tension. Prime Minister ] has broken with secular tradition, by speaking out in favor of limited Islamism and against the active restrictions,{{Citation needed|date=July 2008}} instituted by Atatürk on wearing the Islamic-style ] in government offices and schools. The ] ({{langx|tr|Cumhuriyet Mitingleri|links=no}}) were a series of peaceful mass rallies that took place in the spring of 2007 in support of the ] ideals of ].<ref name="BBC">{{Cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/6554851.stm|title=Secular rally targets Turkish PM|work=]|access-date=2008-08-05|date=2007-04-14}}</ref> | |||
Issues relating to Turkey's secularism were discussed in the lead up to the ], in which the ruling party chose a candidate with Islamic connections, ], for the first time in its secular republic. While some in Turkey have expressed concern that the nomination could represent a move away from Turkey's secularist traditions, including particularly Turkey's priority on equality between the sexes, others have suggested that the conservative party has effectively promoted modernization while reaching out to more traditional and religious elements in Turkish society.<ref>]. "," '']'', April 25, 2007.</ref><ref name=Must>, '']'', April 24, 2007.</ref> On July 22, 2007 it was reported that the more religiously conservative ruling party won a larger than expected electoral victory in the parliamentary elections.<ref>]. "," '']'', July 23, 2007.</ref> | |||
The constitutional rule that prohibits discrimination on religious grounds is taken very seriously. Turkey, as a secular country, prohibits by law the wearing of religious headcover and theo-political symbolic garments for both genders in government buildings and schools;<!--universities now allow it--><ref name="The Islamic veil across Europe">{{Cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/5414098.stm |title=The Islamic veil across Europe|work=]|access-date=2006-12-13|date=2006-11-17}}</ref> a law upheld by the Grand Chamber of the ] as legitimate on 10 November 2005, in '']''.<ref name="Leyla Şahin v. Turkey">{{cite web|url=http://www.echr.coe.int/Eng/Press/2005/Nov/GrandChamberJudgmentLeylaSahinvTurkey101105.htm|title=Leyla Şahin v. Turkey|publisher=]|access-date=2008-08-21|date=2005-11-10|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080804023338/http://www.echr.coe.int/Eng/Press/2005/Nov/GrandChamberJudgmentLeylaSahinvTurkey101105.htm|archive-date=2008-08-04}}</ref> | |||
Turkey's preservation and maintenance of its secular identity has been a profound issue and source of tension. Prime Minister ] has spoken out in favor of limited Islamism and against the active restrictions,{{Citation needed|date=July 2008}} instituted by Atatürk on wearing the Islamic-style ] in government offices and schools. The ] ({{lang-tr|Cumhuriyet Mitingleri}}) were a series of peaceful mass rallies that took place in ] in the spring of 2007 in support of the ] ideals of ].<ref name="BBC">{{Cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/6554851.stm|title=Secular rally targets Turkish PM|work=]|accessdate=2008-08-05|date=2007-04-14}}</ref> | |||
The strict application of secularism in Turkey has been credited for enabling women to have access to greater opportunities, compared to countries with a greater influence of religion in public affairs, in matters of education, employment, wealth as well as political, social and cultural freedoms.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Religion and Politics in Turkey|first=Ali|last=Çarkoğlu|publisher=Routledge|location=UK|year=2004|isbn=978-0-415-34831-7|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=t5G_zw9exMQC&q=Religion+in+Turkey&pg=PP1 }}</ref> | |||
The constitutional rule that prohibits discrimination on religious grounds is taken very seriously. Turkey, as a secular country, prohibits by law the wearing of religious headcover and theo-political symbolic garments for both genders in government buildings, schools, and universities;<ref name="The Islamic veil across Europe">{{Cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/5414098.stm |title=The Islamic veil across Europe|work=]|accessdate=2006-12-13|date=2006-11-17}}</ref> a law upheld by the Grand Chamber of the ] as legitimate on November 10, 2005 in '']''.<ref name="Leyla Şahin v. Turkey">{{cite web|url=http://www.echr.coe.int/Eng/Press/2005/Nov/GrandChamberJudgmentLeylaSahinvTurkey101105.htm|title=Leyla Şahin v. Turkey|publisher=]|accessdate=2008-08-21|date=2005-11-10}}</ref> | |||
Also paradoxical with the Turkish secularism is the fact that ] cards of Turkish citizens include the specification of the card holder's religion.<ref>, ''General Directorate of Population and Citizenship Matters'', ] {{in lang|tr}}</ref> This declaration was perceived by some as representing a form of the state's surveillance over its citizens' religious choices.{{citation needed|date=December 2016}} | |||
The strict application of secularism in Turkey has been credited for enabling women to have access to greater opportunities, compared to countries with a greater influence of religion in public affairs, in matters of education, employment, wealth as well as political, social and cultural freedoms.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Religion and Politics in Turkey|first=Ali|last=Çarkoğlu|publisher=Routledge|location=UK|year=2004|isbn=0-415-34831-5|url=https://books.google.com/books?vid=ISBN0415348315&id=t5G_zw9exMQC&pg=PP1&lpg=PP1&ots=nBltWxHPjd&dq=Religion+in+Turkey&sig=gLF9WOvOo0qZO5iwyUQSUc26Ya0#PPA28,M1 }}</ref> | |||
The mainstream ]te school of ] is entirely organized by the state, through the '']'' (Religious Affairs Directorate), which supervises all ]s, educates the ]s who work in them, and approves all content for religious services and prayers. It appoints imams, who are classified as civil servants.<ref>Fox, Jonathan. ''World Survey of Religion and the State'', Cambridge University Press, 2008, {{ISBN|978-0-521-70758-9}}, page 247</ref> This micromanagement of Sunni religious practices, at times, seems much more sectarian than secular, as it violates the principle of state neutrality in religious practice.{{citation needed|date=December 2016}} Groups that have expressed dissatisfaction with this situation include a variety of non-governmental Sunni / Hanafi groups (such as the ] movement), whose interpretation of Islam tends to be more activist; and the non-Sunni (]), whose members tend to resent supporting the Sunni establishment with their tax money (whereas the Turkish state does not subsidize Alevi religious activities).{{citation needed|date=December 2016}} | |||
Also paradoxical with the Turkish secularism is the fact that ] cards of Turkish citizens include the specification of the card holder's religion.<ref>, ''General Directorate of Population and Citizenship Matters'', ] {{tr}}</ref> This declaration was perceived for some as representing a form of the state's surveillance over its citizens' religious choices. | |||
The mainstream ]te school of ] is entirely organized by the state, through the '']'' (Religious Affairs Directorate), which supervises all ]s, educates the imams who work in them, and approves all content for religious services and prayers. It appoints imams, who are classified as civil servants.<ref>Fox, Jonathan. ''World Survey of Religion and the State'', Cambridge University Press, 2008, ISBN 978-0-521-70758-9, page 247</ref> This micromanagement of Sunni religious at times seems much more sectarian than secular as it violates the principle of state neutrality in religious practice. Groups that have expressed dissatisfaction with this situation include a variety of extra-governmental Sunni / Hanafi groups (such as the ] movement), whose interpretation of Islam tends to be more activist; and the non-Sunni ] lik, whose members tend to resent supporting the Sunni establishment with their tax monies (the Turkish state does not subsidize Alevi religious activities). | |||
==Criticism== | ==Criticism== | ||
Atatürk's ideology of ] abolished the Ottoman ], removed Islam as the state religion, sharia from the legal code, and sought to banish religious interference in government affairs with the "Presidency of Religious Affairs" or ].<ref name="Diyanet.gov.tr">{{cite web| url=http://www.diyanet.gov.tr |title=T.C. Diyanet İşleri Başkanlığı, Namaz Vakitleri, Duyurular, Haberler | publisher=Diyanet.gov.tr | access-date=2013-09-28}}</ref> However, a number of policies of the Turkish government are not in line with the concept of secularism.{{citation needed|date=April 2022}} | |||
Critics{{Who|date=August 2008}} argue that the Turkish state's support for and regulation of ] religious institutions{{spaced ndash}}including mandatory religious education for children deemed by the state to be Muslims{{spaced ndash}}amount to de facto violations of secularism. Debate arises over the issue of to what degree religious observance ought to be restricted to the ]{{spaced ndash}}most famously in connection with the issues of ] and religious-based political parties (cf. ], ]). The issue of an independent Greek Orthodox seminary is also a matter of controversy in regard to Turkey's accession to the European Union, the reason being that it makes no sense for Turkey to completely oppress a small theological education center when it funds thousands more.{{Citation needed|date=August 2008}} Also the fact that only Sunni Muslims receive state salaries when working as appointed clergy is another issue being criticised. | |||
Reforms going in the direction of secularism have been completed under Atatürk (abolition of the Caliphate, etc.). | |||
<br />However, Turkey is not strictly a secular state: | |||
*there is no separation between religion and State | |||
*there is a tutelage of religion by the state | |||
