| Revision as of 20:55, 21 March 2009 view sourceCosmos Raver (talk | contribs)487 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:02, 21 March 2009 view source Cosmos Raver (talk | contribs)487 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| As it's fairly obvious, it should come as no surprise that you have now been blocked as a sock of ]/]. Please stop coming back here as your edits are not welcome here. ···]<sup>] · <small>]</sup></small> 17:19, 21 March 2009 (UTC) | As it's fairly obvious, it should come as no surprise that you have now been blocked as a sock of ]/]. Please stop coming back here as your edits are not welcome here. ···]<sup>] · <small>]</sup></small> 17:19, 21 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
| So your saying I am the same person as this ]? What are you trying to prove? I simply decided to revert the information he had written after it had been vandalized by ]; User:Tadakuni practically took those articles and threw them across his shoulder to be deleted while pretending as if his actions had been virtually substantial to Misplaced Pages's quality standards. How gullible would you have to be to think what he is doing is correct? But why would I happen to jump on such an issue you may ask? It's because I know "Tadakuni" in real life many years ago as a guy who could do nothing more but run his mouth in college about how honored he felt to contribute towards society with an alias like "Tadakuni" without ever revealing his real face in front of other people; he was like some sort of pretend-samaritan, but someone who couldn't actually help others even if he wanted to or tried his hardest. I don't know who this "Exiled Ambition" guy is but his articles had been clearly vandalized so obviously I'm going to stand up in defense of the work he took the time to write. If you don't believe that Tadakuni is deserving of any fault then you shouldn't be an administrator, because it's very apparent |
So your saying I am the same person as this ]? What are you trying to prove? I simply decided to revert the information he had written after it had been vandalized by ]; User:Tadakuni practically took those articles and threw them across his shoulder to be deleted while pretending as if his actions had been virtually substantial to Misplaced Pages's quality standards. How gullible would you have to be to think what he is doing is correct? But why would I happen to jump on such an issue you may ask? It's because I know "Tadakuni" in real life many years ago as a guy who could do nothing more but run his mouth in college about how honored he felt to contribute towards society with an alias like "Tadakuni" without ever revealing his real face in front of other people; he was like some sort of pretend-samaritan, but someone who couldn't actually help others even if he wanted to or tried his hardest. I don't know who this "Exiled Ambition" guy is but his articles had been clearly vandalized so obviously I'm going to stand up in defense of the work he took the time to write. If you don't believe that Tadakuni is deserving of any fault then you shouldn't be an administrator, because it's very apparent my actions have helped Misplaced Pages and I am not speaking words that are disapprovable. ] 17:33, 21 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 21:02, 21 March 2009
Samurai Warriors 3
Hello, Cosmos Raver. I saw your link amending on the Samurai Warriors 3 article. However, Kunoichi is loosely based on the Sanada Ten Braves, while Samurai Warriors#Kunoichi (くのいち) gives a description actually focused on the persona Kunoichi rather than her historical counterparts. If you have any questions, feel free to leave a message on my talk page or the talk page of WikiProject Koei Warriors Games. Thank you. -BlueCaper (talk) 17:10, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
Admin
You are not an administrator, so I have removed Category:Misplaced Pages administrators from your userpage. Please don't put it back. Thank you. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email 02:15, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
Alright. Sorry for the concern User:Matthewedwards. (--Cosmos Raver--) 02:19, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
You have been blocked
Your vandalism of User:Tadakuni (here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here) has been reverted. In addition, your edits (here, here, here, here, and here) to Tadakuni's awards page and to his talk page (here, here, here, here, here, and here) have been reverted as well.
As it's fairly obvious, it should come as no surprise that you have now been blocked as a sock of User:Darin Fidika/User:Exiled Ambition. Please stop coming back here as your edits are not welcome here. ···日本穣 17:19, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
So your saying I am the same person as this User:Exiled Ambition? What are you trying to prove? I simply decided to revert the information he had written after it had been vandalized by User:Tadakuni; User:Tadakuni practically took those articles and threw them across his shoulder to be deleted while pretending as if his actions had been virtually substantial to Misplaced Pages's quality standards. How gullible would you have to be to think what he is doing is correct? But why would I happen to jump on such an issue you may ask? It's because I know "Tadakuni" in real life many years ago as a guy who could do nothing more but run his mouth in college about how honored he felt to contribute towards society with an alias like "Tadakuni" without ever revealing his real face in front of other people; he was like some sort of pretend-samaritan, but someone who couldn't actually help others even if he wanted to or tried his hardest. I don't know who this "Exiled Ambition" guy is but his articles had been clearly vandalized so obviously I'm going to stand up in defense of the work he took the time to write. If you don't believe that Tadakuni is deserving of any fault then you shouldn't be an administrator, because it's very apparent my actions have helped Misplaced Pages and I am not speaking words that are disapprovable. User:Cosmos Raver 17:33, 21 March 2009 (UTC)