Misplaced Pages

User talk:67.87.225.29: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:39, 23 July 2007 edit67.87.225.29 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 01:40, 23 July 2007 edit undo67.87.225.29 (talk) it has been 2 daysNext edit →
Line 10: Line 10:


:This is your one and only warning. If you continue to alter other users comments and sockpuppetry templates in order to disrupt Misplaced Pages, you will be blocked and this page will be protected from editing. - ''']''' ] 21:41, 22 June 2007 (UTC) :This is your one and only warning. If you continue to alter other users comments and sockpuppetry templates in order to disrupt Misplaced Pages, you will be blocked and this page will be protected from editing. - ''']''' ] 21:41, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

{{unblock-auto reviewed|67.87.225.29|Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Putmedown". The reason given for Putmedown's block is: "disruptive sock".|AuburnPilot|decline=Address being used abusively by blocked vandals. In the future, please register an account so we can consider unblocking you. — ] 16:50, 18 July 2007 (UTC)}}
{{unblock-auto reviewed|67.87.225.29|Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Putmedown". The reason given for Putmedown's block is: "disruptive sock".|AuburnPilot|decline=The IP appears to be static and residential. — ] ] 23:13, 19 July 2007 (UTC)}}
== autoblock? == == autoblock? ==

{{unblock-auto reviewed|67.87.225.29|Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Putmedown". The reason given for Putmedown's block is: "disruptive sock".|AuburnPilot|decline=Someone using this IP has been disruptive. Please create an account. That should allow you to avoid the collateral damage you're experiencing now.— ] - ] 02:18, 20 July 2007 (UTC)}}


<nowiki>{{unblock|i apoligize but i would like to continue editing[REDACTED] i am using both templates to make sure i supply the correct information. Also i have checked with my isp this ip address is static but it is used by multiple users including my neighbors that have permision to utilize my Wi-Fi network which uses wireless n next generation technoloy causing my networks range to be extended to many users (as many as 4 houses)}}</nowiki> <nowiki>{{unblock|i apoligize but i would like to continue editing[REDACTED] i am using both templates to make sure i supply the correct information. Also i have checked with my isp this ip address is static but it is used by multiple users including my neighbors that have permision to utilize my Wi-Fi network which uses wireless n next generation technoloy causing my networks range to be extended to many users (as many as 4 houses)}}</nowiki>

Revision as of 01:40, 23 July 2007

It is suspected that this user is a sock puppet of AFUSCO.
Please refer to contributions for evidence. See block log and current autoblocks.

Template:Do not delete

This is your one and only warning. If you continue to alter other users comments and sockpuppetry templates in order to disrupt Misplaced Pages, you will be blocked and this page will be protected from editing. - auburnpilot talk 21:41, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

autoblock?

{{unblock|i apoligize but i would like to continue editing[REDACTED] i am using both templates to make sure i supply the correct information. Also i have checked with my isp this ip address is static but it is used by multiple users including my neighbors that have permision to utilize my Wi-Fi network which uses wireless n next generation technoloy causing my networks range to be extended to many users (as many as 4 houses)}}

See above. You're not blocked directly.--Chaser - T 02:18, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

{{helpme}}

users please contact an administrator to explain why the autoblock on this ip is being extended

Is there anything I can help you with? Andy 00:43, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

See also

q:WQ:AN#ilikepie8. --Aphaia 11:44, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

67.87.225.29 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i have identified the vandalism source as my neighbors who thought it would be funny to vandalize[REDACTED] (router logs) i have threatened to secure my network and not allow them access if they continue (while they believe it may have been funny it is hurting my utilization of[REDACTED] to prevent vandalism i reccomend a softblock (i will create an account elseware for editing) thank you also if their is vandalism from the ip you can notify me by my account that i will create (name will be supplied after creation)

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=i have identified the vandalism source as my neighbors who thought it would be funny to vandalize[REDACTED] (router logs) i have threatened to secure my network and not allow them access if they continue (while they believe it may have been funny it is hurting my utilization of[REDACTED] to prevent vandalism i reccomend a softblock (i will create an account elseware for editing) thank you also if their is vandalism from the ip you can notify me by my account that i will create (name will be supplied after creation) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=i have identified the vandalism source as my neighbors who thought it would be funny to vandalize[REDACTED] (router logs) i have threatened to secure my network and not allow them access if they continue (while they believe it may have been funny it is hurting my utilization of[REDACTED] to prevent vandalism i reccomend a softblock (i will create an account elseware for editing) thank you also if their is vandalism from the ip you can notify me by my account that i will create (name will be supplied after creation) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=i have identified the vandalism source as my neighbors who thought it would be funny to vandalize[REDACTED] (router logs) i have threatened to secure my network and not allow them access if they continue (while they believe it may have been funny it is hurting my utilization of[REDACTED] to prevent vandalism i reccomend a softblock (i will create an account elseware for editing) thank you also if their is vandalism from the ip you can notify me by my account that i will create (name will be supplied after creation) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
Categories:
User talk:67.87.225.29: Difference between revisions Add topic