Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Tim Kincaid: Difference between revisions

< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 13:57, 30 July 2020 editAlejandroLeloirRey (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users1,336 edits →Tim Kincaid ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 16:20, 5 August 2020 edit undoTimothyBlue (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users38,395 edits →Tim Kincaid: Closed as speedy keep (XFDcloser)
(21 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
			<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
⚫	===]===
			:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
	{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD\|B}}
			<!--Template:Afd top

			Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

			The result was '''speedy keep'''. Per nominators request in discussion comment, the nomination is withdrawn as a '''Speedy Keep''' <small>]</small> <span style="font-family:Courier New, Courier, monospace;"><strong>  // ] :: </strong>] </span> 16:20, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
		⚫	===]===
	<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>		<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
	:{{la\|Tim Kincaid}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks"></span>)		:{{la\|Tim Kincaid}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks"></span>)
Line 11:		Line 16:
	* '''Weak keep''' per ]. Can't say it reads terribly well, though. ] (]) 14:21, 29 July 2020 (UTC)		* '''Weak keep''' per ]. Can't say it reads terribly well, though. ] (]) 14:21, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
	*'''Keep''', and '''Ugh! Here we go again nominating another AVN Hall of famer'''. Meets GNG, and this is undoubtedly another of noms less than stellar job at any semblance of following ] and actually looking for sources. ] (]) 10:45, 30 July 2020 (UTC)		*'''Keep''', and '''Ugh! Here we go again nominating another AVN Hall of famer'''. Meets GNG, and this is undoubtedly another of noms less than stellar job at any semblance of following ] and actually looking for sources. ] (]) 10:45, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
	:{{ping\|Gleeanon409}} stop attacking me. I am tired of you. just talk about the subject. --] (]) 13:57, 30 July 2020 (UTC)		::{{ping\|Gleeanon409}} stop attacking me. I am tired of you. just talk about the subject. hall of fame means nothing, we need sources, if there are available sources to prove notability the article has to stay. this is it. --] (]) 13:57, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
			:*{{ping\|Gleeanon409}} One more time, porn awards, including Hall of Fame, don't count towards notability without independent RS acknowledgement. That said, a Google Books search for Tim Kincaid/Joe Gage brings up some interesting hits. It would be more productive to identify the good sources than to beat the PORNBIO dead horse. ] (]) 00:45, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
			::*I wasn’t beating pornbio, I was pointing out that nom’s track record includes targeting other AVN Hall of Famers and this has been a waste of everyone’s time and energy.{{pb}}Nom has been shown to utterly fail in looking for, and identifying sources, consistently. And when others do he typically builds walls of texts frustrating the entire process. It’s hard to continue to see their efforts as good faith concerns, or something else could be going on. In any case it’s wasting a lot of energy on the community to deal with. ] (]) 01:09, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
			:::*AVN/GayVN Hall of Fame <u>is</u> an appeal to PORNBIO, and it does not count anymore. My observation of the nominator's track record is that more articles are getting deleted than kept. The last GayVN Hall of Fame member result was no consensus. One of the most recent AVN Hall of Fame members (Sharon Kane) was no consensus. Please argue the sources, policies and guidelines, not the nominator. ] (]) 06:11, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
			::::*That anyone is able to delete crap articles is unsurprising and a red herring. The issue is not, or unable to look for and locate obvious sources, wasting the community’s energy.{{pb}}I was not appealing to pornbio even if you read it that way. Having said that, if one’s goal is to delete as many gay male porn bios as possible maybe avoid the ones who have the industry’s highest awards and focus on the rest. ] (]) 06:25, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
			:<span style="font-size: 85%;">Note: This debate has been added to the ] ]. ] (]) 00:36, 1 August 2020 (UTC)</span>
			:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ]. ] (]) 00:37, 1 August 2020 (UTC)</small>
			:::::{{ping\|Gleeanon409}} ok, someone needs to help me with this person because I can't stand his accusation no more. I nominated 39 articles (getting rid of garbage porn bios), 7 where kept, 2 where No Consensus, 24 where deleted and 6 are not closed yet. Now, please, please, please someone stop this person from molesting me otherwise I will end up telling him and I will be the blocked one at the end. --] (]) 08:43, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
			::::::Just actually do the research work instead of whatever you have been doing. Or better yet try improving an article on one’s you do like. ] (]) 09:27, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

