Talk:Vladimir Tismăneanu: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 17:09, 3 January 2007 editIcar (talk \| contribs)833 edits Vandahl Dahn strikes again← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 09:31, 23 February 2024 edit undoQwerfjkl (bot) (talk \| contribs)Bots, Mass message senders4,025,628 edits Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)Tag: Talk banner shell conversion
(576 intermediate revisions by 34 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{~~WPBiography~~\|~~living~~=yes\|class=\|~~importance~~=}}		{{WikiProject banner shell\|blp=yes\|class=B\|listas=Tismaneanu, Vladimir\|
			{{WikiProject Biography\|s&a-priority=Low\|s&a-work-group=yes}}
			{{WikiProject Cold War\|importance=Mid}}
			{{WikiProject United States\|importance=Low\|DC=Yes\|DC-importance=Low}}
			{{WikiProject Jewish history\|importance=Low}}
			{{WikiProject Journalism\|importance=Low}}
			{{WikiProject Maryland\|importance=Low}}
			{{WikiProject Politics\|importance=Low}}
			{{WikiProject Romania\|importance=Mid}}
			{{WikiProject Conservatism\|auto=Inherit\|importance=low}}
			{{WikiProject University of Pennsylvania\|importance= }}
			}}
			{{Archive box\|search=yes\|
			* ] <small>(2006–2007)</small>
			}}

			== Câteva notiţe impresioniste despre orgoliu şi apărătorii acestuia: Un post-scriptum intermediar ==
	== PhD subject ==

			Câteva notiţe impresioniste despre orgoliu şi apărătorii acestuia: Un post-scriptum intermediar
	It would be interesting to have the title, and maybe abstract of his PhD thesis. Does anyone have a link to information about this thesis? ] 11:18, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

			Michael Shafir, Radio-Grafii şi alte fobii. Studii contemporane, publicistică şi pubelistică © 2010, Institutul European, pentru prezenta ediţie
	The thesis title is "Noua stînga şi Şcoala de la Frankfurt" (The new Left and the Frankfurt School", (Editura Politică, Bucharest 1976).
	According to a ''Washington Post'' editorial by Victor Gaetan, Tismăneanu's doctoral thesis is "a vitriolic sermon against Western values". The conclusion of the thesis thesis is that "Capitalism cannot be destroyed through vague dreams, dogmatic revolt, sudden transition and metaphysical studies. The only mean to overcome this statu-quo is through Socialist revolution, in which the working class, led by the revolutionary political Party, will play the leading role." (] 11:05, 22 December 2006 (UTC))

			Câteva notiţe impresioniste despre orgoliu şi apărătorii acestuia: Un post-scriptum intermediar
	==Objections==
	In addition to my objections: I have removed details on his father. If you plan an article on him, add them there.

