| Revision as of 18:56, 27 June 2008 editRFC bot (talk | contribs)216,124 editsm Update, 15 current discussions← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:45, 28 June 2008 edit undoRFC bot (talk | contribs)216,124 editsm Update, 15 current discussionsNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| '''The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention:''' | '''The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention:''' | ||
| <strong></strong><strong> | |||
| * ] It is currently under dispute as to what the content and subject of this article should consist of. | * ] It is currently under dispute as to what the content and subject of this article should consist of.</strong><strong> | ||
| * ] There exists disagreement concerning the order of Righteous Among the Nations by country, the inclusion of ] in lieu of an article on the Belgian Righteous Among the Nations, and the absence of a link to ]. The discussion begins under Order" and continues under "My proposal". | * ] There exists disagreement concerning the order of Righteous Among the Nations by country, the inclusion of ] in lieu of an article on the Belgian Righteous Among the Nations, and the absence of a link to ]. The discussion begins under Order" and continues under "My proposal".</strong><strong> | ||
| * ] Several issues are at dispute, including whether or not a controversial claim made by a commercial advertisement is encyclopedic material. | * ] Several issues are at dispute, including whether or not a controversial claim made by a commercial advertisement is encyclopedic material.</strong><strong> | ||
| * ] Are images of Diocletian and Maxentius without Constantine essential to an article on Constantine | * ] Are images of Diocletian and Maxentius without Constantine essential to an article on Constantine</strong><strong> | ||
| * ] There is still no consensus on whether we should use Duchy of Samogitia or Eldership of Samogitia. See discussion and proofs presented in the linked section. | * ] There is still no consensus on whether we should use Duchy of Samogitia or Eldership of Samogitia. See discussion and proofs presented in the linked section.</strong><strong> | ||
| * ] A disagreement exists as to the correct local name for the river flowing through Chippawa - Chippawa "Creek", or "Crick" | * ] A disagreement exists as to the correct local name for the river flowing through Chippawa - Chippawa "Creek", or "Crick"</strong><strong> | ||
| * ] Is there enough support for alternative start dates to be considered the viewpoint of, at least, a significant minority? | * ] Is there enough support for alternative start dates to be considered the viewpoint of, at least, a significant minority?</strong><strong> | ||
| * ] There is a dispute about the neutrality of the article between ] and ], with admin ] and a few others sometimes involved in the discussion. There are basically two versions being argued for here. [http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title | * ] There is a dispute about the neutrality of the article between ] and ], with admin ] and a few others sometimes involved in the discussion. There are basically two versions being argued for here. [http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title</strong><strong> | ||
| * ] Need support of third party to request mediation unless you can think of a way to solve reversion and disputes | * ] Need support of third party to request mediation unless you can think of a way to solve reversion and disputes</strong><strong> | ||
| * ] Should order be described as "revived." Does it "claim" sovereignty or does it have sovereignty? | * ] Should order be described as "revived." Does it "claim" sovereignty or does it have sovereignty?</strong><strong> | ||
| * ] This was a national troop type that can not be readily translated into English, with a variety of translations offered (see copious sources above). The naming in Misplaced Pages is based on the same principle as that used for ]s, ]s and ] | * ] This was a national troop type that can not be readily translated into English, with a variety of translations offered (see copious sources above). The naming in Misplaced Pages is based on the same principle as that used for ]s, ]s and ]</strong><strong> | ||
| * ] GADA 601 is an article about a South American military unit, the majority of the article covers a war with the British. Which form of English spelling should be used? | * ] GADA 601 is an article about a South American military unit, the majority of the article covers a war with the British. Which form of English spelling should be used?</strong><strong> | ||
