Revision as of 16:00, 27 March 2008

Archives

1 2

Wikibreak

Im sick of the fighting and backstabbing on some articles (anything ooxml releated). Microsoft supporters break the rules constantly and nothing is done. Its stopped being fun a long time ago. My carpal tunnel pain is constant. I am taking a break. Kilz (talk) 13:48, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

\ they wore me out too, this is less than cool, it seems to be a battle of attrition through stamina, unpaid interested parties that care are being overwhelmed by continuous persistent MS shills that will bend or break any rule in the fight to win. Peace man, good luck, take a break you deserve it. - jonathan888

What belongs on this page, and what does not.

According to WP:TPG "The purpose of a Misplaced Pages talk page is to provide space for editors to discuss changes to its associated article or project page." This means that it is a discussion about me and my user page. Please do not start discussions related to pages I edit here. Instead place those discussions on the talk pages of the articles so that other editors may find them. In accordance with that I will place any comment not dealing with me or my user page on the appropriate talk page for the subject and Archive it. Also inactive sections will be archived without warning. Thank you for your help in this matter. Kilz 23:05, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Re: blocking

Hi Kilz, basically my advice to you would be to discuss the proposed changes on that article's talk page. If you show that you are using discussion then that lowers your chances of being blocked. But, yes, if you do revert you may be blocked. I recommend you write a brief statement on WP:ANI (with diffs) showing that User:hAl is edit warring again. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. Scarian 13:13, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

He left the replaced edit in place. If he starts again I will post about it. I have learned that its better to avoid edit wars and that there are ways to stop pushy editors without duplicating their actions. Thanks for the advice and the link to the notice board. Kilz (talk) 00:31, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Response

I have responded to your comments on my talk page. WalterGR (talk | contributions) 01:55, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, ill keep looking there while we work this out. Kilz (talk) 02:47, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Responded again. WalterGR (talk | contributions) 03:14, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Responded once more. WalterGR (talk | contributions) 03:58, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

3RR report

I added information to your 3RR report to enhance it. I also added information about the number of reverts you had done during the same time period. In future, you can make better 3RR reports by providing the following information:

• times in the UTC time zone, or at least mention what time zone you're using (I'm not sure whether this is needed or not, but it seems logical to me.)
• A link to the version of the page reverted to, not just to a diff from that version.
• For the 4th revert, evidence that it's a revert, since that can't be seen from the "version reverted to" that you'd provided, which doesn't apply to that diff. I went back through the page history and found where you'd added the quote.

Happy editing, --Coppertwig (talk) 23:12, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, but Im sick of the fighting and backstabbing on some articles. Microsoft fanboys who break the rules constantly and nothing is done. Its stopped being fun a long time ago. My carpal tunnel pain is constant. I am taking a break. Kilz (talk) 13:45, 22 March 2008 (UTC)