Misplaced Pages

Talk:Alexander v. Sandoval: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:00, 18 February 2007 editHydriotaphia (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers4,222 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 04:03, 18 February 2007 edit undoHydriotaphia (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers4,222 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 4: Line 4:


Jim, no one is "stalking" you. I have been watching these pages since I started contributing to Misplaced Pages. Please assume good faith. Respectfully, ] 04:00, 18 February 2007 (UTC) Jim, no one is "stalking" you. I have been watching these pages since I started contributing to Misplaced Pages. Please assume good faith. Respectfully, ] 04:00, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

I have reverted the reference to ''Garrett''. Please see ] for an explanation. ] 04:03, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:03, 18 February 2007

WikiProject iconU.S. Supreme Court cases Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court
???This article has not yet received a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

I don't know what the references to Garrett and other congressional power of enforcement cases are doing in this article. Sandoval is a case about – and solely about – whether a private right of action may be implied under a particular federal statute. It's not about congressional power to create such a right of action. Thus the erasure. Hydriotaphia 21:52, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Jim, no one is "stalking" you. I have been watching these pages since I started contributing to Misplaced Pages. Please assume good faith. Respectfully, Hydriotaphia 04:00, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

I have reverted the reference to Garrett. Please see Talk:Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Garrett for an explanation. Hydriotaphia 04:03, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Categories:
Talk:Alexander v. Sandoval: Difference between revisions Add topic