| Revision as of 09:56, 27 November 2008 edit92.41.71.39 (talk) →User:Orson20← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:57, 27 November 2008 edit undoSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,556,609 editsm Signing comment by 92.41.71.39 - "→User:Orson20: "Next edit → | ||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
| **'''Agreed''' but I think whoever files it is going to get hammered by the subject and his associated friends. I spent the better part of last week playing ] with them. <font face="Verdana"><font color="6600FF">]</font></font> 13:07, 25 November 2008 (UTC) | **'''Agreed''' but I think whoever files it is going to get hammered by the subject and his associated friends. I spent the better part of last week playing ] with them. <font face="Verdana"><font color="6600FF">]</font></font> 13:07, 25 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
| **'''Reported''' I have reported you to[REDACTED] for slander. An email was sent on Monday out-lining proof of deliberate slander and embarrassment. You have jumped on a bandwagon along with other trolls and judging by your history pages the subject is not the first to be part of harsh backlash comments from you and other editors. This is a community site. You appear to be enjoying the ridicule. Whack the mole??? You should NOT be authorised to represent this company. T-J Management. | **'''Reported''' I have reported you to[REDACTED] for slander. An email was sent on Monday out-lining proof of deliberate slander and embarrassment. You have jumped on a bandwagon along with other trolls and judging by your history pages the subject is not the first to be part of harsh backlash comments from you and other editors. This is a community site. You appear to be enjoying the ridicule. Whack the mole??? You should NOT be authorised to represent this company. T-J Management. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 09:56, 27 November 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | ||
| ;Conclusions | ;Conclusions | ||
Revision as of 09:57, 27 November 2008
User:Orson20
- Suspected sockpuppeteer
- Orson20 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Suspected sockpuppets
- 92.40.191.235 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- 92.40.212.254 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- 194.201.64.90 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- 92.40.147.127 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- 92.40.175.92 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Apron Maxim (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Kirsty Welles (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Leon Ousby (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- 87.86.0.50 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Report submission by
StarM 23:30, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
- Evidence
See this MfD, wherein it was claimed the subject wanted deletion following two AfDs:
- Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Leon ousby May 2008
- Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Leon Ousby Sept 2008
The subject has never been proven to be encyclopedically notable and its incessant re-creation my multiple editors has not proven notable. It's current incarnation at User:Leon Ousby is a BLP mess with the drug and alcohol section. One of these editors, re-created after !voting for deletion, so there's definitely something fishy here. This article has been re-created in so many "independent" user spaces that it's fishy at best and a sock farm at worst.
Re-creation locations:
- Leon ousby
- Leon Ousby
- User:Orson20/Leon Ousby (2x, by different editors in the same user space)
- User:Apron Maxim/on Leon Ousby - Actor
There may be more, those are the ones I've found StarM 23:34, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
- Comments
Please see this post to my talk where one of the parties may explain it. StarM 19:27, 17 November 2008 (UTC) In the mean time, please see his contributions to anyone and everyone this evening. Not constructive or making his case for why he's using multiple accounts to avoid what has been deleted by consensus multiple times. StarM 02:20, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
See also this edit, which resulted in my adding the last IP. No one is going to find that thread randomly. StarM 03:57, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Suggest that a checkuser might prove more useful in finding/confirming other accounts... —Dark 10:09, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
- Agreed but I think whoever files it is going to get hammered by the subject and his associated friends. I spent the better part of last week playing whack a mole with them. StarM 13:07, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
- Reported I have reported you to[REDACTED] for slander. An email was sent on Monday out-lining proof of deliberate slander and embarrassment. You have jumped on a bandwagon along with other trolls and judging by your history pages the subject is not the first to be part of harsh backlash comments from you and other editors. This is a community site. You appear to be enjoying the ridicule. Whack the mole??? You should NOT be authorised to represent this company. T-J Management. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.41.71.39 (talk) 09:56, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
- Conclusions