User talk:Captain Nemo III: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 00:53, 4 April 2008 editJzG (talk \| contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers155,107 edits →Blocked: new section← Previous edit		Revision as of 06:28, 4 April 2008 edit undoCaptain Nemo III (talk \| contribs)165 edits →Blocked: Outrageous accusation by JzGNext edit →
Line 70:		Line 70:

	Thanks for your efforts to bring the SCOX dispute to Misplaced Pages, but please be informed that we are well aware of them and not actually stupid either. ] are more of a hindrance than a help. I have blocked you. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 00:53, 4 April 2008 (UTC)		Thanks for your efforts to bring the SCOX dispute to Misplaced Pages, but please be informed that we are well aware of them and not actually stupid either. ] are more of a hindrance than a help. I have blocked you. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 00:53, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
			:: This is an outrageous accusation. My account has been used for a significant amount of time, with a wide range of interests shown in my edit history. Furthermore, I have engaged in precisely ZERO trolling of Mr Merkey. I did not "bring the SCOX dispute to Misplaced Pages" in any fashion.

			Is editing articles related to SCO in itself an offense worthy of a ban? Is bringing attention of a ban violation worthy of a ban?

Revision as of 06:28, 4 April 2008

Welcome

Hello Captain Nemo III! Welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions to this 💕. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! -- Levine2112 00:21, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Getting started
Misplaced Pages tutorial • The five pillars of Misplaced Pages How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Attribution • Neutral point of view • Notability Conflict of interest • Autobiography Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Citing sources • Footnotes Image use policy • Copyrights • Fair use External links • Spam • Vandalism Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry What Misplaced Pages is not • Deletion policy

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The "perfect" article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Blocked

Thanks for your efforts to bring the SCOX dispute to Misplaced Pages, but please be informed that we are well aware of them and not actually stupid either. Disruptive single-purpose accounts are more of a hindrance than a help. I have blocked you. Guy (Help!) 00:53, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

This is an outrageous accusation. My account has been used for a significant amount of time, with a wide range of interests shown in my edit history. Furthermore, I have engaged in precisely ZERO trolling of Mr Merkey. I did not "bring the SCOX dispute to Misplaced Pages" in any fashion.

Is editing articles related to SCO in itself an offense worthy of a ban? Is bringing attention of a ban violation worthy of a ban?