Revision as of 16:44, 16 May 2007 editTempshill (talk | contribs)9,225 editsm Template:Trivia← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:24, 16 May 2007 edit undoPadillah (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers6,828 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
This page is to request comment on policy or guideline topics. That applies both to disputes about any current policy or guideline, and any new proposals or amendments to those. Further, policy matters are also discussed at ]. | This page is to request comment on policy or guideline topics. That applies both to disputes about any current policy or guideline, and any new proposals or amendments to those. Further, policy matters are also discussed at ]. | ||
{{RFCheader|Policy, guideline, and proposal issues}} | {{RFCheader|Policy, guideline, and proposal issues}} | ||
*] - This guideline needs clarification. It is being argued that trivia lists are acceptable when there is no other way to present the information AND that trivia sections should be removed because they add little to the article. Both of these outlooks are perfectly valid when the guidelines to "Avoid trivia sections" and that it would be "better presented" in the body while still maintaining "Don't simply remove it" and "seek to minimize it" which implies it need simply be smaller, not removed. Please help eliminate ] from this guideline and firmly establish if trivia sections are acceptable or not. 19:24, 16 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
*] - This template currently says, "Content in this section should be integrated into the body of the article or removed." The template should instead comport with ], which does not advocate the removal of content because it's in a trivia list. Several editors who appear to be in favor of removing trivia sections from Misplaced Pages entirely, notably ], have repeatedly reverted my attempts at trying to make the template match the ] guideline. ] 16:44, 16 May 2007 (UTC) | *] - This template currently says, "Content in this section should be integrated into the body of the article or removed." The template should instead comport with ], which does not advocate the removal of content because it's in a trivia list. Several editors who appear to be in favor of removing trivia sections from Misplaced Pages entirely, notably ], have repeatedly reverted my attempts at trying to make the template match the ] guideline. ] 16:44, 16 May 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:24, 16 May 2007
Shortcut- ]
This page is to request comment on policy or guideline topics. That applies both to disputes about any current policy or guideline, and any new proposals or amendments to those. Further, policy matters are also discussed at Misplaced Pages:Village pump (policy). Template:RFCheader
- WP:TRIVIA - This guideline needs clarification. It is being argued that trivia lists are acceptable when there is no other way to present the information AND that trivia sections should be removed because they add little to the article. Both of these outlooks are perfectly valid when the guidelines to "Avoid trivia sections" and that it would be "better presented" in the body while still maintaining "Don't simply remove it" and "seek to minimize it" which implies it need simply be smaller, not removed. Please help eliminate Weasel words from this guideline and firmly establish if trivia sections are acceptable or not. 19:24, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
- Template:Trivia - This template currently says, "Content in this section should be integrated into the body of the article or removed." The template should instead comport with WP:TRIVIA, which does not advocate the removal of content because it's in a trivia list. Several editors who appear to be in favor of removing trivia sections from Misplaced Pages entirely, notably User:Matthew, have repeatedly reverted my attempts at trying to make the template match the WP:TRIVIA guideline. Tempshill 16:44, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages:Notability (highways) - There is an ongoing discussion at Misplaced Pages talk:Notability (highways) on drafting a notability guideline for highway related articles. Please help draft the text of the guideline or express your comments at the talk page. --Polaron | Talk 13:43, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages:Spoiler warning. It has been proposed this policy be abandoned. Previously being discussed at MfD, the discussion can now be found at Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Policies/Wikipedia:Spoiler warning. WjBscribe 12:45, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages talk:What Misplaced Pages is not#Clarification. Proposed additional language to the links/images section of WP:NOT. Not a heated dispute, just would like some other users for good consensus. VanTucky 00:39, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages:Native American Tribes. Proposed policy for verifying legitimate Native American Tribes vs. non-recognized tribes and providing standards of verifiability. See Misplaced Pages talk:Native American Tribes for details. Jeffrey Vernon Merkey 05:01, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages:Neutral point of view. Debate over the inclusion of some potentially POV material. See Misplaced Pages talk:Neutral point of view#restoring section for details. 04:35, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages:Citing consensus. A guideline for how to reference a statement that a "consensus" exists on a subject.--Pharos 01:54, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
- , , We are wondering why template:see was deprecated in favor for template:futher. How is explicitly wikilinking in template:further, bottom line, better?100110100 05:44, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages:Long-term Unsourced Articles A policy for dealing with articles which have not had sources for a long period of time. Paul Cyr 02:05, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages talk:Copyrights#If the same user puts the same text in Misplaced Pages and in an external site: a query about a technical detail about copyright. Anthony Appleyard 06:30, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages:Reference desk/guidelines: Is there community support for these proposed guidelines for conduct on the Misplaced Pages Reference Desk? Comments welcomed and encouraged at Misplaced Pages talk:Reference desk/guidelines#So, what is it then.... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by TenOfAllTrades (talk • contribs) 02:38, 23 April 2007 (UTC).
- Proposal/idea... The idea of expanding from Featured and Good Article classes to A and B Article class's, with official Policy guidelines standardizing "Greading". 18:41, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
- WP:FRINGE guideline has been questioned on procedural and content grounds. Please comment at Misplaced Pages talk:Fringe theories#RFC - Does this guideline have consensus?.Lakinekaki 19:39, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:Ancient_Egypt_and_race#remove_OR: disagreement over whether a certain paragraph is Original Research. 19:33, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
- Proposal: Disambiguation pages aren't articles. A newly created proposal, hoping to gain consensus on the declassification of disambiguation pages from article status. Please contribute at Misplaced Pages:Disambiguation pages aren't articles — 23:19, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- A propose for the adoption of the following new policy: Misplaced Pages:Responding to suicidal individuals. This proposal has been extensively discussed here, and that discussion is also reproduced and has been expanded on at the talk page for the proposed policy. In a nutshell the policy is “Misplaced Pages is not a counseling service. Respond to suicidal individuals by pointing them towards one of the listed crisis lines/websites. Do not ridicule or make personal attacks on suicidal editors.” Please edit or comment upon this proposed policy. Thank you. 22:29, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- User:Itayb/Randopedia - a suggestion for introducing randomization into Misplaced Pages to help deal with some problematic aspects, such as conflicts of interest and cabals (I know, there is no cabal. But just to be on the safe side...). Comments are most welcome. 15:59, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
- Reference Desk Talk Page There is a major dispute going on there. People are deleting things written by other users, there are edit wars, people are telling other people to leave Misplaced Pages and people are starting to leave Misplaced Pages. Some people are even going away to Wikiversity. Please, comment there! It's a dispute about what is the Reference Desk and how the Misplaced Pages pillars apply to the Reference Desk. A.Z. 16:52, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- Privacy proposals. Should the proposals Misplaced Pages:Protecting children's privacy, Misplaced Pages:Youth protection, and Misplaced Pages:Privacy be marked as {{rejected}}? Please comment here. 11:38, 5 April 2007 (UTC)