			Vladimir Tismăneanu nu a răspuns niciodată direct la acuza de plagiat pe care, iată, o reiterez. În opinia mea, nimic mai grav nu se poate afirma la adresa unui cadru universitar. Mănuşa rămâne aruncată. Nu au răspuns nici apărătorii domnului profesor din Maryland. În ce se dorea a fi o replică la articolul meu din „Observator cultural” nr. 406, Bogdan Cristian Iacob avea să publice, din nou în „Idei în dialog” un articol în care ignora cu desăvârşire acuza de plagiat, intrând în schimb în polemică cu subsemnatul în ce priveşte importanţa contribuţiei teoretice a lui Vladimir Tismăneanu cu al său „stalinism naţional”1. În alte vremuri, mi-ar fi plăcut să polemizez în continuare cu dl. Iacob. Nu problema pe care insista fusese însă miza principală a răspunsului meu. Consider că tăcerea sa şi a „antreprenorului” domniei sale în ce priveşte această miză vorbeşte de la sine. Alt vajnic apărător al domnului Tismăneanu apare în persoana d-lui Cristian Vasile, secretarul comisiei care a elaborat raportul. Spre deosebire de dl. Iacob, pentru dl. Vasile chiar am o stimă considerabilă, date fiind contribuţiile domniei sale la istoria bisericilor din România comunistă. Îţi trebuie multă îndrăzneală, aş afirma, pentru a îi plasa în acelaşi cazan diavoleşte mistuitor pe toţi criticii Raportului Tismăneanu, de la Paul Goma, pe de o parte, la „Gabriel Andreescu, Michael Shafir, Ion Bogdan Lefter sau Cornel Nistorescu”. Nu ştiu dacă o să ajungem cu toţii în iad, dar sigur nu vom da socoteală pentru acelaşi păcat faţă de neprihănitul raport. A mai afirma, aşa cum o face Cristian Vasile, că în felul acesta ne-am face cu toţii vinovaţi de a fi contribuit la „renaşterea discursului 1 „Comunismul românesc între tipologie şi concept”, în „Idei în dialog” (I-II), 1 aprilie şi 1 mai 2008. Referirea la subsemnatul se făcea în prima parte a acestui articol, unde dl. Iacob îşi mai anunţa şi pierderea respectului faţă de subsemnatul. Din nefericire, mă găsesc în incapacitate de a reciproca. Nu auzisem înainte de doctorandul de la Central European University, aşa că nu puteam să-mi pierd ceea ce nu am avut oricum.
	I'll detail below my other points:
	*His father's name was Leonte Tismăneanu, as chosen by the man himself. Despite the habit, one cannot deny someone else the name he chose for himself. Any detail on this issue belongs in an article on Leon Tismăneanu, not here (Vladimir's name was never Tismineţki - in fact, for reasons of chronology, Leon's own name is likely not subject to Romanian transliteration more than it is to standard Russian-to-English, but that is another matter)
	*Communist words do not a communist make, and we have been debating this before. I do not intend to help anyone build[REDACTED] as a database for a witch hunt, especially when that witch hunt will be based on hypocrisy (among historians, it is not just Tismăneanu who has pointed out that trait of later Romanian Communism)
	*It will be a cold day in hell before[REDACTED] will link to ''Tricolorul'' for references ] 13:50, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

			MICHAEL SHAFIR
	And let me ask you, D: is there any particular reason for not using diacritics? ] 14:06, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

			308
	:: Hi Dahn. As mentioned at some point in the edit history (you should read it), I'm trying to translate the text on ro.wiki (not well worded, anyway). If you wish, correct the text on ro.wiki. And, anyway, I gave up for now. I'll wait for the aftermath of his report.
	:: As for the guy and his report, my oppinion is forged by what I read about them. As for now, I have both CTP, Cristoiu, and what I see as non-partisan public oppinion (as well as the opponents of Basescu) considering this report a disgrace, and the author a spineless guy. I am never relying on only one oppinion, but from my experience both CTP and Cristoiu were quite moderate. I also have friends of mine commenting along the same lines, and have seen no person (public or friend) I appreciate comment positively.
	:: So: I don't try to do a witch hunt. I consider the report to be part of a political campaign of Basescu, and I think it should be put in perspective. Factual perspective, not witch hunt. Tismaneanu is becoming a public figure, and his background must be known. I believe this not to be the case, yet. I don't quite understand your "communist words do not make a communist". We are not talking here about some poor guy that needed to write political propaganda to be left in peace (Adrian Paunescu could be in this case). And even if he did so, then the guy was a fraud when he wrote his first articles. Why should I believe him now?
	:: As for your help, I didn't ask for it. What I am going to do here is to report what I find to be NPOV, while accepting to change my POV according to supplementary sources or enlightening notes by other users.
	:: Cheers. ] 14:45, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
	:::Well, the article on ro wiki is the product of a witch hunt, from a person who has declared himself to be an anti-Semite. I have no stomach to go and undo all of what that person has felt free to do over there, and I'd rather make this article sourced with proper sources and moderate tone.
	::::: Well, I'd say Cristoiu and CTP can be seen as "propoer sources", unless they, too, are anti-semites. :) And these sources <b>are</b> saying Tismaneanu is conducting a witch-hunt. Is this source enough for you? ] 15:33, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
	::::::I'm sorry, did I stutter? I have deleted references from Tricolorul as to Tismăneanu's alleged "communist convictions", I have not removed any of his family history (except those parts that would fit in the link for his father - otherwise, WHY have a link?!), and I have not removed anything by either Cristoiu or Popescu (''nothing'' by Cristoiu or Popescu was prexent in the goddamn text!). ] 15:48, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

