| Revision as of 22:43, 6 August 2007 editJossi (talk | contribs)72,880 edits +← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:27, 7 August 2007 edit undoMarvin Diode (talk | contribs)1,756 edits this discussion has been closedNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| *] an external person affiliated with the republican party has expressed concern over a non-neutral color choice for party shading used in wikipedia. it's silly but a reasonable request that can be accomodated without harming the encyclopedia. --] 05:00, 3 August 2007 (UTC) | *] an external person affiliated with the republican party has expressed concern over a non-neutral color choice for party shading used in wikipedia. it's silly but a reasonable request that can be accomodated without harming the encyclopedia. --] 05:00, 3 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *] -- dispute about whether the use of ] is justified when there is no discussion about the image and its role in the political scandal that the article covers. ], specifically criterion 8, is relevant here. <span style="font-family:Verdana; ">''']''' <small>{]}</small></span> 19:27, 2 August 2007 (UTC) | *] -- dispute about whether the use of ] is justified when there is no discussion about the image and its role in the political scandal that the article covers. ], specifically criterion 8, is relevant here. <span style="font-family:Verdana; ">''']''' <small>{]}</small></span> 19:27, 2 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
| * |
*] dispute over capitalization of the word ''realm'' in ''Commonwealth R/realm''. Needs input from people with knowledge of Misplaced Pages style and insight into the nature of the term ''Commonwealth R/realm''. 00:32, 2 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *] -- NPOV check. Does ] require a discussion of an eight-year Congressional career to include more than a couple of gaffes? 04:17, 1 August 2007 (UTC) | *] -- NPOV check. Does ] require a discussion of an eight-year Congressional career to include more than a couple of gaffes? 04:17, 1 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *] - the organization in question has been divided into two, and anonymous editors sympathizing with either faction conducts proxy war on the page. Clarifications from someone with knowledge and a outside viewpoint would be appreciated. --] 06:19, 31 July 2007 (UTC) | *] - the organization in question has been divided into two, and anonymous editors sympathizing with either faction conducts proxy war on the page. Clarifications from someone with knowledge and a outside viewpoint would be appreciated. --] 06:19, 31 July 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 14:27, 7 August 2007
Shortcut- ]
- Talk:List_of_Skull_and_Bones_members#RfC_Summary Questions about sources used for this article. 22:43, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:Sicko_(film)#Continued_WP:LEAD_violations. WP:LEAD requires the lead of an article to describe notable controversies. Does the lead of this article "describe" notable controversies? 18:53, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
- Template_talk:Party shading#Rfc for republican shading an external person affiliated with the republican party has expressed concern over a non-neutral color choice for party shading used in wikipedia. it's silly but a reasonable request that can be accomodated without harming the encyclopedia. --Tbeatty 05:00, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:Profumo Affair#Keeler image -- dispute about whether the use of Image:CKeeler1.jpg is justified when there is no discussion about the image and its role in the political scandal that the article covers. WP:NFCC, specifically criterion 8, is relevant here. howcheng {chat} 19:27, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:Commonwealth_Realm#Capitalization_in_general dispute over capitalization of the word realm in Commonwealth R/realm. Needs input from people with knowledge of Misplaced Pages style and insight into the nature of the term Commonwealth R/realm. 00:32, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:David_Vitter#NPOV_tag -- NPOV check. Does WP:WEIGHT require a discussion of an eight-year Congressional career to include more than a couple of gaffes? 04:17, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:Movement of Independent Nasserists - al-Murabitun - the organization in question has been divided into two, and anonymous editors sympathizing with either faction conducts proxy war on the page. Clarifications from someone with knowledge and a outside viewpoint would be appreciated. --Soman 06:19, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:Eliot Spitzer - Requesting a review of the biography of Eliot Spitzer. The ongoing controversy has been tagged with NPOV. I've tried to edit it as neutrally as possible. There is no explination for why it was tagged, and I am hoping for some input as to how I could make it more neutral. Thank you. 23:29, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:Allegations_of_apartheid#RfC_on_the_Lead – Is it lead's claim that "critics of this use of the term view it as an epithet" an original research extrapolation?05:51, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:Human rights of Kurdish people in Turkey#Request for Comment: genocide of Kurds? - Dispute over the inclusion and interpretation of sources suggesting a genocide of Kurds in Turkey. 09:37, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:Israeli_settlement#RfC:_Inclusion_of_Golan_Heights_settlements — Whether or not Israeli communities established in the Golan Heights should be considered "Israeli settlements" within the context of this article.07:01, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:Manchester Dispute regarding the population figures for cities in the UK. I have cited sources from a Government department providing accurate population figures for cities in the UK rather than administrative boundaries. I can find no official source stating that local authority boundaries are the population of a city, whereas my cited sources specifically state otherwise. This is being reverted with no source citation, in violation of WP:NPOV and Misplaced Pages:No_original_research. 15:06, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:Anarchism_in_Greece Dispute for political events and neutrality. Totally disputed tag on an article tagged under construction.10:49, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:Waterboarding Editors disagree strongly on whether waterboarding is torture, and what constitutes a source in this case, we would greatly welcome outside views, and of course contributors. 23:29, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:Sanjay Gupta Is it a problem under WP:NPOV#Undue weight and WP:NPOV that the majority of the article consists of Michale Moore's attack on Gupta with no recounting of Gupta's self-defense? Is it appropriate for an anonymous editor to remove the NPOV tag because he disagrees with the multiple editors who find a NPOV violation? 13:44, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:Allegations_of_state_terrorism_by_the_United_States#Request_for_Comment:_title_change_to_Political_violence_by_the_United_States Title change to a neutral title which will drastically reduce edit warring. When the Zionist terrorism page when the name was changed to Zionist political violence the edit warring was reduced dramatically. 11:16, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:Flying_checkpoint#Request_for_Comment There is a dispute about whether to include examples of use of flying checkpoints by Israel, the U.S., and Lebanese militias or to rely only on a general overview of checkpoints.03:33, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:Israel#POV in lead Does the lead of this article sattisfy WP:NPOV? 19:09, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:Ontario, California#Request for Comment: Inclusion of city blocks to medical marijuana dispensaries – The main dispute is whether to include in city articles if that city has either permanently or temporarily blocked medical marijuana dispensaries. 20:54, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- Ethnic minorities in Iran Dispute about use of quotes - whether too extensive or not, whether we should weed out "American sponsored" quotes and sources or not etc and what exactly constities NPOV 00:48, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Barack_Obama#Rezko_house. Dispute about whether placing a real estate dealing with Tony Rezko in the footnotes is giving it enough weight. 19:03, 4 July 2007 (UTC)