| Revision as of 18:03, 28 December 2007 editCeoil (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers172,041 edits Unblock← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:04, 28 December 2007 edit undoCeoil (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers172,041 edits →Unblock: sp.Next edit → | ||
| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
| ==Unblock== | ==Unblock== | ||
| Can you please explain why you unblocked Zeraeph; an editor |
Can you please explain why you unblocked Zeraeph; an editor who has a long history of harassing SandyGeorgia, and has posted vicious attacks on her offsite? ] (]) 18:03, 28 December 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 18:04, 28 December 2007
File:Animalibrí.gif [REDACTED]
![[REDACTED]](https://u3vuiephb.global.ssl.fastly.net/File:Bouncywikilogo.gif){kind=link}
 | |||
|
|
No RfXs since 17:37, 25 December 2024 (UTC).—Talk to my owner:Online |
Original research
You wrote at
...
"that would be OR, because the textbooks you want to use have nothing to do with the film." -- I feel like I must be misunderstanding something here. That doesn't make much sense to me.
Statements about facts are statements about facts, and any reliable source on these facts is germane, and is not "original research" by any natural interpretation of that expression.
Whether or not the sources have something to do with the main topic of the article is irrelevant, or should be -- i.e. our policy should state this.
A policy that says that the source has to be about the main topic of the article is inappropriate.
Thanks for your attention. -- Writtenonsand (talk) 03:38, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
- You may want to read Misplaced Pages:No_original_research#Synthesis_of_published_material_serving_to_advance_a_position where this is explained. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 04:13, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Unblock
Can you please explain why you unblocked Zeraeph; an editor who has a long history of harassing SandyGeorgia, and has posted vicious attacks on her offsite? Ceoil (talk) 18:03, 28 December 2007 (UTC)