| Revision as of 04:11, 13 December 2016 editKs0stm (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators25,728 edits →Discretionary sanctions alert: new sectionTag: contentious topics alert← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 17:37, 17 January 2025 edit undoIljhgtn (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users41,229 edits →A barnstar for you!: new WikiLove messageTag: WikiLove | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
| ==ANI== | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | {{#ifeq:{{{2}}}|alt|]|]}} | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| ] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Barnstar of Good Humor''' | |||
| :Your name has popped up here: ] ] (]) 20:30, 30 November 2016 (UTC) | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | "happy that we finally got a 'self-described neutral observer'" - that made me laugh. That was a positive add. ] (]) 00:02, 30 August 2017 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| == A beer for you! == | |||
| ==Your collaboration on "fake news websites"== | |||
| You say there are stronger sources in the "original version" than in "my version" : | |||
| {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
| For reference: my version | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | I was wondering why I saw you clearing your talk page. ] (]) 04:49, 27 February 2019 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| :Gandy orders a second round. Cheers to one of our best! ] (]) 15:21, 27 February 2019 (UTC) | |||
| ::Writers in '']'', '']'', and '']'' criticized ''The Washington Post'' for including a report by an organization with no reputation for fact-checking (]) in an article on "fake news".<ref name="skeptic1">{{citation|title=Washington Post Disgracefully Promotes a McCarthyite Blacklist From a New, Hidden, and Very Shady Group|date=26 November 2016|url=https://theintercept.com/2016/11/26/washington-post-disgracefully-promotes-a-mccarthyite-blacklist-from-a-new-hidden-and-very-shady-group/|author1=Ben Norton|author2=Glenn Greenwald|work=]|accessdate=27 November 2016|author-link2=Glenn Greenwald}}</ref><ref name="skeptic2">{{citation|last=Ingram|first=Matthew|title=No, Russian Agents Are Not Behind Every Piece of Fake News You See|date=25 November 2016|url=http://fortune.com/2016/11/25/russian-fake-news/|work=]|accessdate=27 November 2016}}</ref><ref name="skeptic3">{{Cite web|url=http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/washington-post-blacklist-story-is-shameful-disgusting-w452543|title=The 'Washington Post' 'Blacklist' Story Is Shameful and Disgusting|last=Taibbi|first=Matt|date=28 November 2016|website=Rolling Stone}}</ref>. ''The Intercept'' journalists ] and Ben Norton were particularly critical of the inclusion of ] on the list of "useful idiots" for Russian propagandists, arguing that the Washington Post article was akin to McCarthyist black-listing.<ref name="skeptic1" /> ''The Intercept'' called the reporting by ''The Washington Post'' "shoddy",<ref name="skeptic1" /> and ''Fortune magazine'' called the evidence "flimsy".<ref name="skeptic2" /> Writing for ''Rolling Stone'', ] described the report as "astonishingly lazy" and questioned the methodology used by PropOrNot and the lack of information about who was behind the organization.<ref name="skeptic3" />''The Washington Post'' article was criticized in an opinion piece in the paper itself, written by ].<ref name=heuvel>{{citation|first=Katrina|last= vanden Heuvel|authorlink=Katrina vanden Heuvel|work=]|accessdate=1 December 2016|date=29 November 2016|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/putin-didnt-undermine-the-election-we-did/2016/11/28/b7cd6984-b594-11e6-959c-172c82123976_story.html|title=Putin didn’t undermine the election. We did.}}</ref> She wrote that the websites listed by PropOrNot: "include RT and Sputnik News, which are funded by the Russian government, but also independent sites such as Naked Capitalism, Truthout and the right-wing Drudge Report."<ref name=heuvel /> | |||
| :<nowiki>*</nowiki>hic* here's another :) sláinte! ]]] 15:27, 27 February 2019 (UTC) | |||
| {{reflist-talk}} | |||
| {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''A Resilient Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | I’m very sorry to see the harassment you have faced. Stay strong Volunteer Marek! ''']] (])''' 16:00, 2 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| == A kitten for you! == | |||
| ] | |||
| A kitten in the hopes that it improves you evening. | |||
| <small>] <small><sup>Need help? ''']'''</sup></small></small> 12:23, 28 September 2021 (UTC) | |||
