Revision as of 18:59, 16 August 2020 editHako9 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers8,346 edits →Ayurveda RfC close: rfc close comment← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 20:55, 14 November 2024 edit undoThe Grid (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers22,287 edits Notification: proposed deletion of Plaza South Tower.Tag: Twinkle | ||
(157 intermediate revisions by 60 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{not around|3=March 2022}} | |||
{{User:MrX/navbar}} | |||
== 😔 == | |||
{{Ds/aware|ap|blp|e-e|a-i}} | |||
--] (]) 19:50, 10 September 2020 (UTC) | |||
{{Archive box|box-width=160px|collapsed=yes| | |||
:I think we can agree on that one. Me and MrX rarely agreed either but that does not mean I wanted to see them leave like this. I do hope you return. ] (]) 19:55, 10 September 2020 (UTC) | |||
'''2011'''<br> | |||
::I endorse this comment. I always viewed MrX as someone I could approach for a better discussion no matter if we disagreed on the content. ] (]) 20:44, 10 September 2020 (UTC) | |||
*]<br><br> | |||
: Well that's a shame. I was going to ask MrX to help write a refinement of the RfC guidelines to cover challenged closes, because we have terrible processes around this and it is probably the only area on Misplaced Pages where a single person can effectively mandate specific content. ''']''' <small>(] - ])</small> 21:10, 10 September 2020 (UTC) | |||
'''2012'''<br> | |||
:MrX, I do hope you return to the project, even if after you take time off. Your contributions have been superb, and greatly valued - certainly by me and many others. You know, I'm strongly reminded of a by ], talking about a difficult case: | |||
*]<br> | |||
::"Any time ] disagrees, you know you're in a difficult area. And the function of his dissent, to make us focus on what we were deciding and to make sure that we felt we were doing the right thing, I think was well-served." | |||
*]<br><br> | |||
:We the community - and ultimately our end-user, the reader - have always been well served by your contributions and wisdom. And it would be regrettable if this one messy disagreement between you and ] — two users I respect very much — led you to part ways with the project permanently. Be well, and all best wishes. --]<sup>]</sup> 21:29, 10 September 2020 (UTC) | |||
'''2013'''<br> | |||
::{{u|Neutrality}}, Thank you. I like and respect MrX. I am mystified by the trajectory this has taken, and genuinely mortified that he has expressed a desire to leave, on which I hope he reconsiders. I hope people will take a look at {{section link|Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for comment|Process for challenging closes}}. ''']''' <small>(] - ])</small> 21:37, 10 September 2020 (UTC) | |||
*]<br> | |||
* I'm sorry that you're taking a break because of this, it's unnecessary, except of course as merited holiday if stress was too high. It's unfortunate when what should be a hobby becomes responsibility, work and no play (and that of course happens because we care about the project). I hope to see you around again when you feel like it, —]] – 02:03, 12 September 2020 (UTC) | |||
*]<br> | |||
*]<br> | |||
*]<br><br> | |||
'''2014'''<br> | |||
*]<br> | |||
*]<br> | |||
*]<br> | |||
*] | |||
'''2015'''<br> | |||
*]<br> | |||
*]<br> | |||
*]<br> | |||
*] | |||
'''2016'''<br> | |||
*]<br> | |||
*]<br> | |||
*]<br> | |||
*] | |||
'''2017'''<br> | |||
*]<br> | |||
*]<br> | |||
*]<br> | |||
*] | |||
'''2018'''<br> | |||
*]<br> | |||
*]<br> | |||
*]<br> | |||
*] | |||
'''2019'''<br> | |||
*]<br> | |||
*]<br> | |||
*]<br> | |||
*] | |||
'''2020'''<br> | |||
*]<br> | |||
*]<br> | |||
}} | |||
{{clear}} | |||
*Best of luck with what you do. ] (]) 13:55, 15 September 2020 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
This is a sad turn of events, but here's to happiness in your break, and in your life, MrX. ''']] (])''' 03:42, 19 September 2020 (UTC) | |||
I dont get the reason for your reversion on this page, https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Racial_views_of_Donald_Trump&diff=963838810&oldid=963812037&diffmode=source . Could you explain? ] (]) 05:23, 22 June 2020 (UTC) | |||
:You cherry picked a source unrelated to he article subject and you misrepresented what is written in the source. The effect is that the content you added violates ], ], and ]. Any further discussion about this should occur on the article talk page. - ]] 11:01, 22 June 2020 (UTC) | |||
{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' | |||
== Your inappropriate reversion of "white supremacist" assertions in Tucker Carlson article == | |||
You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called ] is in effect. Any administrator may impose ] on editors who do not strictly follow ], or the ], when making edits related to the topic. | |||
The Tucker Carlson article falls under ]. The cited sources do not support the assertions in the article text about Tucker Carlson and white supremacy. Also, you assert that the label used in my edit was false. It is not. Read the source articles. The info in the sources simply does not support the assertions in the articles. As currently written, the Tucker Carlson article is libelous and unsupported by a source on the issue of white supremacy. Obviously, that is unacceptable under[REDACTED] guidelines. ] (]) 20:30, 19 July 2020 (UTC) | |||
:Discuss it on the article talk talk page please. - ]] 20:44, 19 July 2020 (UTC) | |||
For additional information, please see the ] and the ] decision ]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. | |||
==You need to self-revert== | |||
}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert -->{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' | |||
Editing my comments as you did is a violation of the special discretionary sanction placed on the top of the page by ] which state "You additionally may not edit, remove, or alter comments by other editors for '''any reason''' other than clear BLP violations or obvious vandalism as a page specific discretionary sanction." (emphasis mine)--] (]) 17:12, 21 July 2020 (UTC) | |||
:Did he edit your comment? No. Did he remove your comment? No. Did he alter your comment? No. Was your comment in the wrong place? Yes. Is it fair to place one of your comments above all other comments so that your opinion has extra prominence? No. Is it fair to allow you to comment in two places when everyone else is limited to commenting in one place? No. Would I have moved your comment if I had noticed it? In a heartbeat. --] (]) 21:09, 21 July 2020 (UTC) | |||
You have shown interest in articles about ], and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called ] is in effect. Any administrator may impose ] on editors who do not strictly follow ], or the ], when making edits related to the topic. | |||
== 2020 Trump endorsement == | |||
For additional information, please see the ] and the ] decision ]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. | |||
You say on this page that you reverted one of my edits, but which one? I can’t seem to figure that one out ] (]) 14:43, 23 July 2020 (UTC) | |||
}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> - ]] 21:03, 19 March 2022 (UTC) | |||
:Hmm. I'm not sure where you see that {{u|Lima Bean Farmer}}. I , not yours. - ]] 15:42, 23 July 2020 (UTC) | |||
I misread that! Never mind, sorry about that! ] (]) 16:25, 23 July 2020 (UTC) | |||
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
== Consensus == | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | If you ever come back, here's some tea for you. Lucky wiki-tea doesn't get cold. ''']] (])''' 14:34, 25 September 2020 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
*Rather late here due to my break, but like others I wish you well and happiness in your life. I'll never forget the help you gave me when I first started here and even after that, you remained someone I could look up to as an editor for his wisdom and who always remained civil even amidst the most controversial discussions. -] (]) 14:30, 26 May 2021 (UTC) | |||
Regarding , the discussion has not concluded nor been closed, and the wording has not yet been agreed. Until that clearly happens the current consensus of no consensus needs to be respected. ] (]) 14:15, 30 July 2020 (UTC) | |||
:::Thank you {{U|Neutrality}}, {{u|Starship.paint}}, {{U|Kraose}}, {{U|Ugog Nizdast}}, and {{U|Mr Ernie}}. I appreciate your heartfelt kindness. - ]] 21:03, 19 March 2022 (UTC) | |||
