| Revision as of 00:44, 25 November 2008 editDanny (talk | contribs)41,414 edits winners | Revision as of 01:37, 25 November 2008 edit undoProteins (talk | contribs)4,880 editsm a few minor typosNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| Exactly a year ago, I began a contest with a promise of financial rewards for people who most improved core articles on Misplaced Pages. Unfortunately, due to financial difficulties on my end, I was unable to award the winners in a timely manner. I sincerely regret this. I am grateful, however, that several generous individuals have come together in support of this effort, believing as I do in the value that this adds to Misplaced Pages's content. It is because of their generosity and determination that we are able to award the authors of seven important articles which have improved the level of Misplaced Pages's content significantly. I am especially glad that contributors can be rewarded for their work, because, after all, it is their efforts, more than anything else, that make Misplaced Pages a valuable resource. | Exactly a year ago, I began a contest with a promise of financial rewards for people who most improved core articles on Misplaced Pages. Unfortunately, due to financial difficulties on my end, I was unable to award the winners in a timely manner. I sincerely regret this. I am grateful, however, that several generous individuals have come together in support of this effort, believing as I do in the value that this adds to Misplaced Pages's content. It is because of their generosity and determination that we are able to award the authors of seven important articles which have improved the level of Misplaced Pages's content significantly. I am especially glad that contributors can be rewarded for their work, because, after all, it is their efforts, more than anything else, that make Misplaced Pages a valuable resource. | ||
| The original judges of the Core Contest scored the articles independently and assessed them by various measures, such as difficulty, the amount of new material written, and of course, its quality, the number and quality of new references |
The original judges of the Core Contest scored the articles independently and assessed them by various measures, such as difficulty, the amount of new material written, and of course, its quality, the number and quality of new references, illustrations, etc. Each judge then ranked the articles in the order of their assessment. The final ranking of the articles was determined by adding the judges' ranks together, and ordering the articles according to that sum. | ||
| The judges are pleased to announce their choices for the winning articles: | The judges are pleased to announce their choices for the winning articles: | ||
| 5<sup>th</sup> place (tie). by ] | 5<sup>th</sup> place (tie). by ] | ||
| 5<sup>th</sup> place (tie). by ] | 5<sup>th</sup> place (tie). by ] | ||
| 4<sup>th</sup> place. by ] | 4<sup>th</sup> place. by ] | ||
| 3<sup>rd</sup> place. by ] | 3<sup>rd</sup> place. by ] | ||
| 2<sup>nd</sup> place (tie). by ] | 2<sup>nd</sup> place (tie). by ] | ||
| 2<sup>nd</sup> place (tie). by ] (now known as ]) | 2<sup>nd</sup> place (tie). by ] (now known as ]) | ||
| ⚫ | and the best-improved article by a single author | ||
| ⚫ | and the best-improved article by a single author: | ||
| 1<sup>st</sup> place. ] (now known as ]) | |||
| However, the list of winners is not complete! The combined ranking of the judges identified the article by ] and ] as the single most improved article. However, as the combined work of two significant authors, it was placed in a category by itself. | 1<sup>st</sup> place. ] (now known as ]) | ||
| However, the list of winners is not complete! The combined ranking of the judges identified the article by ] and ] as the single most improved article. However, as the combined work of two significant authors, it was placed in a category by itself. | |||
| These winning articles are indeed in a class by themselves, with many adding over 30 kB of beautifully written, richly illustrated, and heavily referenced new prose. The top article, ] did not exist on Misplaced Pages prior to the contest and highlights a critical problem facing our planet. ] and ] have become ], while ] quickly became a ]. | These winning articles are indeed in a class by themselves, with many adding over 30 kB of beautifully written, richly illustrated, and heavily referenced new prose. The top article, ] did not exist on Misplaced Pages prior to the contest and highlights a critical problem facing our planet. ] and ] have become ], while ] quickly became a ]. | ||
| All the participants of this contest can be proud of their accomplishments; the judges found the entries to be stellar. The contest focused an incredible outpouring of energy into the most fundamental articles needed by an encyclopedia: articles that are too often ignored. As one judge noted, the core articles of Misplaced Pages improved more in this two-week contest than in a whole year of Article Improvement Drives. Congratulations to ''everyone'' on a job well done; we're all winners for each other's work |
All the participants of this contest can be proud of their accomplishments; the judges found the entries to be stellar. The contest focused an incredible outpouring of energy into the most fundamental articles needed by an encyclopedia: articles that are too often ignored. As one judge noted, the core articles of Misplaced Pages improved more in this two-week contest than in a whole year of Article Improvement Drives. Congratulations to ''everyone'' on a job well done; we're all winners for each other's work. | ||
| If anyone has outstanding questions about the contest, you are kindly directed to ask them on the ] of ] or to me personally via email, and not here. Thank you and congratulations once again! | If anyone has outstanding questions about the contest, you are kindly directed to ask them on the ] of ] or to me personally via email, and not here. Thank you and congratulations once again! | ||
Revision as of 01:37, 25 November 2008
Exactly a year ago, I began a contest with a promise of financial rewards for people who most improved core articles on Misplaced Pages. Unfortunately, due to financial difficulties on my end, I was unable to award the winners in a timely manner. I sincerely regret this. I am grateful, however, that several generous individuals have come together in support of this effort, believing as I do in the value that this adds to Misplaced Pages's content. It is because of their generosity and determination that we are able to award the authors of seven important articles which have improved the level of Misplaced Pages's content significantly. I am especially glad that contributors can be rewarded for their work, because, after all, it is their efforts, more than anything else, that make Misplaced Pages a valuable resource.
The original judges of the Core Contest scored the articles independently and assessed them by various measures, such as difficulty, the amount of new material written, and of course, its quality, the number and quality of new references, illustrations, etc. Each judge then ranked the articles in the order of their assessment. The final ranking of the articles was determined by adding the judges' ranks together, and ordering the articles according to that sum.
The judges are pleased to announce their choices for the winning articles:
5 place (tie). Emily Dickinson by Yllosubmarine
5 place (tie). Electricity by BillC
3 place. Reproductive system by Earthdirt
2 place (tie). Willem Barentsz by Sherurcij
2 place (tie). Domestic sheep by VanTucky (now known as Steven Walling)
and the best-improved article by a single author:
1 place. Deforestation in Brazil Blofeld_of_SPECTRE (now known as User:Dr._Blofeld)
However, the list of winners is not complete! The combined ranking of the judges identified the article Jane Austen by Simmaren and Awadewit as the single most improved article. However, as the combined work of two significant authors, it was placed in a category by itself.
These winning articles are indeed in a class by themselves, with many adding over 30 kB of beautifully written, richly illustrated, and heavily referenced new prose. The top article, Deforestation in Brazil did not exist on Misplaced Pages prior to the contest and highlights a critical problem facing our planet. Domestic sheep and Emily Dickinson have become Featured Articles, while Electricity quickly became a Good Article.
All the participants of this contest can be proud of their accomplishments; the judges found the entries to be stellar. The contest focused an incredible outpouring of energy into the most fundamental articles needed by an encyclopedia: articles that are too often ignored. As one judge noted, the core articles of Misplaced Pages improved more in this two-week contest than in a whole year of Article Improvement Drives. Congratulations to everyone on a job well done; we're all winners for each other's work.
If anyone has outstanding questions about the contest, you are kindly directed to ask them on the talk page of Proteins or to me personally via email, and not here. Thank you and congratulations once again!
Once again, I am especially grateful to those people who believed in the contest and made sure that it was carried through to completion. Danny (talk) 00:44, 25 November 2008 (UTC)