| Revision as of 03:49, 11 April 2018 editDrmies (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators407,595 edits →is there any decent admin on this site?← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 15:43, 12 April 2018 edit undoWeWuzPhoenicians (talk | contribs)56 edits →Bbb23: new section | ||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| Da original Phoenicians Wuz Kangz 😤 | Da original Phoenicians Wuz Kangz 😤 | ||
| == Notification == | |||
| There is currently a discussion here : regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.---] (]) 21:29, 11 April 2018 (UTC) | |||
| == |
== Bbb23 == | ||
| @] i don't understand the reason to why i got blocked... | |||
| ] Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| i am not a sock puppet of "Ehsan iq" and i don't know how was a i confirmed to be a sock puppet. | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> --] (]) 18:19, 4 April 2018 (UTC) | |||
| :@] what edit war mate? | |||
| :do you just go around giving warnings to wrong people? | |||
| :i reverted a statement after a user by the name of Dimadick Vandalized an article and reverted a wrong statement without sourcing it or using the talk page. | |||
| :which then he lied about the main article and reverted his wrong statement again on two articles. | |||
| :but i don't see your warning on his page... now that doesn't seem right, does it? | |||
| :look up this "edit war" before jumping into conclusion. ] (]) 19:32, 4 April 2018 (UTC) | |||
| == WeWuzPhoenicians, you are invited to the Teahouse! == | |||
| {| style="margin: 1em 4em;" | |||
| |- valign="top" | |||
| | ] | |||
| | <div style="background-color:#f4f3f0; color: #393D38; padding: 0.4em 1em;border-radius:10px; font-size: 1.1em;"> | |||
| Hi '''WeWuzPhoenicians'''! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. <br />Be our guest at ]! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Misplaced Pages and get help from experienced editors like {{noping|Cordless Larry}} (]). | |||
| <div class="submit ui-button ui-widget ui-state-default ui-corner-all ui-button-text-only" role="button" aria-disabled="false" style="float: left;"><span class="ui-button-text">]</span></div> | |||
| <div style="text-align:right;">We hope to see you there! | |||
| <small>Delivered by {{noping|HostBot}} on behalf of the ]</small> | |||
| <small>18:53, 4 April 2018 (UTC)</small></div> | |||
| </div> | |||
| |} | |||
| ]<!-- Template:Teahouse_HostBot_Invitation --> | |||
| == WeWuzPhoenicians, you are invited to the Teahouse! == | |||
| {| style="margin: 1em 4em;" | |||
| |- valign="top" | |||
| | ] | |||
| | <div style="background-color:#f4f3f0; color: #393D38; padding: 0.4em 1em;border-radius:10px; font-size: 1.1em;"> | |||
| Hi '''WeWuzPhoenicians'''! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. <br />Be our guest at ]! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Misplaced Pages and get help from experienced editors like {{noping|Lectonar}} (]). | |||
| <div class="submit ui-button ui-widget ui-state-default ui-corner-all ui-button-text-only" role="button" aria-disabled="false" style="float: left;"><span class="ui-button-text">]</span></div> | |||
| <div style="text-align:right;">We hope to see you there! | |||
| <small>Delivered by {{noping|HostBot}} on behalf of the ]</small> | |||
| <small>19:31, 4 April 2018 (UTC)</small></div> | |||
| </div> | |||
| |} | |||
| ]<!-- Template:Teahouse_HostBot_Invitation --> | |||
| == Warning == | |||
| ] Please do not ] other editors, as you did at ]. Comment on ''content'', not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please ] and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-npa2 --> | |||
| Please refrain from labeling the edits of others as vandalism. That is a personal attack. --] (]) 17:06, 7 April 2018 (UTC) | |||
| :@] please do not accuse others of causing "edit wars" as that is a ]. | |||
| :Please refrain from labeling the edits of others as vandalism, and try not to give warnings to wrong people without explaining why. | |||
| :pay attention to the edits before jumping into conclusion, and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. ] (]) 19:12, 7 April 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ::1.Pay attention to your own actions. | |||
| *"''Please refrain from labeling the edits of others as vandalism, and try not to give warnings to wrong people without explaining why.''" | |||
| ::2.This was not the first time you labeled the actions of another editor as vandalism. Which '''is''' a personal attack. | |||
| ::3.Also, you '''were''' edit warring and judging from '''your''' edits, you were continuing the same actions as an IP(which can be connected to Arabos). | |||
| ::4.Please refrain from making accusations(PA, vandalism) when clearly you '''know''' what you are doing. Continued personal attacks and/or edit warring will be reported. | |||
| *"''] please do not accuse others of causing "edit wars" as that is a ]''" | |||
| ::Revert #1, revert #2. That is edit warring. | |||
| ::As for your accusation of a "personal attack", '''report it to an Admin'''. I welcome the eyes of an Admin on &], where an IP did 2 reverts and you did the exact same 2 reverts. So you were edit warring on two articles! | |||
| *"''keep this in mind while editing''" | |||
| ::Keep in mind your edits mirrored an IP that is linked to Arabos(who is indef blocked). You would do well to take your own "''advice''". | |||
| ::Also, are you Arabos? --] (]) 19:32, 7 April 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ::@] First: removing a sourced info is vandalism, and removing a sourced info about someones ethnic background is ethnic vandalism. | |||