| ::''The Washington Post'' and PropOrNot received criticism from '']'',<ref name=disgracefully /> '']'',<ref name=norussianagents>{{citation|url=http://fortune.com/2016/11/25/russian-fake-news/|work=]|first=Matthew|last=Ingram|accessdate=27 November 2016|date=25 November 2016|title=No, Russian Agents Are Not Behind Every Piece of Fake News You See}}</ref> and '']''.<ref name=taibbi /> Matthew Ingram of ''Fortune'' magazine felt that PropOrNot cast too wide a net in identifying fake news websites.<ref name=norussianagents/> ''The Intercept'' journalists ] and Ben Norton were highly critical that the organization included ] on its list.<ref name=disgracefully>{{citation|url=https://theintercept.com/2016/11/26/washington-post-disgracefully-promotes-a-mccarthyite-blacklist-from-a-new-hidden-and-very-shady-group/|accessdate=27 November 2016|date=26 November 2016|author1=Ben Norton|author2=Glenn Greenwald|author-link2=Glenn Greenwald|work=]|title=Washington Post Disgracefully Promotes a McCarthyite Blacklist From a New, Hidden, and Very Shady Group}}</ref> ''The Intercept'' called the reporting by ''The Washington Post'' as "shoddy",<ref name=disgracefully /> and ''Fortune magazine'' called the evidence "flimsy".<ref name=norussianagents /> Writing for ''Rolling Stone'', ] described the report as "astonishingly lazy" and questioned the methodology used by PropOrNot and the lack of information about who was behind the organization.<ref name=taibbi>{{Citation |url=http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/washington-post-blacklist-story-is-shameful-disgusting-w452543 |title=The 'Washington Post' 'Blacklist' Story Is Shameful and Disgusting |last=Taibbi |first=Matt |date=28 November 2016 |work=]|accessdate=30 November 2016}}</ref> ''The Washington Post'' article was criticized in an opinion piece in the paper itself, written by ].<ref name=heuvel>{{citation|first=Katrina|last= vanden Heuvel|authorlink=Katrina vanden Heuvel|work=]|accessdate=1 December 2016|date=29 November 2016|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/putin-didnt-undermine-the-election-we-did/2016/11/28/b7cd6984-b594-11e6-959c-172c82123976_story.html|title=Putin didn’t undermine the election. We did.}}</ref> She wrote that the websites listed by PropOrNot: "include RT and Sputnik News, which are funded by the Russian government, but also independent sites such as Naked Capitalism, Truthout and the right-wing Drudge Report."<ref name=heuvel /> | |||
| <br style="clear: both;"/> | |||
| == Glitch == | |||
| {{reflist-talk}} | |||
| Hi! Looks like there was some sort of edit conflict glitch and your edit reverted a long comment from Nederlandse Leeuw (which is of interest to me because I was tagged in it). I reverted back, I hesitates because we had a little dustup at arbcon the other week so I thought it best to let you know directly what I was thinking and why I reverted your revert. Wish you the best. ] (]) 17:38, 24 May 2023 (UTC) | |||
| :Yeah, don’t know what happened there. Thanks.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 20:11, 24 May 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == Panama Section in 'Allegation of CIA trafficking' page == | |||
| As anyone can see the references are identical. Feel free to revert or to give your '''real reasons''' for reverting. | |||
| Sometime back you made this edit on the 'Allegations of CIA drug trafficking' page:. | |||
| Interesting to find you and Neutrality and Snooganssnoogans all working with this new and suprisingly knowledgeable SPA "Sagecandor", I wonder what is up with that... ] (]) 19:15, 2 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
| There is talk of restoring that section (on-going) on that talk page....I give my thoughts there. I'd be interested to know what you think (maybe expand upon the reasons given in your edit summary)] (]) 18:17, 24 June 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == YGM == | |||
| ::Of those four sources the ''Intercept'' is the weakest one and it is the one given the most prominence in your version. Hence weaker sourcing. Sorry I wasn't more explicit about that. That is the "real reasons". | |||
| ::I have no idea who Sagecandor is and I don't think I've ever interacted with them. If you got some accusations to make, them make them and provide diffs, rather than insinuating whatever it is you're insinuating.] (]) 21:58, 2 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
| No response needed, but occasionally things go to spam, so just letting you know. <span style="font-family:courier"> -- ]</span><sup class="nowrap">[]]</sup> <small>(she|they|xe)</small> 02:45, 16 September 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == Trumpism == | |||
| == ] == | |||
| VM, please do not change the thrust and direction of the ] article while it is under AfD discussion. I think we should restore the version that LavaBaron created, so that we can discuss a stable version. Not have to keep changing our opinions every time massive changes are made to the article. I am asking this as a courtesy; I am not suggesting there is anything illegal or sanctionable about what you are doing, just asking as a favor that you leave the article alone and let it be evaluated. I encourage you to weigh in at the AfD discussion, but not to massively change the article a second time. In particular, I am going to restore the lede to the previous neutral version, and I would prefer to restore the whole article to the version that many people have already weighed in on. --] (]) 20:08, 6 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