:Discussions do not have to be formally closed when their outcomes are clear. Unanimity is not required. More editors have agreed to the wording or a close analogue, but if your complaint is that the WHO withdrawal is missing, you could certainly add that without objection. | |||
:By the way, citing a no consensus from a convenience list of previous consensuses tends to look a bit ]. Word to the wise. - ]] 14:33, 30 July 2020 (UTC) | |||
::The addition was a bit too early in my opinion. I'm not sure what you mean about WP:TEND - I thought the consensus list was there for more than convenience. I do, however, need all the words of wisdom I can get. ] (]) 14:38, 30 July 2020 (UTC) | |||
:::I have summarized consensus no less that three times and no one has seriously disputed my summaries. Only Markbassett has inexplicably claimed that there is consensus for "oppose all". - ]] 14:48, 30 July 2020 (UTC) | |||
:That convenience list is not an exemption from revert protocols. Citing it as such is indeed disruptive.]] 15:38, 30 July 2020 (UTC) | |||
::::MrX, I am so happy to hear from you. I hope that you are well, these have been tough times indeed. ''']] (])''' 12:38, 20 March 2022 (UTC) | |||
== Table == | |||
== A toast sandwich for you! == | |||
The table you made attempting to summarize editor views for covid text in the Trump lead is impressive. When I saw that discussion start I wondered how anyone could possibly wade through the outcome... you did a great job! -] (]) 17:37, 30 July 2020 (UTC) | |||
:Thanks. It wasn't easy. - ]] 17:49, 30 July 2020 (UTC) | |||
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
== Hyphens in refnames == | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Looks like I missed something a few months ago, and only just realized I hadn't seen your name around in a while. | |||
Looking at the food or drink items in the WikiLove gadget like greeting cards, I'm thinking about the signification of the various options. Something sweet? Savory? Coffee/tea seem pretty generally friendly, I guess. I'll go with toast sandwich because I have no idea what that would mean to receive a toast sandwich. Kind of a "huh?" -- but maybe a "huh?" that draws your attention to Misplaced Pages long enough to come back after a break. — <samp>] <sup style="font-size:80%;">]</sup></samp> \\ 16:47, 16 January 2021 (UTC) | |||
I initially removed the leading hyphen from the refname in , thinking it was a typo. Upon checking the results I saw the big red error, "The <ref> tag name cannot be a simple integer". I submit that (1) other editors may also see that as a typo, and (2) many editors are less diligent about checking their work. That being the case, and feeling that unnecessary opportunities for big red errors should be avoided, I wonder if you could adopt a naming convention that looks less like a typo. I think you used to include the first author's surname, but if you feel that's too long you could do something like "R" in place of the hyphen, i.e. name=R200730. This is assuming you feel that refnames are important for refs used only once, and that's a whole separate discussion. ―] ] 20:26, 31 July 2020 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
:Thank you ]. I appreciate your sentiment. And I've always appreciated your insightful comments that accrue to the benefit of Misplaced Pages. - ]] 20:43, 19 March 2022 (UTC) | |||
== Some baklava for you! == | |||
Ah, I now see that that source has no author, so I see your method. Perhaps <code>name=Noname-200730</code>? ―] ] 20:36, 31 July 2020 (UTC) | |||
:Yeah, I use a <s>customized</s> hacked version of ProveIt that automatically generates the refname by concatenating the date, a hyphen, and the last name of the first author. I thought that I had a default value in case there was no last name, but it looks like the script needs some more tweaking. - ]] 21:30, 31 July 2020 (UTC) | |||
::I see. Pending said tweaking, any objection to my inserting "Noname" in these cases? There is one other now in that article. ―] ] 21:32, 31 July 2020 (UTC) | |||
:::No objection, but don't you think the pub name would be more useful than "Noname"? Something like <code><ref name=NYT-200730></code>. - ]] 21:42, 31 July 2020 (UTC) | |||
::::Sure, that makes sense. Speaking of tweaking, maybe it could be further tweaked to omit the space after each pipe character. This is consistent with the output of ] (e.g. {{para|first|Bob}}) and all CS1 doc, and is one of the most widely accepted conventions in CS1 cites. ―] ] 21:50, 31 July 2020 (UTC) | |||
:::::Sure, I'll put that on my to do list. - ]] 22:04, 31 July 2020 (UTC) | |||
::::::{{done}} - ]] 00:33, 1 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
:::::::Cool, much appreciated. ―] ] 00:38, 1 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
{{od}} | |||
See ]. I didn't see any "big red error". I am going to ask that ] add this as to the list of things it fixes. --] (]) 22:34, 31 July 2020 (UTC) | |||
:My big red error was (permalink). No explanation for the discrepancy. ―] ] 22:47, 31 July 2020 (UTC) | |||
::Well, ''that's'' annoying! I cut and pasted your version into my sandbox. No big red error. --] (]) 01:26, 1 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
== Kamala Harris == | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
Please explain your removal of the text "Her romantic relationship with Speaker Brown introduced Harris to political and social elites who aided launch of her own political career" in the Kamala Harris Misplaced Pages article. There is ongoing discussion about the Willie Brown-Kamala Harris on the Kamala Harris talk page. I posted a statement explaining my inserted text. I substantiated by text with five references to reliable sources. Yet you removed 100% of my text without making any comment on the Talk page. Your 100% veto of all of the proposed text, without any justification of your 100% veto on the Talk page, is not a good faith attempt on your part to reach consensus. Please ameliorate this by justifying your action on the Kamala Harris Talk page under the Willie Brown/Kamala Harris Romantic Relationship thread. ] (]) 22:55, 1 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Also miss having MrX around. Great contributor. ] (]) 18:43, 17 January 2021 (UTC) | |||
:On the article talk page please. - ]] 22:57, 1 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
==Orphaned non-free image File:Tea Party Patriots Logo.png== | |||
:Thank you, ], for your kindness. - ]] 20:38, 19 March 2022 (UTC) | |||
] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
== Precious anniversary == | |||
Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 20:45, 2 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
{{User QAIbox/auto|years=Seven}} | |||
miss you --] (]) 12:29, 8 August 2021 (UTC:) | |||
:Thank you ] for you making Wikipeidia exceptional, as you always do. - ]] 20:35, 19 March 2022 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
== I don't want to sidetrack that thread == | |||
<div class="afd-notice"> | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
so here are ten examples. --]] 00:39, 3 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
:Russia Today? Are you actually serious? - ]] 00:47, 3 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
:By the way, I'm open to the idea that CNN has declined in reliability and that their commentary has infected their newscasts, but my comment on RSN was in reference to discussions on Misplaced Pages. I hope we can we agree not to use a wholly unreliable source to impugn another source. - ]] 00:52, 3 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
::"CNN is unreliable because Russian state propaganda says so" is not the most convincing argument. But such are the times we live in, I guess. ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 01:42, 3 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. | |||
== Another barnstar for you! == | |||
<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> <span style="font-family: Times;">] (] • ])</span> 02:33, 13 August 2021 (UTC) | |||
== Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed == | |||
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Special Barnstar''' | |||
|- | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | is a work of art that speaks for many of your fellow editors. ] (]) 14:12, 4 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
