Talk:Seuna (Yadava) dynasty: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 13:21, 26 September 2006 editArya Rajya Maharashtra (talk \| contribs)326 edits →Common history[] 13:14, 26 September 2006 (UTC)← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 16:42, 10 October 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk \| contribs)Bots, Template editors2,311,942 editsm Archiving 13 discussion(s) to Talk:Seuna (Yadava) dynasty/Archive 2) (bot
(135 intermediate revisions by 49 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{User:MiszaBot/config
	==Kannadi marketing==
			\| algo = old(730d)
	This article is another case of Kannadi marketing.Plz see the article for how Kannada is being glorified against Marathi and Sanskrit.I will be shortly getting reference to end up this Kannadisation for I am pretty sure about the Yadavas and Marathi being official language during their reign.Merging Yadavs with Seuns is infact unwarrented.
			\| minthreadsleft = 2

			\| minthreadstoarchive = 1
	If I rememeber this article is about 2-3rd in row including ] ].This is very disguisting.Few users are deliberately moulding history to satisfy their lingual fanaticsm.They are well-equiped with nonsense and crappy sources like that of Kannadi fanatic Mr.Kamath.Nonetheless,I am sure I shall be getting a good citation to wipe out this utter nonsense which endorses karnataka.
			\| counter = 2
	] 08:08, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
			\| archive = Talk:Seuna (Yadava) dynasty/Archive %(counter)d
			\| maxarchivesize = 75k
			\| archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}}
			}}
			{{Skip to talk}}
			{{Talk header}}
			{{WikiProject banner shell\|class=B\|vital=yes\|1=
			{{WikiProject India\|importance=low\|karnataka=yes\|karnataka-importance=mid\|maharashtra=yes\|maharashtra-importance=mid\|history=yes\|history-importance=mid\|assess-date=March 2012}}
			{{WikiProject History\|importance=high}}
			{{WikiProject Former countries}}
			{{WikiProject Jainism\|importance=low}}
			}}
			{{contentious topics/page restriction talk notice\|protection=semi\|ipa}}

	== Nothing disgusting about History if you open your eyes] 14:23, 25 September 2006 (UTC) ==		== Nothing disgusting about History if you open your eyes] 14:23, 25 September 2006 (UTC) ==

	There is nothing disgusting nor is their any Kannadaization of this article as you claim. Read books and then talk. People without knowledge or the habit of acquiring it should not post blatant comments. All info has been sourced from reliable reference source which has been provided. In fact I intend to work on this next more closely , with an additional source (scholarly ofcourse). Your lack of historiacal knowledge is your loss. If you try to remove any material without arbitration, you will find youself in a soup and quit cribbing about Vijayanagar empire, you cant do anything there. I am fully sourced from 4 different sources of research.		There is nothing disgusting nor is their any Kannadaization of this article as you claim. Read books and then talk. People without knowledge or the habit of acquiring it should not post blatant comments. All info has been sourced from reliable reference source which has been provided. In fact I intend to work on this next more closely , with an additional source (scholarly ofcourse). Your lack of historiacal knowledge is your loss. If you try to remove any material without arbitration, you will find youself in a soup and quit cribbing about Vijayanagar empire, you cant do anything there. I am fully sourced from 4 different sources of research.

	Dinesh KAnnambadi

	Dear Dinesh,
	Keep these article with u.And stop swearing by that foolish books written by illiterate and ignorant Kannadi writers.I am starting to develop Yadava article soon,so continue with ur lies here.Yadav article should not be redirected here.

	And get this in ur head-if u dont stop ur moronic Kannadi sermons I am myself gonna go to arbiteration.And u will see that.Ok Rashtrakutas and Vijayanagara empire was Kannadi but YADAVS being Kannadi????Are u for real?And yes call ur friend Sarvagnya too..by this u have only expressed ur 'insecurity' .No more moulding of history please.And yeah trash that kamats books.Dont think that u can hide the glorious past of Maharashtrians.
	] 14:41, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

	== Maharashtra history is intimately tied to Karnataka History] 15:02, 25 September 2006 (UTC) ==		== Maharashtra history is intimately tied to Karnataka History] 15:02, 25 September 2006 (UTC) ==
Line 29:		Line 34:

	Forgot to log in earlier. Lets not forget you received a similar message from your friend Arya also when he came across the Seuna page.		Forgot to log in earlier. Lets not forget you received a similar message from your friend Arya also when he came across the Seuna page.

		⚫	== Common history] 13:14, 26 September 2006 (UTC) ==

		⚫	When I said the history of Karnataka and Maharashtra are tied together, it was meant to be a Phylosophical statement to help develop friendship and appreciate history and discard acrimony. It was not meant to be a derogatory statement. I would not take it as one if the same statement had come from one of you guys. Infact, India is a product of a ''Sum Contribution'' and thats what I was trying to emphasise on. Being neighbouring states, this is all the more true. Did you know that ], father of carnatic music was born in Pandharapur, Maharashtra. Dont we consider him our own?. I did not realise that being tied to ''Kannadis'' was such an offence to you guys. However whatever may be your reaction, I intend to complete this page in detail from other sources. There are always people who acknowledge and others who dont.
		⚫	Also, regarding my article on Belgaum page, I have always regretted having written that.