	:::I have nothing against including criticism of his report, if it is stated on the basis of "he said, she said". Also note that nothing on that was present in the text, and that I have left all information about his family past that had ditect relevancy for Vladimir himself.
	::::: I disagree with you. As CTP noted, part of the infamy of the author of the report comes from his position in the Communist high-life. This information is meaningful in this context. If you want a cheap comparison: Hitler's background is meaningful, too, in explaining his deeds. ] 15:33, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
	::::::What you do not understand, Dpotop, is that I do not deny either the source or Tismăneanu's position in the high-life (more or less - as it is obvious to anyone that his father had fallen into disgrace). Yes, he lived a good life as a kid, and yes, some journalists say that it matters where he grew up (note that Tismăneanu will never deny where he grew up!). This has ''nothing'' to do with "communist convictions" allegedly ''expressed'' by Tismăneanu ''himself''. Now, even if you are to quote someone saying that Tismăneanu himself was a communist, don't quote a piece of trash (ie: if Cristoiu and/or Popescu say it, quote ''them'' saying it; if they do not, there must be a goddamn reason for it!). Just how obvious is this? ] 15:48, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

			radical resentimentar” ridică întrebarea dacă autorul a citit ceea ce critică1.
	:::The personal conclusions you draw about his writings belong to the realm of journalism. Aside from the fact that they are sourced with a newspaper that writes calumnies about the man (and should thus be discredited from the get-go), nothing would allow you to draw a conclusion in presenting the facts. It would also mean that ''every person'' who has ''ever'' graduated from a branch of the University and was required to write such a stereotypical essay is "a communist",as well as all historians who were required to quote Ceauşescu. ] 15:23, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
	::::: We are talking here about human sciences, not exact ones. The boundary between history and journalism is never quite clear. And you are confusing here "Tricolorul", which can be considered as extreme, with well-respected editorialists from Gandul (CTP) and Jurnalul (Cristoiu). Don't mix them. ] 15:33, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
	::::::I see, more appeals to probability. Read above. ] 15:48, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

			Că un Victor Roncea este dispus să folosească orice îi cade în mână pentru a lovi în Vladimir Tismăneanu este adevărat. A făcut-o şi în cazul criticilor mele la adresa raportului2. Ar trebui să-l transforme aceste „asasinate de caracter” pe Tismăneanu în imun la critică? Se pare că aceasta este părerea domnul profesor însuşi. Când analistul washingtonian Richard Hall a „îndrăznit” să publice pe blogul personal un articol în care insista asupra faptului că Tismăneanu ignoră critici pertinente, în schimb scoate în evidenţă toate atacurile de natură antisemită la adresa sa, Roncea a „selectat” din articol ceea ce îi convenea şi a ignorat ceea ce nu se potrivea cu vederile sale legionaroide (deşi se pretindea că analiza lui Hall era reprodusă „integral”), publicând la 27 octombrie 2007 în cotidianul „Ziua” un articol sub titlul „Raportul Tismăneanu pus la zid de un analist CIA”. http://romanianrevolutionofdecember1989.wordpress.com
	:: Diacritics: I don't have them on my US keyboard, and I don't know how to install the needed converter outside Word or OpenOffice. BTW: how do you write them? ] 14:45, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
	:::Er... I click the symbols... at the bottom of the screen... in the editing window... And, in case I hadn't noticed they were there after years of editing wikipedia, I would still copy-paste the words with diacritics, already present in the text... ] 15:23, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

			A urmat o adevărată farsă. Pe de o parte, vicepreşedintele Alianţei Civice Sorin Ilieşiu, o persoană apropiată lui Tismăneanu, a reacţionat punând între ghilimele cuvântul „analist”, pentru ca mai apoi jurnalistul Andrei Bădin să „demonstreze” că Hall nu ar fi analist CIA, unde şi-ar fi petrecut numai o neînsemnată perioadă de „stagiar” de şase luni.3 Cel care a fost ţinta criticii ştia însă mai bine: Hall publicase în revista pe care o condusese până nu demult („East European Politics and Societies”). Drept care, a ridicat telefonul şi a urlat la superiorul lui Richard Hall, într-o scenă demnă a fi inclusă chiar în „Stalinism pentru eternitate”. Cum Richard Hall făcuse imprudenţa de a publica articolul critic la adresa lui Tismăneanu fără a cere în prealabil permisiunea superiorilor po-
	:: And I forgot. I find some references to Tricolorul justifiable, especially when they cite the source (journal, number, year, article), and excerpts. And you are not the only one to decide what gets in and what remains out. ] 14:48, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
	:::See above. Don't invest your energy in discrediting wikipedia. ] 15:23, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
	::::: Don't invest time in defending Basescu's political agenda. It's discrediting wikipedia, too. ] 15:34, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
	::::::1. That agenda would be much more respectable than a paper that engages in slander. 2. I just told you I do not defend it. ] 15:48, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

