Misplaced Pages

User talk:Dindin911: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:52, 5 November 2019 editFyunck(click) (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers63,780 edits Bianca Andreescu origin← Previous edit Latest revision as of 08:13, 7 November 2019 edit undoNinjaRobotPirate (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators148,115 edits Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion 
(7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 43: Line 43:


Things about Bianca Andreescu's heritage belong in the prose section, not the lead. And it is there. MOS is clear that the introductory sentence should mention nationality (which is Canadian), not her heritage. If you want to expand that section, be my guest, but she was born in Canada and plays for Canada. ] (]) 21:48, 5 November 2019 (UTC) Things about Bianca Andreescu's heritage belong in the prose section, not the lead. And it is there. MOS is clear that the introductory sentence should mention nationality (which is Canadian), not her heritage. If you want to expand that section, be my guest, but she was born in Canada and plays for Canada. ] (]) 21:48, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

] Hello, and ]. You appear to be repeatedly ] other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Misplaced Pages this is known as "]" and is usually seen as obstructing the ], as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a ] on the ].

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to ]. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the ], which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> ] <small><sup>]]</sup></small> 04:10, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

== November 2019 ==
] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ].

'''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.{{Break}}''You have two editors asking you to bring this to talk. You fail to engage in discussion. Your summaries are such as "YOU CAN'T CHANGE AS MUCH AS I CAN.CHANGE! YOU WILL SEE!!!" And now you have gone over 3R after a warning from an administrator. Not sure I can help you anymore so please self-revert. Thanks.''<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 04:56, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

== Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion ==
]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at ] regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on ]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. ] (]) 18:15, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px">]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''48 hours''' for ] and violating the ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ].</div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the ], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}. &nbsp;]<sup>]</sup> 18:32, 6 November 2019 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-3block -->
*While blocked, please review the information and links that have been provided to you. Per long-standing consensus, Misplaced Pages includes the nationality/citizenship of biography subjects in the article lead, not descent. Andreescu's Romanian descent is correctly addressed in the Early life section of the article where it is supported by reliable sources. You can read more about this at ]. Once the block expires, please ensure you do not continue to add descent to the lead unless you are able to gain ] to do so on the article talk page. -- ]<sup>]</sup> 18:43, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
* Your block has been extended for apparent ]. ] (]) 08:13, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

==Suck-puppetry?==
Using an IP account as was done with 82.137.8.243 in this edit at , isn't really going to help your situation. Wouldn't it be better to try and work with others? Different wording has been inserted to make things clearer within the guidelines of Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 01:03, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 08:13, 7 November 2019

Welcome!

Welcome to Misplaced Pages!

Hello, Dindin911, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some tips that you might find helpful:

  • Link to other articles with ]
  • Add pictures from Wikimedia Commons using ]
    • Example ]
    • Click here for an exercise in adding images to articles.
  • Now you know how to add pictures to Misplaced Pages, why not add your own? This shows you articles that are near you. Is there one without a picture or where you could take a better one? In many countries modern buildings are still copyrighted, but not in the UK and some other places. This is the upload page on Wikimedia Commons.
  • Add headings with ==double equal signs==
    • If an article has sections two editors can edit different sections simultaneously without edit conflicts. Four or more sections and you get a table of contents.
    • Here are articles where you can practice adding sections when you've finished splitting an article into sections you can delete {{sections|date=Month year}} from the top of the page.
      • ===subheadings are similar===
  • When you add information to Misplaced Pages please summarize things in your own words, and tell us where you got the information from in the following format <ref></ref>
  • If you find unreferenced information on Misplaced Pages that you consider dubious or unlikely, first try to reference it yourself. If you know it is wrong, correct it, if you can't find a source then {{fact}} adds the famous . If, after a week no-one has referenced the information, feel free to remove it.
  • ''Double single quotes'' gives you Italic and '''triple quotes''' Bold.

Many Wikipedians organise themselves by subject area, we have hundreds of WikiProjects ranging from Arts to Zoology, and I'm sure there will be ones that fit your interests. A good place to look for them is Category:WikiProjects by topic, alternatively the talkpages of articles you are interested in may have links to relevant Wikiprojects.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this adds your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, visit The Teahouse, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! ϢereSpielChequers 07:01, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

[REDACTED]
Hello, Dindin911. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES DESiegel Contribs 07:27, 27 October 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.

Your thread has been archived

[REDACTED]

Hi Dindin911! You created a thread called minor edit at Misplaced Pages:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 30 October 2019 (UTC)


Bianca Andreescu origin

Things about Bianca Andreescu's heritage belong in the prose section, not the lead. And it is there. MOS is clear that the introductory sentence should mention nationality (which is Canadian), not her heritage. If you want to expand that section, be my guest, but she was born in Canada and plays for Canada. Fyunck(click) (talk) 21:48, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Misplaced Pages this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Paul Erik 04:10, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

November 2019

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Bianca Andreescu shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You have two editors asking you to bring this to talk. You fail to engage in discussion. Your summaries are such as "YOU CAN'T CHANGE AS MUCH AS I CAN.CHANGE! YOU WILL SEE!!!" And now you have gone over 3R after a warning from an administrator. Not sure I can help you anymore so please self-revert. Thanks. Fyunck(click) (talk) 04:56, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Sportsfan77777 (talk) 18:15, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jezebel's Ponyo 18:32, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
  • While blocked, please review the information and links that have been provided to you. Per long-standing consensus, Misplaced Pages includes the nationality/citizenship of biography subjects in the article lead, not descent. Andreescu's Romanian descent is correctly addressed in the Early life section of the article where it is supported by reliable sources. You can read more about this at MOS:ETHNICITY. Once the block expires, please ensure you do not continue to add descent to the lead unless you are able to gain consensus to do so on the article talk page. -- Jezebel's Ponyo 18:43, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Your block has been extended for apparent block evasion. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:13, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Suck-puppetry?

Using an IP account as was done with 82.137.8.243 in this edit at Bianca Andreescu, isn't really going to help your situation. Wouldn't it be better to try and work with others? Different wording has been inserted to make things clearer within the guidelines of Misplaced Pages. Fyunck(click) (talk) 01:03, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

User talk:Dindin911: Difference between revisions Add topic