| : No, the version that LavaBaron created was simply not based on sources. Yes, it had sources in it but those sources did not actually support the text that he wrote. You can't make stuff up and then add in a barely relevant inline citation at the end to make it look legit. Deleted or not, we just simply don't do that. This is putting asides just basic wrong headedness like titling a section "etymology" when it has nothing to do with etymology, apparently because the editor has no idea what that word means (hint - neologisms don't have etymologies that's why makes them neologisms). I'm not going to restore a bunch of crap to the article, in contravention of policy, simply because it's at AfD. And while I support the deletion of it, editors should be able to make up their mind about their !vote based on as good a version as possible - and that means NOT restoring the orIginal.] (]) 21:14, 6 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::Marek - this article is under 1RR restrictions per ArbCom's U.S. politics case. I haven't been keeping close track but I think you've reached your limit today. Also I'd appreciate it if you ping me when discussing me or making affirmative declarations about my competence such as I have "no idea what that word means". Best - ] (]) 22:19, 6 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
| Try the bookmark tip for quick WL access. You'll thank me later :) <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 02:55, 18 September 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == William John Cox == | |||
| :Thanks.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 13:10, 18 September 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == File:AECases2020.png == | |||
| Earlier this year I did some work on the William John Cox article and just noted the addition of the advertisement notice, apparently by you. Unsure if something I did triggered the notice and interested in ensuring my edits conform with Misplaced Pages guidelines, could I trouble you as to your specific concerns? I did not see any flagged comments. ] (]) 22:46, 8 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
| Recommended changes made by removing all recently added material and external links. The long-standing balance consisting of neutral material based on primary sources not edited. Thank you for your concern. ] (]) 18:49, 10 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
| Hello. If you think this file is no longer useful for Misplaced Pages, set template {{tl|db-author}} on its description page, please. — Ирука<sup>]</sup> 22:59, 1 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == Arbcom sanctions at ] == | |||
| == ] == | |||
| I suggest you self-revert . The notice t the top of the talk page says "All editors must obtain consensus on the talk page of this article before reinstating ''any edits that have been challenged (via reversion)''". Whatever you reason for reinstating the edit, you are clearly in breach of this. ]] (]) 01:27, 11 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
| Reminds you of anything? :/ <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 09:49, 6 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == FBI and CIA == | |||
| :Lol.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 19:02, 6 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ::Um... I hope my ping at ] didn't bother you. I didn't mean to remind you of what you went through but I was somewhat angry on your behalf. I didn't really know much about what Icewhiz did before I read your comment months ago and seeing {{u|FeydHuxtable}} write {{tq|Not sure why several seem to think exceptional editors like Wifione & Icewhiz had malcious intent? Ice used to be a fellow ARS member, he was unusually gentle until he suffered severe provocation. He only sought adminship as a means to fight a certain evil. His play for adminship might have failed, but he simply kept taking things to a new level until his will proved too great for the community to resist. Much as I believe Ice was mistaken in seeing said evil as residing in certain edtiors or being tolerated by Misplaced Pages as a whole, one has to admire his ingenuity & determintation to achieve rightful victory (as he saw it).}} bothered me. I was hoping that maybe the diff I shared would be like a ]? But I also didn't want to speak on your behalf because obviously you can do so for yourself (hence the courtesy ping). But again, I didn't mean to remind you what you went through. If you don't want me to ping you about similar situations in the future, I'll respect that. ] ] 14:09, 13 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message == | |||
| That source may have been synth, but see my comment at ] regarding some contradictions between the FBI and CIA on this. You may find it interesting. ] (]) 05:39, 11 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :Sure, but that's not the same as what the text in the article claimed.] (]) 05:40, 11 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::Agreed. ] (]) 05:41, 11 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| == Lighter fluid == | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">]</div> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| Dear VM, {{diff||754278177||this recent edit of yours}} is certainly an entertaining quote but wouldn't you agree that it doesn't sound very encyclopedic? I would have reverted but I burned my daily 1RR elsewhere… — ] <sup>]</sup> 22:30, 11 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small> | |||
