| Revision as of 04:42, 13 November 2007 editShalom Yechiel (talk | contribs)26,380 edits →Disco inferno generation: del← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:36, 13 November 2007 edit undoDoc Strange (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers36,386 edits →Disco inferno generationNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| :'''Delete''' per nom and per ] and per ] ] | ] 00:32, 13 November 2007 (UTC) | :'''Delete''' per nom and per ] and per ] ] | ] 00:32, 13 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' Yeah, that's weird. ] (] • ]) 04:42, 13 November 2007 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' Yeah, that's weird. ] (] • ]) 04:42, 13 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Speedy Keep''' and ]. Classic bad article: Original Research, no citing, unencyclopedic AND mispellings. Actually, can someone save this as a prime example of a good choice for AfD? ] 07:36, 13 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:36, 13 November 2007
Disco inferno generation
- Disco inferno generation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Neologism generating only a single Ghit, a FT article which uses the term rather than discussing it. There are no given secondary sources, therefore delete per WP:NEO Jeodesic 00:03, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and per WP:NEO and per WP:NN Keeper | 76 00:32, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Yeah, that's weird. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 04:42, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep and WP:SALT. Classic bad article: Original Research, no citing, unencyclopedic AND mispellings. Actually, can someone save this as a prime example of a good choice for AfD? Doc Strange 07:36, 13 November 2007 (UTC)