User talk:Kim Bruning: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 06:51, 19 June 2007 editCharlotteWebb (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers33,527 edits Per request← Previous edit		Revision as of 12:52, 20 June 2007 edit undoMiszaBot III (talk \| contribs)597,462 editsm Archiving 1 thread(s) (older than 14d) to User talk:Kim Bruning/Archive 7.Next edit →
Line 27:		Line 27:

	http://de.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Hauptautoren. {{unsigned\|Eloquence}}		http://de.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Hauptautoren. {{unsigned\|Eloquence}}

	== ArmedBlowfish ==

	Hi Kim,

	Does your statement on the propriety of ArmedBlowfish's RfA constitute an "official" decision in the matter, or are you expressing a knowledgeable opinion? If your comment isn't definitive, what would be?

	One part of your response to the first question bothers me ... "On wikipedia, anything is permitted, as long as does not damage wikipedia."

	My entire point is that it could damage Misplaced Pages to have a completely anonymous editor free access to edit, on the basis of "trust him." Is it true he would even be protected from legal process? Would that put Wikimedia at risk? -- ] 02:48, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

	:I would be grateful if you would answer my question, Kim. You wrote a definitive sounding opinion under the rubric of (IIRC) a "Policy Maintainer." Is that an official position? Does your opinion carry official weight? -- ] 01:34, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

	== Protection ==		== Protection ==

Revision as of 12:52, 20 June 2007

Current status: > regaining energy.

Hello! Please append your message at the end of the page.

This page is automatically archived by MiszaBot III.

Discussion on Jimbos page

I am awake and waiting for your counterarguments. Prandr 11:09 CEST, 14 May 2007

Super datatool!!!

http://de.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Hauptautoren. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eloquence (talk • contribs)

Protection

It probably doesn't, but I haven't seen any other useful suggestions recently. >Radiant< 07:35, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Yesterday noone could fix it at all either, so I fail to see how this changes anything. >Radiant< 10:30, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

#wikipedia-medcab

Could you please give chanop status to Vassyana (talk · contribs), "Vassyana" on IRC? --Ideogram 16:29, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

"Please don't change the policy without consensus"

IMHO sentences such as this one shows lack of understanding of the term consensus. If you feel the same you have the chance to educate people at the talk of m:No open proxies~- check the page history. (I was thinking about doing it myself, but was too lazy. Or something. Besides, I think that of two posts with identical meaning, one signed Kim Bruning and one signed habj, the first one has more weight. FWIW.) // habj 14:30, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Per request

— CharlotteWebb 06:51, 19 June 2007 (UTC)