Religion is mentioned on the identity documents and there is an administration called "Presidency of Religious Affairs" or ]<ref>{{cite web| url=http://www.diyanet.gov.tr |title=T.C. Diyanet İşleri Başkanlığı, Namaz Vakitleri, Duyurular, Haberler | publisher=Diyanet.gov.tr |date= | accessdate=2013-09-28}}</ref> which exploits Islam to legitimize sometimes State and manages 77,500 mosques. This state agency, established by ] in 1924, and which had a budget over U.S. $2.5 billion in 2012 finances only ] Muslim worship. Other religions must ensure a financially self-sustaining running and they face administrative obstacles during operation.<ref>Samim Akgönül - Religions de Turquie, religions des Turcs: nouveaux acteurs dans l'Europe élargie - L'Harmattan - 2005 - 196 pages</ref> | |||
Religion is mentioned on the Turkish identity documents. The government agency known as the "Presidency of Religious Affairs" or ]<ref name="Diyanet.gov.tr"/> draws on tax revenues collected from all Turkish citizens, but finances only ] worship. All other religions must ensure a financially self-sustaining running and they face administrative obstacles during operation.<ref>Samim Akgönül – Religions de Turquie, religions des Turcs: nouveaux acteurs dans l'Europe élargie – L'Harmattan – 2005 – 196 pages</ref> | |||
When harvesting tax, all Turkish citizens are equal. The tax rate is not based on religion. However, through the Diyanet, Turkish citizens are not equal in the use of revenue. | |||
For example, ] Muslims (mostly ]) and ] |
For example, ] Muslims (mostly ]) and ]-] (mostly ]) participate in the financing of the mosques and the salaries of ] imams, while their places of worship, which are not officially recognized by the State, do not receive any funding.{{citation needed|date=April 2022}} | ||
Theoretically, Turkey, through the ] (1923), recognizes the civil, political and cultural rights of non-Muslim minorities.< |
Theoretically, Turkey, through the ] (1923), recognizes the civil, political and cultural rights of non-Muslim minorities. In practice, Turkey only recognizes ], ] and ] religious minorities without granting them all the rights mentioned in the ]. Alevi-Bektashi or ] Muslims,<ref name="clarke">The World of the Alevis: Issues of Culture and Identity, Gloria L. Clarke</ref> ] and ] are not recognized officially.{{citation needed|date=April 2022}} | ||
In practice, Turkey only recognizes ], ] and ] religious minorities without granting them all the rights mentioned in the ].<br> | |||
Alevi Bektashi ] Muslims,<ref name="clarke">The World of the Alevis: Issues of Culture and Identity, Gloria L. Clarke</ref> Latin ] and ] are not recognized officially. | |||
{| center" class="wikitable" |
{| center" class="wikitable" | ||
|- | |- | ||
|+ |
|+ Situation of religions in Turkey | ||
|- | |- | ||
! Religion | |||
! style="text-align:center; background:#036; width:30%;"|<span style="color:#ffffff; font-size:100%;">Religions</span> | |||
! Estimated population | |||
! style="text-align:center; background:#036; width:10%;"|<span style="color:#ffffff; font-size:100%;">Estimated population</span> | |||
! |
! Expropriation measures<ref name="la croix">{{cite news| url=http://www.la-croix.com/Religion/Urbi-Orbi/Monde/Le-gouvernement-turc-va-restituer-des-biens-saisis-a-des-minorites-religieuses-_NP_-2011-08-29-704560 | title=Le gouvernement turc va restituer des biens saisis à des minorités religieuses | newspaper=La Croix | language=fr | publisher=La-Croix.com | date=2011-08-29 | access-date=2013-09-28}}</ref> | ||
! |
! Official recognition through the Constitution or international treaties | ||
! |
! Government Financing of places of worship and religious staff | ||
|- | |- | ||
! |
! Islam – ] | ||
| style="text-align:right;"| 70 to 85% (52 to 64 |
| style="text-align:right;"| 70 to 85% (52 to 64 million) | ||
| style="text-align:right;"| No | | style="text-align:right;"| No | ||
| style="text-align:right;"| Yes through the Diyanet mentioned in the Constitution (art.136) |
| style="text-align:right;"| Yes through the Diyanet mentioned in the Constitution (art.136)<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110812184406/https://www.tbmm.gov.tr/anayasa/anayasa_2011.pdf|date=August 12, 2011}}</ref> | ||
| style="text-align:right;"| Yes through the Diyanet |
| style="text-align:right;"| Yes through the Diyanet<ref name="obtic">{{cite web |url=http://obtic.org/Dosyalar/Cahiers%20de%20l%27Obtic/CahiersObtic_2.pdf |title=Archived copy |access-date=2013-10-02 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131002163826/http://obtic.org/Dosyalar/Cahiers%20de%20l%27Obtic/CahiersObtic_2.pdf |archive-date=2013-10-02 }}</ref> | ||
|- | |- | ||
! |
! ] – ] | ||
|rowspan=2 |
|rowspan=2 style="text-align:right;"| 15 to 25% (11 to 19 million) | ||
|rowspan=2| |
|rowspan=2 style="text-align:right;"| Yes<ref name="clarke"/> | ||
| style="text-align:right;"| No. In 1826 with the abolition of the ] corps, the Bektashi ] (dervish convent) were closed |
| style="text-align:right;"| No. In 1826, with the abolition of the ] corps, the Bektashi ] (dervish convent) were closed<ref name="clarke"/><ref name="janissaire">{{cite web |url=http://janissaire.hautetfort.com/archive/2008/05/14/les-janissaires-1979-de-vincent-mansour-monteil.html |title=Les Janissaires (1979) de Vincent Mansour Monteil : JANISSAIRE |publisher=Janissaire.hautetfort.com |date=2008-05-14 |language=fr |access-date=2013-09-28 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160303181641/http://janissaire.hautetfort.com/archive/2008/05/14/les-janissaires-1979-de-vincent-mansour-monteil.html |archive-date=2016-03-03 }}</ref><ref name="ovipot">{{cite web|url=http://ovipot.hypotheses.org/1348 |title=Les minorités non musulmanes en Turquie : "certains rapports d'ONG parlent d'une logique d'attrition" |author=Jean-Paul Burdy |date=18 April 2010 |publisher=Observatoire de la Vie Politique Turque(Ovipot.hypotheses.org) |doi=10.58079/smk9 | language=fr |access-date=2013-09-28}}</ref> | ||
|rowspan=2| |
|rowspan=2 style="text-align:right;"| No<ref name="obtic"/> | ||
|- | |- | ||
! |
! Twelver Islam – ] | ||
| style="text-align:right;"| No.<ref name="ovipot"/> In the early fifteenth century,<ref name="Persée »">{{cite |
| style="text-align:right;"| No.<ref name="ovipot"/> In the early fifteenth century,<ref name="Persée »">{{cite journal| url=http://www.persee.fr/web/revues/home/prescript/article/cmr_0008-0160_1979_num_20_2_1359?_Prescripts_Search_tabs1=standard& |title=Persée |journal=Cahiers du Monde Russe |year=1979 |volume=20 |issue=2 |pages=239–272 | publisher=] |doi=10.3406/cmr.1979.1359 |access-date=2013-09-28|last1=Bacqué-Grammont |first1=Jean-Louis }}</ref> due to the unsustainable Ottoman oppression, Alevi supported ] who had Turkmen origins. ] supporters, who wear a red cap with twelve folds in reference to the 12 Imams were called ]. Ottomans who were Arabized and Persianized considered ] (Alevi) as enemies because of their Turkmen origins.<ref name="Persée »" /> Today, ], places of worship of Alevi-Bektashi have no official recognition. | ||
|- | |- | ||
! |
! Twelver Islam – ] | ||
| style="text-align:right;"| 4% (3 |
| style="text-align:right;"| 4% (3 million)<ref>Rapport Minority Rights Group Bir eşitlik arayışı: Türkiye’de azınlıklar Uluslararası Azınlık Hakları Grubu 2007 Dilek Kurban</ref> | ||
| style="text-align:right;"| | | style="text-align:right;"| | ||
| style="text-align:right;"| No |
| style="text-align:right;"| No<ref name="ovipot"/> | ||
| style="text-align:right;"| No |
| style="text-align:right;"| No<ref name="obtic"/> | ||
|- | |- | ||
! |
! Twelver Islam – ] | ||
| style="text-align:right;"| 300 to 350 |
| style="text-align:right;"| 300 to 350,000<ref>{{cite web |author=Pirsultan psakd Antalya |url=http://www.psakd.org/dunyada_turkiyede_nusayrilik1.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071012234948/http://www.psakd.org/dunyada_turkiyede_nusayrilik1.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=2007-10-12 |title=Dünyada ve Türkiye'de NUSAYRİLİK |publisher=psakd.org |date=2006-08-16 |language=tr |access-date=2013-09-28 }}</ref> | ||
| style="text-align:right;"| | | style="text-align:right;"| | ||
| style="text-align:right;"| No |
| style="text-align:right;"| No<ref name="ovipot"/> | ||
| style="text-align:right;"| No |
| style="text-align:right;"| No<ref name="obtic"/> | ||
|- | |- | ||
!] | |||
! scope="row" style="background:#ccf; text-align:left;"| ] | |||
| style="text-align:right;"| {{formatnum:20000}} | | style="text-align:right;"| {{formatnum:20000}} | ||
| style="text-align:right;"| Yes |
| style="text-align:right;"| Yes<ref name="la croix"/> | ||
| style="text-align:right;"| Yes through the ] (1923)<ref name="ovipot"/> | | style="text-align:right;"| Yes through the ] (1923)<ref name="ovipot"/> | ||
| style="text-align:right;"| No |
| style="text-align:right;"| No<ref name="obtic"/> | ||
|- | |- | ||
! |
! Christian – ] | ||
| style="text-align:right;"| {{formatnum:5000}} | | style="text-align:right;"| {{formatnum:5000}} | ||
| style="text-align:right;"| | | style="text-align:right;"| | ||
| style="text-align:right;"| No |
| style="text-align:right;"| No<ref name="ovipot"/> | ||
| style="text-align:right;"| No |
| style="text-align:right;"| No<ref name="obtic"/> | ||
|- | |- | ||
! |
! Christian – Latin ] | ||
| style="text-align:right;"| {{formatnum:35000<ref>Andrea Riccardi, ''Il secolo del martirio'', Mondadori, 2009, pag. 281.</ref><br/>}} | | style="text-align:right;"| {{formatnum:35000<ref>Andrea Riccardi, ''Il secolo del martirio'', Mondadori, 2009, pag. 281.</ref><br />}} | ||
| style="text-align:right;"| | | style="text-align:right;"| | ||
| style="text-align:right;"| No |
| style="text-align:right;"| No<ref name="ovipot"/> | ||
| style="text-align:right;"| No |
| style="text-align:right;"| No<ref name="obtic"/> | ||
|- | |- | ||
! |
! Christian – Greek Catholics | ||
