Misplaced Pages

User talk:Wisdom89: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:49, 21 May 2008 editAve Caesar (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers2,545 edits →Thanks, but why?: new sec← Previous edit Revision as of 22:55, 21 May 2008 edit undoWyatt915 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers3,688 edits →Adoption: new sectionNext edit →
Line 80: Line 80:
== PCPP == == PCPP ==
I noticed that you were involved in reverting the continuous page blanking by this user so I'm letting you know I mentioned his behavior at ]. --] (]) 13:49, 21 May 2008 (UTC) I noticed that you were involved in reverting the continuous page blanking by this user so I'm letting you know I mentioned his behavior at ]. --] (]) 13:49, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

== Adoption ==

Sorry it took so long. I haven't been on[REDACTED] for a long time. I finally got around to filling some stuff in on the adoption page, though.
] (]) 22:55, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:55, 21 May 2008

This is a Misplaced Pages user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Misplaced Pages, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Misplaced Pages. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Wisdom89.

Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page. Please use headlines when starting new talk topics. Thank you.


Wisdom89 is a full-time graduate student and is sometimes exceptionally busy in real life.
My apologies to anyone who leaves me a message and receives no reply.
Archive
Archives
  1. 2006 - October 2007
  2. October 2006 - January 2008
  3. January 2008 - February 2008
  4. March 4 2008 - March 10 2008
  5. March 2008 - April 2008
  6. April 19, 2008 - May 17, 2008

WP:HAU

Hello again. The Highly Active Users project has gone through a complete revamping per popular demand. We believe this new format will make it easier for new editors to find assistance. However, with the new format, I must again ask you to verify your information on this page. I attempted to translate the data from the old version to the new, but with the extensive changes, I may have made some errors. Thanks again. Useight (talk) 04:30, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

RFA Thanks from Risker

Thanks for your participation at my recent Request for adminship. I’ll keep your concerns in mind as I continue to work within the project. I hope you find I live up to your expectations of administrators. Best, Risker (talk) 16:41, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Participation comment

Hi, Wisdom. I just wanted to drop you a line and let you know your continued article contributions, RfA discussion involvement and helping tasks are appreciated. Thank you for rolling up your sleeves in so many areas of the project. --Gwguffey (talk) 18:39, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Why dont you like Huggle?

Hi, I saw in the RFA for Aitias that you stated you did not like Huggle and there was another user who opposed stated the same concerns. Why is it that you do not like Huggle? Of course everyone has their preference of vandals tools to use but what has this tool got to do with the actual user? You just need to have experience just like basically everything in life and you will be OK. Everyone is human and everyone will make mistakes, but as long as they're corrected almost immediately there is no harm done i think. Thanks, keep up the great work in the RFAs. We can learn a lot from the comments you make. Roadrunnerz45 05:14, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Huggle just isn't my thing. In my opinion, it increases the incidents of mis-warnings and mistakes. Bear in mind, though, that I would never oppose someone at RfA for utilizing a particular vandal tool. Cheers. Wisdom89 (T / ) 06:23, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

RfA thank-spam

Wisdom89, just a note of appreciation for your recent support of my request for adminship, which ended successfully with 112 supports, 2 opposes, and 1 neutral. If there's something I've realized during my RFA process this last week, it's that adminship is primarily about trust. I will strive to the best of my ability to honour that trust in my future interactions with the community. Many thanks! Gatoclass (talk) 06:15, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
And thanks in particular for your kind words. Gatoclass (talk) 06:15, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

RfA thanks!

RfA: Many thanks
Many thanks for your participation in my recent request for adminship. I am impressed by the amount of thought that goes into people's contribution to the RfA process, and humbled that so many have chosen to trust me with this new responsibility. I step into this new role cautiously, but will do my very best to live up to your kind words and expectations, and to further the project of the encyclopedia. Again, thank you. --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 05:42, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Requests for adminship/Tkgd2007

Can you please refrain from comments like "I wonder what the weather is" on RfAs that are failing? They're needlessly provocative, BITEy, patronizing and just plain impolite. The tone of other comments were also needlessly patronizing, like starting with "Sorry bud, ..." Thanks, Maxim(talk) 12:14, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

I don't agree. Wisdom89 (T / ) 15:07, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
To elaborate. The following could be construed as bitey:
  • Letting an RfA plummet with oppose after oppose and "patronizing" moral supports, especially if the candidate is new to RfA.
  • Instead of using a euphemism (as I did), typing "Close this RfA per SNOW" might elicit the following reaction from the candidate: "What? Close? I thought I had seven days..etc..etc.."

Hopefully you see my point. Also, "Sorry bud" is used informally to sound like the applicant is getting a response from a human being, rather than a faceless phantom over the internet. Anyway, perhaps next time you'll drop me a note with something that reads a little less like an admonishment. Wisdom89 (T / ) 16:00, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

My Recent Rfa

Although you opposed me in my recent RFA I will still say thanks as from your comments and the other users comments that opposed me I have made a todo list for before my next RFA. I hope I will have resolved all of the issues before then and I hope that you would be able to support me in the future. If you would like to reply to this message or have any more suggestions for me then please message me on my talk page. Thanks again. ·Add§hore· /Cont 16:14, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Yum!

King iMatthew 2008 has given you Brownies! Brownies promote WikiLove and hopefully this plate has made your day better, and made you less hungry! Spread the WikiLove to others, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing! Have a nice, delicious plate of chocolate brownies. I though you deserved a treat. Enjoy! King iMatthew 2008 21:26, 20 May 2008 (UTC)


Thanks, but why?

You left me some cookies on my user talk page (thank you!) but I haven't the slightest idea which article they are for! =) Enlighten me? Mistsrider (talk) 05:05, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

PCPP

I noticed that you were involved in reverting the continuous page blanking by this user so I'm letting you know I mentioned his behavior at WP:ANI. --Ave Caesar (talk) 13:49, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Adoption

Sorry it took so long. I haven't been on[REDACTED] for a long time. I finally got around to filling some stuff in on the adoption page, though. Wyatt915 (talk) 22:55, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

User talk:Wisdom89: Difference between revisions Add topic