Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 03:09, 1 October 2008

Archives

2007 2008

This page has archives. Sections older than 23 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

JIDF

Hi Dtrebbien Please check The Jewish Internet Defense Force And discuss with if any thing was wrong with my edits--Puttyschool (talk) 18:04, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Hi Puttyschool. I looked though your edits to the article and they appear fine. This one was particularly spot on.

Be mindful of the three-revert rule, though, especially around where you were reverting User:J Hoffer's "is promoting violence, Islamic terrorism, and".

« D. Trebbien (talk) 17:54, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks Dtrebbien

You are a wiki encyclopedia, my knowledge increases with each RFH
About the spot, in addition it is only listed on the JIDF website, not a reliable source, the article is a mess as it is concerned with Israeli-Palestinian conflict, in this conflict, the word Islamic terrorism is used a double sided weapon, one side uses it to motivate the west while other side uses it to motivate the East, this is why I always combat, but the fact is “terrorism” is unreligious and the word itself is dangerous.
To verify my words check right side edit then left side edit and finally my roll back all in few hours.--Puttyschool (talk) 02:50, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Hi Dtrebbien Please share your point of view, Thank you for your time--Puttyschool (talk) 18:16, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Hello again.

I do not think that I will participate in this discussion for two reasons:

1. I haven't been following the progression of this article very well. If I joined in now, I would be ignorant of the history.
2. I think that the article should be deleted in its current form for the simple reason that the article does not contain a statement which shows the Jewish Internet Defense Force to be notable, even after a number of editors have contributed to its content and have had the opportunity to do so. It appears to me that JIDF is a Facebook group that is just as notable as the "Israel is not a country! Delist it from Facebook as a country" group (which of course does not mean that I agree with "Israel is not a country! Delist it from Facebook as a country"'s position) and both are non-notable as of now.

« D. Trebbien (talk) 23:00, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks Dtrebbien for all of your help. You know I’m assuming you are my wiki teacher.
Not only you are speaking in terms of WP:XX but I like your analyzes very much
If you don’t like watching TV like me, this article and the talk page can be an alternative, in addition you will be familiar with what I described as "Cold wars on web"
The most interesting thing, is that if you visit facebook, you will find a lot of groups, holding the same name, but the country name differs, I don’t know what makes such group|s notable except they are created by silly Childs
By the way, I discovered that the name raised as facebook list Palestine as a country, and the first created group was "Palestine is not..." I think this facebook deserves a lot of studies by Stephen R. Covey--Puttyschool (talk) 03:14, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Thank you very much for the compliment, Puttyschool. I am always glad to help out constructive editors. « D. Trebbien (talk) 01:21, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Hi Dtrebbien
I borrowed the arrows from your signature, looks good, thanks« PuTTY 13:38, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

A study deserves time to read! « PuTTY 18:03, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

That is pretty interesting. Thank you very much for the link. « D. Trebbien (talk) 01:08, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Hey, look at this: "42% of damage incidents ... have essentially no impact." I always wondered about this. « D. Trebbien (talk) 01:13, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Hi Dtrebbien
According to my POV, this is a very important study, especially that "English Misplaced Pages" is now one of the most important references used by the entire world
Do you want a practical example, Roll back the history, Even he don’t want to discuss:-)!!!(I’m studying this case; so I don’t want to revert his edits only I'm collecting references, and finally I’ll re-write it when I have time), about the above case(JIDF), I think (my POV) when editors form both sides tried to understand each other they produced a very good article based mainly on WP:RS and a very long talk page
You know it is rare to find such conditions with scientific articles
Still there is a very long time for peoples to believe that Nationalism is outdated. ;-)« PuTTY 13:14, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

I'm with you Puttyschool. Namely I was very happy to read the first sentence of of the paper's Summary section: Misplaced Pages matters. This really is true, because Misplaced Pages is one of the most visited websites on the Internet, and it is nice to see that this fact was acknowledged. Hopefully the popular activity of criticizing Misplaced Pages, particularly among academics, will start to go away too.

