Revision as of 23:51, 15 August 2017 editKjelltyrid (talk | contribs)65 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 04:37, 22 January 2025 edit undoWilhelm Tell DCCXLVI (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers4,388 edits →User-reported: ReplyTag: Reply | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<noinclude>{{Short description|Noticeboard for persistent vandalism}}__NONEWSECTIONLINK__ | |||
<!-- Adds protection template automatically if page is semi-protected, inside the noinclude, because this page is transcluded. -- |
<!-- Adds protection template automatically if page is semi-protected, inside the noinclude, because this page is transcluded. -->{{#ifeq:{{PROTECTIONLEVEL:edit}}|autoconfirmed|{{pp|1=vandalism|action=edit|small=yes|expiry=}}}}<!-- | ||
__NEWSECTIONLINK__<!-- __NEWSECTIONLINK__ causes a + button | |||
{{Noticeboard protected|reason=Persistent ]}}-->]<!-- prevent accidental archiving with OneClickArchiver --> | |||
appear on the edit page. This is a useful feature, as it allows editors | |||
{{/Header}}<!-- | |||
to add reports without edit conflicts; edit conflicts are very common on this page! --> | |||
<!-- The backlog tag is automatically changed to enabled | |||
({{adminbacklog}}) or disabled ({{noadminbacklog}}) by a bot. There is | |||
usually no need to manually edit the following line. Please see the talk page for more details if you wish to manually force the removal of the backlog indicator, rather than removing it. --> | usually no need to manually edit the following line. Please see the talk page for more details if you wish to manually force the removal of the backlog indicator, rather than removing it. --> | ||
{{ |
{{noadminbacklog|bot=HBC AIV helperbot14}}<!-- v2.0.29 RemoveBlocked=On MergeDuplicates=On AutoMark=On FixInstructions=On AutoBacklog=On AddLimit=4 RemoveLimit=2 --> | ||
</noinclude> | |||
<!-- Do not remove adminbacklog/noadminbacklog template above! --> | |||
==Reports== | == Reports == | ||
{{Misplaced Pages:Administrator intervention against vandalism/TB2}} | {{Misplaced Pages:Administrator intervention against vandalism/TB2}} | ||
===User-reported=== | === User-reported === | ||
<!-- | |||
<!-- The following are examples of how to report a vandal on this page. | |||
Please copy and paste |
Please copy and paste the following to the *VERY BOTTOM* of the page to report a User or IP. | ||
⚫ | * {{Vandal|Username or IP address}} brief reason for listing (keep it short) ~~~~ | ||
--> | |||
Anonymous Users (IP addresses): | |||
*{{vandal|2804:49A4:4007:6D00:1DDD:70A2:FE57:9EE2}} – On {{No redirect|:List of French serial killers}}: Repeated disruptive and unsourced changes (always the same ones) on the mentioned page, no other constructive contributions, doesn't engage on the talk page. I suggest a temporary block, at least from the article in question. ] (]) 04:06, 22 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
⚫ | * {{ |
||
*:{{AIV|e|2 days}} ] (]) 04:22, 22 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
*::Hmm, I don't check my watchlist every day. The reported IP has never made any constructive edits and repeatedly engaged in disruptive editing. Why should it matter whether that's noticed after one or two days? ] (]) 04:26, 22 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
Registered Users: | |||
*:::@] I sympathize with the frustration. However, blocks are intended as preventative and longstanding consensus is that if the block is not in response to relatively recent behavior, then it becomes punitive which is a ]. If you see any further disruption from this user, you can ping me or drop a line on my talk page. I will leave a final warning on their talk page. -] (]) 04:36, 22 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
* {{Vandal|username}} optional brief reason for listing (keep it short) ~~~~ | |||
*:::Because IPs are dynamic. It may well be different people who use the IP now. ] (<small><sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub></small>) 04:37, 22 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
List begins BELOW this line --> | |||
* {{Vandal|Bonnn09}} Long-term abuse. ] (]) 20:09, 15 August 2017 (UTC) | |||
::You're going to need to supply more information than that! At least for me... I have no idea who you're talking about or what kind of abuse they're known for. --] (]) 21:43, 15 August 2017 (UTC) | |||
:::{{ping|Floquenbeam}} I originally had thought that this was ]. Their username closely resembles ], like many other of their socks. I guess if this was the LTA, they probably would have been blocked a long time ago... ] (]) 23:29, 15 August 2017 (UTC) | |||
:::Now that I'm looking at this again, it's definetly not Nsmutte, and the AfD that this user opened up was legitimate, unlike ones that Nsmutte usually opens up... ] (]) 23:31, 15 August 2017 (UTC) | |||
* {{IPvandal|137.152.0.16}} Sneaky vandalism and blanking ] (]) 22:12, 15 August 2017 (UTC) <!-- Marked --> | |||
:*'''Note''': User is in the category: ]. ] (]) 22:13, 15 August 2017 (UTC) | |||
*{{IPvandal|172.58.28.16}} – Long-term abuse, see filter log. ] (]) 22:21, 15 August 2017 (UTC) | |||
::{{nao}} That particular edit filter appears to log ''every single'' edit made from 172.56.0.0/16 and 172.58.0.0/16. Most of these edits are going to be harmless. ] (]) 23:21, 15 August 2017 (UTC) | |||
*{{vandal|Kjelltyrid}} – On ] ({{diff|Henrik Steffens Professor|795703694|795703638|diff}}): vandalism after final warning. ] (]) 23:27, 15 August 2017 (UTC) | |||
*{{vandal|Adam9007}} Aggressive vandalism on ] with insertion of a blatantly false claim about the article being a duplicate when it's clearly not. --] (]) 23:51, 15 August 2017 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 04:37, 22 January 2025
Noticeboard for persistent vandalismNoticeboards | |
---|---|
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes. | |
General | |
Articles, content | |
Page handling | |
User conduct | |
Other | |
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards |
Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention.
Important!- The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam.
- Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s).
- The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future.
- If you decide that a report should be filed, place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section:
* {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~
- Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
- Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing.
- This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action.
This page was last updated at 04:39 on 22 January 2025 (UTC). Purge the cache of this page if it is out of date.
Reports
Bot-reported
- 74.194.126.3 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 03:15, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Warned user. Peaceray (talk) 04:38, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- 2601:8c0:480:67c0:5457:4511:184a:d05a (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 03:29, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
- 2804:49A4:4007:6D00:1DDD:70A2:FE57:9EE2 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On List of French serial killers: Repeated disruptive and unsourced changes (always the same ones) on the mentioned page, no other constructive contributions, doesn't engage on the talk page. I suggest a temporary block, at least from the article in question. Gawaon (talk) 04:06, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Stale report. User has not edited in 2 days. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:22, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hmm, I don't check my watchlist every day. The reported IP has never made any constructive edits and repeatedly engaged in disruptive editing. Why should it matter whether that's noticed after one or two days? Gawaon (talk) 04:26, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Gawaon I sympathize with the frustration. However, blocks are intended as preventative and longstanding consensus is that if the block is not in response to relatively recent behavior, then it becomes punitive which is a no no. If you see any further disruption from this user, you can ping me or drop a line on my talk page. I will leave a final warning on their talk page. -Ad Orientem (talk) 04:36, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Because IPs are dynamic. It may well be different people who use the IP now. Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI (/my edits) 04:37, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hmm, I don't check my watchlist every day. The reported IP has never made any constructive edits and repeatedly engaged in disruptive editing. Why should it matter whether that's noticed after one or two days? Gawaon (talk) 04:26, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- Stale report. User has not edited in 2 days. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:22, 22 January 2025 (UTC)