| Revision as of 16:50, 5 September 2007 view sourceTreasuryTag (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users46,645 edits Your edit not only had collateral damage, it was distinctly incivil. Ask nicely since I've requested that you do so, or go to WP:ANI if that will give you pleasure.← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:51, 5 September 2007 view source TreasuryTag (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users46,645 edits And another thing, it's not DELIBERATELY made unusable, I did it because it looks very cool indeed. WP:NPA.Next edit → | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
| == Same Editor == | == Same Editor == | ||
| How can you be sure it was the same editor on the Master talk page? They have different IP addresses. ] 12:32, 3 September 2007 (UTC) | How can you be sure it was the same editor on the Master talk page? They have different IP addresses. ] 12:32, 3 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
| == Tony Crane == | == Tony Crane == | ||
Revision as of 16:51, 5 September 2007
User:Rambutan/Banner User talk:Rambutan/Archivebox
Error: Image is invalid or non-existent.
Same Editor
How can you be sure it was the same editor on the Master talk page? They have different IP addresses. Kelpin 12:32, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Tony Crane
The article you tagged for speedy deletion, Tony Crane, is notable and I have asserted this. Mattythewhite 15:11, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- I've added a reference to the article. Mattythewhite 15:15, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Excuse me? Its good enough. But I've added another. Pleased now? Mattythewhite 15:21, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
German municipalities
You tagged several of my recently created articles about German municipalities for speedy deletion, and undeservedly IMO. I think I gave enough context for a stub article: that it is a municipality, and in which district, state and country it is located. Markussep 15:42, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
A1 speedy deletions
Going through CAT:CSD, I've found several articles that you've tagged for A1 deletion ({{db-nocontext}}), which don't meet the criterion. WP:CSD#A1 is used on articles that are so short that there's no way to tell what they're about or to find references or more information on the subject. If an article could be fixed by a search on its subject matter, or by following links from it, then there's enough context to (in theory, at least) expand it, and it's not an A1 deletion; likewise, if it's more than a couple of sentences long, then there's almost certainly enough context to expand it, unless the article has other speediable problems (such as being nonsense). Could you check your {{db-context}} tagging more carefully in future? Thanks. --ais523 15:54, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Municipalties
PLease don't try to stop work at stubbing municipalities, Once they are set up the info boxes and details are added later. Any valid geographical place does not meet speedy criteria anyway however stubby they are. It fetting them onto the map so to speak. It might seem pointless now but several months down the line you will see what a great job we're all doing ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ 16:17, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
I've added info boxes to all the new that you put up for deletion now- aren;t I a great wikipedian!. ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ 16:38, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
AfD
It is generally considered poor form to nominate an article for deletion within minutes of its creation, particularly when your objections are in part stylistic. Phil Sandifer 16:41, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Your objection that the article does not clarify its notability sufficiently. It's something that, generally, a bit of time to finish honing the article is appreciated with. Phil Sandifer 16:43, 5 September 2007 (UTC)