| * ] there are several issues involved 1)that at the operation was not a combine/joint operation between the Red Army and the Yugoslav Army at the planing involving higher headquarters, but only involved front-line incidental cooperation at tactical level as required on those occasions when the troops from the two forces encountered each other; 2) That when this encounter occurred, the Yugoslav troops came under command of the Red Army (I need to provide a source for this, but English sources seem rare); 3) that the sources provided by User:DIRECTOR are valid, one being derived from a very general reference in the Library of Congress country dara entry, and others from a site the owner of which admitted they are not referenced (even if true) | * ] there are several issues involved 1)that at the operation was not a combine/joint operation between the Red Army and the Yugoslav Army at the planing involving higher headquarters, but only involved front-line incidental cooperation at tactical level as required on those occasions when the troops from the two forces encountered each other; 2) That when this encounter occurred, the Yugoslav troops came under command of the Red Army (I need to provide a source for this, but English sources seem rare); 3) that the sources provided by User:DIRECTOR are valid, one being derived from a very general reference in the Library of Congress country dara entry, and others from a site the owner of which admitted they are not referenced (even if true)</strong> | ||
| {{#ifeq:{{{hide_instructions}}}|yes| |{{RFC tagging instructions|RFChist}} }} | {{#ifeq:{{{hide_instructions}}}|yes| |{{RFC tagging instructions|RFChist}} }} | ||
Revision as of 03:45, 28 June 2008
The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention:
- Talk:Race of ancient Egyptians It is currently under dispute as to what the content and subject of this article should consist of.
- Template talk:Righteous There exists disagreement concerning the order of Righteous Among the Nations by country, the inclusion of Twentieth convoy in lieu of an article on the Belgian Righteous Among the Nations, and the absence of a link to Chinese Righteous Among the Nations. The discussion begins under Order" and continues under "My proposal".
- Talk:Soy milk Several issues are at dispute, including whether or not a controversial claim made by a commercial advertisement is encyclopedic material.
- Talk:Constantine I Are images of Diocletian and Maxentius without Constantine essential to an article on Constantine
- Talk:Duchy of Samogitia There is still no consensus on whether we should use Duchy of Samogitia or Eldership of Samogitia. See discussion and proofs presented in the linked section.
- Talk:Chippawa, Ontario A disagreement exists as to the correct local name for the river flowing through Chippawa - Chippawa "Creek", or "Crick"
- Misplaced Pages:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard Is there enough support for alternative start dates to be considered the viewpoint of, at least, a significant minority?
- Talk:National Liberation War of Macedonia There is a dispute about the neutrality of the article between Kobra85 and Revizionist, with admin Future Perfect at Sunrise and a few others sometimes involved in the discussion. There are basically two versions being argued for here. [http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title
- Talk:Contras Need support of third party to request mediation unless you can think of a way to solve reversion and disputes
- Talk:Knights Hospitaller Should order be described as "revived." Does it "claim" sovereignty or does it have sovereignty?
- Talk:List of infantry divisions of the Soviet Union 1917–1957 This was a national troop type that can not be readily translated into English, with a variety of translations offered (see copious sources above). The naming in Misplaced Pages is based on the same principle as that used for Cossacks, Hussars and Landwehr
- Talk:GADA 601 GADA 601 is an article about a South American military unit, the majority of the article covers a war with the British. Which form of English spelling should be used?
- Talk:Belgrade Offensive there are several issues involved 1)that at the operation was not a combine/joint operation between the Red Army and the Yugoslav Army at the planing involving higher headquarters, but only involved front-line incidental cooperation at tactical level as required on those occasions when the troops from the two forces encountered each other; 2) That when this encounter occurred, the Yugoslav troops came under command of the Red Army (I need to provide a source for this, but English sources seem rare); 3) that the sources provided by User:DIRECTOR are valid, one being derived from a very general reference in the Library of Congress country dara entry, and others from a site the owner of which admitted they are not referenced (even if true)
| Requests for comment (All) | |
|---|---|
| Articles (All) |
|
| Non-articles (All) | |
| Instructions | To add a discussion to this list:
|
| For more information, see Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment. Report problems to Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for comment. Lists are updated every hour by Legobot. | |
For more information, see User:RFC bot