Misplaced Pages

William S. Stevens: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:18, 31 December 2008 editOffenbach (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users6,948 editsm moved William Stevens to William S. Stevens: Making way for dab page.← Previous edit Revision as of 05:39, 13 January 2009 edit undoTJRC (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers63,566 edits citations for cited articlesNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
'''William Stanley Stevens''' (c. 1948 &ndash; December 8, 2008) was an ] ] best known for his June 1975 law review article ''The ] Origins of the ]'', which treated the development of one of baseball's most-misunderstood rules as if it were a legal matter.<ref name=NYTObit/> '''William Stanley Stevens''' (c. 1948 &ndash; December 8, 2008) was an ] ] best known for his June 1975 law review article ''The ] Origins of the ]'',<ref>''Aside. The Common Law Origins of the Infield Fly Rule,'' 123 U. Penn. L. Rev. 1474 (1975)</ref> which treated the development of one of baseball's most-misunderstood rules as if it were a legal matter.<ref name=NYTObit/>


Stevens was born in ] and grew up in ]. He attended ], where he earned a bachelor's degree in 1970. He served for two years as an officer in the ] and was awarded a law degree in 1975 from the ].<ref name=NYTObit>Grimes, William. , '']'', December 11, 2008. Accessed December 12, 2008.</ref> Stevens was born in ] and grew up in ]. He attended ], where he earned a bachelor's degree in 1970. He served for two years as an officer in the ] and was awarded a law degree in 1975 from the ].<ref name=NYTObit>Grimes, William. , '']'', December 11, 2008. Accessed December 12, 2008.</ref>
Line 7: Line 7:
Stevens was fascinated by the incremental development of the rule and the way in which the rule's formal, step-by-step development mirrored the process by which the common law was created. The semi-parodic paper was thoroughly footnoted to show how the rule was needed in an era in which unseemly behavior was taking place that would not have been accepted in the sport's earlier gentlemanly age.<ref name=NYTObit/> Stevens was fascinated by the incremental development of the rule and the way in which the rule's formal, step-by-step development mirrored the process by which the common law was created. The semi-parodic paper was thoroughly footnoted to show how the rule was needed in an era in which unseemly behavior was taking place that would not have been accepted in the sport's earlier gentlemanly age.<ref name=NYTObit/>


Soon after it was published, a slew of imitators were written, including ''Further Aside: A Comment on ‘The Common Law Origins of the Infield Fly Rule’'', ''The Infield Fly Rule and the Internal Revenue Code: An Even Further Aside'', and ''Strict Constructionism and the Strike Zone and ]: The Sticky Problem of Statutory Construction''. His paper has been referenced in legal articles covering ], ] and ethics.<ref name=NYTObit/> Soon after it was published, a slew of imitators were written, including ''Further Aside: A Comment on ‘The Common Law Origins of the Infield Fly Rule’'',<ref>John J. Flynn, ''Further Aside: A Comment on ‘The Common Law Origins of the Infield Fly Rule’,'' 4 J. Contemp. L. 241 (1978)</ref>
''The Infield Fly Rule and the Internal Revenue Code: An Even Further Aside'',<ref>Mark W. Cochran, ''The Infield Fly Rule and the Internal Revenue Code: An Even Further Aside,'' 29 Wm. and Mary L. Rev. 567 (1988)</ref> ''Strict Constructionism and the Strike Zone'',<ref>Douglas O. Linder, ''Strict Constructionism and the Strike Zone,'' 56 Univ. of Missouri-Kansas City Law Review 117 (1987)</ref> and '']: The Sticky Problem of Statutory Construction''.<ref>Jared Tobin Finkelstein, In re Brett: ''The Sticky Problem of Statutory Construction'', 52 Fordham L. Rev. 430 (1983)</ref> His paper has been referenced in legal articles covering ], ] and ethics.<ref name=NYTObit/>


He worked for a number of law firms in the ] area and became assistant director of the ] and of the ]'s ] program. After retiring in September 2008, he accepted a one-year assignment as the acting director of the continuing education program of the ].<ref name=NYTObit/> He worked for a number of law firms in the ] area and became assistant director of the ] and of the ]'s ] program. After retiring in September 2008, he accepted a one-year assignment as the acting director of the continuing education program of the ].<ref name=NYTObit/>

Revision as of 05:39, 13 January 2009

William Stanley Stevens (c. 1948 – December 8, 2008) was an American lawyer best known for his June 1975 law review article The Common Law Origins of the Infield Fly Rule, which treated the development of one of baseball's most-misunderstood rules as if it were a legal matter.

