| Revision as of 05:08, 11 February 2008 editNE2 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers190,449 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:21, 11 February 2008 edit undoNE2 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers190,449 edits →Deletion reviewNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| ==Deletion review== | ==Deletion review== | ||
| By "rationale", I meant fair use rationale, which the images were deleted for lacking. --] 05:08, 11 February 2008 (UTC) | By "rationale", I meant fair use rationale, which the images were deleted for lacking. --] 05:08, 11 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :I don't have the images, so they would need to be undeleted so I can add the rationale. There should probably be a speedier process for this, but I couldn't find one. --] 05:21, 11 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:21, 11 February 2008
- Please add new entries at the bottom of this page.
- Please SIGN your entry with ~~~~
- If you are here to report a vandal, please use WP:AIV., unless I'm online.
- Archives
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Lilia Zaiarna
Hi, I am most surprised at the outcome of this debate. I understand that it involves more than counting votes, but there were four votes in favour of delete and only two for keep. How does that equate to "possibility leaning towards keep"? The article still remains devoid of independent references, and claims of notability are unproven. Before I plan any further response, I am interested in knowing more of your reasons for maintaining this article. Thanks, WWGB (talk) 04:12, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
- The fact that one of the reference is independent or not is in question, however, it is a reliable source nevertheless. The subject has won two awards, which establishes somewhat of a notability, according to WP:MUSIC, if barely. Some of the deletion comments I find on the debate seemed irralevent to the discussion, such as POV issues and copyvio. If there is an evidence which shows that the source is not independent then I'm probably willing to consider its deletion, however, I do not see any evidence of that so far, as it seems that the independency of the source can probably be debated for weeks. So, basically a somehwat reliable source plus with some awards won shows some borderline notability. The "possibily leaning towards keep" is very weak, I would say, and it is more based on the arguments presented rather than the number of votes there are, especially with one of the !votes which brings issues that are irrelevent to the deletion criteria. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 04:29, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Deletion review
By "rationale", I meant fair use rationale, which the images were deleted for lacking. --NE2 05:08, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
- I don't have the images, so they would need to be undeleted so I can add the rationale. There should probably be a speedier process for this, but I couldn't find one. --NE2 05:21, 11 February 2008 (UTC)