| Revision as of 22:59, 19 July 2008 editMichael Hardy (talk | contribs)Administrators210,289 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:03, 19 July 2008 edit undoMichael Hardy (talk | contribs)Administrators210,289 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| In ], the phrase '''arbitrarily large''', '''arbitrarily small''', '''arbitrarily long''' is used in statements such as: | In ], the phrase '''arbitrarily large''', '''arbitrarily small''', '''arbitrarily long''' is used in statements such as: | ||
| : ƒ(''x'') is non-negative for arbitrarily large ''x''." | : "ƒ(''x'') is non-negative for arbitrarily large ''x''." | ||
| which is shorthand for: | which is shorthand for: | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| In some cases, phrases such as "ƒ(''x'') is true for arbitrarily large ''x''" is used primarily for emphasis, as in "ƒ(''x'') is true for all ''x'', no matter how large ''x'' is." In such cases, the phrase "arbitrarily large" does not have the meaning indicated above, but is in fact logically synonymous with "all." | In some cases, phrases such as "ƒ(''x'') is true for arbitrarily large ''x''" is used primarily for emphasis, as in "ƒ(''x'') is true for all ''x'', no matter how large ''x'' is." In such cases, the phrase "arbitrarily large" does not have the meaning indicated above, but is in fact logically synonymous with "all." | ||
| To say that there are "arbitrarily long ]" does not mean that there is any infinitely long arithmetic progression of prime numbers (there is not), nor that there is any particular arithmetic progression of prime numbers that is in some sense "arbitrarily long", but rather that no matter how large a nunmber ''n'' is, there is some arithmetic progression of prime numbers of length at least ''n''. | |||
| ==See also== | ==See also== | ||
Revision as of 23:03, 19 July 2008
In mathematics, the phrase arbitrarily large, arbitrarily small, arbitrarily long is used in statements such as:
- "ƒ(x) is non-negative for arbitrarily large x."
which is shorthand for:
- "For every real number n, ƒ(x) is non-negative for some values of x greater than n."
This should not be confused with the phrase "sufficiently large". For instance, it is true that prime numbers can be arbitrarily large (since there are an infinite number of them), but it is not true that all sufficiently large numbers are prime. It is also worth noting that "arbitrarily large" does not mean "infinitely large" — for instance, while prime numbers can be arbitrarily large, there is no such thing as an infinitely large prime, since all prime numbers (as well as all other integers) are finite.
In some cases, phrases such as "ƒ(x) is true for arbitrarily large x" is used primarily for emphasis, as in "ƒ(x) is true for all x, no matter how large x is." In such cases, the phrase "arbitrarily large" does not have the meaning indicated above, but is in fact logically synonymous with "all."
To say that there are "arbitrarily long arithmetic progressions of prime numbers" does not mean that there is any infinitely long arithmetic progression of prime numbers (there is not), nor that there is any particular arithmetic progression of prime numbers that is in some sense "arbitrarily long", but rather that no matter how large a nunmber n is, there is some arithmetic progression of prime numbers of length at least n.