Revision as of 08:52, 15 April 2007 editMjb (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users10,692 editsm →Deletion: typo fix← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:44, 10 May 2007 edit undo86.143.195.123 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==What's happening here?== | ==What's happening here?== | ||
well , what is actually happening here is that this page is full of lies about me. i pop in today to survey the new lies this week, its fun cos the lies are always changing as you find magazine articles that you think are relevant, but are actually also lies. oh this week i apparently made a track with someone i have never worked with when i was still at school!!! you also seem to pick the worst people i have worked with and put them up. thanks guys - i will fuck you up at some point - you are my sworn enemy now for not taking this page off. DDOS is too simple and nice for you cunts. ive also been spreading the word about what a useless site[REDACTED] is and hows it is full of *other* lies. it MUST BE STOPPED!!! | |||
Kris Weston | |||
now fucking delete my page. | |||
ps ironically the bit you took off first (underneath) is actually the most truthful but you ever printed, althought the silence was also a reference the the john cage track which mike batt had just got sued for by cages estate. hence the crediting of the track to (trad.) prolly a bit over you guys heads though eh ? mw aha | |||
Why this article is being vandalized and why we can't keep one of previous revisions, which were far better? --] 04:49, 29 June 2006 (UTC) | Why this article is being vandalized and why we can't keep one of previous revisions, which were far better? --] 04:49, 29 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
Line 36: | Line 45: | ||
*I'm pretty sure the Guardian is pretty reliable, even if they are reprinting a quote. I'm far more inclined to believe that Weston forgot about a 10 year-old interview rather than either ID or The Guardian making it up. ] 01:56, 15 April 2007 (UTC) | *I'm pretty sure the Guardian is pretty reliable, even if they are reprinting a quote. I'm far more inclined to believe that Weston forgot about a 10 year-old interview rather than either ID or The Guardian making it up. ] 01:56, 15 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
:Thanks for the quotation; we could add that to the citation. I agree it's plausible, maybe even likely, that Weston forgot, but I wouldn't assume anything about fact-checking by The Guardian when it's reporting on something published in another source. Would the reporter have checked that Weston ''actually'' said some unflattering things about Paterson to i-D, or just that i-D published something that ''says'' that Weston did? My money's on the latter; it'd be i-D's fault if they made up the interview, and of course it's in Weston's interest to deny it so why bother ringing him up to confirm? Bogus interviews have been known to happen in music mags, and The Guardian isn't immune to publishing things for shock value. I'm on the fence about whether the quote should stay but I don't have good reason to doubt it. I think if it does remain, the citation and the way the quote is presented should be changed to tread a little more lightly and not say "Weston said X" but rather The Guardian reported that Weston said X to i-D magazine" or some such. —] 08:51, 15 April 2007 (UTC) | :Thanks for the quotation; we could add that to the citation. I agree it's plausible, maybe even likely, that Weston forgot, but I wouldn't assume anything about fact-checking by The Guardian when it's reporting on something published in another source. Would the reporter have checked that Weston ''actually'' said some unflattering things about Paterson to i-D, or just that i-D published something that ''says'' that Weston did? My money's on the latter; it'd be i-D's fault if they made up the interview, and of course it's in Weston's interest to deny it so why bother ringing him up to confirm? Bogus interviews have been known to happen in music mags, and The Guardian isn't immune to publishing things for shock value. I'm on the fence about whether the quote should stay but I don't have good reason to doubt it. I think if it does remain, the citation and the way the quote is presented should be changed to tread a little more lightly and not say "Weston said X" but rather The Guardian reported that Weston said X to i-D magazine" or some such. —] 08:51, 15 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
why suddenly do these cunts who know nothing about me pontificate on whether facts about my life should feature in a bunch of lies which purports to be a factual biography about me. these people have no qualifications as writers or historians - in fact i could register with[REDACTED] and start writing shit about random people tomorrow! (ala that professor bloke a month back) he underlines it all for me - the fact that[REDACTED] is BULLSHIT. | |||
Kris Weston |
Revision as of 16:44, 10 May 2007
Biography Start‑class | |||||||
|
This article was nominated for deletion on March 4, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep. |
What's happening here?
well , what is actually happening here is that this page is full of lies about me. i pop in today to survey the new lies this week, its fun cos the lies are always changing as you find magazine articles that you think are relevant, but are actually also lies. oh this week i apparently made a track with someone i have never worked with when i was still at school!!! you also seem to pick the worst people i have worked with and put them up. thanks guys - i will fuck you up at some point - you are my sworn enemy now for not taking this page off. DDOS is too simple and nice for you cunts. ive also been spreading the word about what a useless site[REDACTED] is and hows it is full of *other* lies. it MUST BE STOPPED!!!
Kris Weston
now fucking delete my page.
ps ironically the bit you took off first (underneath) is actually the most truthful but you ever printed, althought the silence was also a reference the the john cage track which mike batt had just got sued for by cages estate. hence the crediting of the track to (trad.) prolly a bit over you guys heads though eh ? mw aha
Why this article is being vandalized and why we can't keep one of previous revisions, which were far better? --skysurfer 04:49, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
- because they are full of lies and you lot know fuck all about what actually happened in reality.
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.96.163.46 (talk • contribs) .
The article page was blanked after concerns about unsourced, possibly inaccurate content were raised by the article's subject. Please feel free to work the article back up with due regard for proper sources; see WP:LIVING for details. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 23:16, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
- I would suggest to remove the following unsourced statements:
- 'The silence was an obvious reference to the fact that "WMD" had not been found in Iraq, even though their existence was a selling point of the war. The third release Good Luck, Cunt was a cut up collage of news coverage of Iraq. The fourth and most aggressive release, The War Against Terror Go back to bed America, featured samples of President George W. Bush and comedian Bill Hicks.'
Dr. Who 03:28, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Deletion
Kris Weston: i left the orb because i wanted an expanded role more than engineering apparently... WTF!!! my role in the orb was of artist and engineer and producer.... so i dont see how i could have expanded my role at all..i dont recall doing an interview with ID mag either.... --Doktor Who 03:37, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- The article says that the interview was in i-D, but the citation says The Guardian. Can someone check on that and fix the article or the reference as needed? mjb 22:16, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Hey please give a look here.--Doktor Who 23:12, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- I'm well aware of the situation. There are procedures for article deletion and a recent attempt to delete it was not successful. I'm only asking about this one citation because it's one of his points of contention ("i dont recall doing an interview with ID mag"). mjb 00:57, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- Ok, I am very pleased that you are aware of this matter. I am afraid that I can't help with that citation for now, sorry; thank you for understanding my position and assuming my good faith.Doktor Who 01:08, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- The Guardian article talks about the i-D interview, which is why it is cited. Directly from The Guardian...
- Ok, I am very pleased that you are aware of this matter. I am afraid that I can't help with that citation for now, sorry; thank you for understanding my position and assuming my good faith.Doktor Who 01:08, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- I'm well aware of the situation. There are procedures for article deletion and a recent attempt to delete it was not successful. I'm only asking about this one citation because it's one of his points of contention ("i dont recall doing an interview with ID mag"). mjb 00:57, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- Hey please give a look here.--Doktor Who 23:12, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
In Paterson's words, the Orb began to "self-destruct". Thrash left mysteriously (he later told i-D magazine that "Alex got me in but didn't do his 50 per cent of the work. He couldn't play anything"). But the biggest problem was that Paterson became embroiled in litigation...
Wickethewok 01:14, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- I understand... but.. :D
- this is a Matryoshka !!!---Doktor Who 01:16, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- I'm pretty sure the Guardian is pretty reliable, even if they are reprinting a quote. I'm far more inclined to believe that Weston forgot about a 10 year-old interview rather than either ID or The Guardian making it up. Wickethewok 01:56, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the quotation; we could add that to the citation. I agree it's plausible, maybe even likely, that Weston forgot, but I wouldn't assume anything about fact-checking by The Guardian when it's reporting on something published in another source. Would the reporter have checked that Weston actually said some unflattering things about Paterson to i-D, or just that i-D published something that says that Weston did? My money's on the latter; it'd be i-D's fault if they made up the interview, and of course it's in Weston's interest to deny it so why bother ringing him up to confirm? Bogus interviews have been known to happen in music mags, and The Guardian isn't immune to publishing things for shock value. I'm on the fence about whether the quote should stay but I don't have good reason to doubt it. I think if it does remain, the citation and the way the quote is presented should be changed to tread a little more lightly and not say "Weston said X" but rather The Guardian reported that Weston said X to i-D magazine" or some such. —mjb 08:51, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
why suddenly do these cunts who know nothing about me pontificate on whether facts about my life should feature in a bunch of lies which purports to be a factual biography about me. these people have no qualifications as writers or historians - in fact i could register with[REDACTED] and start writing shit about random people tomorrow! (ala that professor bloke a month back) he underlines it all for me - the fact that[REDACTED] is BULLSHIT.
Kris Weston
Categories: