Misplaced Pages

User talk:Rossnixon: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:58, 2 July 2005 editRossnixon (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers4,330 edits []← Previous edit Revision as of 00:59, 2 July 2005 edit undoRossnixon (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers4,330 edits [] and []Next edit →
Line 19: Line 19:
==Existence of God== ==Existence of God==
Your contribution to ] makes a valid point but as it is phrased it is theist POV. Could you recast it to conform to ]? --] ] 14:52, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC) Your contribution to ] makes a valid point but as it is phrased it is theist POV. Could you recast it to conform to ]? --] ] 14:52, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

==] and ] ==
These pages sure could use some help, perhaps you're interested?

Revision as of 00:59, 2 July 2005

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! --JYolkowski 01:43, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Hi, care to comment?

Would you care to comment on my suggested mass revision to the Creation Science page? The revision is on the Talk:Creation science/Phantym rewrite proposal page and is discussed on the Talk:Creation science/Phantym rewrite proposal/talk page.

Phantym 21:38, 30 May 2005 (UTC)

Existence of God

Your contribution to Existence of God makes a valid point but as it is phrased it is theist POV. Could you recast it to conform to NPOV? --Theo (Talk) 14:52, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

User talk:Rossnixon: Difference between revisions Add topic