Revision as of 05:13, 27 December 2022 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,310,540 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Oath Keepers/Archive 3) (bot← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:57, 2 April 2023 edit undoBill Williams (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,455 edits →Claim that Oath Keepers support "Sovereign Citizens" and "Posse Comitatus": new sectionTag: New topicNext edit → | ||
Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
The first use of his name the article is at: Prominent members > Elmer Stewart Rhodes and links to this article, please pipe to ] also please link the same in the info box, which leaves the redirect alone for it own uses as prescribed. thanks ] (]) 04:10, 1 December 2022 (UTC) | The first use of his name the article is at: Prominent members > Elmer Stewart Rhodes and links to this article, please pipe to ] also please link the same in the info box, which leaves the redirect alone for it own uses as prescribed. thanks ] (]) 04:10, 1 December 2022 (UTC) | ||
== Claim that Oath Keepers support "Sovereign Citizens" and "Posse Comitatus" == | |||
Please provide a single quote from the sources that actually states this, or the notion that they think sheriffs are the highest authorities of the land. I read through the entirety of the sources and never do they specifically state that the Oath Keepers' leadership or most of their members support these views. Do they not obsess over Donald Trump, someone who certainly isn't a sheriff, and attacked the capital in support of him? I'm confused where that even comes from the sources. ] 15:57, 2 April 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:57, 2 April 2023
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Oath Keepers article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article was nominated for deletion on 11 August 2015. The result of the discussion was keep. |
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
Elmer Stewart Rhodes
should there be a separate article on Elmer Stewart Rhodes, as an individual Patbahn (talk) 22:46, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
- Might get redirected (again), but stub at Stewart Rhodes ---Another Believer (Talk) 23:17, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Declutter the lead
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The first paragraph could probably be better at summarizing. I propose:
In November 2022, Rhodes and another leader of the organization were convicted of seditious conspiracy for their actions around the January 6 United States Capitol attack. Along with three other leaders, they were also convicted of obstruction and other felonies.
Is changed to: In November 2022, Rhodes and other leaders of the organization were convicted of various crimes, including seditious conspiracy, for their actions around the January 6 United States Capitol attack.
166.205.97.48 (talk) 21:52, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
- Disagree. Because seditious conspiracy is an extremely serious offense and the text should be clear on which persons were convicted. Right-wing extremists get convicted of violent crimes is a bit like dog bites man. It happens every day. TFD (talk) 12:40, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
Rhodes
The first use of his name the article is at: Prominent members > Elmer Stewart Rhodes and links to this article, please pipe to Stewart Rhodes also please link the same in the info box, which leaves the redirect alone for it own uses as prescribed. thanks 2404:4408:638C:5E00:59:1B5B:5ADB:6C25 (talk) 04:10, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
Claim that Oath Keepers support "Sovereign Citizens" and "Posse Comitatus"
Please provide a single quote from the sources that actually states this, or the notion that they think sheriffs are the highest authorities of the land. I read through the entirety of the sources and never do they specifically state that the Oath Keepers' leadership or most of their members support these views. Do they not obsess over Donald Trump, someone who certainly isn't a sheriff, and attacked the capital in support of him? I'm confused where that even comes from the sources. Bill Williams 15:57, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Categories:- All unassessed articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- C-Class organization articles
- Low-importance organization articles
- WikiProject Organizations articles
- Misplaced Pages articles that use American English