Revision as of 20:18, 22 December 2016 editCrowsus (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers396,160 edits →Mail← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 08:47, 22 January 2025 edit undoMike Selinker (talk | contribs)Administrators111,054 edits Notification: listing of Category:Rankin family of Geelong at WP:Categories for discussion.Tag: Twinkle | ||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{TOCright}} | {{TOCright}} | ||
== This week's ] (week 4, 2025) == | |||
== Mail == | |||
{{You've got mail}} ★☆ ]☆★ 13:38, 21 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
:The IP is block evading already (]), which is what I suggested might happen in the third email. ★☆ ]☆★ 13:44, 21 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
::He/She is also evading with this IP ] and they also violated 3rr with above IP. ★☆ ]☆★ 15:09, 21 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
I also ask that ]'s page be protected, please. ★☆ ]☆★ 15:13, 21 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
:Thanks for all the help. ★☆ ]☆★ 02:52, 22 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
{| style="width:100%; padding:2px;" class="TAFI-weekly" | |||
==McMenemy sources etc== | |||
! <div style="margin:0; background-color:#E2E7FF; border:1px solid blue; text-align:center; color:#082840; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.4em; padding-bottom: 0.4em; padding-right: 0.4em; font-weight:normal">{{AFI/Picture box|week=2025/4}} Hello, GiantSnowman. The ] of the week is: | |||
Look, I do get it. Wikis are not reliable because anyone can add any random thing. And that link just stayed because I copied them both over for quickness to try and end this, I'm on my phone so typing the coding symbols is tiresome. But to be honest, there are a number of reference books I've read where I have some knowledge of the subject and notice the author has stated something that is inaccurate or just wrong, albeit innocently and accidentally. | |||
<span style="font-size:140%;">'''{{Misplaced Pages:Articles for improvement/2025/4/1}}'''</span> | |||
Likewise I see 'reliable' online databases referenced here a lot like ''London Hearts'' which has a lot of good obscure stats, but who's to say it isn't just one guy with some domain space who fills in some blanks randomly at times? It all looks fine to me, but who can be sure? | |||
Please be bold and help improve it! | |||
And this is the disclaimer from Toon1892.com: ''"In presenting this information I would like to point out that I have no connection with, or affiliation to, Newcastle United Football Club, or any other organisation. All research is conducted by myself and where evidence points to conflicting conclusions the decision of which to include is at my sole discretion."''. Now that is one lone guy who is trying his best to present the information correctly, but ultimately he is the God of his site. And there is no-one helping him so it would be easy to miss stuff, like if a player has a brother and father who were both internationals, that's an interesting little note in my opinion but it wasn't on there. But again what is on there seems OK so great, let's quote it. | |||
---- | |||
Previous selections: {{Misplaced Pages:Articles for improvement/2025/3/1}} • {{Misplaced Pages:Articles for improvement/2025/2/1}} | |||
---- | |||
Get involved with the AFI project: ]{{•}} ] | |||
---- | |||
<small>Posted by: <span style="font-family:sans-serif"><b>] <sup>]</sup></b></span> 00:06, 20 January 2025 (UTC) using ] (]) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • {{edit|Misplaced Pages:Articles for improvement/Participants/Notifications|Opt-out instructions}}</small>{{-}}</div> | |||
|}<!-- Substituted from Template:AFI weekly selections notice --> | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:MusikBot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Articles_for_improvement/Participants/Notifications&oldid=1269192161 --> | |||
== "]" listed at ] == | |||
] | |||
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 20#Michael McCann (footballer)}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> <span style="background-color: #FFCFBF; font-variant: small-caps">] <sub>(''']''' / ''']''')</sub></span> 05:28, 20 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
==] has been nominated for renaming== | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>] has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 08:47, 22 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
Contrastingly, yes any loony can add nonsense to the Celtic Wiki, but like Misplaced Pages it will be monitored and scrutinised vigorously by obsessives and the narrow subject range involved and their devotion to it, as well as the collective aspect of collating the information, presents a decent case for the majority of the stuff on there being right as far as anyone is able to investigate it, especially the crazy disorganised world of football from 100 years ago. Still not reliable but the best we can do in some circumstances. | |||
So you can lecture me about this if you like, I realise I am a noob that needs to be reined in; obviously you are in the right as far as the guidelines are concerned, and I understand why they are there (we don't want crap being added and referenced from more crap and then it gets quoted by some lazy journalist and shared on social media and repeated on TV and suddenly the crap is almost fact), but in this instance I feel you're overemphasising it a wee bit. Cheers, peace ] (]) 20:18, 22 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
Hi GS, please can you keep an eye on Pard's page (protect if necessary)...he's just been removed as manager CPFC and the page has already come in for some attention. Thanks. Season's greetings! ] (]) 15:28, 22 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] 17:50, 22 December 2016 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 08:47, 22 January 2025
Archives |
2006 • 2007 • 2008 • 2009 • 2010 • 2011 • 2012 • 2013 • 2014 • 2015 • 2016 • 2017 • 2018 • 2019 • 2020 • 2021 • 2022 • 2023 • 2024 • 2025 • |
This week's article for improvement (week 4, 2025)
The prescription symbol, ℞, as printed on the blister pack of a prescription drug
Hello, GiantSnowman. The article for improvement of the week is:
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Pirn • South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot 00:06, 20 January 2025 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • Opt-out instructions |
---|
"Michael McCann (footballer)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Michael McCann (footballer) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 20 § Michael McCann (footballer) until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:28, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Category:Rankin family of Geelong has been nominated for renaming
Category:Rankin family of Geelong has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 08:47, 22 January 2025 (UTC)