| Revision as of 18:21, 30 May 2007 editGamaliel (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators94,055 edits Lee Harvey Oswald← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:03, 30 May 2007 edit undoJossi (talk | contribs)72,880 edits 3rr block noticeNext edit → | ||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
| {{{icon|] }}}You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, you may be ] from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a ] among editors. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr -->--] <small>(])</small> 18:21, 30 May 2007 (UTC) | {{{icon|] }}}You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, you may be ] from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a ] among editors. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr -->--] <small>(])</small> 18:21, 30 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
| <div class="user-block"> ] | |||
| You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the ]. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.</div><!-- Template:3RR5 --> ] <small>]</small> 20:03, 30 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:03, 30 May 2007
Your edit to David Banner
Your recent edit to David Banner (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Misplaced Pages articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 22:13, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
Regarding edits made during November 8 2006 to John Wayne
It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from an article. Please be careful not to remove content from Misplaced Pages without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. Glen 05:14, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
I did not touch the John Wayne article; he is not someone in whom I am interested in the slightest. I did not in any way, shape, form, or fashion vandalize the Hargitay profile and have only added career information and corrected a typo of my own. I cannot sign into Wiki because my carrier is a satellite, my Wiki name is Mowens35.67.142.130.43 16:44, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
- Well I am sorry if I have wrongly accused you of something you didn't do...I do make mistakes. Sorry if I have caused any trouble.__Seadog 17:42, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
- Then you should be very careful tossing around "last warnings". I make mistakes as well and when I do, I attempt to correct them ASAP and in correcting others' mistakes, I at least let them know why and when. To receive a "last warning" for no apparent reason and with no prior message as to concerns, etc, is disturbing, as it evidences some degree of temperamentalism on the warner's side.67.142.130.43 17:47, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
- I have removed the warning...I do not know why I warned you about that article...I think I know what the problem is, eairler I was using Lupins anti-vandal tool. I was constantly reverting vandalism from a specific IP address, I think what happened is I accidently clicked the warn user button and placed the wrong message on the wrong talk page (yours). I am sorry for this mix-up, I am very new to the tool and I made an honest mistake. I hope I did not offend you.__Seadog 17:53, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
- Then you should be very careful tossing around "last warnings". I make mistakes as well and when I do, I attempt to correct them ASAP and in correcting others' mistakes, I at least let them know why and when. To receive a "last warning" for no apparent reason and with no prior message as to concerns, etc, is disturbing, as it evidences some degree of temperamentalism on the warner's side.67.142.130.43 17:47, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for experimenting with the page North American Man/Boy Love Association on Misplaced Pages. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Martial BACQUET 11:28, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
Regarding your edits to Dwight D. Eisenhower
Please stop. If you continue to vandalise Misplaced Pages, as you did to Dwight D. Eisenhower, you will be blocked. §†SupaSoldier†§ 01:38, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Misplaced Pages, as you did to Dwight D. Eisenhower, you will be blocked from editing. -- Jim Douglas (contribs) 01:51, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
|
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Dwight D. Eisenhower, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. -- Drini 01:57, 6 February 2007 (UTC) |
February 2007
Hi, the recent edit you made to Charles Dickens has been reverted, as it appears to be vandalism. Please do not vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing, or if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks – Qxz 00:56, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Please do not add nonsense to Misplaced Pages, as you did to the Chaz page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. CounterFX 22:38, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Please do not remove content from Misplaced Pages, as you did to Andrew. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. --Chris (talk) 22:39, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Taco Bell, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. --Chris (talk) 22:42, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Misplaced Pages, as you did to Taco Bell, you will be blocked from editing. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. --Chris (talk) 22:43, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
You have been temporarily blocked from editing Misplaced Pages as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. --Chris (talk) 22:46, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Your edit to Goody Cole
Your recent edit to Goody Cole (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Misplaced Pages articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 14:24, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Your recent edit to Matt Damon (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Misplaced Pages articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 21:31, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Lee Harvey Oswald, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Katieh5584 17:51, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did to Lee Harvey Oswald, you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. EliminatorJR 17:52, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
Lee Harvey Oswald
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. --Gamaliel (Orwellian Cyber hell master) 18:21, 30 May 2007 (UTC)