| Revision as of 17:15, 15 July 2017 editParamandyr (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers50,395 edits →Warning: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 10:38, 9 January 2025 edit undoBeshogur (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users33,462 edits →Turkmens: ReplyTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit Reply | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{talk header}} | |||
| {{archive box| | |||
| * ] <small>→ 17 September 2015 — 17 September 2016</small> | |||
| * ] <small>→ 17 September 2016 — 30 May 2017</small>}} | |||
| == baseless revertions == | |||
| you have put an invalid reference on sultanate of rum and thanks for your edits] (]) 19:12, 7 June 2017 (UTC) | |||
| hello. i would like to see your valid argument in reverting my contribs to ] and ]. ] (]) 13:55, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| == List of Turkic dynasties and countries == | |||
| :Stop with "war flag" please. There is no war flag whatsoever, and that naval flag shouldn't be on the infobox at all. Those civil ensigns aren't real flags either. ] (]) 17:15, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| in the case of the ottoman empire please refer to; | |||
| :Why do you remove the orginal content. You can't remove it because you didn't like it. It's funny how you add these dynasties to ] and removing it from ] while these dynasties has a Turkic origin. ] (]) 16:45, 9 June 2017 (UTC) | |||
| war flag: | |||
| * https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/the-balkan-war-1912-13-turkish-infantry-on-the-move-news-photo/830214480 | |||
| ::That's funny, because I haven't added anything to ] since 2014, and I have already stated that the article should be deleted. Unlike you, I refrain from pov-pushing. Just because they had a Turkic origin doesn't make them a 'Turkic dynasty' or a 'Turko-Persian/Iranian state'. That is something fictitious which you have come up with, and if you can't come up with a source to support your claims, I will remove the dynasties again. Revert me again after I have removed them, and I will report you. --] (]) 16:49, 9 June 2017 (UTC) | |||
| * https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b69224969/ | |||
| * https://www.reddit.com/r/Turkey/comments/15600m7/bu_bayrak_ne_bayra%C4%9F%C4%B1/ | |||
| naval ensign; | |||
| :::Why should it be 'fiction' while Persianate society exist, while Turco-Mongol dynasties exist, while Turco-Persian tradition exist. Yes an Iranian Dynasty with Turkic origin does make this dynasty Turkic. They spoke Turkic, and their official language was Turkic. You need source? Open the pages of these Turkic dynasties. And report please. I'm not POV-pushing, you do. ] (]) 16:56, 9 June 2017 (UTC) | |||
| * https://web.archive.org/web/20220104124418/https://denizmuzesi.dzkk.tsk.tr/en/content/563 | |||
| also, i've been editing wiki since two months, what do you mean by 'years'. cheers.] (]) 21:20, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Because in reality they are not called for a 'Turkic dynasty' or a 'Turko-Persian/Iranian state', and you clearly know that as well. I am looking at the articles right now, and they're saying the exact opposite of what you are saying. If you're so sure of what you're saying, and that you're not pov-pushing, then surely it should be easy for you to find some reliable sources that support you edits? --] (]) 17:07, 9 June 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| :::::Well, look what the article says ''"The following is a list of dynasties, states or empires which are Turkic-speaking, of '''Turkic origins''', or both."'' and it says ''"The following list is of '''Iranian dynasties of Turkic origin'''."'' What's wrong with that? Maybe the word that was used is wrong. But that's a reason to remove, Safavid, Afsharid, Qajar, and Mughal dynasties? According you we should make the whole article blanc. ] (]) 17:19, 9 June 2017 (UTC) | |||
| Hello! I noticed your recent revert and on my end it looks like the "ك" is merging into the "ен" in the infobox title. Would it be alright to revert your edit? (Note: I have not reverted it, my recent edit was adding an endash.) <span style="font-family: century gothic;">]<u> ] </u> • '']]''</span> 04:17, 8 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::So what? This is still a clear pov-pushing attempt, and the article is named '''List of Turkic dynasties and countries''', I don't recall those dynasties being a Turkic one? And no, we shouldn't make the whole article blank, in fact we should delete it along with the Iranian one :P. Also, changing the name of the section to 'Iranian dynasties with Turkic origin' doesn't make it any better, since if they're Iranian dynasties, then what are they doing in a article named 'List of Turkic dynasties and countries'? --] (]) 17:40, 9 June 2017 (UTC) | |||
| : |
:{{re|xRozuRozu}} I don't see it that way, maybe your browser has the problem? Your version has a big space between those two. ] (]) 11:16, 8 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| ::I see. I tried accessing the page on Chrome (Macbook + Chromebook + phone), Safari (Macbook + phone), and the mobile app. It seems like it only shows correctly on my phone's Chrome/Safari, however not the app (where almost all of the Cyrillic is obscured). | |||