			1 Vezi recenzia la noua ediţie a volumului lui Tismăneanu „Irepetabilul trecut” (Bucureşti: Editura Curtea Veche), 2008, în „Liternet.ro”, http://atelier. liternet. ro/articol/6434/Bogdan-Cristian-Iacob-Vladimir-Tismaneanu/Persistenta-liberal ismului.html, accesat la 10 septembrie 2008. 2 Vezi „Când Michael Peter Shafir are dreptate” în Asociaţia Civic Media, http://civicmedia.ro/acm/index.php?option=com_content& task =view& id= 617&Itemid=49, accesat la 10 septembrie 2008. Dl. Roncea îmi atribuie acest nume, susţinând că l-aş fi recrutat pe Marius Oprea în servicul informativ german. Nici măcar lecţiile nu ştie să şi le facă ca lumea. Numele meu „de domnişoară” nu a fost Michael Peter Shafir, ci Peter Michael Frisch, ceea ce nu am ascuns niciodată. Vezi supra, p. 197. 3 http://pescurt.ro/stiri-internet/diversiunea-analistul-cia-a-lui-victor-roncea_31-10- 2007_129016, şi http://www.badin.ro/2007/10/diversiunea-analistul-cia- allui- victor.html.

			Radio-grafii şi alte fobii
	==To the IP who keeps pushing the POV==
	''Do'' read the templeate at the very top of this page, and then ], ]. Please understand that rumors from one side of the debate are not "sources", that they are inflammatory, and that, while presenting ''no proof'', they were at least partly dismissed by the person whom they are aimed at (which would make them hot potatoes for wikipedia). Some of them are not reliable on principle, and some content you keep adding is redundant (while the rest is mostly ''libelous''). ] 10:15, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

			309
	Dahn: for you some sources might not be reliable "on principle" but you are not the ultimate decider of what is reliable and what isn't. The links to "Tricolorul" that you have groundlessly removed simply reproduce Tismaneanu's own articles. Ditto for the PhD. thesis conclusion. "Tricolorul" merely provides an online version of the printed papers. Please stop removing them, unless you check that the printed papers are different from what "Tricolorul" claims.

			trivit regulilor instituţiei, a avut de suferit consecinţe de natură disciplinară. Iată cum sunt puse în aplicare în practică valorile liberalismului a căror întruchipare personală, pretinde Cristian Vasile în articolul său, ar fi politologul din Maryland.
	As for "allegations" of communist activities in the "youth years": this is blatantly biased. There remains no doubt that this guy was a dedicated communist propagandist until the age of 30. As The washington Post Editorial (check the link, it is an Editorial) says, his thesis is a "vitriolic sermon against Western values". Do you actually doubt that he wrote that crap? As for "youth", it is misleading to say youth of someone who is 30. These are weasel words, give them up by your own advice. (] 12:53, 22 December 2006 (UTC))

			Cotofana89 (] (]) 01:24, 22 January 2011 (UTC))
	:: Nice contributions, mr. Anonymous editor. Dahn, you should accept these new sources. ] 15:52, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

			== External links modified ==
	1.The links to ''Tricolorul'' are referring to a paper that ids controversial at best, engaged in the debate, and known to have published false material in the past. Linking to that paper also creates a precedent for wikipedia. All of that material needs to be verified, and is in itself undue weight. (Note: I have actually checked other sources, and they do not make as specific claims, which means that, by including ''Tricolorul'', we would not just be introducing a biased source, we would be favoring it!)
	2.The thesis conclusion cites a source as if it is familiar with it. It is not, but merely presumes it is (you have copied the reference from the Romanian version, which ''quoted nothing'', and ''assumed'' that the quote is to be found verbatim in the work in question).
	3.The term "alleged" refers to his ''convictions''. They ''are alleged'', because we would otherwise imply intimate knowledge of a person's feelings and ideas. There is nothing referring to his thesis, and, as all Romanians of the times, he would be entitled to mimicking communist convictions without having them.
	4.The article is not "an editorial", and the link actually says that it was "in the editorial ''section''" ()
	5.Per[REDACTED] conventions, all details about his father that do not relate directly to the son belong in that article. Much of what you push in that area is questionable at the very least, but the debate is to be carried there (though, frankly, I do not see much room for debate). ] 18:11, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

			Hello fellow Wikipedians,
	:His father (surnamed Ciungul) has his own page. By the way; he is one of the main communist propagandists in Romania, according to the report of Tismaneanu's commission.