| == Discretionary sanctions alert == | |||
| </div> | |||
| {{Ivm|2=''This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does '''not''' imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.'' | |||
| </div> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1187131902 --> | |||
| == Editor experience invitation == | |||
| '''Please carefully read this information:''' | |||
| Hi Volunteer Marek :) I'm looking to interview people ]. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. ] ] 12:44, 4 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
| The ] has authorised ] to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is ]. | |||
| == Thanks for the hat-tip == | |||
| Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. | |||
| }}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> | |||
| It was a pleasant surprise to see your mention of me when completing the editor reflection. I'm impressed that you remember my early forays into privacy protection, and am flattered that they had a positive influence on you. There is a certain irony that, having written some of this stuff more than 15 years ago, my RL name and username are practically used interchangeably within the movement, and I've presented in many public fora under my own name. Wishing you well in the coming year, ] (]) 21:33, 18 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
| Please note that ] and many related articles are under a 1RR restriction. ] <sup>(]•]•]•])</sup> 04:11, 13 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:top;" | {{#ifeq:Current Events Barnstar|alt|]|]}} | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: bottom; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Current Events Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | nice catch on the map ] (]) 09:11, 26 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| == Unsourced contributions == | |||
| Greetings, I'm in discussion with another editor regarding supposedly unsourced contributions to a few wiki articles, can you please help me check if those contribs are supported by sources provided. Discussions are at ] and ] , maybe suggest some forum where I can invite others to help, thanks! ] (]) 16:55, 30 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == Happy New Year == | |||
| {| style="border:2px ; background-color: #FDEE00;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="right" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 2; vertical-align: left; height: 1.1em;" | ''']!''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Wishing you and yours a Happy New Year, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free and may Janus light your way. ] (]) 14:49, 31 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| ==DYK for The Torture Camp on Paradise Street== | |||
| {{ivmbox | |||
| |image = Updated DYK query.svg | |||
| |imagesize=40px | |||
| |text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that ], the author of ''''']''''', was placed in the ] for writing "]" in quotation marks in a social media post?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page <small>(], )</small>, and the hook may be added to ] after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the ]. | |||
| }}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> ] (]) 00:02, 27 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == The mention at ANI == | |||
| can be ignored if you choose. Somebody thought they'd been outed is all. Or you can opine if you like but I just thought I would try to alleviate any christ what now thoughts you might have had. I'd give it a miss if I were you, since he will argue forever, but I didn't want to talk about you behind your back even in passing. Oh speaking of, if you still care about the place we do not name there's a thread about the steward elections; your name came up there but not in a bad way about you either ] (]) 16:30, 13 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ==Happy First Edit Day!== | |||
| <!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## --> | |||
| {{ombox | |||
| | name = First Edit Day | |||
| | image = ] | |||
| | imageright = ] | |||
| | style = border: 2px solid CornflowerBlue; background: linear-gradient(300deg, AliceBlue, LavenderBlush 30%, LavenderBlush 70%, AliceBlue); | |||
| | textstyle = padding: 0.75em; text-align:center; | |||
| | plainlinks = yes | |||
| | text = <big>'''Happy First Edit Day!'''</big><br />Hi Volunteer Marek! On behalf of the ], I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made and became a Wikipedian! ] (]) 02:35, 10 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
| }} | |||
| == Request for amendment at ] about World War II and the history of Jews in Poland == | |||
| Hello Volunteer Marek, | |||
| a request for amendment that affects the {{tqq|1-way interaction ban with Piotrus and a 1-way interaction ban with Volunteer Marek}} from the ] has been made at {{slink|Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification_and_Amendment#Amendment_request:_World_War_II_and_the_history_of_Jews_in_Poland}}. Your input would be welcome. | |||