Hello '''MrX'''! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to ] may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the ]. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at ]. Thank you! <span style="font-family:sans-serif">— <span style="font-weight:bold">] <sup>]</sup></span></span> 17:18, 14 September 2021 (UTC) | |||
:Barnstar ornaments don't do justice to MrX's tireless efforts. Maybe a country barn-raising with a spruce bough at the peak and new digs for his livestock? ]] 14:20, 4 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
::Also, the was an almost comically perfect textbook example. -- ] (]) 15:41, 4 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
:::Thank you for your recognition {{u|Scjessey}} and {{u|SPECIFICO}}. It gives me no joy to have had to raise these issues with Markbassett, but like you said, I also speak for other editors. I wish he had been at least somewhat receptive to the concerns I raised. It looks like he has been topic banned, which is not the outcome I was hoping for, but it's also not unexpected. - ]] 17:39, 4 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
== Boo! == | |||
==]== | |||
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:#000; background-color:#FFB924; border-width:2px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">]] | |||
{{Center|'''''{{resize|187%|Happy ]!}}'''''}} | |||
Hi MrX, | |||
---- | |||
'''Hello {{{user|{{<includeonly>SUBST:</includeonly>BASEPAGENAME}}}}}:<br>Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Misplaced Pages, and have a happy and enjoyable ]!'''<br /> —usernamekiran • sign the ] • ] 22:19, 30 October 2021 (UTC)<br /><br /></div> | |||
{{clear}} | |||
== Nomination for deletion of ] == | |||
]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> <span style="color:green">'''Ten Pound Hammer'''</span> • <sup>(])</sup> 00:45, 7 November 2021 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
The ] introduction currently states: | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''', to which you have , is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or if it should be ]. | |||
The discussion will take place at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. | |||
Those who subscribe to the theory speculate that the purpose of the chemical release may be solar radiation management, weather modification, psychological manipulation, human population control, '''biological or chemical warfare, or testing of biological or chemical agents on a population, and that the trails are causing respiratory illnesses and other health problems.''' | |||
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit ]. Delivered by '']'' (]) 01:01, 25 November 2021 (UTC)<!-- User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier/template --> | |||
If you want to debate that portion please use the ] to do so, rather than on the associated template. Thanks. | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
Best, | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''', to which you have , is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or if it should be ]. | |||
] (]) 00:09, 7 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
:{{u|Altanner1991}} If you want to add this to the template, you really need to seek consensus on the '''template talk page''' (see ]). Chemtrails are not a form of medicine (nor are any of the things you listed) and since this has been removed from the template before, I think you have an uphill climb. - ]] 00:33, 7 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
The discussion will take place at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. | |||
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit ]. Delivered by '']'' (]) 01:02, 25 November 2021 (UTC)<!-- User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier/template --> | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''', to which you have , is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or if it should be ]. | |||
The discussion will take place at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. | |||
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit ]. Delivered by '']'' (]) 01:02, 25 November 2021 (UTC)<!-- User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier/template --> | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''', to which you have , is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or if it should be ]. | |||
The discussion will take place at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. | |||
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit ]. Delivered by '']'' (]) 01:02, 25 November 2021 (UTC)<!-- User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier/template --> | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''', to which you have , is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or if it should be ]. | |||
The discussion will take place at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. | |||
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit ]. Delivered by '']'' (]) 01:02, 25 November 2021 (UTC)<!-- User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier/template --> | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''', to which you have , is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or if it should be ]. | |||
The discussion will take place at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. | |||
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit ]. Delivered by '']'' (]) 01:01, 26 November 2021 (UTC)<!-- User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier/template --> | |||
==Request to remove TBAN== | |||
.] (]) 05:39, 22 May 2022 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
<div class="afd-notice"> | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. | |||
<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> –] (]]) 01:38, 4 June 2022 (UTC) | |||
== You have been pruned from a list == | |||
'''Hi MrX!''' You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at ], but you haven't made any edits to the English Misplaced Pages in over 3 months. | |||
Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting ]. | |||
'''Thank you!''' | |||
Message delivered to you with love by ] :) | Is this wrong? Contact ]. | Sent at 18:43, 27 June 2022 (UTC) | |||
== Precious anniversary == | == Precious anniversary == | ||
{{User QAIbox/auto|years= |
{{User QAIbox/auto|years=Eight}} | ||
--] (]) 06:50, 8 August 2022 (UTC) | |||
==Happy holidays!== | |||
== Closure of ] == | |||
] | |||
Happy Holidays and Happy New Year, MrX! | |||
The other day, I was having a conversation with someone about holiday cards and social media. It occurred to me that, in the years since I left Facebook, the site I use most to communicate with people I like isn't actually a social media site at all. If you're receiving this, it's pretty likely I've talked with you more recently than I have my distant relatives and college friends on FB, at very least, and we may have even collaborated on something useful. So here's a holiday "card", Misplaced Pages friend. :) Hope the next couple weeks bring some fun and/or rest. — <samp>] <sup style="font-size:80%;">]</sup></samp> \\ 18:37, 22 December 2022 (UTC) | |||
Hi MrX, | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
<br> | |||
] | |||
I noticed that you closed this discussion with a consensus to adopt the first two proposals, but you didn't actually change the guideline regarding that. If you could do that, that would be helpful. ] (]) 19:04, 14 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
:{{re|Interstellarity}} That's not really part of closing an RfC (although some closers do choose to implement consensus). ] is not edit protected, so you can implement the changes yourself, of perhaps {{u|Opera hat}} could do it since they initiated the proposal. - ]] 19:14, 14 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
== Kamala Harris Truancy Source Conformity == | |||
<blockquote>'''Basically ]. Non-notable product. Orphaned for a decade.'''</blockquote> | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
Hi, | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
your revision https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Kamala_Harris&oldid=972551393 overlaps with my ]. Could you please take a look and address the request? | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] ] 19:00, 8 July 2023 (UTC) | |||
Thanks! | |||
==Orphaned non-free image File:Chuice Logo.png== | |||
] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 02:10, 19 July 2023 (UTC) | |||