			I have just modified one external link on ]. Please take a moment to review ]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes:
	:The links to "Tricolorul" provide the readers with a online reproduction of Tismaneanu's printed papers. Dahn must have some vested interest in defending Tismaneanu aginst his own past writings. One must be mad to hide this information because one has a personal dislike about "Tricolorul". All the comments about Tricolorul are just Dahn's POV. What source do you cite for claiming all those things about that journal?(] 21:11, 2 January 2007 (UTC))
			*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071008065724/http://www.revista22.ro/html/index.php?art=2802&nr=2006-06-16 to http://www.revista22.ro/html/index.php?art=2802&nr=2006-06-16
	::I will not answer again. As to the style and status of the paper, Bogdan gave you an answer below, so did Jmabel. Let's not continue this needlessly. ] 11:37, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

			When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
	:"Allegations about communist convictions" refer to his stated (printed) beliefs. Not all Romanians at the time stated in print such beliefs, whether Dahn likes it or not. One example: Paul Goma. Since you object to this, I will write "activity as communist propagandist". I will include again all references to Tismaneanu's scientific workul°s before 1981.(] 21:11, 2 January 2007 (UTC))
	::Not unless you can point out where you found them. ] 11:37, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

			{{sourcecheck\|checked=false\|needhelp=}}
	==Status of article==
	Dahn asked me to protect this article. I'm not doing that at this time: this seems to be a content dispute, not vandalism or other breach of rules. I haven't looked into all of the details of this. However, I have to say: ''Tricolorul'' makes a pretty lousy source. ] is certainly relevant here, and several aspects of ] seem relevant here as well: in particular, the remarks about ] presumably also apply to partisan or extermist newspapers. - ] \| ] 19:31, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
	:: Agreed. What the anon reader is doing here is equivalent to the POV-pushing of Dahn on ] where he has actually no source but keeps claiming that ] and ] were activists of the PCR. This is relevant here, because the conflict on this page is part of a larger edit conflict related to current events in Romania. Unfortunately, I'm on vacation and have a lousy connection. ] 10:41, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
	:::Weren't you edit-warring for the exact same POV-pushing as the anon editor? In fact, wasn't "you should accept these new sources" directed by you towards me, D? Or did the wind change direction again? ] 21:44, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
	: Pretty lousy? You don't like the newspaper in which Vadim insults all his adversaries? Women are regularly named "whores", while the men are "worms" -- usually ]s and ]s. :-)
	: How can one doubt the veridicity of information such as "" ] 11:08, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

			Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 16:32, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
	==BTW, Dpotop==
	Aside from being weasel-worded OR, Dpotop, that statement about his father being head of the publishing house is also not true - he had been removed from that position a decade earlier! ] 13:35, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

	== ~~Vandahl~~ ~~Dahn~~ ~~strikes~~ ~~again~~ ==		== External links modified (January 2018) ==

			Hello fellow Wikipedians,
	Dahn has again reverted my version by claiming that it is 'misleading'. WHAT is misleading, Mr disruptor? We agree that the references 3 and 4 describe pieces of communist propaganda by Tismaneanu, yes or no? Now we do not talk about convictions (fine thinkers like Dahn say that you cannot tell a convinced communist just by his communist writings). Fine, I removed 'convictions' altogether and replaced it by 'activity'. What on earth can you object to this? As for my English style, mind the log in your own eye(] 17:09, 3 January 2007 (UTC))

			I have just modified one external link on ]. Please take a moment to review ]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes:
			*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070403060531/http://www.realitatea.net/41169_Scrisoarea-celor-50-de-intelectuali-.html to http://www.realitatea.net/41169_Scrisoarea-celor-50-de-intelectuali-.html

			When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

			{{sourcecheck\|checked=false\|needhelp=}}

			Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 15:09, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 09:31, 23 February 2024

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Cold War Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cold War, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Cold War on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Cold WarWikipedia:WikiProject Cold WarTemplate:WikiProject Cold WarCold War
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: District of Columbia Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.

United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia (assessed as Low-importance).

Jewish history Low‑importance

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Maryland Low‑importance

	Maryland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maryland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Maryland on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MarylandWikipedia:WikiProject MarylandTemplate:WikiProject MarylandMaryland
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Romania Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Romania-related topics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomaniaWikipedia:WikiProject RomaniaTemplate:WikiProject RomaniaRomania

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Help Romania reach at least GA-status
- Help History of Romania get WP:GOOD
- Request an article or create a missing one
Assess :
- Assess all articles tagged for this project that have not been assessed for quality
Cleanup :
- Review the Romania-related cleanup listing
- Normalize the use of "Northern Bukovina" (capitalized) and "Northern Bessarabia" (Bessarabian part of Chernivtsi Oblast) all over Misplaced Pages
Disambiguation :
- Disambiguate project articles and get points
Expand :
- Expand Postage stamps and postal history of Romania
Translate :
- Translate Romania-related articles from the Romanian Misplaced Pages
- Translate and keep in sync with the project versions in other languages: Projet:Roumanie (in French), Proiect:România (in Romanian), Проект:Румыния (in Russian)
Unreferenced : * Add more reference to FC CFR Timișoara.
Other :
- Make use in articles of the newly contributed images (about 5800!!) from the Wiki Loves Monuments Romania 2011 (WLM Romania external site)
- Review newly created Romania-related articles
- Check the articles needing expert attention or other work, and help with some of the items
- Create Awards for WikiProject Romania
- Contribute photos related to Romania at Commons:WikiProject Romania. Organize Romania related images on Commons. See also media-related tasks

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

University of Pennsylvania

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of University of Pennsylvania on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject University of PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject University of PennsylvaniaUniversity of Pennsylvania
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1 (2006–2007)

Câteva notiţe impresioniste despre orgoliu şi apărătorii acestuia: Un post-scriptum intermediar

Vladimir Tismăneanu nu a răspuns niciodată direct la acuza de plagiat pe care, iată, o reiterez. În opinia mea, nimic mai grav nu se poate afirma la adresa unui cadru universitar. Mănuşa rămâne aruncată. Nu au răspuns nici apărătorii domnului profesor din Maryland. În ce se dorea a fi o replică la articolul meu din „Observator cultural” nr. 406, Bogdan Cristian Iacob avea să publice, din nou în „Idei în dialog” un articol în care ignora cu desăvârşire acuza de plagiat, intrând în schimb în polemică cu subsemnatul în ce priveşte importanţa contribuţiei teoretice a lui Vladimir Tismăneanu cu al său „stalinism naţional”1. În alte vremuri, mi-ar fi plăcut să polemizez în continuare cu dl. Iacob. Nu problema pe care insista fusese însă miza principală a răspunsului meu. Consider că tăcerea sa şi a „antreprenorului” domniei sale în ce priveşte această miză vorbeşte de la sine. Alt vajnic apărător al domnului Tismăneanu apare în persoana d-lui Cristian Vasile, secretarul comisiei care a elaborat raportul. Spre deosebire de dl. Iacob, pentru dl. Vasile chiar am o stimă considerabilă, date fiind contribuţiile domniei sale la istoria bisericilor din România comunistă. Îţi trebuie multă îndrăzneală, aş afirma, pentru a îi plasa în acelaşi cazan diavoleşte mistuitor pe toţi criticii Raportului Tismăneanu, de la Paul Goma, pe de o parte, la „Gabriel Andreescu, Michael Shafir, Ion Bogdan Lefter sau Cornel Nistorescu”. Nu ştiu dacă o să ajungem cu toţii în iad, dar sigur nu vom da socoteală pentru acelaşi păcat faţă de neprihănitul raport. A mai afirma, aşa cum o face Cristian Vasile, că în felul acesta ne-am face cu toţii vinovaţi de a fi contribuit la „renaşterea discursului 1 „Comunismul românesc între tipologie şi concept”, în „Idei în dialog” (I-II), 1 aprilie şi 1 mai 2008. Referirea la subsemnatul se făcea în prima parte a acestui articol, unde dl. Iacob îşi mai anunţa şi pierderea respectului faţă de subsemnatul. Din nefericire, mă găsesc în incapacitate de a reciproca. Nu auzisem înainte de doctorandul de la Central European University, aşa că nu puteam să-mi pierd ceea ce nu am avut oricum.