| ::Second: please explain how did i unjustly accuse anyone of vandalism?? clearly the two users that i mentioned Vandalized those articles by reverting unsourced statements , and also he accused the IP's that you've mentioned of "Vandalism", but weirdly i also don't see you giving warnings to him about "personal attacks"... and i don't know what i am doing wrong, i am just correcting articles that haven't been corrected, what are you accusing me of? | |||
| ::and i will also welcome an unbiased admin that can look up my edits and tell me that they are "vandalizing", while ignoring the people that reverted my edits. | |||
| ::and please do not accuse anyone of sock puppetry, take that as a second advice, and as an old time user yourself, i am pretty sure you know the rules of this site. | |||
| ::and no i am not "Arabos". ] (]) 20:45, 7 April 2018 (UTC) | |||
| *"''and please do not accuse anyone of sock puppetry, take that as a second advice, and as an old time user yourself, i am pretty sure you know the rules of this site.''" | |||
| ::::Since you are a "new user", I will assume you don't know the difference between an ''']''' and an ''']'''. The interrogative has a <u>question mark</u> at the end. | |||
| *"''First: removing a sourced info is vandalism, and removing a sourced info about someones ethnic background is ethnic vandalism.''" | |||
| ::::1. On ]; | |||
| *"''was an Emesene Arab aristocrat from the Royal family of Emesa in Roman Syria who served as a priest of the cult of El-Gebal in Rome during the reigns of the Severan Roman emperors Lucius Septimius Severus, reign 193–211 and Caracalla, reign 211–217.''" | |||
| ::::Is unsourced. So your statement of "sourced information" is incorrect. | |||
| ::::2. On ]; | |||
| *"''was an Emesene Arab Aristocrat from the Royal family of Emesa in Roman Syria who served as a Priest of the cult of El-Gebal in Rome during the reigns of the Severan Roman emperors Lucius Septimius Severus reign 193-211 and Caracalla reign 211-217.''" | |||
| ::::Sourced by The Emperor Elagabalus: Fact Or Fiction?, by Leonardo de Arrizabalaga y Prado, page xxiv, is unviewable. So you have no idea what it says. And page xxii, states Tiberius Julius Balbillus was a priest of Elagabal in Rome during the reigns of Severus and Caracalla. | |||
| ::::So both articles '''do not''' have sources stating these individuals are Arab or from the ]. So much for "sourced information". | |||
| *"''...also he accused the IP's that you've mentioned of "Vandalism", but weirdly i also don't see you giving warnings to him about "personal attacks"''" | |||
| ::::Considering that IP is indef blocked user, maybe you should take Ehsan iq a blanket or a sandwich. | |||
| ::::Sorry for interupting your message, Wikaviani. --] (]) 21:34, 7 April 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ::@] i said that i am not Arabos, which means i answered your question, and yet i got blocked for "disruptive edits"... | |||
| ::the previous edit called both of them "Assyrian" and i only corrected it, both of them being "from the Royal family of Emesa" (while a wikilink is added for the main article) is a source or at least, closer to it, plus, i am not the one who put the statement that they are "from the Royal family of Emesa" i just replaced the "Assyrian" with "Arab", as that is closer to being correct, i know you people will keep ignoring this but is it correct to call these guys "Assyrian" and also not providing a source for it?, isn't reverting unsourced statements is wrong? or did Misplaced Pages laws just got changed all of the sudden... ] (]) 04:54, 9 April 2018 (UTC) | |||
| :::I asked you to provide a source for your edit at ] and i gave you some advices for finding reliables sources. More, i sourced your edit at ] but you keep going on with your aggressive behavior and your "advices" to much more experienced users like Kansas Bear. Please note that you can not use the article about the ] as a source (this goes against ]), but you can select some sources from this article and use them in other articles (like ]). Again, if you need help for your edit, just ask, i'll be glad to help you as much as i can, but stop seeing other users as enemies, this is not a constructive behavior and can lead you to a block.---] (]) 21:28, 7 April 2018 (UTC) | |||
| :::::{{ping|Kansas Bear}}You're welcome, no problem for my message. I just checked the two articles you posted above, it seems quite clear that WeWuzPhoenicians and the IP are the same user : he got blocked 3 april and his account is 4 days old, sounds like a block evasion. I can report him to an admin who could check this issue more precisely.---] (]) 21:56, 7 April 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ::@] why don't you provide a source that he was "Assyrian"??, i only corrected it because the article states that both of them are "from the Royal family of Emesa", (wikilink for the main page is added) and i know it's hard but just try to click on the main article and try to find a single mention of any "Assyrians", i know that my edit has no source but the previous ones also didn't, again i only corrected it or just made it closer to the truth. | |||
| ::and if both of the edits has no source (mine and the previous one) who decides which one is correct?, i didn't remove a sourced info, but again "Assyrian" is just false, and who said Misplaced Pages was a good site for information? now that is a funny joke. ] (]) 04:56, 9 April 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ==Notification== | |||
| ] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice-->] (]) 22:19, 7 April 2018 (UTC) | |||
| :@] i will care eventually... (sarcasm) ] (]) 04:57, 9 April 2018 (UTC) | |||
| == April 2018 == | |||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px">]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been ''']''' temporarily from editing for persistently making ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the ], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. </div></div><!-- Template:uw-disruptblock --> | |||
| :False accusations of vandalism and persistent addition of unreferenced content are not acceptable. ] ] 00:46, 8 April 2018 (UTC) | |||
| :@] "disrupts progress toward improving an article" | |||
| :"False accusations of vandalism and persistent addition of unreferenced content are not acceptable", now can you say that to (User: Dimadick, "Reverted after vandalism") comment??! ] (]) 05:08, 9 April 2018 (UTC) | |||
| :and yeah sure. | |||
| :{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''i didn't do any of the things your accusing me of :) ~~~~''}} ] (]) 05:08, 9 April 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ::You will need to format your unblock request properly, and another administrator will address it. Hint: Acknowledging your errors is a good start. ] ] 05:16, 9 April 2018 (UTC) | |||
| :@] {{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''i corrected an unsourced statement that was attached via a wikilink to the main article, the statement also Contradicts the main article... i also reverted edits that reverted those unsourced statements, but in the end i was the one that got the warnings and the block... makes perfect sense. ~~~~''}} ] (]) 05:42, 9 April 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ::Another administrator will have to deal with this. Hint: you are ''not'' addressing the reasons why you were blocked. ] ] 06:41, 9 April 2018 (UTC) | |||
| :@] your the one who blocked me mate... and i explained my actions and wondered why did i in the end get the warnings and the block, i replied to your accusations, and gave "reasons for being unblocked", the reason above is my reply, what do you want from me?. ] (]) 06:51, 9 April 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ::Clearly, you do not yet understand that it is unacceptable for you to falsely accuse other editors of vandalism, and to add unreferenced content. If you continue that type of behavior, you will be blocked over and over again. I suggest that you rethink your approach to editing if you hope to be successful on this project. ] ] 06:55, 9 April 2018 (UTC) | |||
| :@] "Clearly, you do not yet understand that it is unacceptable for you to falsely accuse other editors of vandalism", please explain the actions of the User Dimadick??. | |||
| :"and to add unreferenced content", please explain the actions of the Users that reverted "unreferenced added content"??. ] (]) 07:08, 9 April 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ::This conversation is about ''your'' behavior, and is not about anyone else's behavior. ] ] 15:02, 9 April 2018 (UTC) | |||
| :@] what a bloody good answer!, but it took you a while tho... ah who am i kidding, it would probably take a week to craft such a brilliant reply!. ] (]) 19:11, 9 April 2018 (UTC) | |||
| == is there any decent admin on this site? == | |||
| @], @], @] | |||
| sorry for mentioning you guys, i don't know if you are admins or not and you seem to be one, and i know you have more important things to do but i wish you could review my case. | |||
| that is if you have some time to spare. ] (]) 19:11, 9 April 2018 (UTC) | |||
| :I am not an admin. ] (]) 19:35, 9 April 2018 (UTC) | |||
| @] k. ] (]) 20:12, 9 April 2018 (UTC) | |||
| :Phoenicians had some trouble in the past but he was turning a corner - good sources, standard cite format. Then an admin comes and blocks him like it's nothing. They talk about policy - policy they made to preserve their privilege. More than 99% of blocked editors are nonadmins and they still won't admit the system is discriminatory. How will Phoenicians pass an RfA with a block on his record? What are we supposed to tell his family? This site was founded with admins at the top but it was built on the blood and sweat of regular editors. There won't be justice until we confront that legacy. Free Phoenicians! End bias in the admin corps! ] (]) 20:21, 9 April 2018 (UTC) | |||
| @] thank you for your support :) | |||
| but for real tho how am i gonna get a job with a block on my record??. | |||
| Ni@#$$ i got kids to feed!. | |||
| how am i gonna feed muh kids?!. | |||
| damn Capitalism... ] (]) 21:32, 9 April 2018 (UTC) | |||
| *I'm not nearly as decent an administrator as Cullen. ] (]) 02:04, 10 April 2018 (UTC) | |||
| @] shame. ] (]) 18:07, 10 April 2018 (UTC) | |||
| :{{ping|Drmies}} Is it time to revoke talkpage access? ] (]) 19:22, 10 April 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ::They're not blocked anymore. I'm waiting for them to make useful contributions. ] (]) 03:49, 11 April 2018 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 15:43, 12 April 2018
Da original Phoenicians Wuz Kangz 😤
Notification
There is currently a discussion here : regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.---Wikaviani (talk) 21:29, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Bbb23
@Bbb23 i don't understand the reason to why i got blocked... i am not a sock puppet of "Ehsan iq" and i don't know how was a i confirmed to be a sock puppet.