Best regards | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
--] (]) 14:30, 15 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
<blockquote>'''Non-notable railroad spur, not a "community" and never was. Two of the cited sources are GNIS (which is insufficient for notability); the fourth is the census bureau (which has no such entry), and reference 1 plainly says this was a rail spur. Therefore the article is inaccurate as well as a failure of ] and ].'''</blockquote> | |||
:I will comment on the article talk page. - ]] 15:22, 15 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
:: Thanks. ] (]) 17:04, 15 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
== PinkNews == | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
Thank you for closing the RfC about PinkNews at RSN. Based on your closure, what do you think is the most appropriate color to have it listed at ] as? Green or yellow? That is, per the criteria stated at ]. Another editor from the RfC listed it at RSP in green, and with a truncated description that left off important parts of the closure statement, so I did expand the description a bit to match the parts of the closure describing consensus and most editors, but I wanted to get your thoughts on the color. <span style="font-family:Palatino">]</span> <sup>]</sup> 03:35, 16 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
:Hi {{u|Crossroads}}. According to the consensus determined by the community and the usual way we color code the entries on RSP, I guess green is the correct color, not to say that it has to be that way. <span style="display:inline-block; background: #EEFFAA; padding:3px;">Maybe it should be something like this.</span> The words are far more important in my opinion and I'm glad you added them to the entry. The consensus was not strong and there were quite a few concerns raised by other editors about the source. You may want to consider starting a discussion on ] about it. - ]] 11:30, 16 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 19:58, 7 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
] | |||
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | ] | |||
|rowspan="2" | | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Special Barnstar''' | |||
<blockquote>'''Non-notable location, sourced only to GNIS and a place-names gazetteer, neither of which is sufficient for notability. I can find several references to artesian wells in the Moxee area, for example, but none of these refer to a "community" of Artesian. Post office does not count for notability, and the coordinates locate to empty farmland. Fails ].'''</blockquote> | |||
|- | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Awarding you with this barnstar for closing so many discussions listed on ] for months or weeks. Hope to see more diligent closures from you! ] (]) 09:39, 16 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
|} | |||
:{{thank you}} {{u|Kraose}}. - ]] 11:31, 16 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
{{You've got mail}} ] (]) 14:39, 16 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 15:14, 10 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
<blockquote>'''Non-notable railroad point. The sources cited are insufficient for notability; the only one with any information is reference 4, which plainly states this was a "station". The 1950 USGS topo map shows Ashue as a siding with a couple of buildings in the surrounding area, but no "town": . Several mentions of an Ashue Grange can be found in local newspapers, but all these mentions are passing, and grange halls were usually just meeting halls for local farms, not anything connected to a formal "community". Fails ] and ].'''</blockquote> | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 15:23, 10 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
<blockquote>'''Another non-notable Yakima County rail point being falsely described as a community. Zero mentions could be found in local press or any books; only reference 4 has any information at all, which is basically copy-pasted into the article. Birchfield does show up on the 1936 Yakima East USGS topo map: , as an intersection near the tracks with a couple of buildings. There is now a Birchfield Road through the area; every hit I got for Birchfield was to the road. Fails ].'''</blockquote> | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 15:31, 10 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
<blockquote>'''Non-notable location. I can find several passing mentions to a "Blackrock district" or "Blackrock lands" in local press, mostly from the 1900s and 1910s, nothing more recent than 1939. But all of these are trivial mentions about the daily happenings of Joe Blow "of Blackrock district" as rural newspapers often used to publish. This does not ever seem to have been a "community", though, and no other information was found; the coordinates locate to empty grasslands, with a small "Black Rock Cemetery" nearby. This must have been a place significant to some people, but we have no record of it and therefore can't have an article; fails ] because it wasn't legally-recognized and fails ] for lack of SIGCOV.'''</blockquote> | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 15:39, 10 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
<blockquote>'''Non-notable railroad point sourced only to GNIS (reference 3 does not mention Emerald and is just a link to the US Census website). No coverage found of any type; 1965 USGS topo map does show Emerald as a cluster of a few buildings along the tracks: . Today the railroad is gone and the site is just a couple of barns; not a community and never was. Fails ] and ].'''</blockquote> | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 15:54, 10 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
<blockquote>'''Another non-notable railroad waypoint; no information found. Reference 4 is the only mention of Farron that could be found anywhere, and its statement "the town never grew large enough for a post office" is boilerplate text that the NPRRHS inserted in many entries on minor railroad stations. Coordinates locate to empty farmland today. Complete failure of ] and ].'''</blockquote> | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 15:57, 10 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
<blockquote>'''Non-notable railroad spur, as per Reference 1, which is the only piece of information that could be found about this place. Not a community; fails ].'''</blockquote> | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 16:01, 10 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
<div class="afd-notice"> | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 16:16, 10 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
<div class="afd-notice"> | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 23:37, 10 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
<div class="afd-notice"> | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 23:40, 10 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
<div class="afd-notice"> | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 23:43, 10 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
<div class="afd-notice"> | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 23:46, 10 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
<blockquote>'''Non-notable location; only information found was appearance on the 1958 Wiley City USGS topo map: , where it is just an intersection with a church; and a mention in the 1922 Bullinger's Postal and Shippers Guide , a directory. That's pretty thin gruel for coverage; the article cites only GNIS, which is insufficient for notability. Fails ] and ].'''</blockquote> | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 00:19, 11 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
<blockquote>'''Non-notable railroad point; the NPRHA document (reference 4) inconsistently describes Holtzinger as a "spur" and a "town". This is the only mention of Holtzinger that could be found, other than the 1958 Naches USGS topo, which shows it as a level crossing with a large building, probably a fruit warehouse: . Nothing else found; fails ] and ]. GNIS is not sufficient for notability.'''</blockquote> | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 00:26, 11 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