MICHAEL SHAFIR

308

radical resentimentar” ridică întrebarea dacă autorul a citit ceea ce critică1.

Că un Victor Roncea este dispus să folosească orice îi cade în mână pentru a lovi în Vladimir Tismăneanu este adevărat. A făcut-o şi în cazul criticilor mele la adresa raportului2. Ar trebui să-l transforme aceste „asasinate de caracter” pe Tismăneanu în imun la critică? Se pare că aceasta este părerea domnul profesor însuşi. Când analistul washingtonian Richard Hall a „îndrăznit” să publice pe blogul personal un articol în care insista asupra faptului că Tismăneanu ignoră critici pertinente, în schimb scoate în evidenţă toate atacurile de natură antisemită la adresa sa, Roncea a „selectat” din articol ceea ce îi convenea şi a ignorat ceea ce nu se potrivea cu vederile sale legionaroide (deşi se pretindea că analiza lui Hall era reprodusă „integral”), publicând la 27 octombrie 2007 în cotidianul „Ziua” un articol sub titlul „Raportul Tismăneanu pus la zid de un analist CIA”. http://romanianrevolutionofdecember1989.wordpress.com

A urmat o adevărată farsă. Pe de o parte, vicepreşedintele Alianţei Civice Sorin Ilieşiu, o persoană apropiată lui Tismăneanu, a reacţionat punând între ghilimele cuvântul „analist”, pentru ca mai apoi jurnalistul Andrei Bădin să „demonstreze” că Hall nu ar fi analist CIA, unde şi-ar fi petrecut numai o neînsemnată perioadă de „stagiar” de şase luni.3 Cel care a fost ţinta criticii ştia însă mai bine: Hall publicase în revista pe care o condusese până nu demult („East European Politics and Societies”). Drept care, a ridicat telefonul şi a urlat la superiorul lui Richard Hall, într-o scenă demnă a fi inclusă chiar în „Stalinism pentru eternitate”. Cum Richard Hall făcuse imprudenţa de a publica articolul critic la adresa lui Tismăneanu fără a cere în prealabil permisiunea superiorilor po-

1 Vezi recenzia la noua ediţie a volumului lui Tismăneanu „Irepetabilul trecut” (Bucureşti: Editura Curtea Veche), 2008, în „Liternet.ro”, http://atelier. liternet. ro/articol/6434/Bogdan-Cristian-Iacob-Vladimir-Tismaneanu/Persistenta-liberal ismului.html, accesat la 10 septembrie 2008. 2 Vezi „Când Michael Peter Shafir are dreptate” în Asociaţia Civic Media, http://civicmedia.ro/acm/index.php?option=com_content& task =view& id= 617&Itemid=49, accesat la 10 septembrie 2008. Dl. Roncea îmi atribuie acest nume, susţinând că l-aş fi recrutat pe Marius Oprea în servicul informativ german. Nici măcar lecţiile nu ştie să şi le facă ca lumea. Numele meu „de domnişoară” nu a fost Michael Peter Shafir, ci Peter Michael Frisch, ceea ce nu am ascuns niciodată. Vezi supra, p. 197. 3 http://pescurt.ro/stiri-internet/diversiunea-analistul-cia-a-lui-victor-roncea_31-10- 2007_129016, şi http://www.badin.ro/2007/10/diversiunea-analistul-cia- allui- victor.html.

Radio-grafii şi alte fobii

309

trivit regulilor instituţiei, a avut de suferit consecinţe de natură disciplinară. Iată cum sunt puse în aplicare în practică valorile liberalismului a căror întruchipare personală, pretinde Cristian Vasile în articolul său, ar fi politologul din Maryland.

Cotofana89 (Cotofana 89 (talk) 01:24, 22 January 2011 (UTC))

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Vladimir Tismăneanu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071008065724/http://www.revista22.ro/html/index.php?art=2802&nr=2006-06-16 to http://www.revista22.ro/html/index.php?art=2802&nr=2006-06-16

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:32, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070403060531/http://www.realitatea.net/41169_Scrisoarea-celor-50-de-intelectuali-.html to http://www.realitatea.net/41169_Scrisoarea-celor-50-de-intelectuali-.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:09, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Categories: