Misplaced Pages

User talk:Soulscanner: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:47, 23 April 2007 editSoulscanner (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,987 edits Previous comments on your edits to []← Previous edit Revision as of 01:56, 23 April 2007 edit undoJoeldl (talk | contribs)3,344 edits Previous comments on your edits to []Next edit →
Line 27: Line 27:
::That conversation is part of the record of discussion of your edits and should be available to people examining your talk page. ] 01:40, 23 April 2007 (UTC) ::That conversation is part of the record of discussion of your edits and should be available to people examining your talk page. ] 01:40, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
::: The conversation did not belong here. It should havve occured on the talk page for the article. --] 01:47, 23 April 2007 (UTC) ::: The conversation did not belong here. It should havve occured on the talk page for the article. --] 01:47, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
::::It's not clear to me that it was inappropriate to bring it up on your page. There was a potential POV issue and the fact that you chose to make those edits could be of interest to other editors. ] 01:56, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:56, 23 April 2007

Québécois is a native word not french... It was created by the Aboriginals-French decedents that created Canada-Quebec… How else would you call this people? Do you think boatloads of French people just came here? LOL thy would have died with-out Native help and the only way to get this country started was to marry into Native culture…That’s why France sent prisoner here to get the population going… I know because my grate grand father was one of them… Even if families did come they married with people from Native backgrounds… Why do you think we won the war of 1812 we all fought together…Natives from south and north, Meti from the west the Quebecois + some French and the English…

Great job...

on the shortening of the History section. Regards, -- Jeff3000 05:29, 16 January 2007 (UTC)


English-speaking Quebecer

Soulscanner, on the talk page of that article, you have broken up what I wrote. I know it is slightly more complicated to respond to what I wrote without breaking it up, but ultimately nobody else will be able to read it this way. Could you please reorganize your reply and restore what I wrote? Joeldl 19:12, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Don't bother, I've done it. Please don't break up my comments. Joeldl 20:08, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Soulscanner, you've messed up the order of comments again. I responded to Mathieugp, so I indented once more than he had. You were also responding to him, therefore you needed to respond below my comments and indent them the same as mine. Joeldl 09:46, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Well, I don't know. These talk pages are being abused by us anyways, They're getting way too long. It's just too unwieldy. Feel free to shift things around if you don't like the format. Just don't delete anything.--Soulscanner 04:40, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Please don't break up other people's comments. That way, nobody will need to move them around. Joeldl 15:40, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

RE: Proposed move of Canadian French

Greetings! Would you care to weigh in on this proposed move? There's been a lot of discussion, and I apologise in advance for prolixity. :) Merci! Corticopia 12:08, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Previous comments on your edits to Canadian French

You have deleted a discussion from your talk page that can be found here:

You have moved the discussion that was on your talk page to the talk page of the article. I don't know whether this is appropriate Wikiquette. But I don't think you should remove comments from your talk page. You should instead archive them when your talk page is too long. Joeldl 20:59, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

They were not appropriate here. It was a complete discussion about the Canadian French article, where they belong. --Soulscanner 01:27, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
That conversation is part of the record of discussion of your edits and should be available to people examining your talk page. Joeldl 01:40, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
The conversation did not belong here. It should havve occured on the talk page for the article. --Soulscanner 01:47, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
It's not clear to me that it was inappropriate to bring it up on your page. There was a potential POV issue and the fact that you chose to make those edits could be of interest to other editors. Joeldl 01:56, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
User talk:Soulscanner: Difference between revisions Add topic