Revision as of 20:21, 20 May 2017 editInternetArchiveBot (talk | contribs)Bots, Pending changes reviewers5,388,432 edits Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot (v1.3.2) (Feminist)← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 19:59, 7 October 2024 edit undoQwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs)Bots, Mass message senders4,025,680 editsm Removed deprecated parameters in {{Talk header}} that are now handled automatically (Task 30)Tag: paws [2.2] |
(17 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{Talkheader}} |
⚫ |
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|
⚫ |
{{American English}} |
⚫ |
|archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}} |
|
⚫ |
|maxarchivesize = 200K |
|
⚫ |
|counter = 3 |
|
⚫ |
|minthreadsleft = 0 |
|
|
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|
⚫ |
|algo = old(90d) |
|
⚫ |
|archive = Talk:The Autobiography of Malcolm X/Archive %(counter)d |
|
⚫ |
}} |
|
|
{{ArticleHistory |
|
{{ArticleHistory |
|
|action1=GAN |
|
|action1=GAN |
Line 55: |
Line 48: |
|
|maindate=February 21, 2014 |
|
|maindate=February 21, 2014 |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=FA|vital=yes|listas=Autobiography of Malcolm X, The|1= |
|
{{Talk header|search=yes}} |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Books}} |
|
{{WikiProjectBannerShell| |
|
|
{{WikiProject Books|class=FA }} |
|
{{WikiProject African diaspora|importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject African diaspora|class=FA |importance=mid }} |
|
{{WikiProject Islam|importance=low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Islam|class=FA |importance=low }} |
|
{{WikiProject Civil Rights Movement|importance=Mid}} |
|
⚫ |
}} |
|
⚫ |
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
⚫ |
|archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}} |
|
⚫ |
|maxarchivesize = 200K |
|
⚫ |
|counter = 3 |
|
⚫ |
|minthreadsleft = 1 |
|
⚫ |
|algo = old(365d) |
|
⚫ |
|archive = Talk:The Autobiography of Malcolm X/Archive %(counter)d |
|
}} |
|
}} |
⚫ |
{{American English}} |
|
|
{{auto archiving notice |bot=MiszaBot I |age=3 |units=months }} |
|
|
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn |
|
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn |
|
|target=/Archive index |mask=/Archive <#> |leading_zeros=0 |indexhere=yes |
|
|target=/Archive index |mask=/Archive <#> |leading_zeros=0 |indexhere=yes |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
__TOC__ |
|
|
|
|
|
==Yakub== |
|
|
] paragraph 4 refers to this book and some discussion of a "bleaching" process. I think this should be mentioned here too. Anyone know the chapter and page? ] (]) 09:32, 3 May 2017 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:Do ] indicate that Yakub is a significant theme in the ''Autobiography''? If not, ] suggests that it shouldn't be mentioned. — ] <sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 23:30, 4 May 2017 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== External links modified == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians, |
|
|
|
|
|
I have just modified one external link on ]. Please take a moment to review . If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes: |
|
|
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120114124627/http://www.usnews.com/usnews/culture/articles/921123/archive_018698.htm to http://www.usnews.com/usnews/culture/articles/921123/archive_018698.htm |
|
|
|
|
|
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Construction section badly needs to be edited for length == |
|
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Construction section is far too long and detailed for a general encyclopedia article, and reads more like a graduate thesis in literary criticism. Much of the section appears to focus more on the theories of specific critics who are mentioned repeatedly by name. The central point - that Haley was very much involved in shaping both the tone and content - can be made and a few examples given in about a third of the length. ] (]) 04:10, 21 August 2022 (UTC) |
|
Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 20:21, 20 May 2017 (UTC) |
|
|
|
* I mean...that's not the central point. You're ] to edit down the section and I'm sure it could be shorter but understand that the issues are these: |
|
|
** Squaring then contemporary arguments that Malcolm was the sole "author" with later work that contradicted this, WHILE bearing in mind that much of the back and forth over authorship happens without real input from Malcolm or Haley. |
|
|
** Dealing with the possibility (fact?) that Haley materially changed things which became intimately associated w/ Malcolm's image in his later years (namely how the book deals with his relationship with the NOI. |
|
|
** Accurately and respectfully summarizing the '''real''' and substantive academic and community debate about the authorship of the book and what it means. |
|
|
* I don't believe that his can be summed up as "haley was involved with shaping both tone and content". Again, you're welcome to take a crack but please understand that there may be more going on than your surmise. ] (]) 04:35, 21 August 2022 (UTC) |
The Construction section is far too long and detailed for a general encyclopedia article, and reads more like a graduate thesis in literary criticism. Much of the section appears to focus more on the theories of specific critics who are mentioned repeatedly by name. The central point - that Haley was very much involved in shaping both the tone and content - can be made and a few examples given in about a third of the length. 64.30.93.144 (talk) 04:10, 21 August 2022 (UTC)