Revision as of 08:23, 11 July 2007 editA Man In Black (talk | contribs)38,430 edits →[]: delete← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:49, 11 July 2007 edit undoBurzmali (talk | contribs)6,121 edits →[]Next edit → | ||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Still no verification (] of notability (], after the result of the last AfD, and as the discussion page shows, there is no places besides WP to assert that this is more than a web contest held by a handful of people (and despite being a web-based contest, google only has a total of 68 hits for "seven day roguelike"). ] 08:13, 11 July 2007 (UTC) | Still no verification (] of notability (], after the result of the last AfD, and as the discussion page shows, there is no places besides WP to assert that this is more than a web contest held by a handful of people (and despite being a web-based contest, google only has a total of 68 hits for "seven day roguelike"). ] 08:13, 11 July 2007 (UTC) | ||
*'''Delete'''. The nom is a new user, but the reasoning is correct. Nobody has ever seen fit to comment on this particular subject in reliable sources. About three months ago, I tried on the ] to get some sort of insight on what sources might be used to establish the notability of the subject, but the upshot of the discussion was that no such sources exist. Unfortunately, that means that Misplaced Pages shouldn't be the first publication to comment on the subject. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 08:23, 11 July 2007 (UTC) | *'''Delete'''. The nom is a new user, but the reasoning is correct. Nobody has ever seen fit to comment on this particular subject in reliable sources. About three months ago, I tried on the ] to get some sort of insight on what sources might be used to establish the notability of the subject, but the upshot of the discussion was that no such sources exist. Unfortunately, that means that Misplaced Pages shouldn't be the first publication to comment on the subject. - ] <small>(] | ])</small> 08:23, 11 July 2007 (UTC) | ||
*'''Weak Keep''' - The Roguelike genre of computer games definitely meets ] and these contests have been some of the most significant activity in the genre in the last few years. I could see this information merged into ] is such an article existed, but until such a time I think it can stand on it's own merit, if just barely. ] 13:49, 11 July 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:49, 11 July 2007
Seven day roguelike
AfDs for this article:- Seven day roguelike (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - (View log)
Still no verification (WP:V of notability (WP:N, after the result of the last AfD, and as the discussion page shows, there is no places besides WP to assert that this is more than a web contest held by a handful of people (and despite being a web-based contest, google only has a total of 68 hits for "seven day roguelike"). Minimaki 08:13, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. The nom is a new user, but the reasoning is correct. Nobody has ever seen fit to comment on this particular subject in reliable sources. About three months ago, I tried on the talk page to get some sort of insight on what sources might be used to establish the notability of the subject, but the upshot of the discussion was that no such sources exist. Unfortunately, that means that Misplaced Pages shouldn't be the first publication to comment on the subject. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 08:23, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
- Weak Keep - The Roguelike genre of computer games definitely meets WP:N and these contests have been some of the most significant activity in the genre in the last few years. I could see this information merged into History of roguelikes is such an article existed, but until such a time I think it can stand on it's own merit, if just barely. Burzmali 13:49, 11 July 2007 (UTC)