Misplaced Pages

User talk:FisherQueen: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:22, 22 March 2008 edit86.141.25.254 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 13:18, 22 March 2008 edit undoFisherQueen (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users57,545 edits Jon Courtney: so?Next edit →
Line 37: Line 37:
==Jon Courtney== ==Jon Courtney==
You really do fail to see the point I was making, don't you? Seems to me that you decline without reading anything. The point I was making was in relation to the article that you exemplified as causing so much concern, saying that Jon Courtney is notable because he wrote the theme tune to 'the Prisoner'. Of course he didn't, but I have no doubt that he thought he did, just like I thought I was singing to the Queen. In fact he no more wrote the theme music for 'The Prisoner' than I sang for the Queen Why should Wiki tremble? ] (talk) 22:27, 21 March 2008 (UTC) You really do fail to see the point I was making, don't you? Seems to me that you decline without reading anything. The point I was making was in relation to the article that you exemplified as causing so much concern, saying that Jon Courtney is notable because he wrote the theme tune to 'the Prisoner'. Of course he didn't, but I have no doubt that he thought he did, just like I thought I was singing to the Queen. In fact he no more wrote the theme music for 'The Prisoner' than I sang for the Queen Why should Wiki tremble? ] (talk) 22:27, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
:I don't even care about the point you were making. I have no idea who Jon Courtney is, and am not really interested in knowing. I don't need to see the point you were making to see that you were engaged in an edit war, and that's against the rules whether you are right or wrong. There are better ways to sort out your disagreement. -]<span style="font-size: smaller;"> (] · ])</span> 13:18, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:18, 22 March 2008

FisherQueen
User Page · Talk page · Archives · Contributions · Edit count · Sandbox · Patrol · Templates

Some clarifications

Care for a response? I am not looking for bad blood, I'm looking for clarifications; either talk page is fine here or here. --157.228.98.181 (talk) 17:26, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

I never even looked at your edits; I could see that others were already looking at that side. My only objection was to your editing while blocked; as you seem to be unblocked now, you're welcome to edit as far as I'm concerned. Welcome back. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 17:28, 20 March 2008 (UTC)


The River of Wind (Guardians of Ga'Hoole)

Yesterday, I was looking at the Guardians of Ga'Hoole page and I clicked on The River of Wind. However, somehow, it didn't show the page. It just showed the Guardians of Ga'Hoole page all over again. I was wondering where the page went, so, could you please check it? Thanks. (Strix Struma (talk) 21:54, 20 March 2008 (UTC))


Can you tell me if I can make the page if there isn't an article? (Strix Struma (talk) 21:56, 20 March 2008 (UTC))

It looks like once upon a time there was an article, but in this discussion, it was decided that although the series is notable, there isn't a lot of independent writing about this individual book, and that the title should just redirect back to the series title. Which does make for an odd link. I think if you want to create an article about it, you'll have to make sure that this specific book- not just the series as a whole- is cited with significant sources that discuss its importance. That's how the consensus reads to me, anyway. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:47, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Love it!!

I love your sense of humor. You are too funny. Thanks for helping with the "Randy/Car5ly8.." situation. Bane of an existence is an understatement for him. KellyAna (talk) 23:03, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

If only they knew how dull they are, and how easy it is to undo the damage and block them, would they still bother? I suppose they would... -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:04, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank-you!

Thank-you for all your help in moving those pages. You are officially my favorite admin! Bcspro (talk) 16:11, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I'm quite awesome; thank you for noticing. :) -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:15, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

User:Grinchsmate

A 13 year old who drinks Absolut and commutes to his job as a journalist in a 1964 Valiant? Raymond Arritt (talk) 17:30, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

That's about the kind of car that a thirteen year old could reasonably afford. But Absolut is kind of pricey for someone living on a junior high school newspaper reporter's salary. He should maybe stick to the cheap stuff until he graduates from high school. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 17:36, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Jon Courtney

You really do fail to see the point I was making, don't you? Seems to me that you decline without reading anything. The point I was making was in relation to the article that you exemplified as causing so much concern, saying that Jon Courtney is notable because he wrote the theme tune to 'the Prisoner'. Of course he didn't, but I have no doubt that he thought he did, just like I thought I was singing to the Queen. In fact he no more wrote the theme music for 'The Prisoner' than I sang for the Queen Why should Wiki tremble? Justpassinby (talk) 22:27, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

I don't even care about the point you were making. I have no idea who Jon Courtney is, and am not really interested in knowing. I don't need to see the point you were making to see that you were engaged in an edit war, and that's against the rules whether you are right or wrong. There are better ways to sort out your disagreement. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 13:18, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
User talk:FisherQueen: Difference between revisions Add topic