| style="text-align:right;"| | | style="text-align:right;"| | ||
| style="text-align:right;"| Yes |
| style="text-align:right;"| Yes<ref name="la croix"/> | ||
| style="text-align:right;"| Yes through the ] (1923)<ref name="ovipot"/> | | style="text-align:right;"| Yes through the ] (1923)<ref name="ovipot"/> | ||
| style="text-align:right;"| No |
| style="text-align:right;"| No<ref name="obtic"/> | ||
|- | |- | ||
! |
! Christian – ] – Greek (]) | ||
| style="text-align:right;"| {{formatnum:3000-4000<ref name="zaman">{{cite news|url=http://www.todayszaman.com/tz-web/detaylar.do?load=detay&link=161291 | | style="text-align:right;"| {{formatnum:3000-4000<ref name="zaman">{{cite news | ||
|url = http://www.todayszaman.com/tz-web/detaylar.do?load=detay&link=161291 | |||
| |
|access-date = 2008-12-15 | ||
|title=Foreign Ministry: 89,000 minorities live in Turkey | |title = Foreign Ministry: 89,000 minorities live in Turkey | ||
|date=2008-12-15 | |date = 2008-12-15 | ||
|work=] | |work = ] | ||
|url-status = dead | |||
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20100501063653/http://www.todayszaman.com/tz-web/detaylar.do?load=detay&link=161291 | |||
|archive-date = 2010-05-01 | |||
}}</ref>}} | }}</ref>}} | ||
| style="text-align:right;"| Yes |
| style="text-align:right;"| Yes<ref name="la croix"/> | ||
| style="text-align:right;"| Yes through the ] (1923)<ref name="ovipot"/> | | style="text-align:right;"| Yes through the ] (1923)<ref name="ovipot"/> | ||
| style="text-align:right;"| No |
| style="text-align:right;"| No<ref name="obtic"/> | ||
|- | |- | ||
! |
! Christian – ] – ] (]) | ||
| style="text-align:right;"| {{formatnum:18000<ref> |
| style="text-align:right;"| {{formatnum:18000}}<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061220015315/http://www.hr-action.org/thr/GRTURK.html |date=2006-12-20 }} by Marios D. Dikaiakos</ref> | ||
| style="text-align:right;"| | | style="text-align:right;"| | ||
| style="text-align:right;"| No<ref name="ovipot"/> | | style="text-align:right;"| No<ref name="ovipot"/> | ||
| style="text-align:right;"| No |
| style="text-align:right;"| No<ref name="obtic"/> | ||
|- | |- | ||
! |
! Christian – ] – Armenian (]) | ||
| style="text-align:right;"| {{formatnum:57000-80000<ref>{{cite web | last=Turay | first=Anna | title=Tarihte Ermeniler | publisher= |
| style="text-align:right;"| {{formatnum:57000-80000<ref>{{cite web | last=Turay | first=Anna | title=Tarihte Ermeniler | publisher=Armenians of Istanbul| url=http://www.bolsohays.com/webac.asp?referans=1 | access-date=2007-01-04| archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20061206185130/http://www.bolsohays.com/webac.asp?referans=1| archive-date= 6 December 2006 | url-status= live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.taraf.com.tr/Yazar.asp?id=12|access-date=2008-09-02|title=Türk Ermenisiz, Ermeni Türksüz olmaz!|work=]|first=Ayşe|last=Hür|date=2008-08-31|quote=Sonunda nüfuslarını 70 bine indirmeyi başardık.|language=tr|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080902110745/http://www.taraf.com.tr/yazar.asp?id=12|archive-date=2 September 2008|url-status=dead}}</ref> }} | ||
| style="text-align:right;"| Yes<ref name="la croix"/> | |||
|quote=Sonunda nüfuslarını 70 bine indirmeyi başardık.|language=Turkish| archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20080902110745/http://www.taraf.com.tr/yazar.asp?id=12| archivedate= 2 September 2008 <!--DASHBot-->| deadurl= no}}</ref> }} | |||
| style="text-align:right;"| Yes <ref name="la croix"/> | |||
| style="text-align:right;"| Yes through the ] (1923)<ref name="ovipot"/> | | style="text-align:right;"| Yes through the ] (1923)<ref name="ovipot"/> | ||
| style="text-align:right;"| No |
| style="text-align:right;"| No<ref name="obtic"/> | ||
|- | |- | ||
! |
! Christian – Catholics ] (Armenian) | ||
| style="text-align:right;"| {{formatnum:3000}} | | style="text-align:right;"| {{formatnum:3000}} | ||
| style="text-align:right;"| Yes |
| style="text-align:right;"| Yes<ref name="la croix"/> | ||
| style="text-align:right;"| Yes through the ] (1923)<ref name="ovipot"/> | | style="text-align:right;"| Yes through the ] (1923)<ref name="ovipot"/> | ||
| style="text-align:right;"| No |
| style="text-align:right;"| No<ref name="obtic"/> | ||
|- | |- | ||
! |
! Christian – ] ] and ] Churches | ||
| style="text-align:right;"| {{formatnum:15000}} | | style="text-align:right;"| {{formatnum:15000}} | ||
| style="text-align:right;"| Yes |
| style="text-align:right;"| Yes<ref name="la croix"/> | ||
| style="text-align:right;"| No |
| style="text-align:right;"| No<ref name="ovipot"/> | ||
| style="text-align:right;"| No |
| style="text-align:right;"| No<ref name="obtic"/> | ||
|- | |- | ||
! ] | |||
! scope="row" style="background:#ccf; text-align:left;"| ] | |||
| style="text-align:right;"| 377 | | style="text-align:right;"| 377 | ||
| style="text-align:right;"| | | style="text-align:right;"| | ||
| style="text-align:right;"| No |
| style="text-align:right;"| No<ref name="ovipot"/> | ||
| style="text-align:right;"| No |
| style="text-align:right;"| No<ref name="obtic"/> | ||
|} | |} | ||
{{clear}} | {{clear}} | ||
With more than 100,000 employees, the Diyanet |
With more than 100,000 employees, the Diyanet has been described as a form of state within the state.<ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gZfK_OnlAiQC&q=diyanet+l%27etat+dans+l%27etat&pg=PA220 |title=La politique turque en question: entre imperfections et adaptations | language=fr |access-date=2013-09-28|isbn=9782336003054 |last1=Dal |first1=Emel Parlar |year=2012 |publisher=L'Harmattan }}</ref> In 2013, with a budget of over 4.6 billion Turkish lira, the Diyanet occupied the 16th position of central government expenditure.<br /> | ||
] (2013)]] | |||
In 2013, with over 4.6 billion TL (Turkish Lira), Diyanet or Ministry of Religious Affairs, occupies the 16th position of central government expenditure.<br> | |||
The budget allocated to Diyanet is: | |||
] | |||
*1.6 times larger than the budget allocated to the Ministry of the Interior<ref name="tbmm.gov.tr">http://www.tbmm.gov.tr/butce/2013/kanun_tasarisi.pdf</ref> | |||
*1.8 times larger than the budget allocated to the Ministry of Health<ref name="tbmm.gov.tr"/> | |||
*1.9 times larger than the budget allocated to the Ministry of Industry, Science and Technology<ref name="tbmm.gov.tr"/> | |||
*2.4 times larger than the budget allocated to the Ministry of Environment and Urban Planning<ref name="tbmm.gov.tr"/> | |||
*2.5 times larger than the budget allocated to the Ministry of Culture and Tourism<ref name="tbmm.gov.tr"/> | |||
*2.9 times larger than the budget allocated to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs<ref name="tbmm.gov.tr"/> | |||
*3.4 times larger than the budget allocated to the Ministry of Economy<ref name="tbmm.gov.tr"/> | |||
*3.8 times larger than the budget of the Ministry of Development<ref name="tbmm.gov.tr"/> | |||
*4.6 times larger than the budget allocated to MIT – Secret Services <ref name="tbmm.gov.tr"/> | |||
*5,0 times larger than the budget allocated to the Department of Emergency and Disaster Management<ref name="tbmm.gov.tr"/> | |||
*7.7 times larger than the budget allocated to the Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources<ref name="tbmm.gov.tr"/> | |||
*9.1 times larger than the budget allocated to the Ministry of Customs and Trade<ref name="tbmm.gov.tr"/> | |||
*10.7 times greater than the budget allocated to Coast Guard<ref name="tbmm.gov.tr"/> | |||
*21.6 times greater than the budget allocated to the Ministry of the European Union<ref name="tbmm.gov.tr"/> | |||
*242 times larger than the budget for the National Security Council<ref name="tbmm.gov.tr"/> | |||
*268 times more important than the budget allocated to the Ministry of Public Employee<ref name="tbmm.gov.tr"/> | |||
=== Headscarf controversy in Turkey === | |||
Diyanet's budget represents: | |||
*79% of the budget of the Police<ref name="tbmm.gov.tr"/> | |||
*67% of the budget of the Ministry of Justice<ref name="tbmm.gov.tr"/> | |||
*57% of the budget of the Public Hospitals<ref name="tbmm.gov.tr"/> | |||
*31% of the budget of the National Police<ref name="tbmm.gov.tr"/> | |||
*23% of the budget of the ] (]'s second largest standing army)<ref name="tbmm.gov.tr"/> | |||
===Headscarf controversy=== | |||
{{Further|Headscarf controversy in Turkey}} | {{Further|Headscarf controversy in Turkey}} | ||
''Many of the passages citations can be found at the UNHCR<ref>{{cite web|author=United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees |url=http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/country,,IRBC,,TUR,,4885a91a8,0.html |title=Turkey: Situation of women who wear headscarves |publisher=] Unhcr.org |date= |accessdate=2013-09-28}}</ref> | |||
The Turkish government had outlawed the wearing of headscarves by women who work in the ] in 1982.<ref>'''' ("THE REGULATION ON THE DRESS AND ATTIRE OF PERSONNEL WORKING IN PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS AND ORGANIZATIONS") dated 16 July 1982.</ref> The ban had applied to ], ], ] and others working on state premises. The ban on headscarves in the ] and ] and ] institutions was expanded to cover non-state institutions. Authorities began to enforce the headscarf ban among mothers accompanying their children to ] events or public ], while female ] and ] who refused to comply with the ban were expelled from public buildings such as ]s and ] {{Citation needed|date=February 2009}}. In 1999, the ban on headscarves in the public sphere hit the headlines when ], a newly elected MP for the ] was prevented from taking her oath in the National Assembly because she wore a headscarf. The constitutional rule that prohibits discrimination on religious grounds is taken very seriously. Turkey prohibited by law the wearing of religious headcover and theo-political symbolic garments for both genders in government buildings, schools, and universities;<ref name="The Islamic veil across Europe"/> a law that was upheld by the Grand Chamber of the ] as legitimate on 10 November 2005, in '']''.<ref name="Leyla Şahin v. Turkey"/> In 2022, President ] has suggested the constitutional change to guarantee the right to wear a headscarf in the civil service, schools, and universities should be decided through a referendum.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2022-10-23 |title=Turkey's Erdogan proposes a referendum on right to wear headscarf |url=https://www.euronews.com/2022/10/23/turkeys-erdogan-proposes-a-referendum-on-right-to-wear-headscarf |access-date=2023-05-10 |website=euronews |language=en}}</ref> | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="border:1px black; float:right; margin-center:1em" | |||