| Best regards,<br>] (]) 23:37, 21 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Threading == | |||
| This is unrelated to our back-and-forth, but it is on the same article talk page. I indented and moved your 04:57, 7 July 2024 reply to JDiala because it split their reply to themselves. I hope you don't mind. ]. If you revert, I won't contest it. While I'm here, I struck the DE comment and the explanation is available with my 06:15, 7 July 2024 reply. Carry on, ] (]) 06:31, 7 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Utsa Patnaik == | |||
| Hello VolunteerMarek. I had a query about the reliability of ] on the ] article? I ask because you fully removed her opinion from the body on June 24 because it was apparently fringe, yet another even though it's not a summary of the body and with no remaining mention of Patnaik in the body. I think her view deserves some mention in the body but clearly what this anonymous user added is undue and not following Misplaced Pages's guidelines for the lead section. No other scholar even gets named in the lead apart from Patnaik. ] (]) 11:22, 13 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :Patnaik , Monbiot and Hickel are most certainly fringe by any reasonable definition of fringe. “Comment is free” is not a reliable source.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 18:49, 14 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Arbitration motions regarding My very best wishes == | |||
| The Arbitration Committee has resolved by ] that: | |||
| {{ivmbox|] (the topic and interaction bans on ], respectively) are repealed.}} | |||
| And it has resolved by another ] that: | |||
| {{ivmbox|]' ] from World War II in Eastern Europe and the history of Jews in Eastern Europe, imposed under ], is repealed.}} | |||
| For the Arbitration Committee, ] ] 06:33, 8 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| : Discuss this at: '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard|Arbitration motions regarding My very best wishes}}'''<!-- ] (]) 06:34, 8 August 2024 (UTC) --><!--Template:hes--> | |||
| === Arbitration amendment request archived === | |||
| The request for amendment in which those two motions were proposed has been closed and is archived at ]. The repeal of remedy 5.2 means that the ban on My very best wishes interacting with you has been lifted. ] ] 07:30, 8 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination for deletion of Gąsawa massacre == | |||
| ] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at '''the entry on the Articles for discussion page''' ] (]) 16:26, 14 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ], to which you have , is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or if it should be ]. | |||
| The discussion will take place at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. | |||
| To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit ]. Delivered by '']'' (]) 01:01, 15 September 2024 (UTC)<!-- User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier/template --> | |||
| == ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | |||
| </div> | |||
| </div> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1258243333 --> | |||
| == Thank You == | |||
| Thank you for the work on Yalta's page and combating Russian Operatives spreading misinformation and propaganda. ] (]) 08:58, 25 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ==Io Saturnalia!== | |||
| {| style="border:2px ; background-color: #FF0000;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="right" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 2; vertical-align: left; height: 1.1em;" | '''Io, ]!''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free. ] (]) 15:29, 17 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| ==Happy Holidays!== | |||
| <div style="border-style:solid; border-color:green; background-color:lightyellow; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">] ]{{Center|]}} | |||
| Wishing you a most happy holidays! --] (]) 05:14, 25 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| == A barnstar for you! == | |||
| {| style="background-color: var(--background-color-success-subtle, #fdffe7); border: 1px solid var(--border-color-success, #fceb92); color: var(--color-base, #202122);" | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Barnstar of Diligence''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thanks for everything you do. ] (]) 17:37, 17 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
Latest revision as of 17:37, 17 January 2025
|
The Barnstar of Good Humor | |
| "happy that we finally got a 'self-described neutral observer'" - that made me laugh. That was a positive add. Rockypedia (talk) 00:02, 30 August 2017 (UTC) |
A beer for you!
|
I was wondering why I saw you clearing your talk page. Drmies (talk) 04:49, 27 February 2019 (UTC) |
- Gandy orders a second round. Cheers to one of our best! Gandydancer (talk) 15:21, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
- *hic* here's another :) sláinte! ——SerialNumber54129 15:27, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
|
A Resilient Barnstar |
| I’m very sorry to see the harassment you have faced. Stay strong Volunteer Marek! starship.paint (talk) 16:00, 2 October 2019 (UTC) |
A kitten for you!