	Dinesh Kannambadi		Dinesh Kannambadi

			== decency ==
	This is really shameful and embarrassing!U suppose to be well-educated with ur prowess in English still u r acting as Kannadi extremist well equiped with fanatic materials to wage a 'jehad' against other states.Dear Dinesh,open ur mind,get rid of prejudices and READ the article very carefully.Ask ur conscience havent u being partial?Havent u glorified Kannada languages against Marathi?

			Please have the decency to intimate the person (myself) who has taken the trouble to put together this page before making large scale modifications and {{Tl\|Fact}} tags. I understand we all have the right to make edits, but that does not mean you get together and just start doing things because it suits you. The least one of you could do (not the two illmannered guys Mahawiki and Arya Raajya whatever...) is intimate me so I could be involved. After all, there is nothing you guys can do to disprove the facts I have put there.
	I am gonna buy some encyplopedia cds to shut every fanatics mouth here!In fact I end this discussion here since there's no need for redirection of Yadavas to Seuna.So continue ur Kannadi fanaticsm here and mind u,dont even think of degrading Maharashtra's histroy from now onwards...
	Jai Maharashtra

			Dineshkannambadi
	] 08:39, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
	BTW I take ur comments that Maharashtra history is tied to K'taka very lightly as one who says Vihayanagara, Rashtrakutas, Chalukyas, Mughals(?) are Kannadis, all Maharashtrians are actually Kannadis, Shivaji Maharaj is a Kannadi, Kannadi is the old and Marathi has evolved from Kannada and Konkani,Kannadi kavi Pipes and Pump's have enriched Kannada to make it a claasical language blah blah blah!!!!U know what ur blabbering isnt amusing anymore,it counts to cultural terrorism...accept Islam or else...Oh yeah in ur case say Kannadi is best else...!
	] 08:39, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

			== walk before you run ==

			Read the book. All references have been provided. It does not matter who changed it. We all make mistakes.
	== Unfortunate Bias ==

			Dineshkannambadi
	It is really unfortunate how this article has been developed into a Kannadi-propaganda advertisement. Dinesh has really Kannadized each and every article.I mean how much more glory doth you seek ? Those who ride on others achievement never really win. They are looooosers. I hope you are not one of them. Tomorrow you will say Shivaji was Kannadi, the whole Maratha Empire was Kannadi. In fact Maharashtra is Kannadi. Isn't it ?

			== citations ==
	By the way, I still remember your comment on the Belgaon talk page. You said - Vijayanagara and other Kannadi Empires were great and Maratha Empire wasnt great. Well, there was no Kannadi Empire at all. Those were small kingdoms. You know an Empire needs to be Imperial. Marathas were imperial. None of your Kannadi "empires" were imperial. So stop glorifying Kannadi. It doesn't deserve to be glorified, you know !!!!

			Sir, I have reverted back to your version but added my citations to the places where you put {{Fact}. You have asked me ''Which research''? for many points on the page. Sir, I think this is a question best asked to Dr. Kamath himself. I have merely quoted the scholar himself thats all. If you ask me which research, am I supposed to ask Dr. Kamath, which research?? We are supposed to trust our historians to some extent otherwise Dr. Kamath would not be given a ''Sahitya Academy award'' for this origianl work in 1973.
	-<span class="plainlinks" style="border: 2px solid #0001DC; padding: 1px;"><b>]</b></span>]''']''' 09:14, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

			I hope you understand my point.
⚫	== Common history] 13:14, 26 September 2006 (UTC) ==

			Dineshkannambadi
⚫	When I said the history of Karnataka and Maharashtra are tied together, it was meant to be a Phylosophical statement to help develop friendship and appreciate history and discard acrimony. It was not meant to be a derogatory statement. I would not take it as one if the same statement had come from one of you guys. Infact, India is a product of a ''Sum Contribution'' and thats what I was trying to emphasise on. Being neighbouring states, this is all the more true. Did you know that ], father of carnatic music was born in Pandharapur, Maharashtra. Dont we consider him our own?. I did not realise that being tied to ''Kannadis'' was such an offence to you guys. However whatever may be your reaction, I intend to complete this page in detail from other sources. There are always people who acknowledge and others who dont.

⚫	Also, regarding my article on Belgaum page, I have always regretted having written that.
			== Rathors of Baglan ==

			It is probable that at this date the Rathors of Baglan were tributaries of the Yadavas of Deogiri.