|- | |||
! style="background:#f99;" colspan="4"|Do you cover when going outside?<ref name=TESEV07p64>{{cite book|last=Fromm|first=Ali Çarkoğlu, Binnaz Toprak; translated from Turkish by Çiğdem Aksoy|title=Religion, Society and Politics in a Changing Turkey|year=2007|publisher=TESEV publications|location=Karaköy, İstanbul|isbn=978-975-8112-90-6|page=64|url=http://research.sabanciuniv.edu/5854/1/2007_08_Religon%2C_Society_and_Politics_in_a_Changing_Turkey.pdf|access-date=2021-07-27|archive-date=2021-02-21|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210221203347/http://research.sabanciuniv.edu/5854/1/2007_08_Religon%2C_Society_and_Politics_in_a_Changing_Turkey.pdf|url-status=dead}}</ref> | |||
|-Answers | |||
| || 1999 || 2012 | |||
|- | |||
| No, I do not || 47.3% || 66.5% | |||
|- | |||
| Yes, I wear a headscarf || 33.4% || 18.8% | |||
|- | |||
| Yes, I wear a türban || 15.7% || 11.4% | |||
|- | |||
| Yes, I wear a ] || 3.4% || 0.1% | |||
|- | |||
| NI/NA || 0.3% || 2.2% | |||
|} | |||
=== |
=== Workplace === | ||
According to Country Reports 2007, women who wore headscarves and their supporters "were disciplined or lost their jobs in the public sector" (US 11 March 2008, Sec. 2.c). ] (HRW) reports that in late 2005, the ] ruled that a teacher was not eligible for a promotion in her school because she wore a headscarf outside of work (Jan. 2007). An immigration counsellor at the Embassy of Canada in Ankara stated |
According to Country Reports 2007, women who wore headscarves and their supporters "were disciplined or lost their jobs in the public sector" (US 11 March 2008, Sec. 2.c). ] (HRW) reports that in late 2005, the ] ruled that a teacher was not eligible for a promotion in her school because she wore a headscarf outside of work (Jan. 2007). An immigration counsellor at the Embassy of Canada in Ankara stated on 27 April 2005 correspondence with the Research Directorate that public servants are not permitted to wear a headscarf while on duty, but headscarved women may be ] in the ]. On 12 April 2005 correspondence sent to the ], a professor of political science specializing in women's issues in Turkey at ] in ] indicated that women who wear a headscarf "could possibly be denied employment in private or ] sectors." Conversely, some ] with a more traditional constituency might attempt to hire specifically those women who wear a headscarf (Professor 12 April 2005). The professor did add, however, that headscarved women generally experience difficulty in obtaining positions as teachers, judges, lawyers, or doctors in the public service (ibid.). More recent or corroborating information on the headscarf ban in the public service could not be found among the sources consulted by the Research Directorate. | ||
The London-based ] reports that while the ban is officially in place only in the public sphere, many private firms similarly avoid hiring women who wear headscarves (6 May 2007). ] notes that women who wear headscarves may have more difficulty finding a job or obtaining a desirable wage (Apr. 2008), although this could not be corroborated among the sources consulted by the ]. | The London-based ] reports that while the ban is officially in place only in the public sphere, many private firms similarly avoid hiring women who wear headscarves (6 May 2007). ] notes that women who wear headscarves may have more difficulty finding a job or obtaining a desirable wage (Apr. 2008), although this could not be corroborated among the sources consulted by the ]. | ||
=== |
=== Medical care === | ||
According to the |
According to the New York Times, headscarves were banned inside Turkish ], and doctors could not don a headscarf on the job (6 May 2007). Nevertheless, MERO reports that under Turkey's current administration, seen by secularists to have a hidden religious agenda,<ref>The New York Times, 19 February 2008</ref><ref>Washington Post, 26 February 2008</ref> doctors who wear headscarves have been employed in some public hospitals.<ref>MERO Apr. 2008</ref> | ||
===Ban lifted=== | ===Ban lifted=== | ||
On 9 February 2008, Turkey's parliament approved a constitutional amendment that lifted the ban on Islamic headscarves in universities. Prior to this date, the public ban on headscarves officially extended to students on university campuses throughout Turkey. Nevertheless, according to Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2007, "some faculty members permitted students to wear head coverings in class". Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty notes that since the 1990s, some rectors have allowed students to wear headscarves. | On 9 February 2008, Turkey's parliament approved a constitutional amendment that lifted the ban on Islamic headscarves in universities. Prior to this date, the public ban on headscarves officially extended to students on university campuses throughout Turkey. Nevertheless, according to Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2007, "some faculty members permitted students to wear head coverings in class". Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty notes that since the 1990s, some rectors have allowed students to wear headscarves. | ||
On 5 June 2008, Turkey's ] annulled the parliament's proposed ] intended to lift the headscarf ban, ruling that removing the ban would run counter to official secularism. While the highest court's decision to uphold the headscarf ban cannot be appealed (AP 7 June 2008), the government has nevertheless indicated that it is considering adopting measures to weaken the court's authority. | On 5 June 2008, Turkey's ] annulled the parliament's proposed ] intended to lift the headscarf ban, ruling that removing the ban would run counter to official secularism. While the highest court's decision to uphold the headscarf ban cannot be appealed (AP 7 June 2008), the government has nevertheless indicated that it is considering adopting measures to weaken the court's authority.{{citation needed|date=April 2022}} | ||
===Wearing of head-covering=== | ===Wearing of head-covering=== | ||
According to the Turkish Economic and Social Studies Foundation around 62% of women wear the headscarf in Turkey.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article1752230.ece |title=Head scarves to topple secular Turkey? |first=Christina |last=Lamb |date=2007-04-23 | location=London | work=The Times}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article1752230.ece |title=Headscarf war threatens to split Turkey |work=Times Online |date=2007-05-06 | location=London | first1=Christina | last1=Lamb}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/2007/04/23/headscarf/ |title=Head scarves to topple secular Turkey? |work=] |first=Tracy | According to a research by the Turkish Economic and Social Studies Foundation in 2007, around 62% of women wear the headscarf in Turkey.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article1752230.ece |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080727001915/http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article1752230.ece |url-status=dead |archive-date=27 July 2008 |title=Head scarves to topple secular Turkey? |first=Christina |last=Lamb |date=2007-04-23 | location=London | work=The Times}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article1752230.ece |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080727001915/http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article1752230.ece |url-status=dead |archive-date=27 July 2008 |title=Headscarf war threatens to split Turkey |work=Times Online |date=2007-05-06 | location=London | first1=Christina | last1=Lamb}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/2007/04/23/headscarf/ |title=Head scarves to topple secular Turkey? |work=] |first=Tracy | ||
|last=Clark-Flory | |
|last=Clark-Flory |access-date=2008-08-04 |date=2007-04-23}}</ref> | ||
Turkey's strong secularism has resulted in what have been perceived by some as strictures on the ]; for example, the ] has long been prohibited in public universities, and a constitutional amendment passed in February 2008 that permitted women to wear it on university campuses sparked considerable ]. In addition, the armed forces have maintained a vigilant watch over Turkey's political secularism, which they affirm to be a keystone among Turkey's founding principles. The military has not left the maintenance of a secular political process to chance, however, and has intervened in politics on a number of occasions.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2024-03-01 |title=Turkey {{!}} Location, Geography, People, Economy, Culture, & History {{!}} Britannica |url=https://www.britannica.com/place/Turkey |access-date=2024-03-02 |website=www.britannica.com |language=en}}</ref> | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
{{Portal|Turkey}} | {{Portal|Turkey}} | ||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{Reflist |
{{Reflist}} | ||
==Further reading== | ==Further reading== | ||