A kitten in the hopes that it improves you evening.
HighInBC 12:23, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Glitch
Hi! Looks like there was some sort of edit conflict glitch and your edit reverted a long comment from Nederlandse Leeuw (which is of interest to me because I was tagged in it). I reverted back, I hesitates because we had a little dustup at arbcon the other week so I thought it best to let you know directly what I was thinking and why I reverted your revert. Wish you the best. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 17:38, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
- Yeah, don’t know what happened there. Thanks. Volunteer Marek 20:11, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
Panama Section in 'Allegation of CIA trafficking' page
Sometime back you made this edit on the 'Allegations of CIA drug trafficking' page:.
There is talk of restoring that section (on-going) on that talk page....I give my thoughts there. I'd be interested to know what you think (maybe expand upon the reasons given in your edit summary)Rja13ww33 (talk) 18:17, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
YGM
No response needed, but occasionally things go to spam, so just letting you know. -- Tamzin (she|they|xe) 02:45, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2023-09-16/Serendipity
Try the bookmark tip for quick WL access. You'll thank me later :) Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:55, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
File:AECases2020.png
Hello. If you think this file is no longer useful for Misplaced Pages, set template {{db-author}} on its description page, please. — Ирука 22:59, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2023-11-06/Arbitration report
Reminds you of anything? :/ Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:49, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
- Lol. Volunteer Marek 19:02, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
- Um... I hope my ping at WT:RFA didn't bother you. I didn't mean to remind you of what you went through but I was somewhat angry on your behalf. I didn't really know much about what Icewhiz did before I read your comment months ago and seeing FeydHuxtable write
Not sure why several seem to think exceptional editors like Wifione & Icewhiz had malcious intent? Ice used to be a fellow ARS member, he was unusually gentle until he suffered severe provocation. He only sought adminship as a means to fight a certain evil. His play for adminship might have failed, but he simply kept taking things to a new level until his will proved too great for the community to resist. Much as I believe Ice was mistaken in seeing said evil as residing in certain edtiors or being tolerated by Misplaced Pages as a whole, one has to admire his ingenuity & determintation to achieve rightful victory (as he saw it).
bothered me. I was hoping that maybe the diff I shared would be like a victim impact statement? But I also didn't want to speak on your behalf because obviously you can do so for yourself (hence the courtesy ping). But again, I didn't mean to remind you what you went through. If you don't want me to ping you about similar situations in the future, I'll respect that. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 14:09, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
- Um... I hope my ping at WT:RFA didn't bother you. I didn't mean to remind you of what you went through but I was somewhat angry on your behalf. I didn't really know much about what Icewhiz did before I read your comment months ago and seeing FeydHuxtable write
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Editor experience invitation
Hi Volunteer Marek :) I'm looking to interview people here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 12:44, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for the hat-tip
It was a pleasant surprise to see your mention of me when completing the editor reflection. I'm impressed that you remember my early forays into privacy protection, and am flattered that they had a positive influence on you. There is a certain irony that, having written some of this stuff more than 15 years ago, my RL name and username are practically used interchangeably within the movement, and I've presented in many public fora under my own name. Wishing you well in the coming year, Risker (talk) 21:33, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
|
The Current Events Barnstar | |
| nice catch on the map Elinruby (talk) 09:11, 26 December 2023 (UTC) |
Unsourced contributions
Greetings, I'm in discussion with another editor regarding supposedly unsourced contributions to a few wiki articles, can you please help me check if those contribs are supported by sources provided. Discussions are at Talk:Belarusian nationalism#Nationalists were also opposed by the local intellectuals and User talk:RusHistorian#December 2023 , maybe suggest some forum where I can invite others to help, thanks! ManyAreasExpert (talk) 16:55, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Happy New Year
|
Happy New Year! | |
| Wishing you and yours a Happy New Year, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free and may Janus light your way. Ealdgyth (talk) 14:49, 31 December 2023 (UTC) |
DYK for The Torture Camp on Paradise Street