Stevens was born in Orange, New Jersey and grew up in Millburn Township. He attended Yale University, where he earned a bachelor's degree in 1970. He served for two years as an officer in the United States Navy and was awarded a law degree in 1975 from the University of Pennsylvania Law School.

The Infield Fly Rule (now covered by Major League Baseball rules 6.05e and 2.00), was adopted in the 1890s to prevent situations in which fielders could take advantage of base runners by intentionally allowing a ball to drop with runners on first and second or bases loaded and less than two outs in order to turn a double play or triple play on the base runners. In such circumstances, the Infield Fly Rule is invoked at the umpire's discretion if a fair fly ball can be caught by an infielder "with ordinary effort", and the batter is automatically out. The rule was first implemented in the short-lived Players' League in 1890 and adopted by the National League and American Association of Base Ball Clubs in 1894, applying only if a fly ball could be handled by an infielder with a runner on first base occupied and only one out, with additional changes made in subsequent years.

Stevens was fascinated by the incremental development of the rule and the way in which the rule's formal, step-by-step development mirrored the process by which the common law was created. The semi-parodic paper was thoroughly footnoted to show how the rule was needed in an era in which unseemly behavior was taking place that would not have been accepted in the sport's earlier gentlemanly age.

Soon after it was published, a slew of imitators were written, including Further Aside: A Comment on ‘The Common Law Origins of the Infield Fly Rule’, The Infield Fly Rule and the Internal Revenue Code: An Even Further Aside, Strict Constructionism and the Strike Zone, and in re Brett: The Sticky Problem of Statutory Construction. His paper has been referenced in legal articles covering bankruptcy, constitutional law and ethics.

He worked for a number of law firms in the Philadelphia area and became assistant director of the American Law Institute and of the American Bar Association's Continuing Legal Education program. After retiring in September 2008, he accepted a one-year assignment as the acting director of the continuing education program of the Alaska Bar Association.

He wrote numerous articles during his legal career, including work for The Philadelphia Lawyer, but none achieved the renown of his Infield Fly Rule note.

A resident of Narberth, Pennsylvania, Stevens died at age 60 on December 8, 2008 of a heart attack while working in Anchorage, Alaska.

References

  1. Aside. The Common Law Origins of the Infield Fly Rule, 123 U. Penn. L. Rev. 1474 (1975)
  2. ^ Grimes, William. "William S. Stevens, 60, Dies; Wrote Infield Fly Note", The New York Times, December 11, 2008. Accessed December 12, 2008.
  3. Rule 6.01 to 6.02, Major League Baseball. Accessed December 12, 2008.
  4. Official Rules: 2.00 Definition of Terms, Major League Baseball. Accessed December 18, 2008.
  5. Evolution of 19th Century Baseball Rules, 19th Century Baseball. Accessed December 18, 2008.
  6. John J. Flynn, Further Aside: A Comment on ‘The Common Law Origins of the Infield Fly Rule’, 4 J. Contemp. L. 241 (1978)
  7. Mark W. Cochran, The Infield Fly Rule and the Internal Revenue Code: An Even Further Aside, 29 Wm. and Mary L. Rev. 567 (1988)
  8. Douglas O. Linder, Strict Constructionism and the Strike Zone, 56 Univ. of Missouri-Kansas City Law Review 117 (1987)
  9. Jared Tobin Finkelstein, In re Brett: The Sticky Problem of Statutory Construction, 52 Fordham L. Rev. 430 (1983)

{{subst:#if:Stevens, William Stanley|}} [[Category:{{subst:#switch:{{subst:uc:1948}}

|| UNKNOWN | MISSING = Year of birth missing {{subst:#switch:{{subst:uc:2008}}||LIVING=(living people)}}
| #default = 1948 births

}}]] {{subst:#switch:{{subst:uc:2008}}

|| LIVING  = 
| MISSING  = 
| UNKNOWN  = 
| #default = 

}}

Categories:
William S. Stevens: Difference between revisions Add topic