Revision as of 20:58, 29 April 2007 edit164.107.223.217 (talk) →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:36, 29 April 2007 edit undoEmphasisMine (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users10,970 edits →[]: deleteNext edit → | ||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
*'''Delete''' per ] and perhaps ]. ] 19:25, 29 April 2007 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' per ] and perhaps ]. ] 19:25, 29 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
*'''Keep''', because -isms are useful topics for study, especially in universities. --] 20:58, 29 April 2007 (UTC) | *'''Keep''', because -isms are useful topics for study, especially in universities. --] 20:58, 29 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
*'''Delete''' as ]. ] 21:36, 29 April 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:36, 29 April 2007
Mistakism
This appears to be an attempt to coin a neologism/new art movement. Several Ghits, all to self-published sources, most of which are obvious attempts to coin the term. I can't find any reliable secondary sources using the term. Non-notable. Coren 18:58, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NEO and perhaps WP:CB. YechielMan 19:25, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, because -isms are useful topics for study, especially in universities. --164.107.223.217 20:58, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as protologism. EALacey 21:36, 29 April 2007 (UTC)