<blockquote>'''No information about this location found. Sources cited are GNIS (not sufficient for notability) and the Census Bureau, which does not have any entry for a Liberty in Yakima County. Appears on the 1965 Granger USGS topo map as a schoolhouse: , and also as a dot on the 1979 Toppenish map. Current sattelite view shows only a farming area with a couple of agricultural buildings. Fails ] and ].'''</blockquote> | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 00:29, 11 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
<blockquote>'''Just a railroad siding, not a "community". All sources cited describe it as a rail point; having a post office is insufficient for notability as rural post offices were often not located in "communities" at all. Fails ] and ].'''</blockquote> | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 00:33, 11 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
<blockquote>'''Non-notable railroad junction; only information found (other than the cited sources, which do not establish notability) is the word "Midvale" at a rail wye on the 1965 Granger USGS topo map: . Complete failure of ] and ]; is not and never was a community.'''</blockquote> | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 00:37, 11 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
<blockquote>'''East Selah and Pamona are same place and a thorough reading of the local paper shows no town with either of these names. East Selah was farming district. And Pamona was only ever mentioned as a place here https://wwwnewspapers-com.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/article/the-yakima-herald-east-selah/140757627/. Otherwise it is some kind of social club for farmers.'''</blockquote> | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 23:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
<blockquote>'''East Selah and Pamona are same place and a thorough reading of the local paper shows no town with either of these names. East Selah was farming district. And Pamona was only ever mentioned as a place here https://wwwnewspapers-com.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/article/the-yakima-herald-east-selah/140757627/. Otherwise it is some kind of social club for farmers.'''</blockquote> | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 23:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
<blockquote>'''There is not a single mention of this place in a single newspaper anywhere. There are not enough reliable sources available to expand this article.'''</blockquote> | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 00:04, 12 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
<blockquote>'''There is not one mention of Weikel being a place in the local papers. Not enough reliable sources to expand this article.'''</blockquote> | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 00:13, 12 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
<div class="afd-notice"> | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 01:20, 12 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
<blockquote>'''Non-notable rail point, not a community. Only two mentions of this place could be found, both from 1914: , about the comings and goings of people loading potatoes onto trains at "Nass Siding", and , a similarly trivial mention of a couple of locals going about their lives. Complete failure of ] and ]. Furthermore, the census bureau listing in the references is a dishonest attempt to make this place appear better-documented than it is; there is no entry for Nass.'''</blockquote> | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 01:44, 12 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
<blockquote>'''An HOA is not a "populated, legally-recognized place"; furthermore, the fact that the author of this stub describes Pinecliff as 20 miles west of Ellensburg indicates they have no idea what they're talking about; this development is well over an hour from Ellensburg by car (due to terrain), and unless you can fly, the closest town is Yakima. First 2 sources are GNIS (not sufficient for notability) and the third has no such listing, apparently added to pad the reference list. Total failure of ] and ].'''</blockquote> | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 01:52, 12 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
<blockquote>'''No evidence found that this was ever a community. Apart from reference 4 (which describes it inconsistently as a town and a rail junction), only two mentions could be found: One line in Bullinger's Postal and Shippers Guide from 1922(), and one passing mention from 1956: "Mr. and Mrs. Basil Kimmel of Sawyer were dinner guests..." (). This is about as trivial as coverage gets. Current satellite image shows a warehouse surrounded by farmland, with a Sawyer Fire Station nearby. Fails ] and ]. Not a notable place.'''</blockquote> | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 02:22, 12 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
<div class="afd-notice"> | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 23:40, 15 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
<div class="afd-notice"> | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 00:01, 17 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
<blockquote>'''Satellite shows a small cluster of houses at the base of the dam, the airport is in a different city despite being very nearby. Google says it's in the county. Local paper coverage runs from the 1890's to 1988. In 1899 it is a geological feature (https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-yakima-herald-sheep-roadway/141277727/) Fast forward to 1920, and it's become a popular camp site, many people go camping and hunting there. (example:https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-sunnyside-times-camping-at-rimrock/141278267/). In 1925 the lake was created and afterward Fishing was added to the list of activities. (https://www.newspapers.com/article/grandview-herald-rimrock-lake/141278748/). I remember reading about elk being reintroduced, and sure enough rimrock is good for that too (1936: https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-sunnyside-times-1936-not-a-town/141279168/) I goes on like that for decades, people picnicking, fishing etc all the way to modern times. There is no town there now and I've documented very thoroughly that there wasn't ever one. It's GNIS confabulating a geological feature into a town.'''</blockquote> | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 21:00, 17 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
<blockquote>'''The article says nothing is there now, the satellite says nothing is there now. Fortunately, the newspapers cover the area from the 1890's to the late 80's. There are many mentions of Wenas as a valley where people live, and lake where people recreate. There are no mentions of a town named Wenas to be found. GNIS likely confabulated the lake or the wildlife area into a town. Here is a sampling of the nature of the place. | |||
https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-yakima-herald-1899-wenas-valley/141290709/ | |||
https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-yakima-herald-of-the-wenas-1909/141291255/ | |||
https://www.newspapers.com/article/daily-sun-news-in-the-wenas-1/141291970/ | |||
https://www.newspapers.com/article/daily-sun-news-wenas-valley/141292628/'''</blockquote> | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 21:57, 17 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
==MfD nomination of ]== | |||
] ], a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ] and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of ] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:Mfd notice --> ] (]) 12:25, 3 March 2024 (UTC) | |||
== "]" listed at ] == | |||
] | |||
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 30#Misplaced Pages:RACIST}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> --] ] 00:41, 30 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
==Concern regarding ]== | |||
] Hello, MrX. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that ], a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months ], so if you wish to retain the page, please ] again or ] that it be moved to your userspace. | |||
If the page has already been deleted, you can ] so you can continue working on it. | |||
Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 16:14, 18 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
==Your draft article, ]== | |||
] | |||
Hello, MrX. It has been over six months since you last edited the ] submission or ] page you started, "]". | |||
In accordance with our policy that Misplaced Pages is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can . An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. | |||
Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages, and happy editing. <!-- Template:Db-draft-deleted --><!-- Template:Db-csd-deleted-custom --> ] (]) 22:57, 8 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
<blockquote>'''Notability not demonstrated per ] for buildings.'''</blockquote> | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
== Ayurveda RfC close == | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
I don't agree with your close of ], so I'm coming to you first to discuss what I see as the flaws in the close. I would like to make the following points: | |||
# The article has been in the scope of ] for several years without challenge, which is part of an Arbitration decision. An RfC at any particular article is not competent to remove the article from that scope. Our policy ] imposes an obligation to describe Ayurveda as pseudoscience as it is considered so in the mainstream scientific literature and ] requires us to provide such descriptions in the opening paragraph. I made these points on more detail in the ''Discussion'' section of the RfC. Consequently, I believe that !votes that simply oppose the inclusion in the lead cannot be supported in policy and should have been discounted. | |||
# There were 36 "support" !votes and 30 "oppose" !votes. However, some support !votes only supported inclusion in the first paragraph. Some oppose !votes opposed inclusion in the first sentence, but supported inclusion in the first paragraph. There were 20 !votes supporting inclusion in the first sentence and 16 !votes supporting inclusion in the first paragraph. There were 8 !votes arguing against inclusion in the lead, which should have been discounted. | |||
# The support !voters' arguments depended on ],], ], ], ], and ]. I see no instances where these policies were refuted by the opposers. | |||
# The oppose !voters' arguments were a mixture of denial that mainstream sources used the label pseudoscience{{snd}} which was effectively rebutted by referring to sources{{snd}} appeals to policies like ] without any examples of sources deemed unreliable at RSN, and assertions that sources regarded Ayurveda as scientifically-based{{snd}} which were also refuted. | |||
I do not believe that you gave sufficient weight to the strength of the support arguments, and that you failed to sufficiently account for the weaknesses of the oppose arguments. | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> – ] (]) 20:55, 14 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
I accept that a "no consensus for inclusion in the first sentence" close is within the bounds of a reasonable assessment of the debate. However, I believe that you failed to recognise a consensus for inclusion in the first paragraph, which was strongly supported by policy. --] (]) 17:13, 16 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
:I must say at the least I was surprised by the NAC here. I was sort of expecting a panel close from experienced admins followed by a mandatory review. I do agree this was, at the least, an ill-considered close. ] (]) 18:42, 16 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
:I believe the closing statement did not even attempt to provide a reasonable summation of the discussion. I see this as an editor who was indecisive and wanted to please both sides. Atleast a review is needed. - ] (]) 18:59, 16 August 2020 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 20:55, 14 November 2024
This user may have left Misplaced Pages. MrX has not edited Misplaced Pages since March 2022. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
😔
--Floquenbeam (talk) 19:50, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- I think we can agree on that one. Me and MrX rarely agreed either but that does not mean I wanted to see them leave like this. I do hope you return. PackMecEng (talk) 19:55, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- I endorse this comment. I always viewed MrX as someone I could approach for a better discussion no matter if we disagreed on the content. Mr Ernie (talk) 20:44, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Well that's a shame. I was going to ask MrX to help write a refinement of the RfC guidelines to cover challenged closes, because we have terrible processes around this and it is probably the only area on Misplaced Pages where a single person can effectively mandate specific content. Guy (help! - typo?) 21:10, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- MrX, I do hope you return to the project, even if after you take time off. Your contributions have been superb, and greatly valued - certainly by me and many others. You know, I'm strongly reminded of a quote by John G. Roberts, Jr., talking about a difficult case:
- "Any time Judge Garland disagrees, you know you're in a difficult area. And the function of his dissent, to make us focus on what we were deciding and to make sure that we felt we were doing the right thing, I think was well-served."
- We the community - and ultimately our end-user, the reader - have always been well served by your contributions and wisdom. And it would be regrettable if this one messy disagreement between you and Guy — two users I respect very much — led you to part ways with the project permanently. Be well, and all best wishes. --Neutrality 21:29, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Neutrality, Thank you. I like and respect MrX. I am mystified by the trajectory this has taken, and genuinely mortified that he has expressed a desire to leave, on which I hope he reconsiders. I hope people will take a look at Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for comment § Process for challenging closes. Guy (help! - typo?) 21:37, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- I'm sorry that you're taking a break because of this, it's unnecessary, except of course as merited holiday if stress was too high. It's unfortunate when what should be a hobby becomes responsibility, work and no play (and that of course happens because we care about the project). I hope to see you around again when you feel like it, —PaleoNeonate – 02:03, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
- Best of luck with what you do. Kraose (talk) 13:55, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
This is a sad turn of events, but here's to happiness in your break, and in your life, MrX. starship.paint (talk) 03:42, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
- MrX 🖋 21:03, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
If you ever come back, here's some tea for you. Lucky wiki-tea doesn't get cold. starship.paint (talk) 14:34, 25 September 2020 (UTC) |
- Rather late here due to my break, but like others I wish you well and happiness in your life. I'll never forget the help you gave me when I first started here and even after that, you remained someone I could look up to as an editor for his wisdom and who always remained civil even amidst the most controversial discussions. -Ugog Nizdast (talk) 14:30, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you Neutrality, Starship.paint, Kraose, Ugog Nizdast, and Mr Ernie. I appreciate your heartfelt kindness. - MrX 🖋 21:03, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- MrX, I am so happy to hear from you. I hope that you are well, these have been tough times indeed. starship.paint (exalt) 12:38, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
A toast sandwich for you!
Looks like I missed something a few months ago, and only just realized I hadn't seen your name around in a while.
Looking at the food or drink items in the WikiLove gadget like greeting cards, I'm thinking about the signification of the various options. Something sweet? Savory? Coffee/tea seem pretty generally friendly, I guess. I'll go with toast sandwich because I have no idea what that would mean to receive a toast sandwich. Kind of a "huh?" -- but maybe a "huh?" that draws your attention to Misplaced Pages long enough to come back after a break. — Rhododendrites \\ 16:47, 16 January 2021 (UTC) |
- Thank you Rhododendrites. I appreciate your sentiment. And I've always appreciated your insightful comments that accrue to the benefit of Misplaced Pages. - MrX 🖋 20:43, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
Some baklava for you!