On 27 January 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Torture Camp on Paradise Street, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Stanislav Aseyev, the author of The Torture Camp on Paradise Street, was placed in the Izolyatsia torture camp for writing "Donetsk People's Republic" in quotation marks in a social media post? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Torture Camp on Paradise Street. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, The Torture Camp on Paradise Street), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Z1720 (talk) 00:02, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
The mention at ANI
can be ignored if you choose. Somebody thought they'd been outed is all. Or you can opine if you like but I just thought I would try to alleviate any christ what now thoughts you might have had. I'd give it a miss if I were you, since he will argue forever, but I didn't want to talk about you behind your back even in passing. Oh speaking of, if you still care about the place we do not name there's a thread about the steward elections; your name came up there but not in a bad way about you either Elinruby (talk) 16:30, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
 | Happy First Edit Day! Hi Volunteer Marek! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:35, 10 May 2024 (UTC) |  |
Request for amendment at WP:ARCA about World War II and the history of Jews in Poland
Hello Volunteer Marek,
a request for amendment that affects the 1-way interaction ban with Piotrus and a 1-way interaction ban with Volunteer Marek
from the World War II and the history of Jews in Poland case has been made at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment § Amendment request: World War II and the history of Jews in Poland. Your input would be welcome.
Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:37, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Threading
This is unrelated to our back-and-forth, but it is on the same article talk page. I indented and moved your 04:57, 7 July 2024 reply to JDiala because it split their reply to themselves. I hope you don't mind. Link for review. If you revert, I won't contest it. While I'm here, I struck the DE comment and the explanation is available with my 06:15, 7 July 2024 reply. Carry on, Mr rnddude (talk) 06:31, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Utsa Patnaik
Hello VolunteerMarek. I had a query about the reliability of Utsa Patnaik on the Bengal Famine of 1943 article? I ask because you fully removed her opinion from the body on June 24 because it was apparently fringe, yet another anonymous user on July 1 added a whole paragraph sourced to Patnaik to the lead about inflation even though it's not a summary of the body and with no remaining mention of Patnaik in the body. I think her view deserves some mention in the body but clearly what this anonymous user added is undue and not following Misplaced Pages's guidelines for the lead section. No other scholar even gets named in the lead apart from Patnaik. 185.21.22.198 (talk) 11:22, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
- Patnaik , Monbiot and Hickel are most certainly fringe by any reasonable definition of fringe. “Comment is free” is not a reliable source. Volunteer Marek 18:49, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Arbitration motions regarding My very best wishes
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
Remedies 5.1 and 5.2 of World War II and the history of Jews in Poland (the topic and interaction bans on My very best wishes, respectively) are repealed.
And it has resolved by another motion that:
My very best wishes' topic ban from World War II in Eastern Europe and the history of Jews in Eastern Europe, imposed under the Eastern Europe contentious topic procedures, is repealed.
For the Arbitration Committee, SilverLocust 💬 06:33, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- Discuss this at: Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Arbitration motions regarding My very best wishes
Arbitration amendment request archived
The request for amendment in which those two motions were proposed has been closed and is archived at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment/Archive 128#Amendment request: World War II and the history of Jews in Poland. The repeal of remedy 5.2 means that the ban on My very best wishes interacting with you has been lifted. SilverLocust 💬 07:30, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Gąsawa massacre
Gąsawa massacre has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Articles for discussion page Polski Piast from Poland (talk) 16:26, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Gąsawa massacre for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gąsawa massacre, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Gąsawa massacre until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Thank You
Thank you for the work on Yalta's page and combating Russian Operatives spreading misinformation and propaganda. 69.61.139.83 (talk) 08:58, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Io Saturnalia!
.jpg)
|
Io, Saturnalia! | |
| Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free. Ealdgyth (talk) 15:29, 17 December 2024 (UTC) |
Happy Holidays!
.jpg)
Wishing you a most happy holidays! --A.S. Brown (talk) 05:14, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Barnstar of Diligence |
| Thanks for everything you do. Iljhgtn (talk) 17:37, 17 January 2025 (UTC) |