| Revision as of 06:22, 13 April 2007 editDoczilla (talk | contribs)Administrators49,374 edits →Blocked← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:28, 15 April 2007 edit undoAsgardian (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users11,108 edits ←Blanked the pageNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == User notice: temporary 3RR block == | |||
| <div style="background-color: #f9f9f9; border: 1px solid red; padding: 3px;"> | |||
| ==Regarding reversions made on ] ] to ]== | |||
| <div class="user-block"> ] | |||
| You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the ]. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.</div> | |||
| <!-- Template:3RR5 --> The duration of the is 24 hours. ] 17:52, 26 October 2006 (UTC)</div> | |||
| == User CovenantD == | |||
| Greetings. This user is unfortunately a tad obsessive and has once again breached the 3R-rule. 4 reverts on the article ] within 24 hours. His rationale aside, he's still gone ahead and done it. | |||
| Regards | |||
| ] 23:47, 23 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :The correct place to report violations of the 3RR is ]. Please post it there in the prescribed format. ] (]) 09:25, 24 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Also, if you're going to report 3RR violatons, you should practice what you preach. | |||
| ::* | |||
| ::* | |||
| ::* | |||
| ::* | |||
| ::--] 18:24, 24 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==] case== | |||
| {| align="left" | |||
| || ] | |||
| |} | |||
| You have been accused of ]. Please refer to ] for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with ] before editing the evidence page. | |||
| ] 22:27, 30 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Hi Asgardian, I have closed this case; there's no evidence that you've violated ]. However, I urge you to make sure that you're logged in for all your edits, so other editors can be sure that it's you. Happy editing! ] (]) 03:17, 5 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Galactus== | |||
| ] ] 02:28, 3 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Omnipotence== | |||
| Given the discussions we've been involved with over the meaning and misuse of the term ''omnipotent'', you might want to check this out: ] ] 09:06, 4 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Re: Your Last Statement== | |||
| "Odd to be sure, given that your History indicates that you seem to spend all your time policing one entry (cosmic fetish?). Have you actually crafted any articles from scratch? Made significant contributions? If not, perhaps more discussion and less snarkiness may help. Study the changes. | |||
| Asgardian 02:55, 7 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:TheBalance" | |||
| :What's surely odd is ''your'' History indicates that you spend all of your time engaged in revert wars over 3 - 4 entries. (revert fetish?) Have I crafted articles from scratch? Yes, indeed. Perhaps you should accept the reality that you have ''not'' been granted authority over the entries you have contributed to (or trimmed excessively). Perhaps you should also attempt to recognize that your fellow editors do not revert your edits simply because they "do not understand the changes." ] 22:13, 8 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Blocked == | |||
| You've been blocked. The reason is given in the block summary. – ] 12:22, 9 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Not that I ought to be stirring things up, but what happened that got you blocked? I never could figure it out. I still don't know what block summary Steel was talking about, and Steel wasn't exactly responsive to the suggestion he/she could have used a dang template to post the block notice appropriately. ] 06:22, 13 April 2007 (UTC) | |||