I would venture to say that most Internet users have read a Misplaced Pages article about something at least once, so I don't really understand why some feel compelled to criticize Misplaced Pages's existence, when it helps a lot of people to quickly review facts about a topic for free.

(Also, I wrote a few sentences at Talk:Al-Azhar_University.)

« D. Trebbien (talk) 23:59, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

I’m working in the field of Microprogramming and Misplaced Pages makes me feel that CPUs can bind the whole world, Misplaced Pages is based on collecting cultures from different places all over the world, but the other bad side is that not all humans are fair by nature, so it has some drawback, studies will show all drawback and the next step must be how to overcome drawback, but totally Misplaced Pages is one of the greatest internet sites ever found. The strangest thing is when I switch some article, from English to French to Arabic, I found three different POVs, and so I’m searching for a study about this. The third point, I was tracing users, I found (according to my POV) i) some are working in groups. ii) Some for sure are paid for writing. iii) Some are representing X POVs especially who disappear fast. And I think I’ll discover more. So we are following the normal cycle, like the spiral of Stephen R. Covey, we discover drawback, then we solve, then discover more and solve, and there is no end.
Also there is no long term definition for human’s maturity other than “still under development”.
Thank you for your comments on the talk page, But do you know why I’m studding it, it is 1033 years old university, and I found 20% of the article is a about a statement of the Grand Imam, not stated as the university POV, so why to take 20% of the article, and why not to move it to his page. Check which user added it then disappeared, so I believe this article needs a lot of studies and deserves monitoring but I have one drawback, I’m not too much a religious person and I need help from one of editors participating in WikiProject_Islam_members, think about my POV, it is 1033 years old university, in a country with 7,500 years of documented history, is that all “the true encyclopedic materials”. So I was asking Hurmata to document the reason for his changes especially he removed a very important section “the university defined degrees from 1K years”, as I want to understand how things are going. « PuTTY 15:26, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Hi My Wiki Teacher, hope you are fine :-) « PuTTY 20:04, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Hello PuTTYschool. Yes, I am doing well. Things have been a bit busy, but they always are, you know?

How are you? « D. Trebbien (talk) 14:01, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

I’m fine enjoying my time with Misplaced Pages, learning more about Misplaced Pages and the world in general, I think I was encapsulated in a old QFP before joining Misplaced Pages« PuTTY 20:29, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Funniest Pets & People

I have removed your speedy delete tag — a rare move on my part — because the SD criterion does not apply to TV shows, unfortunately. A {{prod}} would be entirely appropriate, though (hint, hint). - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 19:03, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the note. I {{prod}}ed it. « D. Trebbien (talk) 19:09, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

My RfA

Thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which passed with a count of (154/3/2). I appreciate the community's trust in me, and I will do my best to be sure it won't regret handing me the mop. I am honored by your trust and your support. Again, thank you. –Juliancolton 18:28, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Wow

Before I even got to adding it you had - thanks for that - the Australian project has limited categories/articles about inter-ecological region invasives - still scratching my head on that one (its alright I am bald) SatuSuro 03:05, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

No problem . I tend to get overly excited when I see new articles about plants. « D. Trebbien (talk) 03:18, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Its an interesting one in that the great hero von mueller actually created a weed issue in the name of leaving tracks! SatuSuro 03:28, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

I thought that was interesting, too. It was a good idea, but with unforeseen consequences. « D. Trebbien (talk) 03:39, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Weird watchlist entry

{{Helpme}} I recently saw the following in my watchlist and I am confused:

As you can see, my watchlist says that Tinselfairy1 protected Hard to believe that this is legal. Apparently its effects are much more intense than that of weed., but how can this be? I thought only administrators could protect pages.

« D. Trebbien (talk) 00:45, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

• Probably a glitch. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • 00:58, 1 October 2008 (UTC)