| ::I do suppose that most readers would probably access the page on a web browser on their phone, but I think that having "a big space" is better than having overlapping text. <span style="font-family: century gothic;">]<u> ] </u> • '']]''</span> 02:23, 9 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::It's not just a wording, the issue was talked about in the Iranian version of the article as well .Well they're not Turkic dynasties, and you still haven't come up with any source to support your claims. I'll wait a little bit longer, and if you haven't come up with anything, I'll remove them. --] (]) 17:55, 9 June 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :::I see now on mobile. It's | |||
| ::: |
:::nastalic text. No reason for it. ] (]) 10:38, 9 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| ::::::::::Still not a Turkic dynasty. Also, you still haven't added anything that calls them a 'Turkic dynasty'. --] (]) 20:39, 9 June 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::::::I don't want waste my time. Bye lol. ] (]) 20:58, 9 June 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == Original Research v Verifiability == | |||
| Please note the difference between Original Research and Verifiability of information. Original Research is where a user has done their own primary work on a subject or topic. This is different to verifiability which is ensuring that sources used and information in articles is accurate. Not once did I refer to the information in the ] as Original Research you claimed that I did . It is also far from a joke that the information in the article is u encyclopedic. The information has been tagged as to the areas where it falls down. The information removed is unverified and is news cruft.The section must only contain information which conforms with Wikipeidia's policies on a Neutral Point of View, Verifiability, No Original Research and Relevance. ] (]) 12:57, 13 June 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ==Edit Summaries== | |||
| I would caution you about making statements in edit summaries as these are permanent and cannot be removed after the fact, be careful with what is added as it is permanent. ] (]) 12:57, 13 June 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == Sorry, my mistake, you didn't vandalise the Marawi crisis page == | |||
| It was some editor with the IP address. Again, sorry | |||
| == Warning == | |||
| ] Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did to ], without giving a valid reason for the removal in the ]. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been ]. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the ] for that. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-delete2 --> --] (]) 17:15, 15 July 2017 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 10:38, 9 January 2025
| This is Beshogur's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
baseless revertions
hello. i would like to see your valid argument in reverting my contribs to Flags of the Ottoman Empire and Flag of Turkey. 83.9.35.43 (talk) 13:55, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Stop with "war flag" please. There is no war flag whatsoever, and that naval flag shouldn't be on the infobox at all. Those civil ensigns aren't real flags either. Beshogur (talk) 17:15, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
in the case of the ottoman empire please refer to; war flag:
- https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/the-balkan-war-1912-13-turkish-infantry-on-the-move-news-photo/830214480
- https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b69224969/
- https://www.reddit.com/r/Turkey/comments/15600m7/bu_bayrak_ne_bayra%C4%9F%C4%B1/
naval ensign;
also, i've been editing wiki since two months, what do you mean by 'years'. cheers.83.9.35.43 (talk) 21:20, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Turkmens
Hello! I noticed your recent revert and on my end it looks like the "ك" is merging into the "ен" in the infobox title. Would it be alright to revert your edit? (Note: I have not reverted it, my recent edit was adding an endash.) x RozuRozu • cups 04:17, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- @XRozuRozu: I don't see it that way, maybe your browser has the problem? Your version has a big space between those two. Beshogur (talk) 11:16, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- I see. I tried accessing the page on Chrome (Macbook + Chromebook + phone), Safari (Macbook + phone), and the mobile app. It seems like it only shows correctly on my phone's Chrome/Safari, however not the app (where almost all of the Cyrillic is obscured).
- I do suppose that most readers would probably access the page on a web browser on their phone, but I think that having "a big space" is better than having overlapping text. x RozuRozu • cups 02:23, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- I see now on mobile. It's
- nastalic text. No reason for it. Beshogur (talk) 10:38, 9 January 2025 (UTC)