| Revision as of 06:13, 6 March 2009 editVantine84 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers3,228 edits Struck my earlier comment, disregard.← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:17, 6 March 2009 edit undoDHowell (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,674 edits →Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Longest word in Turkish: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
| == Notability (Fiction) == | == Notability (Fiction) == | ||
| There seems to be some progress being made towards redrafting the guideline. Most of the arguments for a permissive guideline seem to have been countered in the sense that they have been found not to be viable. My attempts to obtain a compromise earlier this year seem to be leading towards a slightly stricter applciation of ] for fiction that should discourage topics which are only the subject of in universe plot summary, trivia and cruft. A recent post at ] seems to make this clear. Can you provide some cool and clear support towards drafting a compromise that is compliant with existing Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines? --] (]) 19:31, 4 March 2009 (UTC) | There seems to be some progress being made towards redrafting the guideline. Most of the arguments for a permissive guideline seem to have been countered in the sense that they have been found not to be viable. My attempts to obtain a compromise earlier this year seem to be leading towards a slightly stricter applciation of ] for fiction that should discourage topics which are only the subject of in universe plot summary, trivia and cruft. A recent post at ] seems to make this clear. Can you provide some cool and clear support towards drafting a compromise that is compliant with existing Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines? --] (]) 19:31, 4 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
| == ] == | |||
| Could you explain your "delete" closure ]? I don't see anything near a consensus to delete in that discussion, nor any overriding policy reasons to delete. Please reply here, rather than my talk page. ] (]) 06:17, 6 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 06:17, 6 March 2009
...
While this makes messages more fragmented, it also saves time. Please note many other users prefer to centralize discussions.
The WPVG Newsletter (February 2009)
| The WikiProject Video games Newsletter | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||
- Newsletter delivery by xenobot 00:13, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
VG sources
Hi there! I'm just curious why you removed gaygamer.net from the video game WikiProject's sources page. — Levi van Tine (t – c) 12:56, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- I'm confused...there are plenty of sites in the checklist section that don't have a discussion. Why haven't you removed those as well? — Levi van Tine (t – c) 13:16, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
You didn't answer my question. — Levi van Tine (t – c) 05:55, 5 March 2009 (UTC)— Levi van Tine (t – c) 06:13, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Halo Wars page
Can you please unprotect the Halo Wars page? I made a large summary of the Leaders and their units which I cannot post. —Preceding unsigned comment added by UNSC Fury (talk • contribs) 13:36, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Notability (Fiction)
There seems to be some progress being made towards redrafting the guideline. Most of the arguments for a permissive guideline seem to have been countered in the sense that they have been found not to be viable. My attempts to obtain a compromise earlier this year seem to be leading towards a slightly stricter applciation of WP:V for fiction that should discourage topics which are only the subject of in universe plot summary, trivia and cruft. A recent post at WT:FICT#The rules seems to make this clear. Can you provide some cool and clear support towards drafting a compromise that is compliant with existing Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines? --Gavin Collins (talk) 19:31, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Longest word in Turkish
Could you explain your "delete" closure here? I don't see anything near a consensus to delete in that discussion, nor any overriding policy reasons to delete. Please reply here, rather than my talk page. DHowell (talk) 06:17, 6 March 2009 (UTC)