Also miss having MrX around. Great contributor. Stefka Bulgaria (talk) 18:43, 17 January 2021 (UTC) |
- Thank you, Stefka Bulgaria, for your kindness. - MrX 🖋 20:38, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
Seven years! |
---|
miss you --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:29, 8 August 2021 (UTC:)
- Thank you Gerda Arendt for you making Wikipeidia exceptional, as you always do. - MrX 🖋 20:35, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Boden, Florida for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Boden, Florida is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Boden, Florida until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:33, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed
Hello MrX! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II 17:18, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
Boo!
Happy Halloween!Hello MrX:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Misplaced Pages, and have a happy and enjoyable Halloween!
—usernamekiran • sign the guestbook • (talk) 22:19, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Good source
Template:Good source has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • 00:45, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Vista, Washington for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vista, Washington, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Vista, Washington until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Richland Junction, Richland for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Richland Junction, Richland, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Richland Junction, Richland until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Chaffee, Washington for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chaffee, Washington, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Chaffee, Washington until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Whitcomb, Washington for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Whitcomb, Washington, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Whitcomb, Washington until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Apricot, Washington for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Apricot, Washington, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Apricot, Washington until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of North McNary, Washington for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article North McNary, Washington, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/North McNary, Washington until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Request to remove TBAN
here. Anythingyouwant (talk) 05:39, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Hydrogen water for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hydrogen water is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Hydrogen water until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
–LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 01:38, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
You have been pruned from a list
Hi MrX! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Biography/Members, but you haven't made any edits to the English Misplaced Pages in over 3 months.
Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Biography/Members.
Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:43, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
Eight years! |
---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:50, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
Happy holidays!
Happy Holidays and Happy New Year, MrX!
The other day, I was having a conversation with someone about holiday cards and social media. It occurred to me that, in the years since I left Facebook, the site I use most to communicate with people I like isn't actually a social media site at all. If you're receiving this, it's pretty likely I've talked with you more recently than I have my distant relatives and college friends on FB, at very least, and we may have even collaborated on something useful. So here's a holiday "card", Misplaced Pages friend. :) Hope the next couple weeks bring some fun and/or rest. — Rhododendrites \\ 18:37, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Chuice
The article Chuice has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Basically WP:PROMO. Non-notable product. Orphaned for a decade.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PepperBeast (talk) 19:00, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Chuice Logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Chuice Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:10, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Venner, Washington
The article Venner, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable railroad spur, not a "community" and never was. Two of the cited sources are GNIS (which is insufficient for notability); the fourth is the census bureau (which has no such entry), and reference 1 plainly says this was a rail spur. Therefore the article is inaccurate as well as a failure of WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 19:58, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Artesian, Washington
The article Artesian, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable location, sourced only to GNIS and a place-names gazetteer, neither of which is sufficient for notability. I can find several references to artesian wells in the Moxee area, for example, but none of these refer to a "community" of Artesian. Post office does not count for notability, and the coordinates locate to empty farmland. Fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 15:14, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Ashue, Washington
The article Ashue, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable railroad point. The sources cited are insufficient for notability; the only one with any information is reference 4, which plainly states this was a "station". The 1950 USGS topo map shows Ashue as a siding with a couple of buildings in the surrounding area, but no "town": . Several mentions of an Ashue Grange can be found in local newspapers, but all these mentions are passing, and grange halls were usually just meeting halls for local farms, not anything connected to a formal "community". Fails WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 15:23, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Birchfield, Washington
The article Birchfield, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Another non-notable Yakima County rail point being falsely described as a community. Zero mentions could be found in local press or any books; only reference 4 has any information at all, which is basically copy-pasted into the article. Birchfield does show up on the 1936 Yakima East USGS topo map: , as an intersection near the tracks with a couple of buildings. There is now a Birchfield Road through the area; every hit I got for Birchfield was to the road. Fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 15:31, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Blackrock, Washington
The article Blackrock, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable location. I can find several passing mentions to a "Blackrock district" or "Blackrock lands" in local press, mostly from the 1900s and 1910s, nothing more recent than 1939. But all of these are trivial mentions about the daily happenings of Joe Blow "of Blackrock district" as rural newspapers often used to publish. This does not ever seem to have been a "community", though, and no other information was found; the coordinates locate to empty grasslands, with a small "Black Rock Cemetery" nearby. This must have been a place significant to some people, but we have no record of it and therefore can't have an article; fails WP:GEOLAND because it wasn't legally-recognized and fails WP:GNG for lack of SIGCOV.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 15:39, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Emerald, Washington
The article Emerald, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable railroad point sourced only to GNIS (reference 3 does not mention Emerald and is just a link to the US Census website). No coverage found of any type; 1965 USGS topo map does show Emerald as a cluster of a few buildings along the tracks: . Today the railroad is gone and the site is just a couple of barns; not a community and never was. Fails WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 15:54, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Farron, Washington
The article Farron, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Another non-notable railroad waypoint; no information found. Reference 4 is the only mention of Farron that could be found anywhere, and its statement "the town never grew large enough for a post office" is boilerplate text that the NPRRHS inserted in many entries on minor railroad stations. Coordinates locate to empty farmland today. Complete failure of WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 15:57, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Flint, Washington
The article Flint, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable railroad spur, as per Reference 1, which is the only piece of information that could be found about this place. Not a community; fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 16:01, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Givens Corner, Washington for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Givens Corner, Washington is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Givens Corner, Washington until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 16:16, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Birchfield, Washington for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Birchfield, Washington is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Birchfield, Washington until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 23:37, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Ashue, Washington for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ashue, Washington is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Ashue, Washington until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 23:40, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Farron, Washington for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Farron, Washington is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Farron, Washington until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 23:43, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Blackrock, Washington for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Blackrock, Washington is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Blackrock, Washington until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 23:46, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Harwood, Washington
