Revision as of 00:22, 30 April 2007 edit164.107.223.217 (talk) →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:27, 30 April 2007 edit undoDGG (talk | contribs)316,874 edits →[]: dNext edit → | ||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
**'''Comment''' This anonymous user has voted Keep in every AfD he's voted in. ] 00:16, 30 April 2007 (UTC) | **'''Comment''' This anonymous user has voted Keep in every AfD he's voted in. ] 00:16, 30 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
:::So what? If I find one that I agree should be deleted, I promise that I will vote as such, but if I have a reason to keep, why not share it? Should I comment that you mostly vote to delete articles based on your recent history as evidence of something? --] 00:22, 30 April 2007 (UTC) | :::So what? If I find one that I agree should be deleted, I promise that I will vote as such, but if I have a reason to keep, why not share it? Should I comment that you mostly vote to delete articles based on your recent history as evidence of something? --] 00:22, 30 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
*'''delete''' unless the anon user above can find some sources, since he apparently thinks there might be some. ''']''' 04:27, 30 April 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:27, 30 April 2007
MAODDP
This article is original research. Evidence:
- The article's subject, MAODDP, is referred to as a "research outcome" here
- The article's author added this link to List of ad-hoc routing protocols. The link is a presentation of MAODDP as OR
- When the author added MAODDP to List of ad-hoc routing protocols the summary was "Addition of new protocol details"
The article has already been deleted once before.
andy 22:12, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy delete recreation of deleted material. --JianLi 22:23, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete spam. JuJube 23:22, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep if additional sources can be found. --164.107.223.217 00:12, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
- Comment This anonymous user has voted Keep in every AfD he's voted in. JuJube 00:16, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
- So what? If I find one that I agree should be deleted, I promise that I will vote as such, but if I have a reason to keep, why not share it? Should I comment that you mostly vote to delete articles based on your recent history as evidence of something? --164.107.223.217 00:22, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
- delete unless the anon user above can find some sources, since he apparently thinks there might be some. DGG 04:27, 30 April 2007 (UTC)