			*'''Keep''' per ] and possibly ]. Despite the article's junk-quality references, this filmmaker's mainstream and porn work gets sufficient available RS coverage. Both the director and the film articles can be improved. ] (]) 01:00, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
			*'''Keep''' per ]; he's the director of two notable films. — ] (]) 02:52, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
			*'''comment''' reading your votes I can see I did a bad nomination and I would like to withdraw it so that I don't waist other people time any longer. the problem is that this discussion became the focus of another discussion and I don't want to make mistakes. --] (]) 18:44, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
			{{clear}}
			:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 16:20, 5 August 2020

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Per nominators request in discussion comment, the nomination is withdrawn as a Speedy Keep (non-admin closure) // Timothy :: talk 16:20, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Tim Kincaid

New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

sources do not offer evidence of notability. further independent search didn't yield any better sources. AlejandroLeloirRey (talk) 09:02, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

Keep seems to pass WP:GNG and director of notable films Robot Holocaust and Breeders. Theroadislong (talk) 09:13, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 09:35, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 09:35, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

Weak keep per Theroadislong. Can't say it reads terribly well, though. Skylar MacDonald (talk) 14:21, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
Keep, and Ugh! Here we go again nominating another AVN Hall of famer. Meets GNG, and this is undoubtedly another of noms less than stellar job at any semblance of following WP:Before and actually looking for sources. Gleeanon409 (talk) 10:45, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

@Gleeanon409: stop attacking me. I am tired of you. just talk about the subject. hall of fame means nothing, we need sources, if there are available sources to prove notability the article has to stay. this is it. --AlejandroLeloirRey (talk) 13:57, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

@Gleeanon409: One more time, porn awards, including Hall of Fame, don't count towards notability without independent RS acknowledgement. That said, a Google Books search for Tim Kincaid/Joe Gage brings up some interesting hits. It would be more productive to identify the good sources than to beat the PORNBIO dead horse. • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

I wasn’t beating pornbio, I was pointing out that nom’s track record includes targeting other AVN Hall of Famers and this has been a waste of everyone’s time and energy.Nom has been shown to utterly fail in looking for, and identifying sources, consistently. And when others do he typically builds walls of texts frustrating the entire process. It’s hard to continue to see their efforts as good faith concerns, or something else could be going on. In any case it’s wasting a lot of energy on the community to deal with. Gleeanon409 (talk) 01:09, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

AVN/GayVN Hall of Fame is an appeal to PORNBIO, and it does not count anymore. My observation of the nominator's track record is that more articles are getting deleted than kept. The last GayVN Hall of Fame member result was no consensus. One of the most recent AVN Hall of Fame members (Sharon Kane) was no consensus. Please argue the sources, policies and guidelines, not the nominator. • Gene93k (talk) 06:11, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

That anyone is able to delete crap articles is unsurprising and a red herring. The issue is not, or unable to look for and locate obvious sources, wasting the community’s energy.I was not appealing to pornbio even if you read it that way. Having said that, if one’s goal is to delete as many gay male porn bios as possible maybe avoid the ones who have the industry’s highest awards and focus on the rest. Gleeanon409 (talk) 06:25, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:36, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:37, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

@Gleeanon409: ok, someone needs to help me with this person because I can't stand his accusation no more. I nominated 39 articles (getting rid of garbage porn bios), 7 where kept, 2 where No Consensus, 24 where deleted and 6 are not closed yet. Now, please, please, please someone stop this person from molesting me otherwise I will end up telling him and I will be the blocked one at the end. --AlejandroLeloirRey (talk) 08:43, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Just actually do the research work instead of whatever you have been doing. Or better yet try improving an article on one’s you do like. Gleeanon409 (talk) 09:27, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Keep per WP:CREATIVE and possibly WP:BASIC. Despite the article's junk-quality references, this filmmaker's mainstream and porn work gets sufficient available RS coverage. Both the director and the film articles can be improved. • Gene93k (talk) 01:00, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Keep per WP:CREATIVE; he's the director of two notable films. — Toughpigs (talk) 02:52, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
comment reading your votes I can see I did a bad nomination and I would like to withdraw it so that I don't waist other people time any longer. the problem is that this discussion became the focus of another discussion and I don't want to make mistakes. --AlejandroLeloirRey (talk) 18:44, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.