	Dinesh Kannambadi

			Imperial gazetteer of India: Provincial series, Volume 8
	==Dont Show Off National Integration ==

	Kannadabadi, you are not doing anything except ''nautanki''. When did your friendship go when you write "''..While Sanskrit and Kannada were in official usage from the begining of their rule, the later part of their rule saw the rise of Marathi as an important language of literature.''". Why ? Wasn't Marathi the court language. It is another thing that Kannada was never the official language of Yadavas. But even if once, let us say that what you say is true, then why didn't you mention Marathi ?!?!? Again, in the literature section and almost everywhere, Marathi is mentioned last. When Maharashtri Prakrit is the most widely spoken language of the region how can it not be mentioned in the article ? This reeks of extreme lingual fanaticism. Don't try to act too smart. Your friendliness and good faith towards Marathi has been trashed by your own comments on ] talkpage.

			http://books.google.co.in/books?ei=V8OiTc2eJ4vQrQen85D7Ag&ct=result&id=Ph62AAAAIAAJ&dq=yadavs+are+rathors&q=Rathors+of+Baglan+
	-<span class="plainlinks" style="border: 2px solid #0001DC; padding: 1px;"><b>]</b></span>]''']''' 13:21, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 16:42, 10 October 2024

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Seuna (Yadava) dynasty article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This

level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

India: Karnataka / Maharashtra / History Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Karnataka (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Maharashtra (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article was last assessed in March 2012.

History High‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Former countries (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesFormer countries

Jainism Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Jainism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Jainism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects. Guidelines: Manual of Style – Naming conventionsJainismWikipedia:WikiProject JainismTemplate:WikiProject JainismJainism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

You must be logged-in to an autoconfirmed or confirmed account (usually granted automatically to accounts with 10 edits and an age of 4 days)

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Nothing disgusting about History if you open your eyesDineshkannambadi 14:23, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

There is nothing disgusting nor is their any Kannadaization of this article as you claim. Read books and then talk. People without knowledge or the habit of acquiring it should not post blatant comments. All info has been sourced from reliable reference source which has been provided. In fact I intend to work on this next more closely , with an additional source (scholarly ofcourse). Your lack of historiacal knowledge is your loss. If you try to remove any material without arbitration, you will find youself in a soup and quit cribbing about Vijayanagar empire, you cant do anything there. I am fully sourced from 4 different sources of research.

Maharashtra history is intimately tied to Karnataka History129.42.208.182 15:02, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

The day you guys realise this, much of the disputes will go away. Unfortunately as I have stated earlier, politicials and false history propaganda machinery has I believe hidden much of real history from Indians. I am not saying this with malice against any particular state.

Regarding the Yadavas or Seunas, remember that they were feudatories first of the Rashtrakuta (late period of Rashtrakuta) and all the way thru the Kalyani Chalukya rule before declaring independence. I have quoted the names of the Kannada scholars in the Suena court, their works etc. I have also given balanced info about the arrival of Marathi literature only because thats what the source says. I have done this without any prejudice or personal gains. Its upto you to see this with an open mind. Feel free to bring other sources. In fact I can quote you a source other then Kamath (Since you hate him). Please take time to read history first and discuss and Tag. Creating alternate pages for the same topic based on challenge and ego is not acceptable to either history or probably wikipedia.

Dinesh Kannambadi

InsecurityDineshkannambadi 15:33, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Forgot to log in earlier. Lets not forget you received a similar message from your friend Arya also when he came across the Seuna page.

Common historyDineshkannambadi 13:14, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

When I said the history of Karnataka and Maharashtra are tied together, it was meant to be a Phylosophical statement to help develop friendship and appreciate history and discard acrimony. It was not meant to be a derogatory statement. I would not take it as one if the same statement had come from one of you guys. Infact, India is a product of a Sum Contribution and thats what I was trying to emphasise on. Being neighbouring states, this is all the more true. Did you know that Purandaradasa, father of carnatic music was born in Pandharapur, Maharashtra. Dont we consider him our own?. I did not realise that being tied to Kannadis was such an offence to you guys. However whatever may be your reaction, I intend to complete this page in detail from other sources. There are always people who acknowledge and others who dont. Also, regarding my article on Belgaum page, I have always regretted having written that.

Dinesh Kannambadi

decency

Please have the decency to intimate the person (myself) who has taken the trouble to put together this page before making large scale modifications and {{Fact}} tags. I understand we all have the right to make edits, but that does not mean you get together and just start doing things because it suits you. The least one of you could do (not the two illmannered guys Mahawiki and Arya Raajya whatever...) is intimate me so I could be involved. After all, there is nothing you guys can do to disprove the facts I have put there.

Dineshkannambadi

walk before you run

Read the book. All references have been provided. It does not matter who changed it. We all make mistakes.

Dineshkannambadi

citations

Sir, I have reverted back to your version but added my citations to the places where you put {{Fact}. You have asked me Which research? for many points on the page. Sir, I think this is a question best asked to Dr. Kamath himself. I have merely quoted the scholar himself thats all. If you ask me which research, am I supposed to ask Dr. Kamath, which research?? We are supposed to trust our historians to some extent otherwise Dr. Kamath would not be given a Sahitya Academy award for this origianl work in 1973.

I hope you understand my point.

Dineshkannambadi

Rathors of Baglan

It is probable that at this date the Rathors of Baglan were tributaries of the Yadavas of Deogiri.

Imperial gazetteer of India: Provincial series, Volume 8

http://books.google.co.in/books?ei=V8OiTc2eJ4vQrQen85D7Ag&ct=result&id=Ph62AAAAIAAJ&dq=yadavs+are+rathors&q=Rathors+of+Baglan+

Categories: