Revision as of 02:08, 21 February 2021 editTenPoundHammer (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers279,077 edits r← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:10, 21 February 2021 edit undoCeoil (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers172,037 edits →Spiderland: rNext edit → | ||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
Input would be gratefully received, with the proviso that dont have to deal with Ten Pound Hammer's unthinking, unresearched, brutalist, "impressions" things. ] (]) 01:46, 21 February 2021 (UTC) | Input would be gratefully received, with the proviso that dont have to deal with Ten Pound Hammer's unthinking, unresearched, brutalist, "impressions" things. ] (]) 01:46, 21 February 2021 (UTC) | ||
*{{re|Ceoil}} "dont have to deal with Ten Pound Hammer's unthinking, unresearched, brutalist, 'impressions' things." -- wtf is this out of nowhere personal attack about? <span style="color:green">'''Ten Pound Hammer'''</span> • <sup>(])</sup> 02:08, 21 February 2021 (UTC) | *{{re|Ceoil}} "dont have to deal with Ten Pound Hammer's unthinking, unresearched, brutalist, 'impressions' things." -- wtf is this out of nowhere personal attack about? <span style="color:green">'''Ten Pound Hammer'''</span> • <sup>(])</sup> 02:08, 21 February 2021 (UTC) | ||
*It means what it means, and don't play innocent, but is irrelevant to keeping or demoing this page. ] (]) |
Revision as of 02:10, 21 February 2021
Spiderland
Spiderland (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Notified: Brandt Luke Zorn, WikiProject Music diff
- Issues in the lead were mentioned back in July on the talk page and seem to have gone unfixed.
- I posted the following concerns on the talk page and none were addressed. Also pinged FA editor User:Brandt Luke Zorn who did not respond despite still being active.
- Among the concerns:
- tag in "Background"
- and tags in "Production".
- "Music" section is very choppy and has a lot of one- and two-sentence paragraphs. Also the last paragraph is uncited.
- "Don't Look Back Concerts" (citation 27) redirects to a hotel website.
- Genius.com (citation 91) does not appear to be reliable.
Ten Pound Hammer • 21:48, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- Let me see what I can do. I'm cleaning up a little bit of trivial info on the background section and replacing some possibly unreliable sources with AllMusic, which is definitely a reliable source. It's slow going, especially since I don't have access to the 33 1/3 book outside of the limited preview in Google Books. Famous Hobo (talk) 02:15, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
- These pointers have been handy for a general clean up, though overall the article remains in very good condition.
- Have removed Genious.com, and replaced Don't Look Back Concerts with a ref from Pitchfork.
- Issue in background removed.
- Looking for a source for the 1st two sentences in "Production"...the is gone...its obvious that it was in 1990
- Dont agree re the "Music" section being choppy...the short paras are because each discusses an individual song. Having them like this makes it easier for readers to find what they are looking for on a quick scroll through scan.
- will update when the Production bit is reffed Ceoil (talk) 21:17, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
- oh and the issues with the lead were addressed during last summer. Ceoil (talk) 21:45, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
- Ceoil is this ready yet for others to look in? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:12, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, except the statements within "McMahan and Walford began writing together for the band's next record, creating six new songs which the band practiced throughout the summer of 1990. Slint entered River North Records in August 1990 to record Spiderland. At that time there were no vocals or lyrics prepared for the album, so the band wrote them while in the studio" are as yet uncited - cough User:Brandt Luke Zorn. There is no question that they are not true, but text shift has made them out of sorts....hold on.
Input would be gratefully received, with the proviso that dont have to deal with Ten Pound Hammer's unthinking, unresearched, brutalist, "impressions" things. Ceoil (talk) 01:46, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Ceoil: "dont have to deal with Ten Pound Hammer's unthinking, unresearched, brutalist, 'impressions' things." -- wtf is this out of nowhere personal attack about? Ten Pound Hammer • 02:08, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- It means what it means, and don't play innocent, but is irrelevant to keeping or demoing this page. Ceoil (talk)