*{{cite web|url=https://archive.org/download/the-paradox-of-turkish-secularism/The_Paradox_of_Turkish_Secularism.pdf|title=The Paradox of Turkish Secularism|work=Özgüç Orhan|publisher=Turkish Journal of Politics Vol. 4 No. 1}} | |||
*]. ''Secularism and State Policies toward Religion The United States, France, and Turkey'' Cambridge University Press, 2009. | *]. ''Secularism and State Policies toward Religion The United States, France, and Turkey'' Cambridge University Press, 2009. | ||
*Hirschberger, Bernd / Püttmann, Friedrich. "". In: Hirschberger, Bernd / Voges, Katja (eds.) (2024): . Bielefeld: transcript. Retrieved 30 June 2024, pp. 91-104. | |||
*Peker, E. 2020. "]" ''Social Science History'' | |||
*Davison, Andrew. "." The South Atlantic Quarterly 102.2 (2003): 333-350. | |||
*Sevinc, K., Hood, R. W. Jr., Coleman, T. J. III, (2017). . In Zuckerman, P., & Shook, J. R., (Eds.), ''The Oxford Handbook of Secularism''. Oxford University Press. | |||
*M. Hakan Yavuz, "", Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, Vol. 19, No.1; https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2019.1576367 | |||
<!-- Please use the following templates when adding references: | <!-- Please use the following templates when adding references: | ||
*{{cite book | *{{cite book | ||
Line 280: | Line 280: | ||
*{{cite journal | *{{cite journal | ||
|first = | last = | |||
|authorlink = | |||
|coauthors = | |||
|year = | |||
|month = | |||
|title = '''REQUIRED''' | |title = '''REQUIRED''' | ||
|journal = | |||
|volume = | |||
|issue = | |||
|pages = | |||
|doi = | |||
|id = | |||
|url = | |||
|accessdate = | |||
}} | }} | ||
--> | --> | ||
*{{cite web|url=https://www.huffpost.com/entry/turkey-secularism_b_9818250|title=Stop Defending Turkey's 'Secularism' — It's Been a Lie All Along|work=Fréderike Geerdink|date=2 May 2016 |publisher=]}} | |||
{{Turkey topics}} | {{Turkey topics}} | ||
{{Secularism in Turkey|state=autocollapse}} | |||
{{Europe topic|Secularism in}} | {{Europe topic|Secularism in}} | ||
{{Asia topic|Secularism in}} | {{Asia topic|Secularism in}} | ||
{{Laïcité |state=autocollapse}} | |||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] |
Latest revision as of 02:42, 31 December 2024
Separation of religious matters and state affairs in Turkey
Religion in Turkey |
---|
Secularism in Turkey |
Islam in Turkey |
Christianity in Turkey |
Judaism in Turkey |
Minor religions |
Irreligion in Turkey |
In Turkey, secularism or laicism (see laïcité) was first introduced with the 1928 amendment of the Constitution of 1924, which removed the provision declaring that the "Religion of the State is Islam", and with the later reforms of Turkey's first president Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, which set the administrative and political requirements to create a modern, democratic, secular state, aligned with Kemalism.
Nine years after its introduction, laïcité was explicitly stated in the second article of the then Turkish constitution on 5 February 1937. The current Constitution of 1982 neither recognizes an official religion nor promotes any.
The principles of Turkish secularism, and the separation of state and religion, were historically established in order to modernize the nation. This centralized progressive approach was seen as necessary not only for the operation of the Turkish government but also to avoid a cultural life dominated by superstition, dogma, and ignorance.
Turkey's concept of laiklik ("laicism") calls for the separation of state and religion, but also describes the state's stance as one of "active neutrality", which involves state control and legal regulation of religion. Turkey's actions related with religion are carefully analyzed and evaluated through the Presidency of Religious Affairs (Diyanet İşleri Başkanlığı or simply Diyanet). The duties of the Presidency of Religious Affairs are "to execute the works concerning the beliefs, worship, and ethics of Islam, enlighten the public about their religion, and administer the sacred worshipping places".
History
Further information: Kemalism, Atatürk's reforms, and History of the Republic of TurkeyThe history of secularism in Turkey extends to the Tanzimat reforms of Ottoman Empire. The second peak in secularism occurred during the Second Constitutional Era. The current form was achieved by Atatürk's Reforms.
Ottoman Empire
Further information: Ottoman Caliphate and Religion in the Ottoman EmpireThe establishing structure (Ruling institution of the Ottoman Empire) of the Ottoman Empire (13th century) was an Islamic state in which the head of the Ottoman state was the Sultan. The social system was organized around millet. Millet structure allowed a great degree of religious, cultural and ethnic continuity to non-Muslim populations across the subdivisions of the Ottoman Empire and at the same time it permitted their incorporation into the Ottoman administrative, economic and political system. The Ottoman-appointed governor collected taxes and provided security, while the local religious or cultural matters were left to the regional communities to decide. On the other hand, the sultans were Muslims and the laws that bound them were based on the Sharia, the body of Islamic law, as well as various cultural customs. The Sultan, beginning in 1517, was also a caliph, the leader of all the Sunni Muslims in the world. By the turn of the 19th century the Ottoman ruling elite recognized the need to restructure the legislative, military and judiciary systems to cope with their new political rivals in Europe. When the millet system started to lose its efficiency due to the rise of nationalism within its borders, the Ottoman Empire explored new ways of governing its territory composed of diverse populations.
Sultan Selim III founded the first secular military schools by establishing the new military unit, Nizam-ı Cedid, as early as 1792. However the last century (19th century) of the Ottoman Empire had many far reaching reforms. These reforms peaked with the Tanzimat which was the initial reform era of the Ottoman Empire. After the Tanzimat, rules, such as those relating to the equalized status of non-Muslim citizens, the establishment of a parliament, the abandonment of medieval punishments for apostasy, as well as the codification of the constitution of the empire and the rights of Ottoman subjects were established. The First World War brought about the fall of the Ottoman Empire and the subsequent partitioning of the Ottoman Empire by the victorious Allies.
Reforms of Republic
Main article: Atatürk's ReformsReforms and policies designed to modernize Turkey adopted by Kemal Atatürk (1881–1938), the founder and the first president of Republic of Turkey, were known as "Kemalism", and had "six principles: republicanism, nationalism, populism, secularism, revolutionism and statism". Unlike some "softer" forms of secularism, Kemalist secularism "did not mean the separation of religion only from the state, rather it meant the separation of religion from whole public spheres—politics, jurisprudence, education, society and so on".
Kemalism excluded "religious symbols from public domain" and put religion "under the strict control of the state". The weekly holiday was changed from Friday to Sunday, the calendar changed from the Muslim lunar to Gregorian, and the alphabet changed from Arabic to Latin.
During the establishment of the Republic, there were two sections of the elite group at the helm of the discussions for the future. These were the Islamist reformists and Westerners. They shared a similar goal, the modernization of the new state. Many basic goals were common to both groups. The founder of the modern Turkish Republic Mustafa Kemal Atatürk's achievement was to amplify this common ground and put the country on a fast track of reforms, now known as Atatürk's Reforms.
Their first act was to give the Turkish nation the right to exercise popular sovereignty via representative democracy. Prior to declaring the new Republic, the Turkish Grand National Assembly abolished the constitutional monarchy on 1 November 1922. The Turkish Grand National Assembly then moved to replace the extant Islamic law structure with the laws it had passed during the Turkish War of Independence, beginning in 1919. The modernization of the Law had already begun at the point that the project was undertaken in earnest. A milestone in this process was the passage of the Turkish Constitution of 1921. Upon the establishment of the Republic on 29 October 1923, the institution of the caliphate (a title held by the Ottoman Sultanate since 1517) remained, but the passage of a new constitution in 1924 effectively abolished this title. Even as the new constitution eliminated the caliphate it, at the same time, declared Islam as the official religion of the Turkish Republic. According to the law text passed by the Turkish Parliament, "Since the Caliphate was essentially present in the meaning and concept of the Government and the Republic, the office of the Caliphate was abolished."
Following quickly upon these developments, a number of social reforms were undertaken. Many of these reforms affected every aspect of Turkish life, moving to erase the legacy of dominance long held by religion and tradition. The unification of education, installation of a secular education system, and the closure of many religious orders took place on 3 March 1924. This extended to closure of religious convents and dervish lodges on 30 November 1925. These reforms also included the extension to women of voting rights in 1931 and the right be to elected to public office on 5 December 1934. The inclusion of reference to laïcité into the constitution was achieved by an amendment on 5 February 1937, a move regarded as the final act in the project of instituting complete separation between governmental and religious affairs in Turkey.