The article Harwood, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable location; only information found was appearance on the 1958 Wiley City USGS topo map: , where it is just an intersection with a church; and a mention in the 1922 Bullinger's Postal and Shippers Guide , a directory. That's pretty thin gruel for coverage; the article cites only GNIS, which is insufficient for notability. Fails WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 00:19, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Holtzinger, Washington
The article Holtzinger, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable railroad point; the NPRHA document (reference 4) inconsistently describes Holtzinger as a "spur" and a "town". This is the only mention of Holtzinger that could be found, other than the 1958 Naches USGS topo, which shows it as a level crossing with a large building, probably a fruit warehouse: . Nothing else found; fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG. GNIS is not sufficient for notability.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 00:26, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Liberty, Yakima County, Washington
The article Liberty, Yakima County, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No information about this location found. Sources cited are GNIS (not sufficient for notability) and the Census Bureau, which does not have any entry for a Liberty in Yakima County. Appears on the 1965 Granger USGS topo map as a schoolhouse: , and also as a dot on the 1979 Toppenish map. Current sattelite view shows only a farming area with a couple of agricultural buildings. Fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 00:29, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Lichty, Washington
The article Lichty, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Just a railroad siding, not a "community". All sources cited describe it as a rail point; having a post office is insufficient for notability as rural post offices were often not located in "communities" at all. Fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 00:33, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Midvale, Washington
The article Midvale, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable railroad junction; only information found (other than the cited sources, which do not establish notability) is the word "Midvale" at a rail wye on the 1965 Granger USGS topo map: . Complete failure of WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG; is not and never was a community.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 00:37, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of East Selah, Washington
The article East Selah, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
East Selah and Pamona are same place and a thorough reading of the local paper shows no town with either of these names. East Selah was farming district. And Pamona was only ever mentioned as a place here https://wwwnewspapers-com.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/article/the-yakima-herald-east-selah/140757627/. Otherwise it is some kind of social club for farmers.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. James.folsom (talk) 23:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Pomona, Washington
The article Pomona, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
East Selah and Pamona are same place and a thorough reading of the local paper shows no town with either of these names. East Selah was farming district. And Pamona was only ever mentioned as a place here https://wwwnewspapers-com.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/article/the-yakima-herald-east-selah/140757627/. Otherwise it is some kind of social club for farmers.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. James.folsom (talk) 23:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Yethonat, Washington
The article Yethonat, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
There is not a single mention of this place in a single newspaper anywhere. There are not enough reliable sources available to expand this article.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. James.folsom (talk) 00:04, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Weikel, Washington
The article Weikel, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
There is not one mention of Weikel being a place in the local papers. Not enough reliable sources to expand this article.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. James.folsom (talk) 00:13, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Artesian, Washington for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Artesian, Washington is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Artesian, Washington until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 01:20, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Nass, Washington
The article Nass, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable rail point, not a community. Only two mentions of this place could be found, both from 1914: , about the comings and goings of people loading potatoes onto trains at "Nass Siding", and , a similarly trivial mention of a couple of locals going about their lives. Complete failure of WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG. Furthermore, the census bureau listing in the references is a dishonest attempt to make this place appear better-documented than it is; there is no entry for Nass.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 01:44, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Pinecliff, Washington
The article Pinecliff, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
An HOA is not a "populated, legally-recognized place"; furthermore, the fact that the author of this stub describes Pinecliff as 20 miles west of Ellensburg indicates they have no idea what they're talking about; this development is well over an hour from Ellensburg by car (due to terrain), and unless you can fly, the closest town is Yakima. First 2 sources are GNIS (not sufficient for notability) and the third has no such listing, apparently added to pad the reference list. Total failure of WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 01:52, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Sawyer, Washington
The article Sawyer, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No evidence found that this was ever a community. Apart from reference 4 (which describes it inconsistently as a town and a rail junction), only two mentions could be found: One line in Bullinger's Postal and Shippers Guide from 1922(), and one passing mention from 1956: "Mr. and Mrs. Basil Kimmel of Sawyer were dinner guests..." (). This is about as trivial as coverage gets. Current satellite image shows a warehouse surrounded by farmland, with a Sawyer Fire Station nearby. Fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG. Not a notable place.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 02:22, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of East Selah, Washington for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article East Selah, Washington is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/East Selah, Washington until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.James.folsom (talk) 23:40, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Pomona, Washington for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pomona, Washington is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Pomona, Washington until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.James.folsom (talk) 00:01, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Rimrock, Washington
The article Rimrock, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Satellite shows a small cluster of houses at the base of the dam, the airport is in a different city despite being very nearby. Google says it's in the county. Local paper coverage runs from the 1890's to 1988. In 1899 it is a geological feature (https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-yakima-herald-sheep-roadway/141277727/) Fast forward to 1920, and it's become a popular camp site, many people go camping and hunting there. (example:https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-sunnyside-times-camping-at-rimrock/141278267/). In 1925 the lake was created and afterward Fishing was added to the list of activities. (https://www.newspapers.com/article/grandview-herald-rimrock-lake/141278748/). I remember reading about elk being reintroduced, and sure enough rimrock is good for that too (1936: https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-sunnyside-times-1936-not-a-town/141279168/) I goes on like that for decades, people picnicking, fishing etc all the way to modern times. There is no town there now and I've documented very thoroughly that there wasn't ever one. It's GNIS confabulating a geological feature into a town.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. James.folsom (talk) 21:00, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Wenas, Washington
The article Wenas, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The article says nothing is there now, the satellite says nothing is there now. Fortunately, the newspapers cover the area from the 1890's to the late 80's. There are many mentions of Wenas as a valley where people live, and lake where people recreate. There are no mentions of a town named Wenas to be found. GNIS likely confabulated the lake or the wildlife area into a town. Here is a sampling of the nature of the place.
https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-yakima-herald-1899-wenas-valley/141290709/ https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-yakima-herald-of-the-wenas-1909/141291255/ https://www.newspapers.com/article/daily-sun-news-in-the-wenas-1/141291970/
https://www.newspapers.com/article/daily-sun-news-wenas-valley/141292628/
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. James.folsom (talk) 21:57, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
MfD nomination of Talk:Nikola Tesla/nationality alert
Talk:Nikola Tesla/nationality alert, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Nikola Tesla/nationality alert and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Talk:Nikola Tesla/nationality alert during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Joy (talk) 12:25, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
"Misplaced Pages:RACIST" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Misplaced Pages:RACIST has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 30 § Misplaced Pages:RACIST until a consensus is reached. --MikutoH 00:41, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Ruth, Washington
Hello, MrX. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ruth, Washington, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. FireflyBot (talk) 16:14, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Ruth, Washington
Hello, MrX. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Ruth".
In accordance with our policy that Misplaced Pages is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 22:57, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Plaza South Tower
The article Plaza South Tower has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Notability not demonstrated per WP:GEOFEAT for buildings.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – The Grid (talk) 20:55, 14 November 2024 (UTC)