| Revision as of 05:58, 29 July 2021 editJuanpumpchump (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users10,787 editsm →Re: Dave Courtney Reversion← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:46, 30 July 2021 edit undoJuanpumpchump (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users10,787 edits →Re: Dave Courtney Reversion: Further response.Next edit → | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
| Do you mind NOT leaving your rude comments on my talk page. | Do you mind NOT leaving your rude comments on my talk page. | ||
| I made one alteration to the listed above in the title and you felt that because you didn't like it not only did you change it that you felt so strongly that you had to leave a message on my user talk page telling me not to make quite clearly in your own opinion something that you didn't like - one word.... | |||
| Pathetic. | |||
| Do not bother to respond to this message and go off and bother others and see if you get the same response. | |||
| " July 2021 | |||
| Information icon Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Misplaced Pages about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Dave Courtney. Thank you. Chaheel Riens (talk) 18:00, 18 July 2021" | |||
| ] (]) 05:58, 29 July 2021 (UTC) | ] (]) 05:58, 29 July 2021 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 09:46, 30 July 2021
 Archives (Index) |
Lower back tattoo article
Hello, Chaheel!
I've been trying to edit the article Lower back tattoo. I see you revert it & do make a good point...that the source may not cite that particular idea. Though, there's no way to verify/see the source without buying the book/chapters in the prof's book.
Still, I wonder if you see the article as problematic in terms of sexism? I do. I feel, Misplaced Pages as a whole sexualizes literally everything women do & this article is what I'm focusing on -- it's so blatant.
The chicago sun times for example (i'd hope out of embarrassment?) doesn't have their article available anymore. The most recent source is 10 years old.
It's written entirely as if women are the only ones who have this tattoo placement and bringing with it societal (harsh) judgements and male gaze with it. It's clear men have them (see links below) so help me understand what's the goal of this article? -Rachel Li
Re: Dave Courtney Reversion
Do you mind NOT leaving your rude comments on my talk page.
I made one alteration to the listed above in the title and you felt that because you didn't like it not only did you change it that you felt so strongly that you had to leave a message on my user talk page telling me not to make quite clearly in your own opinion something that you didn't like - one word....
Pathetic.
Do not bother to respond to this message and go off and bother others and see if you get the same response.
" July 2021 Information icon Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Misplaced Pages about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Dave Courtney. Thank you. Chaheel Riens (talk) 18:00, 18 July 2021"