Erdoğan's policies of Islamization
According to at least one observer (Mustafa Akyol), under the Islamist Justice and Development Party (AKP) government of Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, "hundreds of secularist officers and their civilian allies" were jailed starting in 2007, and by 2012 the "old secularist guard" were removed from positions of authority and replaced by members/supporters of the AKP and the Islamist Gülen movement. On 25 April 2016, the Turkish Parliament Speaker İsmail Kahraman told a conference of Islamic scholars and writers in Istanbul that "secularism would not have a place in a new constitution", as Turkey is "a Muslim country and so we should have a religious constitution". (One of the duties of Parliament Speaker is to pen a new draft constitution for Turkey.)
Traditionally, the function of the Diyanet was to maintain control over and limit the religious sphere of Islam in Turkey. Some (David Lepeska, Svante Cornell) have complained that under Erdoğan that role has "largely been turned on its head", with the Diyanet, now greatly increased in size, promoting Islam in Turkey, specifically a certain type of conservative Islam—issuing fatawa forbidding such activities as "feeding dogs at home, celebrating the western New Year, lotteries, and tattoos"; and projecting this "Turkish Islam" abroad.
In education, the AKP government pursued the explicit policy agenda of Islamization to "raise a devout generation" against secular resistance, in the process causing many non-religious citizens of Turkey to lose their jobs and schooling. Following the July 2016 coup attempt—which President Erdoğan called "a gift from God"—thousands were purged by the AKP government. The victims were primarily followers of the Gülen movement — which is alleged to have launched the coup—but also secularists who had not already been sacked in earlier purges. One explanation for the replacement of secularist policies in Turkey is that business interests who felt threatened by socialism saw Islamic values as "best suited to neutralize any challenges from the left to capitalist supremacy."
Some (such as Turan Kayaoğlu) see interest and support of secularism in Turkey as strengthening, not decreasing. After Erdoğan stated his desire to "raise a religious youth," politicians of all parties condemned his statements as abandoning Turkish values. A petition reading "f Muslim, Christian, Jewish, Zoroastrian, Alawite, Shafi’i, religious and nonreligious, atheist and agnostic backgrounds, all joined with a firm belief in secularism, find your recent remarks about raising a religious and conservative youth most alarming and dangerous" was signed by over 2,000 people. The pro-government newspaper Bugün ran a story stating "no one has the right to convert this society into a religious one, or the opposite." Surveys of the Turkish people also show a great support for maintaining a secular country. The Turkish Economic and Social Studies Foundation found that only 9% of Turks supported a religious state in 2006. A more recent 2015 poll by Metropoll found that over 80% of Turkish people supported the continuation of Turkey as a secular state, with even the majority of AKP voters supporting a secular state too.
Constitutional principles
See also: Constitution of TurkeyThe Constitution asserts that Turkey is supposed to be a secular and democratic republic, deriving its sovereignty from the people. The sovereignty rests with the Turkish Nation, who delegates its exercise to an elected unicameral parliament, the Turkish Grand National Assembly. Moreover, Article 4 declares the immovability of the founding principles of the Republic defined in the first three Articles:
- "secularism, social equality, equality before the law"
- "the Republican form of government"
- "the indivisibility of the Republic and of the Turkish Nation",
The Constitution bans any proposals for the modification of these articles (see Entrenched clause). Each of these concepts which were distributed in the three articles of the constitution can not be achieved without the other two concepts. The constitution requires a central administration which would lose its meaning (effectiveness, coverage, etc.) if the system is not based on laïcité, social equality, and equality before law. Vice versa, if the Republic differentiate itself based on social, religious differences, administration can not be equal to the population when the administration is central. The system which tried to be established in the constitution sets out to found a unitary nation-state based on the principles of secular democracy.
Impact on society
See also: Politics of TurkeyThe Turkish Constitution recognizes freedom of religion for individuals whereas identified religious communities are placed under the protection of state. The constitution explicitly states that it is illegal for a religious community to get involved in politics, or to form a Party openly representing a religious group.
In recent history, two parties have been ordered to close (Welfare Party in 1998, and Virtue Party in 2001) by the Constitutional Court for Islamist activities and attempts to "redefine the secular nature of the republic". The first party to be closed for suspected anti-secularist activities was the Progressive Republican Party on 3 June 1925.
Issues relating to Turkey's secularism were discussed in the lead up to the 2007 presidential election, in which the ruling party chose a candidate with Islamist connections, Abdullah Gül, for the first time in the history of the secular republic. While some in Turkey have expressed concern that the nomination could represent a move away from Turkey's secularist traditions, including particularly Turkey's priority on equality between the sexes, others have suggested that the conservative party has effectively promoted modernization while reaching out to more traditional and religious elements in Turkish society. On 22 July 2007, it was reported that the more religiously conservative ruling party won a larger than expected electoral victory in the snap general election.
Turkey's preservation and maintenance of its secular identity has been a profound issue and source of tension. Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has broken with secular tradition, by speaking out in favor of limited Islamism and against the active restrictions, instituted by Atatürk on wearing the Islamic-style head scarves in government offices and schools. The Republic Protests (Turkish: Cumhuriyet Mitingleri) were a series of peaceful mass rallies that took place in the spring of 2007 in support of the Kemalist ideals of state secularism.
The constitutional rule that prohibits discrimination on religious grounds is taken very seriously. Turkey, as a secular country, prohibits by law the wearing of religious headcover and theo-political symbolic garments for both genders in government buildings and schools; a law upheld by the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights as legitimate on 10 November 2005, in Leyla Şahin v. Turkey.
The strict application of secularism in Turkey has been credited for enabling women to have access to greater opportunities, compared to countries with a greater influence of religion in public affairs, in matters of education, employment, wealth as well as political, social and cultural freedoms.
Also paradoxical with the Turkish secularism is the fact that identity document cards of Turkish citizens include the specification of the card holder's religion. This declaration was perceived by some as representing a form of the state's surveillance over its citizens' religious choices.
The mainstream Hanafite school of Sunni Islam is entirely organized by the state, through the Diyanet İşleri Başkanlığı (Religious Affairs Directorate), which supervises all mosques, educates the imams who work in them, and approves all content for religious services and prayers. It appoints imams, who are classified as civil servants. This micromanagement of Sunni religious practices, at times, seems much more sectarian than secular, as it violates the principle of state neutrality in religious practice. Groups that have expressed dissatisfaction with this situation include a variety of non-governmental Sunni / Hanafi groups (such as the Nurcu movement), whose interpretation of Islam tends to be more activist; and the non-Sunni (Alevi), whose members tend to resent supporting the Sunni establishment with their tax money (whereas the Turkish state does not subsidize Alevi religious activities).
Criticism
Atatürk's ideology of Kemalism abolished the Ottoman caliphate, removed Islam as the state religion, sharia from the legal code, and sought to banish religious interference in government affairs with the "Presidency of Religious Affairs" or Diyanet. However, a number of policies of the Turkish government are not in line with the concept of secularism.
Religion is mentioned on the Turkish identity documents. The government agency known as the "Presidency of Religious Affairs" or Diyanet draws on tax revenues collected from all Turkish citizens, but finances only Sunni worship. All other religions must ensure a financially self-sustaining running and they face administrative obstacles during operation. For example, Câferî (Ja'fari) Muslims (mostly Azeris) and Alevi-Bektashi (mostly Turkmen) participate in the financing of the mosques and the salaries of Sunni imams, while their places of worship, which are not officially recognized by the State, do not receive any funding.
Theoretically, Turkey, through the Treaty of Lausanne (1923), recognizes the civil, political and cultural rights of non-Muslim minorities. In practice, Turkey only recognizes Greek, Armenian and Jewish religious minorities without granting them all the rights mentioned in the Treaty of Lausanne. Alevi-Bektashi or Câferî Muslims, Catholics and Protestants are not recognized officially.
Religion | Estimated population | Expropriation measures | Official recognition through the Constitution or international treaties | Government Financing of places of worship and religious staff |
---|---|---|---|---|
Islam – Sunnite | 70 to 85% (52 to 64 million) | No | Yes through the Diyanet mentioned in the Constitution (art.136) | Yes through the Diyanet |
Twelver Islam – Bektashi | 15 to 25% (11 to 19 million) | Yes | No. In 1826, with the abolition of the Janissary corps, the Bektashi tekke (dervish convent) were closed | No |
Twelver Islam – Alevi | No. In the early fifteenth century, due to the unsustainable Ottoman oppression, Alevi supported Shah Ismail I. who had Turkmen origins. Shah Ismail I. supporters, who wear a red cap with twelve folds in reference to the 12 Imams were called Qizilbash. Ottomans who were Arabized and Persianized considered Qizilbash (Alevi) as enemies because of their Turkmen origins. Today, cemevi, places of worship of Alevi-Bektashi have no official recognition. | |||
Twelver Islam – Câferî | 4% (3 million) | No | No | |
Twelver Islam – Alawite | 300 to 350,000 | No | No | |
Judaism | 20,000 | Yes | Yes through the Treaty of Lausanne (1923) | No |
Christian – Protestant | 5,000 | No | No | |
Christian – Latin Catholics | 35,000 |
No | No | |
Christian – Greek Catholics | Yes | Yes through the Treaty of Lausanne (1923) | No | |
Christian – Eastern Orthodox – Greek (Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople) | 3,000−4,000 | Yes | Yes through the Treaty of Lausanne (1923) | No |
Christian – Eastern Orthodox – Antiochian Orthodox (Greek Orthodox Church of Antioch) | 18,000 | No | No | |
Christian – Oriental Orthodox – Armenian (Armenian Patriarchate of Constantinople) | 57,000−80,000 | Yes | Yes through the Treaty of Lausanne (1923) | No |
Christian – Catholics Chaldean Christians (Armenian) | 3,000 | Yes | Yes through the Treaty of Lausanne (1923) | No |
Christian – Syriac Orthodox and Catholic Churches | 15,000 | Yes | No | No |
Yazidi | 377 | No | No |
With more than 100,000 employees, the Diyanet has been described as a form of state within the state. In 2013, with a budget of over 4.6 billion Turkish lira, the Diyanet occupied the 16th position of central government expenditure.
Headscarf controversy in Turkey
Further information: Headscarf controversy in TurkeyThe Turkish government had outlawed the wearing of headscarves by women who work in the public sector in 1982. The ban had applied to teachers, lawyers, parliamentarians and others working on state premises. The ban on headscarves in the civil service and educational and political institutions was expanded to cover non-state institutions. Authorities began to enforce the headscarf ban among mothers accompanying their children to school events or public swimming pools, while female lawyers and journalists who refused to comply with the ban were expelled from public buildings such as courtrooms and universities . In 1999, the ban on headscarves in the public sphere hit the headlines when Merve Kavakçı, a newly elected MP for the Virtue Party was prevented from taking her oath in the National Assembly because she wore a headscarf. The constitutional rule that prohibits discrimination on religious grounds is taken very seriously. Turkey prohibited by law the wearing of religious headcover and theo-political symbolic garments for both genders in government buildings, schools, and universities; a law that was upheld by the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights as legitimate on 10 November 2005, in Leyla Şahin v. Turkey. In 2022, President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has suggested the constitutional change to guarantee the right to wear a headscarf in the civil service, schools, and universities should be decided through a referendum.
Do you cover when going outside? | |||
---|---|---|---|
1999 | 2012 | ||
No, I do not | 47.3% | 66.5% | |
Yes, I wear a headscarf | 33.4% | 18.8% | |
Yes, I wear a türban | 15.7% | 11.4% | |
Yes, I wear a çarşaf | 3.4% | 0.1% | |
NI/NA | 0.3% | 2.2% |
Workplace
According to Country Reports 2007, women who wore headscarves and their supporters "were disciplined or lost their jobs in the public sector" (US 11 March 2008, Sec. 2.c). Human Rights Watch (HRW) reports that in late 2005, the Administrative Supreme Court ruled that a teacher was not eligible for a promotion in her school because she wore a headscarf outside of work (Jan. 2007). An immigration counsellor at the Embassy of Canada in Ankara stated on 27 April 2005 correspondence with the Research Directorate that public servants are not permitted to wear a headscarf while on duty, but headscarved women may be employed in the private sector. On 12 April 2005 correspondence sent to the Research Directorate, a professor of political science specializing in women's issues in Turkey at Boğaziçi University in Istanbul indicated that women who wear a headscarf "could possibly be denied employment in private or government sectors." Conversely, some municipalities with a more traditional constituency might attempt to hire specifically those women who wear a headscarf (Professor 12 April 2005). The professor did add, however, that headscarved women generally experience difficulty in obtaining positions as teachers, judges, lawyers, or doctors in the public service (ibid.). More recent or corroborating information on the headscarf ban in the public service could not be found among the sources consulted by the Research Directorate.
The London-based Sunday Times reports that while the ban is officially in place only in the public sphere, many private firms similarly avoid hiring women who wear headscarves (6 May 2007). MERO notes that women who wear headscarves may have more difficulty finding a job or obtaining a desirable wage (Apr. 2008), although this could not be corroborated among the sources consulted by the Research Directorate.
Medical care
According to the New York Times, headscarves were banned inside Turkish hospitals, and doctors could not don a headscarf on the job (6 May 2007). Nevertheless, MERO reports that under Turkey's current administration, seen by secularists to have a hidden religious agenda, doctors who wear headscarves have been employed in some public hospitals.
Ban lifted
On 9 February 2008, Turkey's parliament approved a constitutional amendment that lifted the ban on Islamic headscarves in universities. Prior to this date, the public ban on headscarves officially extended to students on university campuses throughout Turkey. Nevertheless, according to Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2007, "some faculty members permitted students to wear head coverings in class". Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty notes that since the 1990s, some rectors have allowed students to wear headscarves.
On 5 June 2008, Turkey's Constitutional Court annulled the parliament's proposed amendment intended to lift the headscarf ban, ruling that removing the ban would run counter to official secularism. While the highest court's decision to uphold the headscarf ban cannot be appealed (AP 7 June 2008), the government has nevertheless indicated that it is considering adopting measures to weaken the court's authority.
Wearing of head-covering
According to a research by the Turkish Economic and Social Studies Foundation in 2007, around 62% of women wear the headscarf in Turkey.
Turkey's strong secularism has resulted in what have been perceived by some as strictures on the freedom of religion; for example, the headscarf has long been prohibited in public universities, and a constitutional amendment passed in February 2008 that permitted women to wear it on university campuses sparked considerable controversy. In addition, the armed forces have maintained a vigilant watch over Turkey's political secularism, which they affirm to be a keystone among Turkey's founding principles. The military has not left the maintenance of a secular political process to chance, however, and has intervened in politics on a number of occasions.
See also
- Freedom of religion in Turkey
- Headscarf controversy in Turkey
- Islam in Turkey
- Religion in Turkey
- White Turks
- Black Turks
- Conservatism in Turkey
References
- "Turkey". The World Factbook. Central Intelligence Agency (US). 24 July 2008. Archived from the original on 10 January 2021. Retrieved 1 August 2008.
- Daver, BÜLENT. "Secularism in Turkey". Atatürk Araştırma Merkezi Başkanlığı. PROF. DR. BÜLENT DAVER. Archived from the original on 22 March 2019. Retrieved 21 March 2019.
This principle, unlike in western countries, is not realized by evolutionary currents and philosophers' ideas, spread among most people throughout the century, but rather by direct and decisive action and revolutionary enthusiasm from a very small elite consisting of bureaucrats and young army officer.
- Öztürk, Ahmet Erdi; Sözeri, Semiha. "Diyanet as a Turkish Foreign Policy Tool: Evidence from the Netherlands and Bulgaria". Religion and Politics Section of the American Political Science Association: 3, 5. Archived from the original on 19 September 2018.
- Ahmet Erdi Öztürk (2016). "Turkey's Diyanet under AKP rule: from protector to imposer of state ideology?" (PDF). Southeast European and Black Sea Studies. 16 (4): 619–635. doi:10.1080/14683857.2016.1233663. S2CID 151448076.
- Basic Principles, Aims And Objectives Archived 2008-01-08 at the Wayback Machine, Presidency of Religious Affairs
- ^ "Secularism: The Turkish Experience" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 June 2008. Retrieved 28 September 2013.
- Hussain, Ishtiaq (7 October 2011). "The Tanzimat: Secular Reforms in the Ottoman Empire" (PDF). Faith Matters. Retrieved 28 September 2013.
- ^ Al Faruki, Jakir; Siddiky, Md. Roknuzzaman (July 2017). "Secularism and the Muslim World: An Overview July 2017 Authors". Journal of Social Science, Rajshahi College. 1 (1): 22. Retrieved 23 November 2021.
- Wu, B. (2007). Secularism and secularization in the Arab world. Journal of Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies (in Asia). 1(1), 55-65
- Bagdonas, O.D. (2008). A Poststructuralist to ideology and foreign policy: Kemalism in Turkish foreign policy discourse. A Doctoral Thesis, Central European University.
- Karakas, C. (2007). Turkey: Islam and laicism between the interests of state, politics and society. PRIF Report No. 78, Peace Institute Frankfurt.
- ^ Burak, Begum. (2012). Can secularism hinder democracy? The Turkish experiment. İnsan & Toplum, 2(4), 65-82
- Toprak, B. (2005). Secularism and Islam: the building of modern Turkey. Macalester International: Vol. 15, Article 9, 27-43.
- "Hilafetin İlgasına ve Hanedanı Osmaninin Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Memaliki Haricine Çıkarılmasına Dair Kanun - Vikikaynak". tr.wikisource.org.
- Akyol, Mustafa (22 July 2016). "Who Was Behind the Coup Attempt in Turkey?". The New York Times. New York Times. Retrieved 23 July 2016.
- "Secularism must be removed from constitution, Turkey's Parliament Speaker says". Milliyet. 27 April 2016. Retrieved 31 January 2021.
- ^ Lepeska, David (17 May 2015). "Turkey Casts the Diyanet". Foreign Affairs. Retrieved 27 July 2016.
- Cornell, Svante (9 October 2015). "The Rise of Diyanet: the Politicization of Turkey's Directorate of Religious Affairs". turkeyanalyst.org. Retrieved 27 July 2016.
- Tremblay, Pinar (29 April 2015). "Is Erdogan signaling end of secularism in Turkey?". Al Monitor. Archived from the original on 8 August 2016. Retrieved 25 July 2016.
- Sözeri, Semiha; Öztürk, Ahmet Erdi (September 2018). "Diyanet as a Turkish Foreign Policy Tool: Evidence from the Netherlands and Bulgaria" (PDF). Politics and Religion. 11 (3): 624–648. doi:10.1017/S175504831700075X. ISSN 1755-0483. S2CID 148657630.
