| Revision as of 23:50, 5 November 2019 editCommanderLinx (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,037 edits →100?: don't need potentially 600 people on this list← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 17:36, 19 January 2025 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,311,938 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:List of oldest living people/Archive 20) (bot |
| (603 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{Talkheader}} |
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|blp=yes|1= |
|
| ⚫ |
{{WPBiography|living=yes|class=List|listas=Living Supercentenarians, List Of}} |
|
| ⚫ |
{{WikiProject World's Oldest People|class=List|importance=Top}} |
|
|
{{WP Lists|class=list}} |
|
| ⚫ |
}} |
|
|
{{annual readership}} |
|
{{annual readership}} |
|
{{Old AfD multi | date = August 10, 2007 | votepage = List of living supercentenarians | date2 = 23 December 2015 | result2 = '''speedy keep''' | page2 = List of oldest living people}} |
|
{{Old AfD multi | date = August 10, 2007 | votepage = List of living supercentenarians | date2 = 23 December 2015 | result2 = '''speedy keep''' | page2 = List of oldest living people}} |
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject banner shell|blp=yes|class=List|listas=Living Supercentenarians, List Of| |
| ⚫ |
{{Copied|from=List of oldest living people|from_oldid=696430259|to=Oldest people|to_diff=696633192|to_oldid=696444175|date=2015 December 23}} |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Biography}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Longevity|importance=Top}} |
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Lists|class=List|importance=Mid}} |
|
⚫ |
}} |
|
⚫ |
{{Copied|from=List of oldest living people|from_oldid=696430259|to=Oldest people|to_diff=696633192|to_oldid=696444175|date=23 December 2015}} |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav|noredlinks=y}} |
|
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav|noredlinks=y}} |
|
|maxarchivesize = 100K |
|
|maxarchivesize = 100K |
|
|counter = 18 |
|
|counter = 20 |
|
|algo = old(30d) |
|
|algo = old(60d) |
|
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|
|minthreadsleft = 2 |
|
|minthreadsleft = 2 |
|
|archive = Talk:List of the oldest living people/Archive %(counter)d |
|
|archive = Talk:List of oldest living people/Archive %(counter)d |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
{{archives |
|
|
|auto = short |
|
|
|index = /Archive index |
|
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
== New part of HTML comment at top of list == |
|
|
|
|
|
Lately it has been common for a GRG-validated person to die and for GRG's list to have them on their list for a few days after their death. For this reason, I want to know if anyone can add the following information to the HTML comment: |
|
|
|
|
|
Having a reliable source revealing the person died is sufficient for a person to be removed from the list; there is NO requirement that the person has been removed from GRG's list. |
|
|
|
|
|
] (]) 18:50, 8 October 2019 (UTC) |
|
| ⚫ |
:Correct. If someone on the list has been reported to have died by a reliable source then they should be removed. Whether or not they have been reported by the GRG as deceased is irrelevant. ] <sup>(] ])</sup> 07:12, 9 October 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Gustav Gerneth == |
|
== 129 years == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
swami sivananda from India he is 129 years old and still alive his DOB-8-august-1896] (]) 18:54, 19 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
It seems that Gustav Gerneth passed away: https://www.volksstimme.de/sachsen-anhalt/todesfall-114-jaehriger-aus-havelberg-gestorben ] (]) 19:24, 22 October 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
|
:He is in ] where he belongs. ] <sup>(] ])</sup> 20:53, 19 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Semi-protected edit request on 6 January 2025 == |
|
== Sourcing issues == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{edit semi-protected|List of oldest living people|answered=yes}} |
|
I have just removed seven individuals for various sourcing issues (sources are fan websites, no date of birth, not about them, etc.) Many of these individuals have been added by @]. TFBCT1, do not add individuals who do not have actual reliable sources that are dated within one year and have a reliably sourced date of birth. Also, when adding an individual, you must fill out the whole citation, never just slap in a url and call it a day. All such contributions do more harm then good and need to stop. If such conduct continues, any editor may be taken to ANI. ] (]) 13:58, 3 November 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
|
Add |
|
:The HTML comment at the top of the list already says that the Gerontology Wiki at Wikia and the 110 Club are not reliable sources. Any other un-reliable sources that it's important for the HTML comment to emphasize?? ] (]) 14:39, 3 November 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
|
rank = 1 |
|
::@] Thank you for the support. Not sure if it will do any good to add them, but the additional fan websites used here were: supercentenariditalia.it and najstarsipolacy.pl The more fundamental problem, unfortunately, is TFBCT1's longstanding refusal to follow the policies of this and other related pages and just adding people based on what Gerontology Wiki says about them. ] (]) 14:53, 3 November 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
|
name = Umarova Khuvayda |
|
:::One thing to know is that unlike most Wikia wikis it stayed at Wikia rather than going to Fandom. If I were to guess a reason, I would guess it's because it's about a formal subject. ] (]) 15:09, 3 November 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
|
sex = F |
|
|
birth date = 01.01.1895 |
|
|
age as of 6 january 2025 = 130 years, 5 days |
|
|
country of residence = Uzbekistan |
|
|
] (]) 19:24, 6 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
:Not verified, not eligible for this page. Upper limit for ] (where she was previously listed) is 130. Claims over 130 can be included in ]. ] <sup>(] ])</sup> 19:39, 6 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
::Thank you all for your support and appreciation for the time and effort I put into trying to keep pages updated and current when other editors go on sabbatical for weeks and contribute nothing. Also, thank you to Newshunter12 for his keen eye, if only he could contribute more consistently instead of popping up every once in awhile to push his agenda. For the record, I have never used Gerentology Wiki as a source, and nowhere does it state that using a sole url is inadequate. Newshunter12 has a habit of making up his own rules as part of his OCD nature,] (]) 15:58, 3 November 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Izabel Rosa Pereira == |
|
I just reviewed the individuals removed by Newshunter12. Four of the seven were added by me of the recent near 25 I have added to this list to keep it updated. I am in disagreement with two that were removed, but will not contest do to the editor’s uncompromising nature. I will here admonish Newshunter12 not to threaten me on public talk pages for “good faith” errors or I will be forced to take action against him. It appears by the page history that your edits have not been well accepted by all.] (]) 16:19, 3 November 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Izabel Rosa Pereira is the only person in the list not being veryfied by Gerontology Research Group. Checking "LongeviQuest", I could not even find an article in Misplaced Pages about this group. How reliable is it? Is Mrs Pereira's age verified by other groups or at least accepted for approval by Gerontology Research Group? Does it make sense to keep her listed in top ten without further evidence? |
|
== 100? == |
|
|
|
Kind regards |
|
|
Michael ] (]) 21:28, 6 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
:] founder Robert Young is formerly of the GRG. The fans of each organization may disagree, but Misplaced Pages regards them as equally ]. ] <sup>(] ])</sup> 22:11, 6 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
why 100 oldest living people? why not limit on 110 year?--] (]) 09:54, 4 November 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
:The GRG estimates there's between 150 and 600 living 110+ year olds. Do we really need a list of roughly 600 people on it? That'd be a maintenance hassle. ] (]) 23:50, 5 November 2019 (UTC) |
|
Izabel Rosa Pereira is the only person in the list not being veryfied by Gerontology Research Group. Checking "LongeviQuest", I could not even find an article in Misplaced Pages about this group. How reliable is it? Is Mrs Pereira's age verified by other groups or at least accepted for approval by Gerontology Research Group? Does it make sense to keep her listed in top ten without further evidence?
Kind regards
Michael 2A02:3033:701:FD68:A9CB:FA69:5C2:5C5 (talk) 21:28, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