- Sukru Kucuksahin (20 June 2016). "Turkish students up in arms over Islamization of education". Al-Monitor.
- Zülfikar Doğan (29 June 2016). "Erdogan pens education plan for Turkey's 'devout generation'". Al-Monitor.
- Sibel Hurtas (13 October 2016). "Turkey's 'devout generation' project means lost jobs, schools for many". Al-Monitor.
- "Coup Was 'Gift From God' for Erdogan Planning a New Turkey". Bloomberg.com. 17 July 2016. Retrieved 9 January 2017.
- Simon P. Watmough and Ahmet Erdi Öztürk (2018). "From 'Diaspora by Design' to Transnational Political Exile: The Gülen Movement in Transition". Politics, Religion & Ideology. 19: 33–52. doi:10.1080/21567689.2018.1453254.
- "Leftists, Kemalists suspended from posts for being Gülenists, says CHP report | Turkey Purge". turkeypurge.com. Retrieved 9 January 2017.
- Yavuz, M. Hakan; Öztürk, Ahmet Erdi (18 February 2019). "Turkish secularism and Islam under the reign of Erdoğan". Southeast European and Black Sea Studies. 19: 1–9. doi:10.1080/14683857.2019.1580828. ISSN 1468-3857.
- "Turkey's journey from secularism to Islamization: A capitalist story". Your Middle East. 23 May 2016. Retrieved 9 January 2017.
- ^ Kayaoğlu, Turan (10 April 2012). "Secularism in Turkey: Stronger than Ever?". Brookings Institution. Retrieved 25 April 2017.
- "Turkey is becoming more secular, not less". Al-Monitor. 2 March 2015. Retrieved 25 April 2017.
- "Secular rally targets Turkish PM". BBC News. 14 April 2007. Retrieved 25 April 2017.
- Sencar, Özer (January 2015). "Türkiye'nin Nabzı: Din, Şiddet ve Özgürlük [Pulse of Turkey: Religion, Violence and Freedom]" (PDF). Metropoll. p. 34.
- Tavernise, Sabrina. "In Turkey, a Sign of a Rising Islamic Middle Class," New York Times, April 25, 2007.
- "Turkey 'must have secular leader'", BBC News, April 24, 2007.
- Tavernise, Sabrina. "Ruling Party in Turkey Wins Broad Victory," New York Times, July 23, 2007.
- "Secular rally targets Turkish PM". BBC News. 14 April 2007. Retrieved 5 August 2008.
- ^ "The Islamic veil across Europe". BBC News. 17 November 2006. Retrieved 13 December 2006.
- ^ "Leyla Şahin v. Turkey". European Court of Human Rights. 10 November 2005. Archived from the original on 4 August 2008. Retrieved 21 August 2008.
- Çarkoğlu, Ali (2004). Religion and Politics in Turkey. UK: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-34831-7.
- State ID cards, General Directorate of Population and Citizenship Matters, Ministry of the Interior (in Turkish)
- Fox, Jonathan. World Survey of Religion and the State, Cambridge University Press, 2008, ISBN 978-0-521-70758-9, page 247
- ^ "T.C. Diyanet İşleri Başkanlığı, Namaz Vakitleri, Duyurular, Haberler". Diyanet.gov.tr. Retrieved 28 September 2013.
- Samim Akgönül – Religions de Turquie, religions des Turcs: nouveaux acteurs dans l'Europe élargie – L'Harmattan – 2005 – 196 pages
- ^ The World of the Alevis: Issues of Culture and Identity, Gloria L. Clarke
- ^ "Le gouvernement turc va restituer des biens saisis à des minorités religieuses". La Croix (in French). La-Croix.com. 29 August 2011. Retrieved 28 September 2013.
- Constitution of the Republic of Turkey (in Turkish) Archived August 12, 2011, at the Wayback Machine
- ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2 October 2013. Retrieved 2 October 2013.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) - "Les Janissaires (1979) de Vincent Mansour Monteil : JANISSAIRE" (in French). Janissaire.hautetfort.com. 14 May 2008. Archived from the original on 3 March 2016. Retrieved 28 September 2013.
- ^ Jean-Paul Burdy (18 April 2010). "Les minorités non musulmanes en Turquie : "certains rapports d'ONG parlent d'une logique d'attrition"" (in French). Observatoire de la Vie Politique Turque(Ovipot.hypotheses.org). doi:10.58079/smk9. Retrieved 28 September 2013.
- ^ Bacqué-Grammont, Jean-Louis (1979). "Persée". Cahiers du Monde Russe. 20 (2). Persee.fr: 239–272. doi:10.3406/cmr.1979.1359. Retrieved 28 September 2013.
- Rapport Minority Rights Group Bir eşitlik arayışı: Türkiye’de azınlıklar Uluslararası Azınlık Hakları Grubu 2007 Dilek Kurban
- Pirsultan psakd Antalya (16 August 2006). "Dünyada ve Türkiye'de NUSAYRİLİK" (in Turkish). psakd.org. Archived from the original on 12 October 2007. Retrieved 28 September 2013.
- Andrea Riccardi, Il secolo del martirio, Mondadori, 2009, pag. 281.
- "Foreign Ministry: 89,000 minorities live in Turkey". Today's Zaman. 15 December 2008. Archived from the original on 1 May 2010. Retrieved 15 December 2008.
- The Greeks of Turkey, 1992-1995 Fact-sheet Archived 2006-12-20 at the Wayback Machine by Marios D. Dikaiakos
- Turay, Anna. "Tarihte Ermeniler". Armenians of Istanbul. Archived from the original on 6 December 2006. Retrieved 4 January 2007.
- Hür, Ayşe (31 August 2008). "Türk Ermenisiz, Ermeni Türksüz olmaz!". Taraf (in Turkish). Archived from the original on 2 September 2008. Retrieved 2 September 2008.
Sonunda nüfuslarını 70 bine indirmeyi başardık.
- Dal, Emel Parlar (2012). La politique turque en question: entre imperfections et adaptations (in French). L'Harmattan. ISBN 9782336003054. Retrieved 28 September 2013.
- KAMU KURUM VE KURULUŞLARINDA ÇALIŞAN PERSONELİN KILIK VE KIYAFETİNE DAİR YÖNETMELİK ("THE REGULATION ON THE DRESS AND ATTIRE OF PERSONNEL WORKING IN PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS AND ORGANIZATIONS") dated 16 July 1982.
- "Turkey's Erdogan proposes a referendum on right to wear headscarf". euronews. 23 October 2022. Retrieved 10 May 2023.
- Fromm, Ali Çarkoğlu, Binnaz Toprak; translated from Turkish by Çiğdem Aksoy (2007). Religion, Society and Politics in a Changing Turkey (PDF). Karaköy, İstanbul: TESEV publications. p. 64. ISBN 978-975-8112-90-6. Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 February 2021. Retrieved 27 July 2021.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - The New York Times, 19 February 2008
- Washington Post, 26 February 2008
- MERO Apr. 2008
- Lamb, Christina (23 April 2007). "Head scarves to topple secular Turkey?". The Times. London. Archived from the original on 27 July 2008.
- Lamb, Christina (6 May 2007). "Headscarf war threatens to split Turkey". Times Online. London. Archived from the original on 27 July 2008.
- Clark-Flory, Tracy (23 April 2007). "Head scarves to topple secular Turkey?". Salon.com. Retrieved 4 August 2008.
- "Turkey | Location, Geography, People, Economy, Culture, & History | Britannica". www.britannica.com. 1 March 2024. Retrieved 2 March 2024.
Further reading
- "The Paradox of Turkish Secularism" (PDF). Özgüç Orhan. Turkish Journal of Politics Vol. 4 No. 1.
- Ahmet T. Kuru. Secularism and State Policies toward Religion The United States, France, and Turkey Cambridge University Press, 2009.
- Hirschberger, Bernd / Püttmann, Friedrich. "The Political Instrumentalization of the Topics of Secularism, Religious Freedom and Islamophobia in Turkey". In: Hirschberger, Bernd / Voges, Katja (eds.) (2024): Religious Freedom and Populism: The Appropriation of a Human Right and How to Counter It. Bielefeld: transcript. Retrieved 30 June 2024, pp. 91-104.
- Peker, E. 2020. "Beyond Positivism: Building Turkish Laiklik in the Transition from the Empire to the Republic (1908–38)." Social Science History
- Davison, Andrew. "Turkey, a "secular" state?: The challenge of description." The South Atlantic Quarterly 102.2 (2003): 333-350.
- Sevinc, K., Hood, R. W. Jr., Coleman, T. J. III, (2017). Secularism in Turkey. In Zuckerman, P., & Shook, J. R., (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Secularism. Oxford University Press.
- M. Hakan Yavuz, "Understanding Turkish Secularism in the 21th Century: A Contextual Roadmap", Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, Vol. 19, No.1; https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2019.1576367
- "Stop Defending Turkey's 'Secularism' — It's Been a Lie All Along". Fréderike Geerdink. Huffington Post. 2 May 2016.
Turkey | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
History |
| ||||||||||||
Geography |
| ||||||||||||
Government |
| ||||||||||||
Economy | |||||||||||||
Demographics | |||||||||||||
Society |
| ||||||||||||
|
Secularism in Turkey | |
---|---|
Laws | |
People and organisations |
|
Secularism in Europe | |
---|---|
Sovereign states |
|
States with limited recognition | |
Dependencies and other entities |
Secularism in Asia | |
---|---|
Sovereign states |
|
States with limited recognition | |
Dependencies and other territories | |